Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Thanks I’ll have to look for that, I was sure I read 75% in that link, but that might have been for something else.
And I answered my own question regarding Jason Robert Nunn.
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10652955
Looks like Jason and NioCorp have the same address and so does this company below
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09842747
Jim Sims answered my Email question promptly again
See questions and answers below.
************
Good day Jim
Finding out about NioCorp Technologies through the Scandium Symposium presentation was a bit of a shocker to me as I would have thought that would be material news and worthy of a News/Press Release.
Questions
Is there going to be an official press release about this event or would you like to give me the background on this UK company?
*******
Is NioCorp Technologies Limited a wholly owned subsidiary of NioCorp Developments Limited
Who are the directors and / or senior management / board of directors?
Is there an official Company address in the UK or a business mailing address?
I would like to hear as much information as possible. Or if you can direct me to a link where I can read it for myself.
****
Jim’s Answer
The formation of our UK subsidiary is not a material event. We will be issuing announcements about this initiative as developments and commercial business considerations dictate. You can see publicly available information here: https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15225336
******
Looks to me it is 75% ownership for NioCorp with Scott Honan and Jason Robert Nunn as directors, and the link says everything I asked Jim
Is there anyone on this board who knows who Jason Robert Nunn is?
Thanks Jim
Either help me with the answers I seek or shut your pie hole.
I’d like you a whole lot better if it was the latter.
FYI
I WANT TO KNOW THAT,
NioCorp Developments Limited is the sole owner of NioCorp Technologies Limited.
Is that a problem?
Weird. I searched UK registries name checker.
Either the info is wrong or it was registered today
********
NIOCORP TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
15225336 - Incorporated on 20 October 2023
Private limited company
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company-name-availability?q=NioCorp+Technologies+Ltd.
************
I don’t know about anybody else on here, but I sure would like to hear from the company NioCorp developments limited as to who owns NioCorp technologies Limited, a private company in the UK
I would also like to know who are the directors and upper management
May I ask what question you asked? Or how you asked the question?
I ask, because it doesn’t mention any other subsidiaries
Has anybody tried to research the new company NioCorp Technologies Ltd? I would like to see it listed as a subsidiary of NioCorp developments
I haven’t been able to locate that as of yet
Perhaps NioCorp Technologies can finance NioCorp Developments. eom
Dare I say?
For fear of the always wrong label. LoL
triangle candlestick pattern
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/technical/03/091003.asp
https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=NB.TO
********
If there’s a good thing about HC Wainwright dropping our target price to $12 from $13, it would be that every time they raised the target price before, our share price would drop immediately.
So one might surmise that the Target price dropping should ensure we get a breakout to the upside.
Thanks for pointing that out Walter
The question I have is why wouldn’t we be told in a news release when a new company is being formed under the name NioCorp?
Is it not material news? Is it not something that investors should know, Without stumbling over it like you did?
Did you know HC Wainwright cut our target price from $13-$12?
And I’m sure the answer I will get,
if I get one, will be
**What part of as soon as possible in 2023 don’t you understand Putz?**
Considering the answer he gave me yesterday,
“ when the work gets done“
And as Mark stated in HC Wainwright video
We are working hard on the titanium offtake agreement as we speak, and we hope to have something on that in the very near future.
https://www.factmr.com/report/4641/titanium-dioxide-market?utm_source=adwords&utm_medium=ppc&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIhNin4ZKCggMV5Ap9Ch04qANFEAAYASAAEgKduPD_BwE
And how many time have you bought and sold shares in 2023?
What do I call the answer?
Truth or Transparency
***************
Or none of the above.
LoL. Yep eom
It just depends on what you consider “the results”
Imo we were given appetizer / Pacifier results, but not the main course
“When the work gets done”
My apologies for the misquote.
I asked Jim if he could give us a timeline for the work that he stated needs to be done now that the alloy has been poured yesterday, his only timeline was “when the word gets done”.
I also asked about the scandium metal purity that was used to make the alloy, and he said they are working on the chemical composition now and they will know when that work is completed
So we wait.
Admittedly, I’m a bit confused, I would have thought they would know and would use a specific purity of Scandium metal that goes into pouring the SC Mstr alloy but obviously I’m wrong.
Which came first the chicken or the egg.
But Kudos to him for the quick response.
X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy, or XRF, is a method of PMI that uses low-energy X-rays to scan the chemical composition of alloys. A handheld instrument is used and can determine the composition of the alloy within seconds.
You’re like a gardener who plants beautiful roses just to pull the thorns off of the stems to watch it wilt.
How about letting Mark Smith have his day in the garden?
It’s a sunny day Stop and smell the roses.
One of my favourite movies of all-time.
Nice touch for the day of the Scandium Symposium.
NioCorp Produces Ingot of Aluminum-Scandium Metal Alloy Using Environmentally Superior Process
You are misrepresenting what Jim said, in his response to NCT
And we’ve already got millions of dollars from Yorkville
The commercial scale plants results are done but that doesn’t mean the extra work and effort and engineering is done to complete the FS
Jim Sims stated in previous communications that the FS should be completed “as early as possible in 2023”
********
Thanks for sharing NCT
Is that a vote of confidence, or a rub the wrong way? hahaha
Even Putz can connect the dots...
I’m going nuts trying to figure this BDO RESIGNATION out,
but I wouldn’t put it past this to be happening per the link below.
I can’t remember what SEC filing it was that I saw but it was approved by both BDO and Marcum.
https://www.goingconcern.com/rumor-has-it-somethings-going-down-at-marcum/amp/
Does anyone think BDO may have stepped away as accountant firm so they could partake in equity deals ? Or could they have got involved anyways?
I don’t see why they would not tape it.
They put out a news release about it like it’s a big deal and we are Sponsors, so there should be some sort of feedback.
JMO
But we are imminent,
For
Niobium, for Batteries, and Infrastructure.
Scandium Master Alloy (everybody wants it)
Titanium Metal, via Ticl4 (Dark Horse)
REE for Magnets (and whatever)
Calcium (pick something)
Magnesium for Titanium Reduction Process, and for sale.
The dimensions of the reactor make it possible to study the process of reduction of titanium from titanium tetrachloride with Mg
To be fair to myself, I was using a valuation Mark chose to put on the HCW presentation.
Even if I cut that valuation by 1/3 considering the loss of titanium in any reduction process. TICL4 tickles my fancy when I do my math. I can’t help it if my calculation ends with
astronomical valuations
So Mark is speaking first thing.
So then, what is the value 4,221,000 tonnes, Mark has in the chart @ 5:55 in HC W. presentation?
Would like to know what you were thinking was the reason, if you would like to share.
It looks like it is a Requirement.
I like this Rule!
Read this link.
https://www.complianceweek.com/accounting-and-auditing/why-companies-replace-their-external-auditors/26741.article
The fact that public companies must rotate engagement partners every five years, as mandated by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, sometimes plays a role in the decision-making process. “If a company knows the five-year rotation period is coming up, they’ll look to see what the other firms have to offer,” says Trent Gazzaway, Grant Thornton’s national managing partner of quality and innovation for audit services.
So if this is the Price China gives our specific Dark Horse, Titanium, Ticl(4)
$10-15/kg per this link 99.9%
https://quanjinci.en.made-in-china.com/product/jdBfGxgTfOkZ/China-Factory-Supply-High-Quality-Ticl4-99-9-Titaniumtetrachloride-CAS-7550-45-0-with-Good-Price-and-High-Quality-Research-Chemical.html
And in LOM we have 4,221,000(Tonnes),000/kg as per Mark's Chart @ 5:55 mark.
ruth and Trans. I believe Mark was told to cash out!
Cashflow neutral, so to speak. no outstanding debt loans allowed.
But that's just my opinion
PS
ge11 thinks Duke likes me, and in that regard, I think you like Dick.
I like the clause below, but imo, what's bad for the goose, isn't necessarily bad for the gander.
But it's fair.
Force Majeure Clause
Although the Offtake Agreement is a tightly drafted, legally binding contract, it does require both parties to the agreement to make some very big promises extending many years into the future. It is certainly within the realm of possibility that during the term of the agreement something will happen that materially affects the ability to perform under the contract that is beyond the control of either party.
To account for events that cannot be counted on, most Offtake Agreements contain a force majeure clause which allows either party to modify or cancel the Offtake Agreement if something happens that puts undue hardship on either party which is beyond anyone’s control. Force majeure protects against catastrophic harm from things such as acts of God, fires, floods or natural disasters.
What you always wanted to know about offtake agreements, but we’re afraid to ask, because you think you know it all.
https://globaltradefunding.com/project-finance/project-finance-documents/offtake-agreements/#:~:text=Offtake%20Agreements%20provide%20fixed%20or,in%20the%20financing%20approval%20process.
If I remember correctly, we did not have a feasibility study for any of our previous long term offtakes. Just a PEA
We should be expecting off takes for titanium soon (“in the near future”), as Mark mentioned @ 7:45 in the HC Wainwright presentation.
Define near future??? LoL
That is a 2014 article and Mark was already with NioCorp
Mark Smith left Molycorp at the end of 2012 (Dec)
********
https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/why-molycorp-mcp-stock-gaining-203800840.html
Is this then fake numbers you posted or real USGS numbers from past years?
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172979347
Clearly the USGS numbers and the NioCorp feasibility study numbers seem to be appropriate and you posted it. Even the year of the pandemic shows NioCorp was correct, but it wasn’t until the next year, and the year after that, that Scandium price fell, Which is also when Mark Smith went on Fox and suggested scandium price was a risk
Yet for years you have been saying our numbers are fake and $1200 is what the market should go by because of your infatuation with one or two Australian mines.
Do you really think Rio Tinto is so stupid, but they will sell scandium for $1200 when they can get$2100 for it or $4000 for it?
Any time I try to find a scandium price online it is nowhere near $1200,
And I don’t know much about those mines that you’re talking about but there must be something very very wrong if they’re going to put such a small price and when the market is paying three times that much.
No, why would I? eom
Because nobody else is.
He stopped using scandium as a fake price for a reason, because he’s not credible and unless somebody steps on his toes he’s just gonna keep on keeping on with his Bankable BS
Ever since he’s been posting on this board he has said the only reason this company is not able to get financed is because of scandium price in the feasibility study is fake and that makes it unfinanceable.
He posted the proof himself the other day that he’s been lying about it. The price has always been $4000 or more for Scandium Oxide until the pandemic.
And now I know why when Mark went on FOXBusiness and said scandium was a risk, because the price dropped by more than a third, After the pandemic hit.
We now have seven minerals instead of three, and he still here with his agenda.
It’s one thing to be mad at the company for things they are doing but when you’re caught over and over and over again misleading and lying about the company or the project that’s a different story.