Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I suspect he remains a wealth of info. of which he may use to try and save his neck once he is back on US soil
Edwards may be a tad too late for that.
Years ago the Feds busted "Uncle Milt" for securities fraud, (which he served six years for) not to mention other crimes committed during the years. No doubt they would have love to nail "Uncle Milt" again, but unfortunately he died four years ago. There doesn't appear to be any info out there from Harlan, Houser, Walters, etc., to suggest anyone higher up than Edwards besides Uncle Milt. So, with the death of "Uncle Milt" all roads could lead to Edwards.
Surfit once posted about the falling out he had with another associate of Uncle Milt's, Bobby McAllister (currently serving time for securities fraud). There were threats and innuendos about spilling the beans. The question is how much did Slurp know? Maybe he knew Edwards with another alias? If you go back far enough with the previous GBDX companies Surfit was touting a few of those on message boards. Some folks have speculated that Surfit was singing. And we know Houser told the Feds about his dealings with the Edwards gang.
Over the last two years Vince LoCastro has plead guilty to enough crimes to put anyone away for 15 to 30 years. Each time he got a slap on the hand (so far). Vince and Turino's severed relationship ended ugly, but the Turino/Edwards relationship continued. Did, or will Vince sing?
Gary Walters (currently incarcerated) sang on message boards, even to Hnd/Hnd in a phone conversation. In the phone conversation Walters mention Uncle Milt/McAllister's involvement before their names came up in the Harlan deposition. Harlan stated he rented Edwards house, so Edwards was no stranger to Harlan.
Walters may be a crazy crook but, he did have dealings with many of the CMKX insiders who were connected to NNOS and with NevWest accounts.
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=MPTG&read=3417
Joined: Jan 2006 ..Read and learn the cons MO!
Posts: 114
Karma: 28
[ Exalt | Smite ] Gary Walters chimes in on the Vegas Gang
« Thread Started on Today at 2:54pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m going to try and keep this simple, so it’s easier to read and understand, but let’s take a “excerpted” review of how Gary Walters chooses to describe his cohorts in the “Vegas Gang”, noting that he himself is charged with some 30 counts of stock forgery and securities fraud. Keep in mind that Walters “ran” Nanosignal – it’s where his personal priorities lie.
Walters has been hung out to dry by his cohorts, and he’s been firing back with both cannons for about a year now. Is it all true? Doubt it. But it is an interesting read. Note: the timeline goes back pre-CMKX and carries forward into the present.
Also, at my own liberty, I’ve corrected several spelling and syntax errors, so Walters ramblings are easier to follow. I also left long and unrelated “ramblings” out. However, I did not take out any references to UC. Walters words are in green.
Recall that Exxcode merged with Nanosignal. Some lawsuits ensued back and forth. Dvorak wrote a letter on behalf of Exxcode concerning “shares due” to about a dozen trusts – 8 or 9 of which have (A) been linked to Edwards, and (B) appear on the CMKX shareholder list:
RICK TAULLI AND SHAWN HACKMAN DID THE BOX JOB ON EXXCODE , THEY HAD BRIAN DEVORAK DO THE LEGAL OPINION , IT WAS SHAWN HACKMAN AND RICK TAULLI WHO DID THE S4 AND HAD BRIAN DEVORK SIGN OFF ON IT AS THEY PREPARED IT IN HACKMANS OFFICE
RICK TAULLI FORWARD SPLIT THE COMPANY SHELL EXXCODE INC AND USED PHONY TYPED CHEAP STOCK CERTS ETC.
THEY CREATED JOHN EDWARDS GROUP OF NOMINEES THAT THEY PAID INTO MICRO SIGNAL
MAT M. GOT 150K RICK CREATED 25 MILL FOR EDWARDS GROUP AND THEN 25 MILL FOR HIM RICK TAULLI , SHAWN HACKMAN , AND BRIAN DEVORAK.
WHEN EDWARDS DECIDED HE WANTED OUT HE HAD HIS MUSCLE MEN VINCE AND ? THREATEN ME TO RETUN 200K TO THEM. BOBBY MCALISTER DOWN IN FLORIDA KEPT 2.5 MILLION SHARES AND EDWARDS KEPT 1.5 MILLION SHARES.
JOHN EDWARDS WANTED OUT BECAUSE HE SAW THE FUED BETWEEN RICK TAULLI AND THE OTHERS HEATING UP.
LATER EDWARDS STAYED WITH TAULLI AND TAULLI ENGINEERED AND CRAFTED MORE BOX JOBS..I SUED EDWARDS IN STATE COURT IN NEVADA AND JOHN EDWARDS CAME TO THE TABLE FAST. WE MET OUT AT THE CONTRY KITCHEN ON RAINBOW AND THERE HE GAVE ME A BROWN ENVELOPE SEALED AND SAID DID YOU BRING THE CASH , HE HAD A MUSSEL GUY WITH HIM NAMED ?? ANYWAY EDWARDS COUNTED OUT THE 250K AND THEN GAVE ME THE ENVOLOPE AND SAID NICE DOING BUSINESS WITH YOU IT IS ALL THERE ALL 25 MILLION SHARES. WELL IT WAS NOT ALL THERE.
Note: I believe I’ve read an article by Lee Webb suggesting that John Dolkart is John Ed Dhonau (if I’m wrong, someone please correct the record)
I WAS FREAKING OUT , SO I CALLED JOHN DOLKART HE HELPED ME IMMEDIATLY DRAFT A LAW SUIT AGAINST EDWARDS AND HIS STOCK HOLDERS ETC THAT EDWARDS CLAIMED WERE HIS CLIENTS.
For recollection, recall that the Zamans (who are connected with BBX Equities) were connected to a huge pennystock scam and charged and convicted in the Sky Scientific stock fraud. Cook is our past attorney (Thomas C Cook, the one who was to be holding UC’s shares in escrow).
SEEMS LIKE THE GRAND JURY WANTS ANOTHER INTERVIEW WITH TUALLI, ZAMAN, GARCIA, SCARA AND A FEW OTHERS - HACKMAN TO. NOW WE ARE GOING TO THROW COOK IN THE MIX WITH CONVITED FELLONS.
[speaking to Tualli]
ROBERT GARCIA IS THE ONE WHO SOLD YOU HIS OWNERSHIP IN THE 2808 COWAN CIRCLE RESIDENSE IS HE NOT? AND HE TRIED TO SCAM AN INSURANCE COPMPANY OUT OF MONEY ON THAT SAME HOUSE YOU TOLD PEOPLE YOU BOUGHT FOR 800K . YOU ALSO SAID YOU PUT 150K INTO THE HOME , BUT YET YOU SHOW TO THE IRS THE VALUE OF THE HOUSE IS 4OOK. ARE YOU FRAUDING THE IRS TOO, RICHARD A TAULLI?
YOUR GROUPIES AND THE EDWARDS GROUPIES - THE FEDS HAVE YOU ALL NOW COMMING IN AND, BY THE WAY, WAIT TILL YOU SEE ALL THE CONFLICTS BETWEEN LAWYERS BUDDY PLANS TO WRITE EACH OTHERS GHOST STORY...
Note: Desormeau participated heavily in the B&B Farms scam – also it’s interesting that he walked away with all of B&B's computers...
SEEMS LIKE COOK AND DEVORAK WERE THE SAME TWO ATTORNIES FOR CMKX AND BARRINGTON FOODS, AND BB WORM FARMS , WOW WHAT A LINK TO THEM...THEFT IS JUST AT YOUR DOORSTEPS NOW!!!!! HOW CAN YOU BE PAID BY A COMPANY AND YOU NOT ONLY PLOT TO STEAL THERE BUSINESS AND CLIENTS BUT YOU EVEN FABRICATE PHONY STOCK AND STOCK HOLDERS.
Ok, I’ve posted this previously – it’s seemingly the same rendition of many of the events listed above, except here Walters is making a defensive response to my interview with John Jarvis, where Jarvis claimed Walters was the main promoter in the CMKI deal. (In other words, Jarvis said it was Walters who flew to Houston to pitch the CMKI deal - Jarvis said the plan was to merge several shells into CMKI, with CMKX being only a holding company). Now, which one’s telling the truth? Are either? Both Jarvis and Walters are scum, I’m sure of that.
GARY WALTERS NEVER EVER TALKED TO JOHN JARVIS ABOUT ANY SHELL FOR CMKX.
THE REAL MATTER IS THAT DON DICKSON INTRODUCED JOHN EDWARDS TO JOHN JARVIS.
THAT DEAL WAS BOUGHT BY JOHN EDWARDS LONG BEFORE ANY CONSIDERATION OF THE CASSAVANT DEAL CAME INTO PLAY.
GARY WALTERS AND MIKE MYERS MET URBAN CASSAVANT ONE MORNING IN A HOUSE BELONGING TO BETESTA IN SPANISH TRAIL.
THERE THEY WERE SHOWN MAPS AND THE LIKE OF DIAMOND MINING CLAIMS BY URBAN CASSAVANT IN SA. CANADA ,
IT WAS GARY WALTERS WHOM TOLD DON DICKSON ABOUT THE CASSAVANT MINING DEAL
IT WAS DON DICKSON WHOM INTRODUCED JOHN EDWARDS AS THE MERCHANT BANKER THAT WOULD MOST LIKELY PROVIDE THE SHELL TO DO THE DIAMOND DEAL
EDWARDS AND COFFEY CONJURED UP THE STOCK ISSUANCE PLANS AND RECORDS WILL PROVE IT ALL.
URBAN GAVE GARY WALTERS 200 MILLION SHARES FOR HIS INTRODUCTION AND OTHER CONTACTS, AND TO HELP WITH THE IR.
WHEN JOHN EDWARDS GOT MORE INVOLVED, HIS PARTNERS FROM THE PCBM MANAGEMENT GROUP JEFF AND VINCE AND ARE THE ONES THAT ACTIVLY PROVIDED THE RETAIL OF THE CMKX STOCK
EDWARDS WAS THE ONE REALLY DUMPING AT THE TIME.
LATER EDWARDS CALLED A MEETING AT CESEARS PALACE WITH GARY WALTERS VINCE AND JEFF. IT WAS JEFF WHOM BLAMED GARY WALTERS IN SHORTING THE STOCK OF CMKX AND STEALING MILLIONS OF DOLLARS THEY CLAIMED WAS TO BE THEIRS. IT WAS HEATED AND YELLING AMONG ALL OF THEM.
THE NEXT DAY JOHN EDWARDS CAME OVER TO THE COWAN CIRCLE HOUSE AND WANTED TO SEE THE 2 CERTS GW HAD FOR A 100 MILL SHARES EACH , GW TOOK EDWARDS UPSTAIRS AND SHOWED HIM HE HAD HIS CERTS INTACT.
THEN JOHN EDWARDS ATTEMPTED TO WANT TO TAKE THEM BUT GW ONLY ALLOWED HIM TO MAKE COPIES AND TAKE THEM WITH HIM.
THE NEXT DAY URBAN CALLS GW AND SAYS WE WANT TO BUY YOU OUT COMPLETELY , WE HEAR YOU ARE VERY UPSET, GW SAID YES I AM UPSET YOU SQUANDERED 2 MILLION DOLLARS AT HARAHAS AND OTHER CASINOS ETC , AND THIS MADE GW FERIOUS.
THE FACT IS, IT WAS JOHN EDWARDS WHOM HAD ALL THESE NOMINEES AND LOTS OF CMKX STOCK TO SELL. GW BELIEVES JOHN EDWARDS STOLE ALOT OF MONEY FROM THE OTHERS IN BED WITH HIM AND THEY WERE MAD.
THEY BOUGHT GW OUT FOR A HEAFTY SUM. CASH DEALS WERE MADE AND PAID TO GW AT THE COMMUNITY BANK ON RAINBOW.
GW EVEN HAD TO DO RADIO SHOWS FOR URBAN BECAUSE HE WAS ALWAYS DRUNK ETC,
THERE WAS A BOBBY MACALISTER WHOM TOOK ALOT OF SHARES BELIVED FROM EDWARDS AND NEVER DID ANYTHING FOR THEM AT ALL.
THEN WHEN GW CAUGHT SHAWN HACKMAN AND RICK TAULI AND BRIAN DVORACK BOXING STOCK AND COUNTERFITTING IT TO GET LOTS OF AQ SHARES FREE TRADING.
3 DAYS LATER SHAWN HACKMAN WAS INDICTED FOR THE VERY SAME THING RICK TAULI DID - BOXING STOCK PUTTING IT IN THE NAME OF HIS GIRLFRIEND AND OTHERS IN THE BOXED STOCK, KNOWING DAM WELL THAT THEY HAD NO MONEY OR CHECKS INVOLVED .
RICK TAULI IS STILL DOING DEALS WITH JOHN EDWARDS, AND CIRCUMVENTING, CHEATING, LYING, BACK DATING DOCS, FABRICASTING THEM FOR THE HIS CHEATING OCCASSIONS AND FOR OTHERS’
The person who writes this nonsense is a busy promotional beaver, and most probably a busy seller now that the stock is up.
600% earnings can be yours by playing BWMG today....into such staggers at a morning wake? and isn't herself the divil's daughter
mature thoughts I began to doubt whether I was injured or no. country, the mistress of arts and arms, the scourge of France,
over it, and blurted out, "Why, this beats even shorthand!"
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=76279440
traderdon
Tuesday, June 05, 2012 10:58:00 AM
Re: Alydyr post# 3073
Post # of 3084
Yep, all of mine were unsolicited as well... from wierd email addresses:
From Jesus manihuari silvano [acuario158-12@hotmail.com]
Attention Subscriber's,
Please Allow Links and Images to See this Breaking Write-Up!
<="" a="">
no means satisfied with the relation I gave him of the manner I
Cecily, if it is any disappointment to you, but I am afraid I have the prior claim. and there was a strange and horrible gurgling in her throat.
three leagues, till we were able to work no longer, being already
AND ALSO FROM yenny luz cudriz diaz [ylh20@hotmail.com]
Dear Member's,
You need to Allow Links and Images to View this Special Announcement!
<="" a="">
had never till then beheld so terrible a sight.
The chafts will wag as they be used to. Some day soon the Angel of Death and continue the breed. That a weak diseased body, a meagre
much reading in the day between, and much anxiety on the day to follow,
SO STRANGE
Seriously? Doesn't that alone raise a red flag with Mr. Fryar?
I don't have any documentary evidence that
2 proves this, but there the shareholders had been
3 told by company insiders, some of whom are now d e ad,
4 that there were settlements done several years back
5 to set up funds for the benefit of the shareholders.
Because there is a reason for no documentary evidence. Never happened!
Fryar Hearing Testimony
By: retireman
02 Jun 2012, 10:47 AM CDT
Rating: Msg. 1097514 of 1097564
Jump to msg. #
Fryar Hearing Testimony
•
•
1
1 CAUSE NUMBER 2011-47860
2
3 HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
4 PETITIONER 164th JUDICIAL DISTRICT
5
6
7
8
9 ******************************************* * *****
10 SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
11 *************************************************
12
13
14
15
16 On the 30th day of September, 2011, the
17 following proceedings came on to be heard in the
18 above-entitled and -numbered cause before the
19 Honorable Alexandra Smoots-Rogan, Judge Presiding,
20 held in Houston, Harris County, Texas.
21 Proceedings reported by Certified Shorthand
22 Reporter and Machine Shorthand/Computer-Aided
23 Transcription.
• 1
2 A P P E A R A N C E S
3
4 FOR THE PETITIONER:
FOR
Mr. F. Eric Fryar, SBN 07495770
Mr. Avneil J. Adler, SBN 24071933
FRYAR LAW FIRM, P.C.
1001 Texas Avenue, Suite 1400
Houston, Texas 77001
Telephone: 281-715-6396
Facsimile: 281-715-6397
THE DEPOSITORY TRUST & CLEARING CORPORATION:
Mr. Edward B. Adams, Jr., SBN 00790200
Mr. Peter C. Tipps, SBN 24070748
FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI, L.L.P.
Fulbright Tower
1301 McKinney, Suite 5100
Houston, Texas 77010
Telephone: 713-651-5151
Facsimile: 713-651-5246
• 1 P R 0 C E E D I N G S
2 THE COURT: All right. We are on the
3 record in Cause Number 2011-47860;
4 and if I could have appearance for the record,
5 Counsel.
6 MR. FRYAR: Eric Fryar, Avneil Adler,
7 Fryar Law Firm, for Petitioner.
8 MR. ADAMS: Edward B. "Teddy" Adams and
9 Peter Tipps for DTCC, one of the respondents.
10 THE COURT: All right. And this is a
11 motion to compel depos prior to suit, correct?
12 MR. FRYAR: I guess for permission to
• 13 take depos prior to suit.
14 THE COURT: Okay. All right. You can
15 give me the background if you want. I've read it.
16 I -- I guess my -- my major question at this point
17 is: The depos you're seeking to get are those
18 dep -- are all of those depos out of county?
19 MR. FRYAR: Yes.
20 MR. ADLER: They're all out of state.
21 THE COURT: They're all out of state.
22 Do I -- that's -- this is going to be my first
23 question to you. Do I have authority to order depos
24 of witnesses that are out of state when we don't even
• 25 have a case pending?
4
• 1 MR. ADLER: Well -- so actually
2 Respondent somewhat addressed that in his objections.
3 THE COURT: I thought of it before he
4 came to his objection, so that's
5 MR. ADLER: Right.
6 THE COURT: That's why I'm asking the
7 question.
8 MR. ADLER: Right. Okay. We 11,
9 Rule 201 does allow us to take out-of-state
10 depositions in the case that there is an action or
11 proceeding in the state. Mr. Adams actually said an
12 action. In the beginning of Rule 201 it says • 13 proceeding in the state.
14 THE COURT: Okay.
15 MR. ADLER: You can certainly make the
16 argument that the Rule 202 petition is a proceeding
17 of some sort. It's an action. There's a cause
18 number. Actually, the case law Mr. Adams cites and
19 which just generally speaks about Rule 202 is about
20 I ' whether or not 1t's subject to removal for federal
21 diversity grounds.
22 So there really is no case law as far
23 as -- I mean, there is case law that discusses
24 Rule two -- as an ancillary proceeding, but there's
• 25 no case law on point as far as out-of-state
• 1 subpoenas, but I'd argue that it is a proceeding for
2 purposes of allowing letters rogatory.
3 MR. FRYAR: It -- it would seem to be
4 strange to set up to say we want to have in this
5 state a mechanism where people can take limited
6 discovery with the permission of the Court in order
7 to avoid unnecessary lawsuits and limit that to
8 discovery within the state unless, you know, it were
9 specifically stated in the rule --
10 THE COURT: Uh-huh.
11 MR. FRYAR: -- and it's not. The rule
12 allows us to have a proceeding, subject to permission
• 13 of the Court, to take limited discovery to determine
14 whether a cause of action exists and allows us to use
15 the rules of discovery to do that.
16 Rules of discovery clearly say -- I
17 mean, you can't order a deposition in New York, but
18 you issue letters rogatory, and we have to go follow
19 the New York procedure in order to secure a subpoena
20 there and get that.
21 THE COURT: Uh-huh.
22 MR. FRYAR: But, I mean, there is a
23 proceeding on file here. There is a cause number.
24 If you issue an order, then Rule 202 gives us the
• 25 right to go exercise, you know, whatever remedies
• 1 exist in New York, Florida, and California.
2 MR. ADLER: Right. Incidentally, we
3 also -- we styled the petition in a way that it's for
4 an anticipated suit. I actually looked into the case
5 law and -- or the -- rather, the statutes in
6 California and Florida, and they also have a similar
7 type of proceeding for obtaining testimony prior to a
8 lawsuit.
9 THE COURT: Okay. Response.
10 MR. ADAMS: Yes, Your Honor. And you
11 want to just talk about whether they can do this at
12 all? • 13 THE COURT: Yeah. I mean, if I don't
14 have legal authority to do it, then I'm not going to
15 do it whether you respond to it or not. I'm--
16 MR. ADAMS: Sure.
17 THE COURT: That's all I'm asking.
18 MR. ADAMS: We believe there is no
19 legal authority for out-of-state depositions. As the
20 Court knows, this is a very narrow area that allows
21 very limited, specific discovery. You don't get to
22 take discovery -- you don't get to do anything
23 besides take a deposition of someone in state.
24 As opposing counsel mentioned, there's
• 25 not a lot of case law on this, but that case law that
··-------------------------------
7
• 1 does exist talks about whether this is an action or
2 proceeding in the context of removal. You can remove
3 an action. So if there were truly an action, we
4 could've come down here and removed the case to
5 federal jurisdiction -- federal court of
6 jurisdiction -- existed.
7 The case that I looked at said "No.
8 You can't do that because this is not an action that
9 can be removed." And for the same reason it's not an
10 action letters rogatory rules of procedure that
11 allow you to, in this pre-suit context, reach over to
12 Florida or New York or California to take a
• 13 deposition of somebody who's a stranger to Texas.
14 But even if you could, Your Honor
15 THE COURT: Uh-huh.
16 MR. ADAMS: -- under that reason, you
17 shouldn't allow the deposition of Mr. Richards here
18 because although -- be talking about investigating a
19 claim, the motion they filed was for -- there are two
20 reasons you can take a deposition pre-suit, one, to
21 investigate a claim --
22 THE COURT: Uh-huh.
2 3 MR. ADAMS: and two, to prevent a
24 failure or delay of justice. At least as to
• 25 Mr. Richards, they went for the latter, and there is
-------- - - -------- ··-- ··-·-·· --- .
8
• 1 no evidence at all anywhere in the papers they filed
2 that taking Mr. Richards' deposition now would any
3 way prevent a failure or delay of justice. He's not
4 sick. He's not going away. If they think they have
5 a lawsuit, they can file it and then go through the
6 procedure, take his deposition if they need it, but
7 there's nothing in the record to indicate that he
8 needs to be deposed now. They could've filed a
9 different motion asking to -- to investigate a claim.
10 We'd have a different issue. They didn't do that.
11 THE COURT: And I thought I read in
12 these papers that this is not y'all's first rodeo,
• 13 that there's already some litigation previously
14 around this.
•
15 MR. ADAMS: Let me give you a little
16 bit of background about this.
17 THE COURT: Okay.
18 MR. FRYAR: Not us.
19 THE COURT: Not you, but there's some
20 previous was it in your response --
21 MR. ADAMS: It was, Your Honor.
22 THE COURT: that I read that? Okay.
23 MR. ADAMS: There's a company called
24 CKKM Diamonds [sic] .
25 THE COURT: Uh-huh.
•
•
9
1 MR. ADAMS: It's a penny stock. The
2 people that ran that company were bad actors, issued
3 billions of shares improperly. There was lawsuits in
4 Nevada by the SEC against the operators of that.
5 Everyone in there either agreed to a consent judgment
6 against them or had summary judgment found against
7 them. While that proceeding was going on, the
8 company was folded up. Through that -- there were
9 various doc exchanges between that company -- other
10 companies as part of the winding-up process.
11 Meanwhile, in California -- and these
12 were some of the documents that were attached to the
13 petition. Mr. Hodges, one of the lawyers, one of the
14 people they want to depose, filed a lawsuit, a
15 putative class action against all the commissioners
16 of the SEC, and their theory is that there is a
17 secret multi-trillion-dollar fund that was set up.
18 That case was dismissed on the
19 pleadings, and one of the things they want to do is
20 depose the lawyer. The DTCC -- and I'm sorry for
21 this background. This is a little complicated.
22 Back in the olden times, when you
2 3 bought a share of stock, you got a stock certificate.
24 They sent it to you in the mail . That doesn't happen
25 anymore. What happens now is the company called the
• 1 DTCC that we represent, The Depository Trust &
2 Clearing Corporation, collects all those stock
3 certificates for pretty much everybody in the
4 country, and they put them in a vault, and they keep
5 electronic records of "Teddy Adams has a thousand
6 shares of Exxon stock" and I have it through Smith
7 Barney. Smith Barney will have an account with the
8 DTC that says "We have 5 million shares," and if they
9 need more shares they'll buy them from Morgan Stanley
10 and they'll make a record on the books.
11 Along with the functions of
12 storing/keeping records of who owns -- which
• 13 brokerage houses own stock, the DTCC also will -- if
14 you're going to make a dividend payment, instead of
15 ExxonMobil having to pass it out to everybody,
16 they'll give it to the DTCC, which, in turn, will
17 say, "All right. Smith Barney has a thousand shares.
18 They get $500,000. Merrill Lynch has 5,000 shares.
19 They get $25,000." Then Merrill Lynch and Smith
20 Barney will allocate it to their people.
21 Mr. Richards, who they want to depose,
22 is somebody who works for the DTCC
23 THE COURT: Okay.
24 MR. ADAMS: -- and he is part of this
• 25 other lawsuit and part of this morass.
1 Someone called him and recorded a
2 conversation with Mr. Richards in which he says "I
3 don't know anything about this. I don't know what
4 you're talking about. I've never seen anything, nor
5 have I told anyone I've ever seen anything." So this
6 is some big fishing expedition trying to find
7 something that may lead to some lawsuit about a $2.8
8 trillion secret fund that may or may not exist.
9 MR. FRYAR: Let me
10 THE COURT: Okay.
11 MR. FRYAR: -- get
12 THE COURT: Yeah.
13 MR. FRYAR: -- real practical.
14 THE COURT: Okay.
15 MR. FRYAR: Okay? First of all, we're
16 representing shareholders okay? -- shareholders
17 who bought stock that wasn't even authorized stock
18 okay? -- who lost their money. They're victims; no
19 question. There was a lot of litigation involving
20 the people that perpetrated the fraud, none which
21 went to a judgment that actually benefited the
22 shareholders.
23 THE COURT: Okay.
24 MR. FRYAR: Okay? There are -- you
25 know, I' 11 just say there are rumors -- okay?
DONNA KING, CSR
164TH OFFICIAL REPORTER
(713) 368-6256
There
1 is -- I don't have any documentary evidence that
2 proves this, but there the shareholders had been
3 told by company insiders, some of whom are now d e ad,
4 that there were settlements done several years back
5 to set up funds for the benefit of the shareholders.
6 Mr. Hodges is one of the people we want
7 to depose. He instituted a lawsuit in California in
8 which he went -- you know, we got records of -- of
9 arguments before the Court in which he stated: I've
10 got evidence that this record that these trust
11 funds exist. DTCC is one of the owners of this.
12 Mr. -- who's the other guy?
13 MR. ADLER: Richards.
14 MR. FRYAR: -- Richards has been
15 contacted. The other guy' Fielding
16 MR. ADLER: Phillips.
17 MR. FRYAR: -- Phillips says he's
18 actually seen records that prove that this trust fund
19 exists and is where Mr. Hodges says.
20
21
22
2 3 wait, wait.
24
25
THE COURT: Okay.
MR. FRYAR: So we have contact
THE COURT: Is Phillips one -- wait,
Is Phillips
MR. FRYAR: Okay.
THE COURT: Is this Phillips person
somebody you wanted to depose?
2 MR. FRYAR: Yes. There were --
3 MR. ADLER: Yeah.
4 MR. FRYAR: -- three people we want to
5 depose, Richards, Phillips, and Hodges. Basically
6 we've been hired by a bunch of these shareholders,
7 who say "If there's money out there that belongs to
8 us, we want to find it and we want to assert our
9 rights to it. We want to be paid. If there's not
10 we want to know that too. " You know?
11 THE COURT: Uh-huh.
12 MR. FRYAR: So, I mean, this is a
13 situation in which I could file a lawsuit, which
14 would be very expensive, and go through motions
15 practice on information and belief based on these
16 representations that have been made to our clients.
17 We'd be doing it in good faith. They think the money
18 is there.
19 THE COURT: Okay.
20 MR. FRYAR: Okay? But what we want to
21 do is use this rule for exactly what it's designed
22 for, which is to say, you know, "DTCC, if we're
23 crazy" -- and some people have said Mr. Hodges is
24 crazy. "If this fund doesn't exist, why don't you go
25 under oath and tell our shareholders it doesn't exist
instead of file -- hiring Fulbright & Jaworski tot
2 come in and file a paper the day before the hearing
3 to say 'Don't -- we don't want to go under oath to
4 say whether you have -- we have your money or not.'"
5 THE COURT: Uh-huh.
6 MR. FRYAR: Okay? What we're tying --
7 trying to do is save resources, use the rule for what
8 it's designed for, and they're in here trying to
9 block our access to information. Well, all -- all
10 our people want to know is: Should we be suing
11 somebody? We don't want to file a lawsuit if there's
12 no basis. We've been told that we're crazy. We've
13 been told that this is a lie. We've also been told
14 that it's the truth. You know, "Attorney Fryar, can
15 you -- is there any way to find out for sure?" You
16 know? To which, my response is: There's Rule 2 0 2'
17 which allows us to take a deposition for exactly this
18 type of situation.
19 THE COURT: Right. But does it allow
20 you to take all of those dep -- it sounds like, from
21 the little bit you just told me, the main person you
22 need is this Phillips person, but --
23 MR. FRYAR: Well, Phillips and Hodges
24 definitely, and -- but, you know, what they're saying
2 5 is: We've seen the information -- we -- we have
• 1 information that it's at the DTCC. We've seen a
2 record that it's at the DTCC. They're not, like
3 they're not associated with the DTCC. They're -- all
4 they can give us is hearsay. Why not go to the
5 source? I mean, give us one guy who's going to say
6 "This is true" or "This is false" under oath.
7 MR. ADLER: If I may add, just as far
8 as the DTCC is concerned, the phone transcript that
9 Mr. Adams was referring to earlier -- that's actually
10 a call from the CEO of the company. The rumors were
11 so prevalent that the CEO of a company actually
12 called Mr. Richards, hosted a transcript on their
• 13 company Web site --
14 THE COURT: Uh-huh.
15 MR. ADLER: -- and com -- and put up a
16 report about -- aside from the actual conversation
17 about the substance of this conversation.
18 It was obviously a very prevalent
19 rumor, and there were several people -- we weren't
20 we weren't able to find those people that had spoken
21 directly to Mr. Richards. There were several people
22 that had said -- to that effect, that
23 THE COURT: Uh-huh.
24 MR. ADLER: -- you know •
25 THE COURT: All right. Frankly, I
1 don't think you're saving any money to take three
2 depositions, regardless. I'm still kind of
3 questioning whether or not I even have the authority
4 to order these depositions. I'm--
5 And this Phillips person is somebody
6 you represent as well?
7 MR. ADAMS: No, Your Honor. We
8 represent Morris --we represent DTC, who's Morris
9 Richards' employee [sic].
10 THE COURT: Okay.
11 MR. ADAMS: Hodges and Phillips -- I
12 don't know anything about them. They --
tt 13 THE COURT: Yeah.
14 MR. ADAMS: They're on their own.
15 I think we I'd like to just re-focus
16 for a little bit. First of all, Rule 202 -- there's
17 got to be some standard. It can't just be based on
18 rumors and hopes and dreams. The transcript that was
19 posted was unequivocal. He said he didn't know
20 anything about this, but we're getting a little bit
21 a -- far -- far afield because they asked to take a
22 deposition not to investigate a claim as to
23 Mr. Richards, but to prevent a failure or delay of
24 justice, a situation if somebody is sick, dying,
1 THE COURT: Yeah. I mean, if that's
2 the reason -- that seems like the wrong reason. I'll
3 tell you that right now. If that's what you've
4 alleged, that's the absolute wrong reason because we
5 haven't even talked about that.
6 MR. FRYAR: Well, we don't want to sue
7 Mr. Richards individually, but he's a witness in a
8 lawsuit -- if this -- if the fund exists --
9 THE COURT: Uh-huh.
10 MR. FRYAR: -- our people have a
11 lawsuit to assert their interest in the fund.
12 THE COURT: I understand
tt 13 MR. FRYAR: Right.
14 THE COURT: exactly what you're
15 saying, but if the basis for your wanting a
16 deposition prior to suit is just because you want to
17 avoid him dying on you or something like that
18 that's not what we've discussed. What we've
19 discussed is investigating a claim.
20 If that's your basis, it sounds like
21 that should have been part of the original motion.
22 MR. FRYAR: I think we alleged that in
23 the alternative. Didn't we?
24 MR. ADLER: Well, the rule actually
25 says to perpetuate or obtain testimony, and I don't
1 think that whether Mr. Richards --
•
•
2 THE COURT: Do you have a copy of your
3 motion?
4 MR. ADLER: Yes.
5 THE COURT: Make my life easy. If all
6 it says is that you want to prevent it because he's
7 dying or he's got some other calamity, then it's
8 going to be denied. You're not barred from re-filing
9 it with the correct claim, but -- or you might just
10 save yourself some money, just file this thing.
11 MR. ADLER: Here's the paragraph that
12 talks about Richards' testimony .
13 THE COURT: Yeah. You got "may prevent
14 further delay." You --
15 MR. ADLER: I don't -- I don't think
16 the situation of whether or not he might die is
17 necessarily an only circumstance where --might
18 prevent a delay of justice.
19 THE COURT: And I think we're saying
20 the same things. The problem is that's not what --
21 you -- you alleged it as just trying to prevent delay
22 instead of alleging trying to prevent delay or --
23 and/or investigating the claim.
24 So, you know, if that's all you've got,
25 I'm going to deny as to Richards. Let me see
• 1 Phillips. It sounds like you just need this Phillips
2 person. I will tell you that.
3 MR. FRYAR: Well -- and Hodges is the
4 attorney who says that he has this evidence, and his
5 lawsuit was dismissed before it got to discovery or
6 anything on the merits, so we want to -- and he's
7 also a shareholder, so we want to find out what he's
8 got.
9 THE COURT: Okay. I'll let you depose
10 Hodges and Phillips. You're not deposing Richards.
11 Give me an order. There you go.
12 MR. ADAMS: Thank you, Your Honor. May
• 13 we be excused?
•
14 THE COURT: Yes. You're excused.
15 Do you have an order for me, or do you
16 want to submit one?
17 MR. ADLER: I have one here.
18 THE COURT: If you want to doctor it
19 and submit it to me, that's fine.
20 MR. ADLER: I have -- if you want to
21 just change the -- put the relevant names --
22 THE COURT: There. You fill in their
23 names so that I don't misspell them and then hand it
24 back to me .
25 MR. ADLER: Sure. Sure.
• 1 THE COURT: I'll sign it. Okay?
2 MR. ADAMS: May we submit an order as
3 to Richards?
4 THE COURT: Yes. Submit an order as to
5 Richards, and I'll sign off on it.
6 MR. ADAMS: Thank you.
7 THE COURT: Okay? Thank you. Have a
8 good weekend.
9 (End of proceedings.)
1 THE STATE OF TEXAS
2 COUNTY OF HARRIS
3
4 I, Donna King, Official Court Reporter in
and for the 164th Judicial District Court of Harris
5 County, Texas, do hereby certify that the above and
foregoing contains a true and correct transcription
6 of all portions of evidence and other proceedings
requested in writing by counsel for the parties to be
7 included in this volume of the Reporter's Record in
the above-styled and -numbered cause, all of which
8 occurred in open court or in chambers and were
reported by me.
9
10 I further certify that this Reporter's
Record of the proceedings truly and correctly
11 reflects the exhibits , if any, admitted by the
respective parties.
12
13 I further certify that the total cost for
the preparation of this Reporter's Record is
14 $ and was paid/will be paid by
15
16 WITNESS MY OFFICIAL HAND this, the 13th day
of October, 2011.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
~--l{l-;~--------- DONNA KING, Texas CS 6273
Expiration Date: 12/ 1/12
Official Court Reporter
164th Judicial District Court
Harris County, Texas
201 Caroline, 12th Floor
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 368-6256
• 25
DONNA KING, CSR
164TH OFFICIAL REPORTER
(713) 368-6256
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=1097514
23 years! That's a hefty sentence.
Give Squiddie some credit, he is a curse on pennystock CEOs.
Squiddie has the most awesome collection of certs. If he really wants to make some money he should frame and sell them as souvenirs. Wait until after the next criminal trial though.
I read somewhere that Rufus Harris was sentence to 20 years. Is that accurate?
The family that preys together...
The All-Pro property sold, and so has the house at Standing Rock Drive. Hopefully the State recovered some funds.
http://www.observer-reporter.com/or/story11/05-12-2012-All-Pro-Auto-Mall
http://www.trulia.com/property/39932687-102-Standing-Rock-Dr-Canonsburg-PA-15317
This is the new address.
http://www.trulia.com/homes/Pennsylvania/Bethel_Park/sold/734146-203-Spartan-Dr-Bethel-Park-PA-15102
Three family members arraigned
By Kathie O. Warco Observer-Reporter kwarco@observer-reporter.com
Three members of one family charged with racketeering and theft stemming from a car financing scheme were arraigned May 14.
Vincent LoCastro, 48, of 203 Spartan Drive, Bethel Park, who once owned All Pro Auto Mall in Canonsburg, was arraigned before District Judge David Mark on two counts each of corrupt organizations and conspiracy as well as 18 counts each of theft and defrauding creditors.
His brother, Frank LoCastro, 57, of 151 Carol Drive, McMurray, was arraigned before Mark on two counts each of corrupt organizations and conspiracy along with 32 counts each of theft and defrauding creditors. He also is charged with unsworn falsification.
Nicole LoCastro, 21, also of 203 Spartan, was arraigned on two counts of corrupt organizations and conspiracy. She is the daughter of Vincent LoCastro.
All three were released on $100,000 unsecured bond.
Vincent LoCastro's son, Joseph Bruce LoCastro, 26, also of 203 Spartan, was arraigned May 17 on two counts of corrupt organization and conspiracy. He was arraigned before District Judge Jay Weller and was released on $100,000 unsecured bond.
Frank LoCastro is accused of purchasing 16 high-end vehicles from dealerships in Pennsylvania, Ohio, New Jersey and Maryland between Dec. 23, 2008, and Feb. 9, 2009, according to a criminal complaint filed by a trooper with the state police Bureau of Criminal Investigations. Thirteen different financial institutions were used to finance the purchases. Vehicles purchased included a Hummer, Porsche, Mercedes-Benz and Cadillac Escalade.
Vincent LoCastro, along with his son and daughter, reportedly were involved in the vehicle transactions.
Frank LoCastro reportedly gave false information on loan documents, identifying himself as vice president of LoCastro & Associates with an annual salary of $144,000. Frank LoCastro then defaulted on the loans.
Court documents indicate creditors lost several hundred thousand dollars on the defaulted loans. Some of the vehicles were recovered, but others were not, investigators said.
A preliminary hearing on the charges is set for Aug. 8 before Mark.
http://www.thealmanac.net/alm/story11/05-23-2012-locastros-arraigned
http://www.observer-reporter.com/or/washingtoncounty11/05-23-2012-last-locastro
5/12/2012 3:34 AM
Hospital eyes former All Pro site for possible future office
By Brad Hundt, Staff writer bhundt@observer-reporter.com
CANONSBURG - The site of the former All Pro Auto Mall at 108 S. Central Ave. could end up being the home of a satellite office operated by Washington Hospital.
Jamie Ivancic, a spokeswoman for Washington Hospital, confirmed that the hospital has purchased the property with an eye toward possibly moving its family practice and diagnostic facility at 67 E. Pike St. to that spot.
Ivancic noted, however, that permits have not been sought and no timetable has been established for moving to that location or for construction to start.
"Our intent is to replicate the same services," Ivancic said. "It's a bigger space."
All Pro Auto Mall, a used-car dealership, was once owned by Vincent LoCastro, who faces charges of corruption, conspiracy, fraud and theft charges that were filed this week. Last year, LoCastro pleaded guilty to a separate charge of making a false insurance claim in 2008. He was sentenced to 18 months' probation and fined $500.
http://www.observer-reporter.com/or/story11/05-12-2012-All-Pro-Auto-Mall
Three family members arraigned
By Kathie O. Warco Observer-Reporter kwarco@observer-reporter.com
Three members of one family charged with racketeering and theft stemming from a car financing scheme were arraigned May 14.
Vincent LoCastro, 48, of 203 Spartan Drive, Bethel Park, who once owned All Pro Auto Mall in Canonsburg, was arraigned before District Judge David Mark on two counts each of corrupt organizations and conspiracy as well as 18 counts each of theft and defrauding creditors.
His brother, Frank LoCastro, 57, of 151 Carol Drive, McMurray, was arraigned before Mark on two counts each of corrupt organizations and conspiracy along with 32 counts each of theft and defrauding creditors. He also is charged with unsworn falsification.
Nicole LoCastro, 21, also of 203 Spartan, was arraigned on two counts of corrupt organizations and conspiracy. She is the daughter of Vincent LoCastro.
All three were released on $100,000 unsecured bond.
Vincent LoCastro's son, Joseph Bruce LoCastro, 26, also of 203 Spartan, was arraigned May 17 on two counts of corrupt organization and conspiracy. He was arraigned before District Judge Jay Weller and was released on $100,000 unsecured bond.
Frank LoCastro is accused of purchasing 16 high-end vehicles from dealerships in Pennsylvania, Ohio, New Jersey and Maryland between Dec. 23, 2008, and Feb. 9, 2009, according to a criminal complaint filed by a trooper with the state police Bureau of Criminal Investigations. Thirteen different financial institutions were used to finance the purchases. Vehicles purchased included a Hummer, Porsche, Mercedes-Benz and Cadillac Escalade.
Vincent LoCastro, along with his son and daughter, reportedly were involved in the vehicle transactions.
Frank LoCastro reportedly gave false information on loan documents, identifying himself as vice president of LoCastro & Associates with an annual salary of $144,000. Frank LoCastro then defaulted on the loans.
Court documents indicate creditors lost several hundred thousand dollars on the defaulted loans. Some of the vehicles were recovered, but others were not, investigators said.
A preliminary hearing on the charges is set for Aug. 8 before Mark.
http://www.thealmanac.net/alm/story11/05-23-2012-locastros-arraigned
http://www.observer-reporter.com/or/washingtoncounty11/05-23-2012-last-locastro
5/12/2012 3:34 AM
Hospital eyes former All Pro site for possible future office
By Brad Hundt, Staff writer bhundt@observer-reporter.com
CANONSBURG - The site of the former All Pro Auto Mall at 108 S. Central Ave. could end up being the home of a satellite office operated by Washington Hospital.
Jamie Ivancic, a spokeswoman for Washington Hospital, confirmed that the hospital has purchased the property with an eye toward possibly moving its family practice and diagnostic facility at 67 E. Pike St. to that spot.
Ivancic noted, however, that permits have not been sought and no timetable has been established for moving to that location or for construction to start.
"Our intent is to replicate the same services," Ivancic said. "It's a bigger space."
All Pro Auto Mall, a used-car dealership, was once owned by Vincent LoCastro, who faces charges of corruption, conspiracy, fraud and theft charges that were filed this week. Last year, LoCastro pleaded guilty to a separate charge of making a false insurance claim in 2008. He was sentenced to 18 months' probation and fined $500.
http://www.observer-reporter.com/or/story11/05-12-2012-All-Pro-Auto-Mall
I was recently accused of not being fit to eat with pigs and she came to my defense.
Assured my critic that I was.
Hilarious! LOL
By: fungagain
BTW, it was not Urban who sent the boxes of evidence It was an attorney who sent the boxes. Urban was very sloppy. Kevin claims in his haste to leave, Urban got rid of expensive furniture very next to nothing.
as UC just handed over the keys to him along with boxes of evidence which might be used against him. Very suspicious.
By: fungagain
31 May 2012, 12:30 PM CDT
Rating: Msg. 1096680 of 1096811
(Reply to 1096656 by Kilroy.Sanddfoil)
Jump to msg. #
kilroy.....your whole point is idiotic. First off, much has been learned by not only the public over the years. When CMKX started all this garbage, they were pretty much pioneers. It started for them with PCBM then grew bigger with this round. It should have been obvious to the most naive of investors it was a scam.
You obviously chose to be greedy, and now you're mad because you weren't protected from yourself. Much like someone who gets screwed by a Nigerian letter, you want to be bailed out from your poor choices.
The SEC was supposed to police the market, but the Mob and lowlifes discovered that people could be taken in by small penny scams that added up to millions. When the SEC first halted the trading, that should have told you all you needed to know, but I'll bet you were one of them who complained about it, weren't you?
Now, isn't Edwards sitting in a prison? Didn't Kevin West come in and calm you all down from pursuing some sort of legal action against Urbie? Didn't Frizzy convince you all this was legit?
Quit blaming the only source who attempted to help you. Put the blame where it belongs.
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=1096680
By: Kilroy.Sanddfoil
31 May 2012, 01:23 PM CDT
Rating: Msg. 1096720 of 1096852
(Reply to 1096680 by fungagain)
Jump to msg. #
Funagain, YOUR whole post is idiotic and presumptuous. First off, your second sentence seems fragmented. CMKX wasn't a "pioneer"... Michael Milken "pioneered" long before UC & JE. If it "should have been obvious to the most naive of investors it was a scam", then it should have been obvious to the SEC as well, yet they allowed tens if not hundreds of millions of dollars to leave the pockets of investors. I didn't choose to be greedy (are all investors "greedy"?), and I'm not mad because I wasn't protected from myself. I didn't rob myself. I was robbed by others under the auspices of the SEC, who abetted the robbers by giving investors a false sense of security due to their mission statement.
"The SEC was supposed to police the market, but the Mob and lowlifes discovered that people could be taken in by small penny scams that added up to millions". I agree. So you're saying that the SEC mandated police work sucked, right? I agree.
I never complained about the SEC halting the trading. Not at all. I looked forward to it so that forensic accounting of the share structure could be done. So, you're presumptuously wrong again. IS Edwards sitting in a prison? I have no evidence of that. He may have been arrested, but with his hidden millions, I'm sure he could have made bail. If he were in custody, why has he not been extradited back to the U.S. for "swift justice? Kevin West did NOT calm me down at all. I was leery of him from the beginning, as UC just handed over the keys to him along with boxes of evidence which might be used against him. Very suspicious. BF did NOT convince me this was legit. In fact, he was in bed with KW & apparently UC. However, I WAS willing to give $25 to ANYONE who acted like they might dig up the facts since the SEC wasn't doing their job.
I DO put the blame where it belongs... the taxpayer funded policing entity who failed (1) to stop the crime from happening, (2) to freeze the outflow of investor money, and (3) who failed to extradite and promptly prosecute the perpetrators. You're obviously in bed with this inept if not collusive failure of a regulatory body. Daily I read of their settling for 10% of the loot without criminal prosecution of the thieves destroying the integrity of our markets. But, you seem to have no problem with them at all. That's very suspicious. ROFLMAO!
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=1096720
By: fungagain
31 May 2012, 02:28 PM CDT
Rating: Msg. 1096771 of 1096854
(Reply to 1096720 by Kilroy.Sanddfoil)
Jump to msg. #
kilroy....boy, talk about fragmented sentences, you're all over the place. But nonetheless....
I find reading your posts most interesting, throughout you claim to have known what you were doing. All along you recognized the fraud that you succumbed to, and yet you just keep going along with it. You recognized Frizzy was a scammer, but you gave him $25 anyway? How can I take anything else you say seriously? That's like saying, "I know the SuperBowl tickets I bought were counterfeit, but I really wanted to see the game".
So, you are more clever than most in your ignorance. Congrats.
Once again, over the years the SEC has had to learn right along with everyone else. No, Michael Milken never traded penny stocks. In fact, once upon a time, a penny stock was any stock under $3. Milken was scamming in high yield bonds. Do some research.
Your constant need to blame the SEC for not protecting you better rings pretty weak when you admit to continuing to allow yourself to be scammed, even though you knew the truth.
And no, I have no ties nor allegiance to anything. Why does it seem to shock the typical Xer that a perfectly normal person can recognize a scam without being somehow involved in some secret plot?
It's called common sense.
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=1096771
By: fungagain
31 May 2012, 11:42 AM CDT
Rating: Msg. 1096620 of 1096811
Jump to msg. #
For the simpletons, here's your summary....
Urbie and crew were the most crooked. Screwed you over, but gave you a free hat.
Frizzell is a mediocre lawyer who recognized an opportunity to fleece you by charging each of you a small sum to learn nothing, but give him some spending cash.
Kevin West was out of work and recognized Frizzy as a willing partner. He "allowed" Urbie to hand him over the business with an agreement he could get a running start before unfolding stuff.
Maheu was an old codger and willing to accept some nice cash for lending his name. Didn't count on actually having to know anything, so quickly bailed.
A littany of clowns started running through the ranks at the urging of Keviepoo. They were promised a chunk of money if they just stood there and pretended to be interested. Most learned the truth about the scam and signed a release to keep quiet in exchange for a little more cash.
The new guy comes in and actually thinks he's involved with a real company. Continually puts his foot in his mouth because he hasn't a clue what he has gotten himself into. I predict he will soon depart with a puzzled look on his face.
Now, somewhere in between all this, the SEC TRIED to tell you things weren't right, but instead of thanking them, you bit them on the foot and accused them of trying to steal your bone. They gave up, but apparently still have to go into court on occasion to remind you all this was all a scam, which of course you choose to ignore.
Oh yeah, the Queen, Pope, and Obama scratch their heads wondering who or what is an Xer.
Buffalo Bill rides on.
Somewhere is some goofy individual who is ticked that Al never gave him a car.
Keep this post as a reminder whenever the haze reappears over your head.
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=1096620
By: fungagain
31 May 2012, 12:04 PM CDT
Rating: Msg. 1096647 of 1096811
(Reply to 1096637 by Kilroy.Sanddfoil)
Jump to msg. #
kilroy.....the SEC has worked within the parameters available to them. At one time, all they could basically do was put a temporary freeze on trading. Of course, all of you were offended by this and accused the SEC of manipulation, rather than see it as the warning it was.
Out of curiousity, how many of the posters here would still cry foul if Urbie were brought into court? If I recall correctly, the last time in court, Maheu stood up and admitted he had no clue what the heck was going on with the company, and most here claimed it was intentional?
C'mon, when are shareholders going to put the blame where it belongs?
It astounds me that almost all here hate Leslie Hakala. Some for doing too much, and some for not doing enough. If the SEC wasn't stopping this for not having all the facts years ago, what's your excuse?
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=1096647
that's honest of him
Kirkpatrick is a newcomer and lacks CMKX history. He may also have some Xers feeding him misinformation. More the reason for him to answer only current questions pertaining to his end of the business.
It is after all, a complex story.
And what is the POINT of discussing it AGAIN?
Kirkpatrick was asked his opinion about the Jeff letter. Apparently he said something about Jeff admitting guilt and paying up while Urban was still there. That started the new wave of Xer-madness on the boards.
Kirkpatrick later released this statement.
To All CMKM Shareholders:
On the webinar last night, I inadvertently stirred up unnecessary controversy about the JEFF matter. My answer to a question about Jeffries selling/clear shares of CMKX outside of normal clearing procedures was misleading and incomplete. I am researching this matter closely, and will publish an update fully explaining the facts about Jeffries' dealings in the next few days.
After speaking to many sources today, it is clear to me that most do not understand the facts - including me. I am sorry for creating unnecessary confusion or controversy about this matter. I will get all the facts and present them on the website for your study and understanding. Thank you to those who attended last night's webinar!
Steve Kirkpatrick
Lordie, Lordie
Kirkpatrick is going to discuss the Jeff letter again.......... IN DETAIL! lol
Hopefully the last meeting taught him a lesson.
We should show this man some compassion and compile a list of names/subjects never to discuss at his meetings. It only leads to confusion and Xer-madness.
Or better yet, Kirkpatrick should start every meeting with a simple statement, "If the topic of your question is not current, don't ask". That will cut his Webinar time in half.
courtesy of goodoldboy
May 29, 2012
RE: Company Meeting – Webinar #4
To All CMKM Shareholders:
I hope each of you had a blessed and restful Memorial Day weekend. We indeed have much to be thankful for in America, and it is good to reflect on these blessings, and honor those who have sacrificed so much for our freedoms.
I am hosting another company meeting/webinar Thursday, May 31, 2012 at 8 P.M. CDT. Please click on the following link to register for or join the meeting:
https://cmkmdiamondsinc.webex.com/cmkmdiamondsinc/onstage/g.php?d=663198257&t=a
Event Password CMKM
I will discuss the JEFF letter in detail, review a few topics, and answer your questions. The meeting will probably be shorter than the previous meetings, however.
I hope you are able to join us on Thursday night. Take care, and God bless!
Steve Kirkpatrick
And just how many companies are saying they are 'producing' their product, yet it's completely made in China.
Interesting question. I recall reading an article a few years back that China's own population demands kept them from being a major exporter of food products. The article did say there were a few exceptions with garlic being one of them, which had U.S. growers concern.
Back when the pet food/melamine incident occur the U.S. implemented a ban on wheat gluten from China. The pressure cause the Chinese to investigate the matter.
Good grief! Why don't they do us all a favor and ban pet food products from China. It's like playing Russian roulette.
The Food and Drug Administration has being logging these reports of illness since November 2011 and continues to send out warnings to dog owners about feeding their pets chicken jerky nuggets and strips. The affected products are believed to cause a range of health issues in canines, from vomiting and diarrhea to kidney failure and death.
RELATED: Pet Food Recall Expands
Responding to mounting reports, the FDA sent inspectors to China earlier this year to investigate the plants where the dogs treats are produced. So far, the inspections haven't yielded any incriminating evidence. Tests on the treats, starting back to 2007, also have yet to elicit any traces of toxins or other irritants that could be causing the symptoms seen in affected dogs.
Until more concrete findings can be produced the FDA, vets and the owners of the sick canines are urging pet owners to stay away from Waggin' Train and Canyon Creek Ranch brand treats produced by Nestle Purina PetCare Co., and Milo's Kitchen Home-Style Dog Treats, produced by the Del Monte Corp.
http://www.pawnation.com/2012/05/25/close-to-1-000-dogs-poisoned-by-chinese-jerky-treats/#page=1%3Ficid
GO ERCILIA!!
Many mounds of dirt were disturbed the night of the great Cassavant spell.
And dancing crows with electric claws tell no tales my friend.
if Nufced is Tuscan
Too funny.
Nobody got under leo/djzzz's skin the way nufced and Jonas has. They are her RB nemesis. And nuf barely ever post there these days!
So is she dead or alive?
With voodoo in play she could be a zombie. Technically making her claim difficult to prove since she's dead from the neck up, but still able to pound on a keyboard. Bush Sr. hiring the Electric Witches was a stroke of genius. And remember, Obama also hired the Electric Witches to steal the election.
The ultimate deed preform by the Electric Witches was the night they hopped on their brooms and went to the barn in the middle of nowhere. That night the coven placed a wicked spell on Urban Cassavant. Ever since Urban has been unable to return to his mecca, (Las Vegas) was investigated by the IRS, and indicted (RICO). Electric Witches rule!
Here we go again.
tuscun9, i believe you are nufced
Long time ago djzzzz believed nufced and Janice Shell were the same person. But nufced and tuscan? Now that's insulting! lol
By: leowanta
29 May 2012, 10:20 AM CDT
Rating: Msg. 1095558 of 1095577
Jump to msg. #
I LOVE JESUS CHRIST
WITH ALL MY HEART, WITH ALL MY SOUL AND WITH ALL MY MIND AND MIGHT!
i know you people want answers; understandably so, to tell you the facts would take a book. i will make a movie of what has happened; for Satan is coming defacto and the world needs to see how it operates.
you people that were involved here; got a preview of what is coming.
tuscun9, i believe you are nufced, i also believed you are LaVerne Smith Scales daughter, Scales is a Lachesis witch, she is one with satan, his wife one of many wives. Satan gives her whatever she needs, to destroy, God's righteous people.
i am One with Christ, the wife of Christ, a pure heart. it takes a pure heart to defeat pure evil.
Bush Sr. stole my reward money in 1989, around 2 weeks later Scales, was assigned out of Washington D.C. to my office wherein there was no position for her. Her job was to covertly murder me so Sr could keep my reward; if i am dead, there can be no claim for what he stole.
So, there you have the setting for the spiritual warfare, one very bad fig, duking it out with one very good fig. who wins decides much for the Father about mankind; and when satan will be released. For the money was caused by the Father for my purpose; which is to do a work, a project that will come into play in these last days...
The Father gave me clampet to assist me; for clampet is a seer. It was love at first sight, true love has power to do any work. The witch was on the losing end of the war.
So, she tries to come between clampet and i to break us apart. Many of her works to separate us have worked for her; she hung his spirit upside down, which turned his whole world upside down. To make him believe i left him; she tied my spirit to an anchor deep underwater so he could not find me/feel me. Christ broke me free sending his angel, after awhile...during this time Clampet's life had completely changed, he was attached to another woman. When he felt me again, he left the woman because of the vow he gave to the Father to love, honor and cherish me til death due us part...and i took the same vow to the Father about clampet.
So tuscan9, you are part of the fodder the witch thru infront of clampet to make him break his vow, you were put in his path while his world was still upside down....clampet has been in the worst nightmare of his life; and could not get free from the confusion ...until last fall, when he began emailing me, showing me he was right side up! so, he got too close to you and he broke his vow,
he must repent to get back into God's saving grace...but that has to be his choice, he must decide freely which path he is going to take, at this point in his life.
the fraud on wall street...another part of the fodder the witch thru in front of me, destory my country, for i am a founding father, the constitution is being destroyed....the republic is getting weaker, it's like DC is under a spell of "sleep at the wheel" letting our nation fall into massive debt which was one of the topics of my complaint to Ronald Reagan in 1988.....i love my country, and anything i love the witch attacks....so i had to win this fight on wall street...whatever it took, i had to do it, even to the point of losing everything to continue the fight against the massive fraud set in motion by the witch. Knowing Christ was with me all the way, holding my right hand, i never gave up. Chirst moved in when clampet left in confusion.
So, there you have it...you can say what you want about me i don't care, i have a job to do for the Lord and NOTHING, and i mean NOTHING is going to pull me away from the Father, Christ my Lord. if Clampet doesn't repent, then you will see him again tuscan9...and he'll come back on this board with his 3 computers playing his old symphony, of his 3 ring circus with many aliases.
this is my last post here.....i have lots of work to do for the Lord my job, using this board to help you here is finished.
ADIOS
THANK YOU FATHER, CHRIST MY LORD, IN HIS NAME GRANT ME ALL THAT I NEED FOR YOU KNOW WHAT I NEED BEFORE I ASK! AMEN
leowanta, you servant and friend
It really was her email address, and it was sent to a bunch of her employees. Who of course circulated it
First time I ever read this e-mail.
OMG I can't stop laughing about it! Why did she beg her employees to send her money instead of her family members like normal people do? It's the Dominion Melchizedek way. lol
Man, that woman is a piece of work. No wonder the Nigerians have her number. She could rip off the most experience "Nigerian Prince" and he would have no clue until she was safely home with her bags unpacked. The Nigerians may have their "Princes of Scams", but Pearl is sadly our Queen.
From: E. Pearl Asian <pearlasian@hotmail.com>
Date: Mar 14, 2009 12:11 AM
Subject: Help Needed Urgently..
To:
Hi,
I'm in a hurry writing this mail. I had
a trip to Nigeria for a conference. Unfortunately all my
money has been stolen at the hotel where I stayed, by some armed
robbers and since then I've been without any money and I'm even owing
money to the hotel here. So I have only access to my e-mails,my mobile
phone can't work here so I didn't bother bringing it along.Please can i
get up to $3,000 or any amount you can render for me, so I can return
back and settle the hotel bills I will return it back to you as soon as
i get home.You can have it sent through money grams or western union. I
will receive it here, please let me hear from you as soon as you
receive these mail so that i can send you my information and address
where you can send the money to me..
all i need right now is the
money to settle up the bills and leave. i promise to pay back your
money as soon as i return home please i only hope on you now please
understand it very hard for me to explain.Thanks
best
regards
Hasn't she moved since they were her next door neighbors?
Did she? I sort of lost track of her when the Krazy Al saga started. She dropped way down on the list of Krazy delusional Xers with the introduction of the World Reports gang, letters to the Queen, Interpol, the POTUS, secret Supreme Court decisions, and the Xers who supported and believed Krazy Al. djzzz was firmly against Krazy Al's nonsense.
And for the half-man, half-viper.
Dang, how could I forget. It's half-viper, not half snake.
that is too good for Tuscan
LOL
At least djzzzz is no longer obsessed by nufced. I'm guilty of laughing many times at her expense, but thankfully those days are over. Now it's Tuscan's turn. ;)
Why wouldn't a Cheshire cat speak English? And what are "clickers"?
Good point. I guess if a Cheshire cat could talk it would speak English. Maybe the cat is a well train informant? lol
Who knows in her world what a "clicker" is. She has no clue what a lesbian is.
The xFBI agent now owns a private investigation company. His credentials are impressive. It must be hell living next door to her.
http://www.yatedo.com/p/Gilberto+%27Gil%27+Torrez/normal/604f90bda2423a29e98b9ce70684b6db
She spent the afternoon reposting many times on the CMKI board I LOVE JESUS CHRIST. And I thought after all these years she finally settle down.
I LOVE JESUS CHRIST leowanta
5/28/12 01:58 PM
OMG The old djzzzz is back! She is starting another war with the Electric Witches, the xFBI agent, half man half snake, and an English speaking Cheshire cat. lol
Too funny. djzzzz is accusing a woman who she claims is a lesbian of pursuing this married man for 18 years and wanting a romantic relationship with him. Can someone on RB please explain to leowanta the definition of lesbianism? And why is she filing a complaint against the xFBI agent with the SEC?
She is clearly off her meds again.
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=1094973
By: leowanta
28 May 2012, 09:55 AM CDT
Rating: Msg. 1094973 of 1095162
(Reply to 1094966 by leowanta)
Jump to msg. #
ATTN SEC/DOJ REMOVE LAVERNE SMITH SCALES FROM CMKX DISTRIBUTION;
again, DO NOT PAY LAVERNE SMITH SCALES...investigate her and her
daughter for covert terrorism/murder using witchcraft and voodoo.
Scales is a black woman, and practices witchcraft and voodoo, she
lives in Houston, Texas.
SEC/DOJ/FBI DO NOT PAY GILBERTO TERREZ, ERCILIA TORREZ, DANIELLE TORREZ, AND "MARK" THE 1/2 MAN 1/2 SERPENT; IF THEY ARE IN THE CMKX DISTRIBUTION----DELETE THEIR NAMES FROM THE DISTRIBUTION.
SCALES half-brother is Gilberto Torrez, xFBI Agent, Washington D.C. FBI Headquarters has an extensive file on Torrez, containing pictorial evidence of the covert terrorism against me and my family using witchcraft and voodoo, wherein, Scales, i believe had control of a Cheshire cat, living with Torrez that spoke english, who roamed the neighborhood at night and watched my house and my children from a window in Torrez's house. A recent TCR was filed about Torrez on the SEC website concerning the huge loss of my property and physical abuse/loss i endured from Scales/Torrez family witchcraft/voodoo effected on me and my family. Damages in the amount of $100M claimed.
SCALES/TUSCAN, ET AL YOUR ALIASES...'GOD IS COMING' IS IN CONGRESS AS OF THE 8TH OF MAY.........ALL I HAD TO DO WAS PUT AN ALIAS TO YOUR NAME---YOU INCRIMINATED YOURSELF TRYING TO CONTROL JDCLAMPET1 THROUGH PAIN AND SUFFERING IF HE DIDN'T PROFESS NIGHTLY THAT HE LOVED YOU...WHICH HE DOESN'T...HE LOATHS YOU AS DO i FOR YOU ARE A MURDERING SCUMBAG.
there is no doubt in my mind there are drones following you around....a camera can see you in any state you shapeshift into...i truly hope they followed you to your hidden "altar" to satan in that old farmhouse barn...out in the country where nobody can see you....i am sure clampet has seen you there as well.....
this time, there are no "words of power" to save you...you are going down right along with all you 'clickers'
THANK YOU FATHER
leowanta
PS..a big THANK YOU to JDCLAMPET1 for exposing Tuscan....may God Bless you and yours...you certainly are wiser than the serpent and as harmless as a dove. Thank You for all you've done for me, my family and for the CMKX Family!
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=1094966
By: leowanta
28 May 2012, 01:23 AM CDT
Rating: Msg. 1094966 of 1095162
(Reply to 1094886 by leowanta)
Jump to msg. #
ATTN SEC/DOJ REMOVE LAVERNE SMITH SCALES FROM CMKX DISTRIBUTION;
again, DO NOT PAY LAVERNE SMITH SCALES...investigate her and her
daughter.
Scales is a black woman, and practices witchcraft and voodoo, she
lives in Houston, Texas
Please: Request you investigate her for the death of the following deaths: (there are more, these are the ones i personally know of)
Joe Stevens, Manager, to Secretary of a Regulator
sudden death spring of 1993
John Wright, Electronic Engineer, Same Regulator
34 years old, thin man/fit as a fiddle
married, father of two children 8 and 7 years old
death my massive heart attack playing basketball on his
driveway with his two children January 21, 1990
Beverly Barbola, Supervisor, same Regulator
Best Friend of LaVerne Smith Scales
Loved Her Husband, it was true love
massive heart attack, she was around 38 years old
@ Summer of 1992
----------
Luke 10:19 Christ speaking
"Behold, I give unto power to tread on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy; and nothing shall by any means hurt you."
This is a PROMISE of Christ our Lord...stand on it in HIS name...He is the power...HE destroys the serpents and scorpions power over you and sets you free...
..Faith=believing that Christ and the Father are ONE (John 10:30)"I and my Father are One." That Christ is the only begotten son of the Father, He died on the cross and rose in his flesh body ....and is at the right hand of God, through Christ ...there is salvation from sin, by asking for forgiveness and repenting...repenting has to be a real change of heart. When you repent, your sins are wiped away from your book of life, they don't exist anymore.
When you walk in this kind of faith; all the promises of the Father, Christ our Lord, are yours for he asking.
No EVIL can keep a hold on you; No EVIL can harm/hurt you because Christ protects you from EVIL minds/hands/trickery....
*****************
let me share a true story with you. back in the day, because of my righteous acts; a witch was paid to covertly murder me. she was a black woman, who befriended me; tricked me into believing she was my friend. she came to my house uninvited...(you never let a witch in your home.) Graciously i let her in my home and all the demons/familars came with her into my home.
strange things began to happen to me...this black woman began calling me every day...i found out she was a lesbian, and was warned by my co-workers that she practiced witchcraft and voodoo, one co-worker actually saw her in a full-moon ritual---he was a pastor outside of work; and helped those afflicted with witchcraft and voodoo, so he learned all about witches by going to their rituals...that's how he knew she was a witch. i did not believe in witchcraft...i did not heed his warning and should have. i learned the hard way through trial and error...this is why i began to study the bible, seeking answers to my problem, for this witch attached herself to my life, everything i loved, she destroyed.
in telephone conversations with this witch, she told me of a man she "wanted" he was married. Every night this man had to call her and tell her he loved her and if he didn't call her; she would covertly attack him or his wife....for 18 years this b i t c h interferred in this mans marriage trying to break it up....God Bless that black man for hanging on to his wife! i was his blessing...this lesbian let go of this man and turned her attention/time to destroying my life and everyone i loved.
i have power over this b i t c h because of the scripture above....she tries to this day....but she knows she can never have what i love the most, Christ and i know that Christ will return all that she has stolen from me, for it's HIS PROMISE to me...Joel 2:25-26....nothing she can do to stop it from boomeranging onto her; all that she has done to me and those i love will come back on her and her family 7-fold.
Keep the faith, and stand on his promises, set yourself FREE! Know Christ our Lord is with you and nothing; i mean nothing can hurt you or your family, unless you follow the witch and not Christ.
THANK YOU FATHER
leowanta
I'd just love to see Vinnie explain about those drug dealers.
Oh, hell yeah! Please, please let THIS one go to court! Inquiring minds want to know! lol
Now here is another juicy gem of a story about the boyz. Note the familiar, "FLASH their CASH and JEWELRY" around. Even PCBMers will recognize that as one of Vinnie's character flaws.
http://www.barntowire.com/smf/index.php?topic=6456.55;wap2
lobro:
Quote from: the DailyDaley on July 14, 2006, 10:31:33 AM
If you read a previous posting of mine, I explained the "Family Tree" at the Meadows.
It started with Bob (swim to win) Inman (in the 80's at the Meadows) who taught Bob Belcher who taught Marcus Marashian who taught Fred Aboid who taught Alex Spence who taught Frank Pelligrini who taught John Sokol who taught Jenny.
Oppps we forgot Keith Kash Jr. Keith was pretty smart. He got out before the pot got to hot. But he learned "HOW TO HELP ONE" by Uncle Bob.
Mike and his brother Dave started a team effort at the Meadows. One of their primary owners was Vince and Dino LoCastro. Let's just say Vince and Dino liked to "FLASH their CASH and JEWELRY" at the track. They bought some horses, let Mike train them and Dave drive them.
That didn't turn out too well and Dave petitioned the Pa. Race Commission to be allowed to drive other horses in the same race that were being trained by his brother, Mike.
The Pa. Race Commission took the bait and "IT ALL WENT DOWNHILL" from there.
Vince and Dino were pissed now because of 2 things. They bought these fairly high priced horses, they weren't going well and now Dave opted out to drive other stock.
This was a sore point for a while with Vince and Dino, but when they realized that they could have multiple horses in the same race, "THEIR OPTIONS" were "ENDLESS".
The game$$$$$$ began. Then we throw in the Mowoods, Tony and Joe.
Let's say a "FEW DOLLARS" was wagered on a "CERTAIN RACE" (there are MANY more) at the Meadows. That "MONEY" got parked  [w] and it went down the drain.
Every now and then, when the races were over, the DRIVERS met at the Holiday Inn by the track for a beverage and / or a conference. Â [ht]
Guess who showed up. Â ::)
1. The Parkeee - Dave Palone  2. The Parker - J.C. Miller Jr.
3. "The Enforcers" - Tony and Joe Mowood.
After a rather "HEATED DISCUSSION" Â one of the Mowoods decided he was going to put JC in an uncomfortable position.
He did. He "LITERALLY CRUSHED" JC's windpipe and JC was on life support for about a week.
Just the facts. You wanted them, you got'em. No dreams, no fabrication, no drugs.
[cool] Just the facts.
Fascinating stuff..................................I can't wait for the next big story...
I wish they would throw in Arson!
That might never happen because of Vinnie's past connections. You know the old story.
But, do you believe having Vinnie's family involved now will make it more difficult for him to cop a plead this time round? It would be interesting for Vinnie to go to court and try to explain how "drug dealers" are in possession of the other vehicles the authorities are interested in.
Evil naked short sellers, evil drug dealers, it is always some lame excuse with this guy.
in one deposition with bank investigators, Vince LoCastro said "the other vehicles were in the hands of drug dealers, and he could not recover them," the affidavit said.
Vittone said the cars that were not recovered were likely resold by All Pro Auto Mall. The transferred titles were altered to not show the banks' liens on the vehicles.
http://triblive.com/news/1611455-74/locastro-charges-vehicles-family-frank-joseph-police-pro-vince-auto
Racketeering charges filed against Bethel Park man, family members
About Matthew Santoni
Tribune-Review Staff reporter Matthew Santoni can be reached via e-mail or at 412-380-5625. Contact us
More Tribune-Review
By Matthew Santoni
Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, May 10, 2012, 7:28 p.m.
Updated: Friday, May 11, 2012
Authorities in Washington County filed racketeering charges on Thursday against a Bethel Park man and his family, alleging they used a Canonsburg car dealership to get fraudulent loans and default on cars one family member purchased.
According to state police, Frank LoCastro, 57, of Peters, purchased 16 vehicles from dealerships in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Maryland and Illinois between 2008 and 2009, financing more than $500,000 through 13 financial institutions.
Police said the title on some of the vehicles was transferred to the now-closed All Pro Auto Mall in Canonsburg, the business of his brother, Vincent LoCastro of Bethel Park, using forms notarized by All Pro employee Dennis Logue or Vince LoCastro's son, Joseph LoCastro. Frank LoCastro would default on the loans after a few payments, but most of the cars could not be found for repossession, police reported in an affidavit supporting the charges.
Vince LoCastro, 48; Frank LoCastro; Joseph LoCastro, 26; and Joseph's wife, Nicole LoCastro, 21, all face charges of participating or conspiring in a corrupt organization -- known as Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, charges. They also face charges of theft and defrauding secured creditors.
Members of the LoCastro family could not be reached for comment. They did not appear for arraignment yesterday, and a warrant would likely be issued for their arrests, Washington County District Attorney Gene Vittone said.
"We're using the RICO statute because of the scope of this case," he said.
In all of the cases, Frank LoCastro would state on credit applications that he worked for LoCastro and Associates or Met PA Racing, making more than $100,000 a year. He would then purchase one or more vehicles and would make several payments -- often from accounts associated with LoCastro Associates, Vincent LoCastro, Joseph LoCastro or Nicole LoCastro -- before eventually defaulting on the loans, police said.
Only a few of the vehicles were repossessed, and in one deposition with bank investigators, Vince LoCastro said "the other vehicles were in the hands of drug dealers, and he could not recover them," the affidavit said.
Vittone said the cars that were not recovered were likely resold by All Pro Auto Mall. The transferred titles were altered to not show the banks' liens on the vehicles.
Vince LoCastro was on probation for state and federal charges, Vittone said, including insurance fraud and identity theft. All Pro Auto Mall accumulated a long trail of negative reviews online for selling vehicles "as-is" that quickly broke down or were in worse shape than advertised.
Pearlasia Gamboa Named 'Notable Fraudster' by Nigerian Magazine
Place on the list of "World's Notable Fraudsters'' by Nigerians is quite the accomplishment for an old scammer like Pearl. They are experts on con artists.
http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2012/01/nigeria_fraud_pearlasia_gamboa.php
Pearlasia Gamboa Named 'Notable Fraudster' by Nigerian Magazine
By Peter Jamison Mon., Jan. 9 2012 at 3:50 PM
Categories: Law & Order, Media
?Given the now-cliched form of e-mail fraud known as "The Nigerian Prince" -- someone claiming to be African royalty sends you a message out of the blue offering to entrust you with a fortune in exchange for some personal information, such as your bank account number -- it seems odd that a Nigerian publication would chose to print a list of famous international con artists.
Well, the humor in the situation is not lost on Nigeria's Eagle En Style magazine, which recently published a story under the headline, "List of 'World's Notable Fraudsters' (Note: Not a Single Nigerian on It."
Aside from this charming self-deprecation, we paid attention to the list because it includes Pearlasia Gamboa, the Redwood City woman, profiled in a July 2011 SF Weekly cover story, who federal and state authorities say has been involved in what are surely some of the most bizarre scams in recent history.
As we reported, Gamboa is the former president of the Dominion of Melchizedek, a fictitious South Pacific island that authorities say was designed as a sort of mothership for con artists, providing phony documentation such as banking licenses and passports. She was also targeted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for allegedly selling shares in a fake gold mine in the Philippines.
As Eagle En Style noted,
Pearlasia Gamboa, president of the micronation of Melchizedek, hundreds of aliases; in 2002, one of Gamboa's banking and investor fraud schemes was described by the Italian newspaper La Republica as "one of the most diabolical international scams ever devised in recent years", and in 2000, the Asia Times described Gamboa's operations as "an astonishing series of worldwide swindles.
Gamboa asserts that she is innocent of all such allegations, and has been unfairly punished because of crimes committed by her former husband, Tzemach Ben David Netzer Korem. Here is video footage of her defending the legitimacy of the Dominion and other aspects of her legacy.
Interestingly enough, it is another African nation -- the Central African Republic -- that is the sole country in the world ever to establish diplomatic ties with the Dominion of Melchizedek.
Follow us on Twitter at @SFWeekly and @TheSnitchSF
They don't think what they do is "really" wrong.
Ban from penny stocks, always in some kind of legal trouble, and still can't figure out right from wrong? Not to mention angry scam victims wishing him ill will.
I would be paranoid to death living that sort of life. Oh well.........
True. But, it leaves me speechless that people would corrupt their own children.
I think the whole thing with his kids is tragic. Why teach them the con game too? What a moron!
It really is amazing how he's managed to stay out of slam for so long.
So, Vince lost All-Pro and was about to open a dealership in another area. He will NEVER stop scamming.
Racketeering and theft charges have been filed against Vincent LoCastro, the site developer who received approval from the Baldwin Township Board of Commissioners in January for EZ Auto Sales to open on McNeilly Road.
I hope this time he won't get probation. AGAIN.
He received nearly five years probation so far. sheesh! AND his brother Dino got a slap on the hand for his last run in with the law.
Now Vince has his kids in big trouble too! Lord have mercy.......
Former car dealer LoCastro and family facing fraud charges
http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/local/neighborhoods-south/former-car-dealer-locastro-and-family-facing-fraud-charges-635447/
May 11, 2012 12:25 am
By Janice Crompton / Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
A former Bethel Park car dealer and three members of his family have been charged with obtaining fraudulent loans to buy cars.
Washington County officials on Thursday announced they had charged Vincent LoCastro, 48, of Bethel Park, with two counts of corrupt organizations, two counts of conspiracy, 18 counts of theft by unlawful taking, and 18 counts of defrauding secured creditors.
Also charged were his brother Frank LoCastro, 57, of Peters, and Vincent LoCastro's two children, Nicole, 21, and Joseph, 26, who live with their father.
Frank LoCastro is charged with 69 counts of theft and conspiracy, charges that state police and the Washington County district attorney's office say involved his buying vehicles and financing them through multiple financial institutions.
From Dec. 23, 2008, to Feb. 5, 2009, police said Frank LoCastro, in conjunction with his brother, niece and nephew, used fraudulent employment and income information to obtain 19 loans totaling $509,831 from institutions including PNC, Bank of America and Huntington Bank.
After paying the first several monthly installments, court records show Mr. LoCastro subsequently defaulted on all of the loans.
Several of the banks told police they have not been able to find the vehicles to repossess them.
Nicole and Joseph LoCastro each face two counts of corrupt organizations and two counts of criminal conspiracy.
In the past three years, Vincent LoCastro has faced hundreds of criminal charges in conjunction with his former business, the All Pro Auto Mall in Canonsburg.
In November 2010, he was convicted of 27 counts of falsifying odometers and engaging in unprofessional conduct, although 572 other charges were dropped. He received 12 months probation and paid $5,695 in fines.
A year ago, he was convicted in federal court for identity theft and check-kiting charges involving a scheme to fraudulently obtain car loans for luxury automobiles and was ordered to pay $545,872 in restitution and serve three years probation.
Janice Crompton: jcrompton@post-gazette.com or 412-851-1867
First Published May 11, 2012 12:00 am
Racketeering Charges Against Four in Car Financing Scheme
http://baldwin-whitehall.patch.com/articles/racketeering-charges-against-four-in-car-financing-scheme
Vincent LoCastro—site developer in Baldwin Township—and three family members are charged.
May 10, 2012
Racketeering and theft charges have been filed against Vincent LoCastro, the site developer who received approval from the Baldwin Township Board of Commissioners in January for EZ Auto Sales to open on McNeilly Road.
LoCastro is also the former owner and operator All Pro Auto Mall in Canonsburg Borough. Three of his family members were also charged.
The charges were announced on Thursday by Washington County District Attorney Gene Vittone and the Pennsylvania State Police Department.
LoCastro, 57, of 203 Spartan Dr. in Bethel Park, was charged with two counts of corrupt organizations, two counts of criminal conspiracy, 18 counts of theft by unlawful taking and 18 counts of defrauding secured creditors. If convicted on all charges, LoCastro could face up to 206 years in prison.
Also charged were:
Frank LoCastro of 151 Carol Dr. in Peters Township, brother of Vincent—two counts of corrupt organizations, two counts of criminal conspiracy, 32 counts of theft by unlawful taking, 32 counts of defrauding secured creditors and one count of unsworn falsification to authorities. If convicted on all charges, Frank could face up to 370 years in prison.
Nicole LoCastro of 203 Spartan Dr., daughter of Vincent—two counts of corrupt organizations and two counts of criminal conspiracy. If convicted on all charges, Nicole could face up to 80 years in prison.
Joseph Bruce LoCastro, of 203 Spartan Dr., son of Vincent—two counts of corrupt organizations and two counts of criminal conspiracy. If convicted on all charges, Joseph could face up to 80 years in prison.
The allegations set forth in Thursday's filing of criminal charges are based on documents filed before Magisterial District Judge David Mark.
Those documents allege that:
Between Dec. 23, 2008, and Feb. 5, 2009, Frank LoCastro purchased multiple vehicles and financed them through multiple financial institutions.
Frank LoCastro used fraudulent employment and income information to obtain the loans.
Frank LoCastro subsequently defaulted on all of the loans.
Examination of the records from each transaction show that 14 of the vehicle purchase transactions also involved Vincent LoCastro; 10 of the transactions involved Joseph LoCastro; and eight of the transactions involved Nicole LoCastro.
"Filing of criminal charges under Pennsylvania's Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act is a rare event due to the complex nature of these types of cases," Vittone said.
"The Pennsylvania State police investigation exposed the fraudulent car financing scheme by the Locastros conducted through All Pro Auto Mall in Canonsburg. Hundreds of hours of police work were invested in this case. For their dedication, I commend the diligent efforts of the state police in this investigation."
All criminal defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty.
No charges have been filed against any LoCastros related to any involvement with EZ Auto Sales. EZ Auto is approved in Baldwin Township to run a motor vehicle sales agency at 514 McNeilly Rd., but as of Wednesday, 514 McNeilly is vacant with only an "EZ AUTO SALES" banner hanging there.
EZ Auto does not own 514 McNeilly.
Family charged in car scheme
http://www.observer-reporter.com/or/break11/05-11-2012-locastros-charges
By Kathie O. Warco Staff writer kwarco@observer-reporter.com
5/11/2012 3:33 AM
The owner of a former Canonsburg used car dealership and three family members face racketeering and theft charges stemming from a car financing scheme.
Vincent LoCastro, 57, of 203 Spartan Drive, Bethel Park, who once owned All Pro Auto Mall, is charged with two counts each of corrupt organizations and conspiracy as well as 18 counts each of theft and defrauding creditors.
His brother, Frank LoCastro, 47, of 151 Carol Drive, McMurray, is charged with two counts each of corrupt organizations and conspiracy along with 32 counts each of theft and defrauding creditors. He also is charged with unsworn falsification.
Vincent LoCastro's son, Joseph Bruce LoCastro, 26, along with his 21-year-old wife, Nicole LoCastro, also of 203 Spartan, also were charged with two counts of corrupt organizations and conspiracy.
A trooper with the state police Bureau of Criminal Investigations filed the charges this week at the office of District Judge David Mark.
Frank LoCastro reportedly purchased 16 high-end vehicles from dealerships in Pennsylvania, Ohio, New Jersey and Maryland between Dec. 23, 2008, and Feb. 9, 2009. Thirteen different financial institutions were used to finance the purchases. Vehicles purchased included a Hummer, Porsche, Mercedes-Benz and Cadillac Escalade.
Vincent LoCastro, along with his son and daughter-in-law, reportedly were involved in the vehicle transactions. Specifically, Vincent LoCastro was involved in 14 transactions; Joseph LoCastro, 10; and Nicole LoCastro, eight.
Frank LoCastro reportedly gave false information on loan documents, identifying himself as vice president of LoCastro & Associates with an annual salary of $144,000. Frank LoCastro then defaulted on the loans.
Court documents indicate creditors lost more than $400,000 on the defaulted loans. Some of the vehicles were recovered, but others were not, investigators said.
"Filing of criminal charges under Pennsylvania's Racketeering Influence and corrupt Organizations Act is a rare event due to the complex nature of these type of cases," said Eugene Vittone, Washington County district attorney.
"Hundreds of hours of police work were invested in this case," added Vittone.
Vincent LoCastro is no stranger to Washington County courts. Last September, he pleaded guilty to charges in connection with a false insurance claim in November 2008. He was sentenced to 18 months of probation after pleading guilty to one count each of insurance fraud, theft and forgery. LoCastro also was fined $500.
In December 2010, LoCastro pleaded guilty to unlawful business practices at the dealership from 2007 to 2009.
Also in December 2010, LoCastro was indicted in federal court for allegedly using another person's personal information to obtain financing for nine luxury cars. He was charged with identity theft for allegedly using the name, date of birth and Social Security number of "a person known to the grand jury" to acquire loans that resulted in four banks losing thousands of dollars.
Last June, LoCastro pleaded guilty and was placed on probation for 3 years. He was ordered to pay restitution in the amount of $545,872.
All four LoCastros are expected to be arraigned before Mark on the charges later this month.
Racketeering Charges Against Four in Car Financing Scheme
http://baldwin-whitehall.patch.com/articles/racketeering-charges-against-four-in-car-financing-scheme
Vincent LoCastro—site developer in Baldwin Township—and three family members are charged.
May 10, 2012
Racketeering and theft charges have been filed against Vincent LoCastro, the site developer who received approval from the Baldwin Township Board of Commissioners in January for EZ Auto Sales to open on McNeilly Road.
LoCastro is also the former owner and operator All Pro Auto Mall in Canonsburg Borough. Three of his family members were also charged.
The charges were announced on Thursday by Washington County District Attorney Gene Vittone and the Pennsylvania State Police Department.
LoCastro, 57, of 203 Spartan Dr. in Bethel Park, was charged with two counts of corrupt organizations, two counts of criminal conspiracy, 18 counts of theft by unlawful taking and 18 counts of defrauding secured creditors. If convicted on all charges, LoCastro could face up to 206 years in prison.
Also charged were:
Frank LoCastro of 151 Carol Dr. in Peters Township, brother of Vincent—two counts of corrupt organizations, two counts of criminal conspiracy, 32 counts of theft by unlawful taking, 32 counts of defrauding secured creditors and one count of unsworn falsification to authorities. If convicted on all charges, Frank could face up to 370 years in prison.
Nicole LoCastro of 203 Spartan Dr., daughter of Vincent—two counts of corrupt organizations and two counts of criminal conspiracy. If convicted on all charges, Nicole could face up to 80 years in prison.
Joseph Bruce LoCastro, of 203 Spartan Dr., son of Vincent—two counts of corrupt organizations and two counts of criminal conspiracy. If convicted on all charges, Joseph could face up to 80 years in prison.
The allegations set forth in Thursday's filing of criminal charges are based on documents filed before Magisterial District Judge David Mark.
Those documents allege that:
Between Dec. 23, 2008, and Feb. 5, 2009, Frank LoCastro purchased multiple vehicles and financed them through multiple financial institutions.
Frank LoCastro used fraudulent employment and income information to obtain the loans.
Frank LoCastro subsequently defaulted on all of the loans.
Examination of the records from each transaction show that 14 of the vehicle purchase transactions also involved Vincent LoCastro; 10 of the transactions involved Joseph LoCastro; and eight of the transactions involved Nicole LoCastro.
"Filing of criminal charges under Pennsylvania's Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act is a rare event due to the complex nature of these types of cases," Vittone said.
"The Pennsylvania State police investigation exposed the fraudulent car financing scheme by the Locastros conducted through All Pro Auto Mall in Canonsburg. Hundreds of hours of police work were invested in this case. For their dedication, I commend the diligent efforts of the state police in this investigation."
All criminal defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty.
No charges have been filed against any LoCastros related to any involvement with EZ Auto Sales. EZ Auto is approved in Baldwin Township to run a motor vehicle sales agency at 514 McNeilly Rd., but as of Wednesday, 514 McNeilly is vacant with only an "EZ AUTO SALES" banner hanging there.
EZ Auto does not own 514 McNeilly.
---
Former car dealer LoCastro and family facing fraud charges
http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/local/neighborhoods-south/former-car-dealer-locastro-and-family-facing-fraud-charges-635447/
May 11, 2012 12:25 am
By Janice Crompton / Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
A former Bethel Park car dealer and three members of his family have been charged with obtaining fraudulent loans to buy cars.
Washington County officials on Thursday announced they had charged Vincent LoCastro, 48, of Bethel Park, with two counts of corrupt organizations, two counts of conspiracy, 18 counts of theft by unlawful taking, and 18 counts of defrauding secured creditors.
Also charged were his brother Frank LoCastro, 57, of Peters, and Vincent LoCastro's two children, Nicole, 21, and Joseph, 26, who live with their father.
Frank LoCastro is charged with 69 counts of theft and conspiracy, charges that state police and the Washington County district attorney's office say involved his buying vehicles and financing them through multiple financial institutions.
From Dec. 23, 2008, to Feb. 5, 2009, police said Frank LoCastro, in conjunction with his brother, niece and nephew, used fraudulent employment and income information to obtain 19 loans totaling $509,831 from institutions including PNC, Bank of America and Huntington Bank.
After paying the first several monthly installments, court records show Mr. LoCastro subsequently defaulted on all of the loans.
Several of the banks told police they have not been able to find the vehicles to repossess them.
Nicole and Joseph LoCastro each face two counts of corrupt organizations and two counts of criminal conspiracy.
In the past three years, Vincent LoCastro has faced hundreds of criminal charges in conjunction with his former business, the All Pro Auto Mall in Canonsburg.
In November 2010, he was convicted of 27 counts of falsifying odometers and engaging in unprofessional conduct, although 572 other charges were dropped. He received 12 months probation and paid $5,695 in fines.
A year ago, he was convicted in federal court for identity theft and check-kiting charges involving a scheme to fraudulently obtain car loans for luxury automobiles and was ordered to pay $545,872 in restitution and serve three years probation.
Janice Crompton: jcrompton@post-gazette.com or 412-851-1867
First Published May 11, 2012 12:00 am
Family charged in car scheme
http://www.observer-reporter.com/or/break11/05-11-2012-locastros-charges
By Kathie O. Warco Staff writer kwarco@observer-reporter.com
5/11/2012 3:33 AM
The owner of a former Canonsburg used car dealership and three family members face racketeering and theft charges stemming from a car financing scheme.
Vincent LoCastro, 57, of 203 Spartan Drive, Bethel Park, who once owned All Pro Auto Mall, is charged with two counts each of corrupt organizations and conspiracy as well as 18 counts each of theft and defrauding creditors.
His brother, Frank LoCastro, 47, of 151 Carol Drive, McMurray, is charged with two counts each of corrupt organizations and conspiracy along with 32 counts each of theft and defrauding creditors. He also is charged with unsworn falsification.
Vincent LoCastro's son, Joseph Bruce LoCastro, 26, along with his 21-year-old wife, Nicole LoCastro, also of 203 Spartan, also were charged with two counts of corrupt organizations and conspiracy.
A trooper with the state police Bureau of Criminal Investigations filed the charges this week at the office of District Judge David Mark.
Frank LoCastro reportedly purchased 16 high-end vehicles from dealerships in Pennsylvania, Ohio, New Jersey and Maryland between Dec. 23, 2008, and Feb. 9, 2009. Thirteen different financial institutions were used to finance the purchases. Vehicles purchased included a Hummer, Porsche, Mercedes-Benz and Cadillac Escalade.
Vincent LoCastro, along with his son and daughter-in-law, reportedly were involved in the vehicle transactions. Specifically, Vincent LoCastro was involved in 14 transactions; Joseph LoCastro, 10; and Nicole LoCastro, eight.
Frank LoCastro reportedly gave false information on loan documents, identifying himself as vice president of LoCastro & Associates with an annual salary of $144,000. Frank LoCastro then defaulted on the loans.
Court documents indicate creditors lost more than $400,000 on the defaulted loans. Some of the vehicles were recovered, but others were not, investigators said.
"Filing of criminal charges under Pennsylvania's Racketeering Influence and corrupt Organizations Act is a rare event due to the complex nature of these type of cases," said Eugene Vittone, Washington County district attorney.
"Hundreds of hours of police work were invested in this case," added Vittone.
Vincent LoCastro is no stranger to Washington County courts. Last September, he pleaded guilty to charges in connection with a false insurance claim in November 2008. He was sentenced to 18 months of probation after pleading guilty to one count each of insurance fraud, theft and forgery. LoCastro also was fined $500.
In December 2010, LoCastro pleaded guilty to unlawful business practices at the dealership from 2007 to 2009.
Also in December 2010, LoCastro was indicted in federal court for allegedly using another person's personal information to obtain financing for nine luxury cars. He was charged with identity theft for allegedly using the name, date of birth and Social Security number of "a person known to the grand jury" to acquire loans that resulted in four banks losing thousands of dollars.
Last June, LoCastro pleaded guilty and was placed on probation for 3 years. He was ordered to pay restitution in the amount of $545,872.
All four LoCastros are expected to be arraigned before Mark on the charges later this month.