Long shot, the 3 step IMO PLAN…

1.Don’t do anything!
2. Wait until all long term shareholders drop dead and shares are sold.
3. Make sales!

See new expiration dates on stock options.

And did I say IMO!

Now what about contracts!!!!!

A freaking ASHM WITHOUT CONTRACTS!!!
is like having no meeting at all.

Like sitting down for dinner and being served no dinner at all.

The hell with the CC’s the pitiful 10Q’s 10K’s and ridiculous ASHM’s !!!

!!????Where the hell are the contracts???!!!

Excellent post informing all.

What about those 10Q’s, the power upgrade, the terminated manufacturing staff, all of the terminated executives since 2016, the closing of OH to the opening of a rental, the 10K’s, the website, the decline in (share price, interest and trading volumes) liquidity, the ASHM, the touted manufacturing capacity, the stock option sales by insiders, the control of the company via China vis-à-vis LL, the contracts with the Swatch Group, Martin guitar pins, the partnerships with Materion and Engle and all of the other partners who have faded away, the promise of profitability and Nasdaq? What about those?

And what about all of those PR’s and updates and blog posts all were accustomed to?

And what about that self made Q&A CC earlier this year, everyone raved about (one way or the other)?

And what about The burning of over $30 million in cash over six years and the salaries exceeding revenues?

And those contracts? Yeah, what about those contracts! And no new ones of any size in over 16 months!

And all of those 100’s of prototypes and increased sales force worldwide?

Come to think of it, where the hell are they? Not the sales force. Those contracts?

And what about why people are still in it? Like FOMO & more FOMO & if’s and maybes and great finds and trickle down theories and charts and mazes and dots and dashes and potential and bullish positive points of views!!!

And you say what? “A total scam.”

How dare you even think of such a thing!
Do you have anything to back up such a claim.

Tic tic tic tic tic tic…..

Hmmm?

This year?….

https://liquidmetal.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Wearables_SmartWatchBezel-1024x254.png

Tic tic tic tic tic tic….

It has been going on for years. Any contracts yet? Any updates? Any progress? Any potential customers? Any probable customer?

With a share price of what it is now, the probability of one seems always to be resting somewhere in the prototype abyss of LQMT. Along with all of those other great finds of hopes dreams ifs maybes and expectations of the many uses of LQMT.

https://liquidmetal.com/salt-water-corrosion-testing/

Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
Wish all, we had a contract.
Don’t feel too bad...
It’s all water under the bridge now.

Another week passes and LQMT is up 1.8% from 0.0639 cents to 0.065 cents on extremely weak trading volumes and little interest. The same when LQMT moves up or down.

It has been 16 months since LQMT announced a new contract.

All of their recent financial statements 10K’s and 10Q’s back this up and are in direct contrast and at odds with any spin given by anyone outside of LQMT who believe LQMT is doing just fine and deals are imminent. History shows deals in LQMT are not imminent and any deal will happen when LQMT announces one.

Any share price under .25 cents tells me LQMT is not doing fine and anemic trading volumes are also telling me LQMT is not doing fine. Both have to increase at the same time.

The trend for LQMT is to continue to head lower as the fundamentals remain unchanged and reported revenues decline. There is no basis for the share price to trend higher unless one uses the hypothetical view of insider knowledge. Try to stay away from hypotheticals. They just don’t pan out well.

Manufacturing capacity is not what is preventing LQMT from inking a deal according to TC @ LQMT!!! Then what is? A question TC may have conveniently chosen not to answer or account for over the last three years.

Of course I disagree with his position about a backup supplier. But maybe he knows he has a deal in the works without one and that is purely speculation on my behalf.

Perhaps in 2024 or 2025 or 2026 LQMT might succeed and if they ever do make it in 2023, I’ll be very thankful and glad that they did.

IMO, the share price be it a nickel or a dollar means dukas with volume under 2 1/2% of the float.

Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.

FOMO LIVES! It is real. It is not speculative or hype. It is pure emotion. It probably is the real reason over any other for why anyone holds regardless of their positive, negative or realistic views.

Be it in auto medical industrial or non CE etc., a significant contract in any endeavor will rocket up the share price. Take the blinders off. It does not have to be CE, but I don’t think anyone would complain if it is or it is not. What the heck, can someone make a Liquid Metal pin ball machine or a Liquid Metal hammer head surface?

There is nothing wrong with expecting skies are the limit or beyond. It just might take more time to get there. Time that many long terms don’t have any more.

There exists a forum a venue right now to put forth issues that require a vote in which all already know what the outcome will be. The Q&A in this case is not black and white. The location not very inviting and the timeframe not exactly ideal. I’m quite sure a share holder can ask whatever they want. I’m also sure the answers will only be rhetorical in nature and forward worded at best regarding the future.

16 months without a contract answers a lot of questions. The risk factors answers a lot of questions. We all can see the difficulties in CE use. But zero mention of the other endeavors. Does it take a sales force of 21 to make a mega deal? No! It takes only one.

Contracts of any size is what all want. For many many years now we all know something is very wrong when LQMT can only secure small insignificant contracts with a number of customers you can count on one hand.

Obviously the issues of resistance are far more serious than is known or that LQMT desires to discuss with shareholders.

Or LQMT is just plainly inept. I say this in lieu of the purported success abroad for a few years now.

I do believe it is inevitable that LQMT will receive $$$. But looking at their formula for receiving revenues if no direct contract is inked, does not make for an avalanche of $$$.

Given the last CC with TC, IMHO and not to influence anyone it would not be worth the trip nor adding the $$$ for that trip into LQMT Shares. But if you live nearby the HQ’s of LQMT, by all means let them know you will attend.

By the way, great post.

Ok time for some real positive news.

Or should I say real positive facts.

LQMT is currently trading 50% above its enterprise value! And that’s a fact.

Not saying I’m happy with where it is per share price. But facts are facts.

Speaking of facts LQMT’s share price vs the enterprise value looked a hell of a lot better when I was driving forward looking in the rear view mirror. Can someone stop this car?

Speaking of cars and great finds. Elon Musk is going to build a brand new factory in North America with a new car line to open up next year. Now that should start a whole new flurry of trickle down great finds using the what if door latch door hinge uses LQMT’s amorphous metal.

I can see one angle like this: Elon can recoup any investment loss in another company by adding LQMT shares to his portfolio now. Anyone see if Elon owns 405+ million shares? Now that truly would be a great find. And he could do it for a little over one third the price for what LL paid. A $26 million dollar investment from EM would rocket the world of dice rollers and other high rollers interest way above fair value.
Another great find.

Or let’s forget about all of the above great find BS and wait for that big mega deal announcement from LQMT.

Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.

I just don’t get it. The company wants to do a ASHM and there’s a lot of upset dice rollers?
When there are no ASHM’s dice rollers are also upset.

Could it be there will be no transparency?
Could it be because there will be no Q&A?
Could it be where & when it is being held?

I think a charter flight of 100 dice rollers sounds like a plan. But did you read the fine print on who gets to decide what issues are to be discussed? No? Well it could be the one with the biggest block of shares.

This ASHM and I could be wrong because I usually am is a formality to fulfill a legal responsibility. Regarding extending for executives tenure for another period of time and perhaps stock options etc.

Those in favor? Aye Aye Aye Aye. There are no Nays. The Ayes have it! There you have it. A ASHM LL style. I love it.

As always my opinions are worth less than the price of a LQMT share. :)

As usual very little time is given to DD. But much time is given to much useless blather.

A foreign manufacturer of watches and other products have been incorporating the LQMT IP into their products for over five years now.

The foreign manufacturers’s watch and other products have been sold in Europe. See the Eontec/LQMT agreements which define the footprints of both companies.

Now most of the blather about this over the years have been posted on many of the www sites and all logically concluded that LQMT would receive avalanches of $$$ to trickle down and into the coffers of LQMT’s bottom line.

Has anyone seen the avalanche???

Maybe one day. But so far zilch nada dukas.

Less blathering and more DD might help.

Am I disappointed in LQMT’s performances? Not that anyone asked. Yes and no more than anyone else. Even the realistic bullish of bulls have expressed their disappointments.

But none of the disappointments should discourage anyone from DD on LQMT if they are still invested IMO.

Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
And if you don’t think TC doesn’t need well wishes. You might not be reading the 10Q’s lately or you are happy with the SP trading under a dollar and a ASHM in a office at 9am.

Here it is…..

https://liquidmetal.gcs-web.com/node/11941/html

If you want a play by play I will list it to find it.

Good luck to you.

You see those voting shares (2&6) see filing link from my previous post. Now anyone with an ounce of…….knows who is calling the shots and if anyone still has an issue with that, man o man do they need help and prayers too.

Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
Either they expanded the office or they don’t expect to many overnight flight guests. 9am?

Link…here…

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1141240/000143774923014798/lqmt20230512_def14a.htm

Beats the crap out of me why investors still are trying to smell (China’s) crap instead of their own (LQMT crap).

How about why can’t LQMT sell one part to one new customer in the biggest market place in the world!!! The USA!!! In 16 months???

How about all who are bullish emailing LQMT and posting their response.

Now that would be a whole bunch of great finds! Focusing on LQMT. :)

Good luck to all in LQMT
Wish TC luck.

Not what are. What were? The LQMT IP has been used by this company for over five years. The products of this company have been restricted from the USA.

Were the USA restrictions lifted? I don’t think so.

Are USA companies permitted to earn revenue from parts sold in its footprint in Europe? If so, I saw no revenues reflected in LQMT’s bottom line from abroad as these products have been sold in parts of LQMT’s footprint abroad.

No $$$ has been reflected yet in LQMT’s bottom line. No lawsuits have been filed.

LL’s job title is to oversee the CEO’s fiduciary responsibilities along with the other executives.

What are the ramifications? Simple if LQMT cannot collect a penny from any of these part sales. The ramifications are the same as LQMT failing to sign a deal with any company here in the USA that might use LQMT’s amorphous metal! The revenues decrease and the investment dice roll remains a failure until LQMT increases revenues or increases potentials to earn revenues. They do not increase when hype or speculation thinks so.

The ramifications are simple and were simple. The fundamentals never changed and the price dropped from 0.44 to where it is today around 0.06 cents!

As always I could be wrong and usually I am. Could be the reason why trading volumes have declined significantly are due to the fact that most who wanted to average down, have done so.

Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.

We need it!

Yes, it would have been nice in hindsight had we all sold even at TC’s stock options SP in 2017. We then would all have had the opportunity to buy back in at .06 .07 .08 etc.

Who knew?

Good luck to you.

Why don’t they discuss the reasons for failures more openly so that all outsiders can have a better understanding to make suggestions to help turn the next potential clients into successful ones.

From what I can make out of all of their commentary and hundreds of pipeline prototype dreams they have touted is that they never ever want to have that honest conversation with outside investors in the first place. They seem to be always hiding something. Or as you eloquently put it in other words Maybe they have nothing to hide because they are doing nothing.

It’s just a thought and not a conclusion. But what the hell have they done to dispute it? As far as I can see, nothing! Not even is there any live public dialogue between shareholders and the company.

Can anyone positive or bullish, negative or bearish, bashers or sycophants, pumpers or dumpers, tell me and document, when was the last time LQMT had a public forum between outside shareholders and the company, where back and forth dialogue took place?

Tic tic tic tic tic tic.

Good luck to you.

So with all of the many new products out there that can potentially use amorphous metal parts the bottom line is and without any disrespect is that you are still not sure.

And who the hell can blame you? After two decades of the same nonsense from LQMT failing to perform.

One thing is for sure. It’s not the investors who are falling at guessing success for LQMT. It’s LQMT who are falling all, who are guessing for LQMT’s success.

!!!It is LQMT who are failing at success!!!

Another week passes and LQMT is up 3.1% from 0.062 cents to 0.0639 cents on extremely weak trading volumes and little interest. The same when LQMT moves up or down.

It has been 16 months since a new contract.

All of their recent financial statements 10K’s and 10Q’s back this up and are in direct contrast and at odds with any spin given by anyone outside of LQMT who believe LQMT is doing just fine and deals are imminent.

Any share price under .25 cents tells me LQMT is not doing fine and anemic trading volumes are also telling me LQMT is not doing fine. Both have to increase at the same time.

The trend for LQMT is to continue to head lower. This fact has been proven all the while LQMT had $64.5 million $55 million $45 million or $35 million in assets and makes no difference how many shares an insider owned during the same time frame of seven years. (See LQMT’s filed statements for the same time frame if anyone needs proof.)

New real interest in LQMT has dissipated from new outsiders. (See trading volumes.)

Manufacturing capacity is not what is preventing LQMT from inking a deal according to TC @ LQMT!!!

Of course I disagree with his position about a backup supplier. But maybe he knows he has a deal in the works without one and that is purely speculation on my behalf. And if he doesn’t have a deal in the works without a backup manufacturer then someone is definitely pulling his strings also as I noted in a recent post.

Li’s consortium of companies abroad are claiming to be doing deals and contracts with whales.

The logic for many to hang on is if Li, can do it abroad what prevents him from doing it in the USA? Or what prevents TC from doing what his mentor has been doing abroad?

For others it is (fear of missing out) FOMO.

Even the most ardent upbeat enthusiasts are grasping at straws as research for information has turned into continuous guesses and less actual DD on LQMT.

The use of LQMT IP BY CHINA IN THE PAST HAS BEEN RESTRICTED TO CHINA’s FOOTPRINT.

There is some proof on the www that LQMT’s IP USE IN PARTS HAVE TRICKLED INTO LQMT’s FOOTPRINT.
So far it means absolute dukas!!! (Read LQMT’s filed statements for proof.)

The LQMT website has a ton of information and is constantly being updated. I have posted some of what was known to me but not all of what is there with the purpose of getting all invested in LQMT to focus on LQMT and not to speculate. There is a trail of real (….&- - - -.)

THERE ARE ALSO CUES ON THESE PAGES AS TO WHY LQMT DOES NOT NEED A NDA FOR EVERY CONSUMER PART ENDEAVOR AND WHY THEY DO NOT HAVE TO UPDATE SHAREHOLDERS AS TO ANY PROGRESS. (Which I posted recently.)

HINT: Anyone see a lawsuit against the Apple headset?

All of the parts where LQMT uses forward worded language need no updates nor is LQMT indicating a potential sale, negotiation or progress towards any. Rather LQMT is displaying the capabilities and if interested a deal can ensue or one might be in the works or can be if one interested party is interested.

So that all might understand the last statement above, you have to do a little DD of the 10Q’s which were pointed out in a recent post.

What one outside of LQMT derives from this is speculation and anything else one wants to see and LQMT is in no way responsible for the spin that results from one’s imagination.

In other words sometimes LOGIC and FOMO are too embarrassing for many to hang on. So inventing and conjuring up other angles based on (so called great finds) good intentions becomes the reasons for hanging on. They don’t increase interest in LQMT or the bottom line. But they do seem more soothing for hanging on. Many in the last category cannot comprehend those who hang on for the first two reasons. Thus they tend to focus less on LQMT and more on things that have nothing to do with LQMT, as if in the know. This too, has been going on for more years then I want to know.

Perhaps in 2024 or 2025 or 2026 LQMT might succeed and if they ever do make it in 2023, I’ll be very thankful and glad that they did.

Again, IMO, the share price be it a nickel or a dollar means dukas with volume under 2 1/2% of the float.

Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.

FOMO LIVES! It is real. It is not speculative or hype. It is pure emotion. It probably is the real reason over any other for why anyone holds regardless of their positive, negative or realistic views.

Be it in auto medical industrial or non CE etc., a significant contract in any endeavor will rocket up the share price. Take the blinders off. It does not have to be CE, but I don’t think anyone would complain if it is.

There is nothing wrong with expecting skies are the limit or beyond. It just might take more time to get there. Time that many long terms don’t have any more.

Most LQMT investors too who only bank on LQMT.

Now, normally one would look at the charts after a dismal or should I say a disastrous 10Q and say; Wow! LQMT looks like it’s ready to breakout and bust out. The only problem with it is the daily trading volumes are still horrific, pitiful and anemic. Meaning the liquidity still (pardon my French)sucks. The liquidity tells anyone interested stay away unless you too want to roll the dice, where for the past two decades the payouts would violate the casino rules in Las Vegas.

The only reason IMHO, right now to throw a nickel or a dime at LQMT would be for FOMO.

There might be two other reasons for doing so. Either as an act of Christianity or as an act of temporary insanity. :)

As always my opinions are worth less than the price of a LQMT share.

Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.

That is not true. Read the agreements again.
They have nothing to do with LQMT’s operations as far as inking contracts or how LQMT chooses to attract revenues up or down. But they do have the capability within the agreements to make it easier for LQMT to facilitate one and may have already done so.

They also must share through the CIP agreements in perpetuity or until the agreements are terminated.

Now, I could be wrong and I always am. But I don’t recall reading any specific terms regarding terminating or a time frame for terminating of the perpetual agreements.

Reread one of my recent posts and they (LQMT ) are under no obligation to state it.

It may be disrespectful in the way LL HAS MUZZLED AND TERMINATED FORMER EMPLOYEES FROM DISSEMINATING INFORMATION TO ALL OUTSIDERS. But that is just the way it is unless they are violating S.E.C. regulations.

The word help in this case is not narrow it is very broad. But if you look at it within a very narrow range, then you are correct.

Come on now. A true believer in chairman Li, who receives emails from chairman Li, never ever doubts the success of LQMT and never ever would express doubt of LQMT’s success and a true believer who receives emails from both LL & TC never ever let’s their e-mail buddies down at LQMT.

So far from reading all of the posts I have not found a true believer who has communicated or communicates with either one by email. :)

How about when one purports to be doing everything and puts out a10Q like they did it’s even more of a reason to keep it a secret. :)

At least if they said as you say they did nothing it is easy to see the bottom line results. But it’s more disgraceful when they show nothing while stating all of their efforts to do something.

Is there no shame in collecting salaries much larger than a 10Q?

NDA’s should not take this long to disclose all of the failures. In fact all of the failures are already known.

15 months and zero insignificant contracts! You don’t need an nda to sell insignificant contracts! You need to wake up every morning and go to work!! Or hand in a letter of resignation!!!

LL SURE KNOWS HOW TO PUT ON A FANTASTIC MARIONETTE SHOW

https://www.marionettes.cz/en/detail/326-pinocchio-handcarved-marionette

Good luck to you.

I have posted this page before and I believe at the time all were caught by surprise at the message and part’s pictures.

https://liquidmetal.com/consumer-electronics/

What I did not post was why LQMT has this on their website at all. Reason being is I don’t like to speculate as I did when I began to invest in LQMT. Like most others who speculate it sets you up for more disappointment period.

That said, from reading the 2010 agreements and subsequent additions and their terms for confidentiality I can only speculate, LQMT requested and was granted a waiver regarding using the term consumer electronics and a limited use. Or whatever parts they want to prototype and hopefully sell do not violate the agreements.

In previous statements by former executive BB, LQMT did state they were researching for a part or parts that don’t violate the law regarding (CE) consumer electronics. He (LQMT) would not state that at that time (a couple of years ago) if the 2010 and subsequent amendments were not in perpetuity.

Sometimes we only see what we only want to see or our vision for other obvious points of views are obstructed by the elephant in the room.

We do know one of the parties to the agreements is like an elephant and we do know the other is like a nat trapped in the eye of that elephant.

We also know that there are no active lawsuits against LQMT.

Again, I detest speculation. But let’s face it LQMT is often referred to as a roll of the dice, a crapshoot. So if what my thoughts are on this subject is considered speculative. So be it. But I do so in a positive way and not in a way that I expect a windfall soon. Just the possibility of it however remote based on historical and present day data released from LQMT.

Good luck to all in LQMT.
I wish TC luck.
Unfortunately for outsiders myself included, TC doesn’t seem to be a very good crapshooter.
Perhaps for all, his luck will change.
From current data flowing in it doesn’t seem like it is the material or the manufacturing capacity holding back a successful dice roll.

From the looks of all of the rebuttals, I would say you are correct in your points of view.

I forgot who said this but it goes something like this: Dumb people do not learn from their mistakes. Smart people learn from their mistakes and Geniuses learn from the mistakes of others.

I don’t try to place anyone in any of those categories for anyone who invested in LQMT IMO, has so far made a mistake whether they are up or down in LQMT or whether anyone is in it for 20 years or 1 year.

I do believe in why all are still in it and that end result will either place everyone in the first category or the last. :)

Eagle nailed it; FOMO.

It was great reading your post. It was the most purest glass of clean drinking water posted in a long time. It may not be easy for everyone to digest. But to me it was honest.

Good luck to you.

What LQMT is saying In essence and in my opinion regarding their last filled statement and since China vis-à-vis Eontec vis-à-vis LL has been telling outsiders, is this….

Where does one begin to argue against your position, after comparing what has been said during the cc’s vs what has been stated in the 10Q’s and 10K’s.

To attempt to do so would probably tarnish one’s own credibility.

Good luck to you.

Why its not LQMT…

https://www.medtronic.com/us-en/healthcare-professionals/products/spinal-orthopaedic/cervical-arthroplasty/prestige-lp.html

In trying to research LQMT & medical. Often (100%) you come across why it is not LQMT.

Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
If you don’t know why? Read the last 10Q again for the first time.

Another week passes and LQMT is down 6% from 0.066 cents to 0.062 cents on extremely weak trading volumes and little interest. The same when LQMT moves up or down.

The trend for LQMT is to continue to head lower as it has been doing for six years now. This downward trend is factually backed up with the daily anemic outside interest, anemic daily trading volumes insignificant contracts, a loss of two major customers and operating costs exceeding incoming revenues from all sources continually. ( see accumulated debt annually.)

The dice roll therefore still rests on individual expectations, hopes, theories and for the most part FOMO as real interest in LQMT has dissipated from new outsiders.

To put it more plainly, manufacturing capacity is not what is preventing LQMT from inking a deal according to LQMT!!!

Li’s consortium of companies abroad are claiming to be doing deals and contracts with whales not just gold fish companies like LQMT!!! And if li can do it abroad what prevents him from doing it in the USA? The CCP? Or Nothing? Or something else? Or what prevents TC from doing what his mentor has been doing abroad? Or maybe he is doing something. We don’t exactly know. The pictures tells a story of prototypes worth many many millions. The 10Q’s and 10K’s do not!

Even the most ardent upbeat enthusiasts are grasping at straws as research for information has turned into continuous guesses and less actual DD on LQMT.

The LQMT website has a ton of information and is constantly being updated. I have posted some of what was known to me but not all of what is there with the purpose of getting all invested in LQMT to focus on LQMT and not to speculate. There is a trail of real (….&- - - -). All anyone can do is hope they connect with the bottom line one day soon. One day soon before all drop dead!

Could be a major reason why very few new dice rollers are placing bets at the LQMT table. They would rather increase the winning odds by paying a higher share price on a sure thing.

Perhaps in 2024 or 2025 or 2026 LQMT might succeed and if they ever do make it in 2023, I’ll be very thankful and glad that they did.

Again, IMO, the share price be it a nickel or a dollar means dukas with volume under 2 1/2% of the float.

Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.

FOMO LIVES! It is real. It is not speculative or hype. It is pure emotion. It probably is the real reason over any other for why anyone holds regardless of their positive, negative or realistic views. If you don’t believe FOMO lives. Just take a walk around the www and see the ever increasing grasping at straws info vs the actual decrease in DD and actual research in all aspects of LQMT’s endeavors. Be it in auto medical industrial or non CE etc., a significant contract in any endeavor will rocket up the share price. Take the blinders off

In lieu of this week’s LQMT 10Q release, This weeks post except for the share price change is identical to last week’s post and is fitting. The bottom line outcome only surprises those expecting much from so little. Mind you I know it is extremely difficult to deal in reality when it comes to LQMT.
It has not been easy for me to stay on point week after week regarding the reality of what LQMT reports vs what may be expected.

There is nothing wrong with expecting skies are the limit or beyond. It just might take a little more time to get there. Time that many long terms don’t have any more.

It’s not DD. What you say, what you want and what you desire and what every outside shareholder deserves from LQMT executives are very reasonable and sound answers and expectations.

But in reality those logical and realistic points of view you point out just does not sit well with LQMT’s DD on disseminating information or updates unless they are required by law.

In other words It’s not DD.

Don’t misunderstand what I am saying. As many do. I am in total agreement with all of your points of view. It’s just that the executives of LQMT are legally not!

And there In lies the disconnect and discontent between LQMT and outside shareholders who believe in the expectations of the words; “being reasonable. “

But, unfortunately it’s not DD.

For starters read page 2 & 18 of the 10Q of LQMT.

Never give up those values and views. Just keep in mind of the reality of what you are dealing with when investing in LQMT. It often sucks and it often is reality and I know you know it and that is what is called doing your DD. Hopes dreams expectations and compassion are all very nice. But again, unfortunately right now it just doesn’t fit the narrative of LQMT and their relationship with outside shareholders.

As always my opinions are worth less than the price of a LQMT share.

Good luck to you.

LQMT Sales…

Annually:

12-2022 $383 thousand
12-2021 $811 thousand
12-2020 $989 thousand
12-2019 $1,373 one million.373 thousand

Not exactly headed in the right direction are they?

And even if the numbers were reversed they still wouldn’t be enough to increase shareholder value.

The answer will always be…

Where are the contracts for profitability?

No guessing no what ifs no maybes.

Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.

About those watches…

“In March 2009, we entered into a license agreement with Swatch Group, Ltd. (“Swatch”) under which Swatch was granted a non-exclusive license to our technology to produce and market watches and certain other luxury products. In March 2011, this license agreement was amended to grant Swatch exclusive rights as to watches as against all third parties (including us), but non-exclusive as to Apple. We will receive royalty payments over the life of the contract on all Liquidmetal products produced and sold by Swatch. The license agreement with Swatch will expire on the expiration date of the last licensed patent.”

Source LQMT 10K.

https://www.upcounsel.com/an-exclusive-contract#:~:text=An%20exclusive%20contract%20is%20between%20at%20least%20two,provide%20new%20opportunities%20and%20bring%20in%20additional%20revenue.


https://juro.com/learn/exclusivity-meaning-exclusive-contract

So the more complicated questions might be this since Liquidmetal parts have possibly trickled onto LQMT’s footprint…

Is LQMT circumventing any exclusive agreements between LQMT and The Swatch Group, by collecting revenues from a competitor who contracted with a manufacturer in China and may have an agreement to pay LQMT X amount of $$$ per part? Is yihao obligated at all to pay out?

I don’t see any agreements to that are in effect between yihao and LQMT regarding Eontec and LQMT.

So did li vis-à-vis China circumvent the agreements to avoid sharing any $$$ sales where parts are sold outside of China’s footprint?

I can go on and on with the hypothetical questions. So far the only answers are is that LQMT has received squat.

And no lawsuits have been issued. So either we assume no laws are broken. Laws are broken. LQMT is in cahoots and on and on , which gets us nowhere but distracted from the fact that it has been well over a year since LQMT has announced any deal or 8K to increase shareholder value.

The hypotheticals and the hype mean bullshit until the bullshit increases the share price!

Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.

Yep, as far as I can remember, when imagining revenues with LQMT there is always a big fricken “IF”. Always a gray area. Never does one want to deal with the black and white facts of the past or present. The future has always been about moving the goalposts to fit one’s positive position.

Dealing with the present facts and 0.06 cent share price never fits that narrative, when imagining LQMT’s future. It’s been this way for over a decade. Perhaps more.

For sure the future can’t be based on LQMT’s actual results. No one dare reference those numbers. It has to be based on ifs maybes and other schemes.

As I recall this was the question: “Are those LQMT USA agreements with The Swatch Group still exclusive? ”

Are those LQMT USA agreements with The Swatch Group still exclusive?

Time to do some DD.

Since no one else said it. Of course if they have a plan to ink contracts and make use of their trademark then it can go above two dollars a share and at that point and only at that point reverse split to reduce the ridiculous amount of outstanding shares or initiate a plan to buy back 25% of those shares. Nothing like seeing confidence from insiders to drive more interest in the company. At that point skies the limit for the share price.

Anyone see a business plan? Hmmm?

Why do I ask? Hype, NDA’s and the bottom lines of 10Q expectations just don’t cut it anymore. Neither are fees of 6% with a burn rate of 5% and growing.

Oh well, let’s hope one of those 21 darts they hired hits a significant target and it sticks.

They slowed down the hemorrhaging at the expense of revenues. (Study income statements before the OH and after the OH in LF CA..)

China then from what I see, proved companies are interested in the materials, terminated executives at LQMT during the entire process and excluded LQMT USA from those revenues by restricting sales to their footprint. But now the cat is out of the bag and all here are expecting the same to happen. The big problem with this is the supplier. Whales need guarantees and LQMT cannot give them that under the current plan of infrastructure. When a planted ceo tells you the company doesn’t need domestic capabilities to ink a whale. The ceo is either lying or has a deal or his strings are being pulled. And don’t blame TC. Who the heck would turn down a quarter of a million just to have a title and not worry about anything else?

It’s why very few give a rats about the upcoming 10Q. Remember not too long ago, when there was a lot of excitement and enthusiasm before one of those? The share price would pop on the hype and there would be real interest and high hopes and expectations!!! The volumes would increase not decrease. The share price would increase not decrease. Imagine now, many will think it’s great when they see the pps go from the nickels to eight cents. How pathetic.
It should be going past a dollar not a dime every time LQMT inks a deal. The contracts should be significant and not insignificant.

My opinions are always worth less than the price of a LQMT share.

And even though the share price can drop to 0.01 cents a share, IMO BASED ON ITS ASSETS CURRENTLY ITS WORTH AT LEAST 0.03 cents a share.

As always my opinions are always worth less than the price of a share of LQMT.