Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
FastEddie777: There was only one trade at .005 for less than 48000 shares.
Of course, there were a shitload of trades at .003...
And the .005 was a single trade for less than 25.00 worth of stock.
The true high was yesterday's close.
If this stock trades over 150M shares today, how many shares can it possibly trade tomorrow?
There must be some flipping going on, but it is very, very difficult to do on the grey market.
So the TA admitted to you that Jim has them gagged?
Interesting.
Only if Plant calls a shareholders meeting and puts him on the ballot.
Also, assuming that 3B stays more than 50%...
And????
Wow - .0007 is now an uptick?
Ouch...
Anyone know how much BA is paid on a monthly basis? I seem to remember rumors that they were paid in shares, and that the monthly fee was an ungodly 40K. But my memory isn't all the good these days. Maybe that was what they were paying HISC?
If that is anywhere near true, just paying BA every month at this PPS will increase the float dramatically every month. And BA would probably dump the shares ASAP to convert to cash.
Doesn't matter for what I wanted to see today - They list the same trades at 10:07 this AM, which was almost 36M going off in five trades, 4 of them for 9000000 each, at exactly the same time, to the second.
Very strange...
I did that. Shows the trades, but only lists .00 as the trade prices.
And it still shows that the estimated share counts as of January 22nd.
Hardly a ringing endorsement of those numbers being what the share count is today.
Thanks. Problem is is doesn't show the price (only shows .00), but it does show the same set of trades, with all of them occurring at the exact same time, to the second.
That is virtually impossible, unless the trades were pre-planned...
Anyone have a different source of Time & Sales? This is what freerealtime.com shows happened for the first trades this AM:
10:07:06 AM Trade 0.001 914500
10:07:06 AM Trade 0.001 9000000
10:07:06 AM Trade 0.001 9000000
10:07:06 AM Trade 0.001 9000000
10:07:02 AM Trade 0.001 9000000
36,914,500 shares on what appears to be a market-type dump. The problem is, you'd pretty much need to have an agreement with someone in place to have these kind of trades go off, with 4 of those trades done at the exact same time, down to the second.
rocky822: I love PACER, myself. Excellent source of info on federal cases past and present, including bankruptcy cases like your search found.
One major problem with your post: You really should have been more detailed in id'ing who the case is about. Instead of just talking about Jim Plant, you really should have mentioned that it was for James E. Plant.
I don't know if James E. Plant is the Jim Plant of CyberKey, but it sure is easier to figure that out if you mention the full name.
Divine Madcat: It got backed out. Low back to .002.
Pig Trainer: Most likely someone screwed themself by typing in .0004 when they meant to sell at .004.
Few bad trades get backed out on the greys...
msgbrdinfo: In the best case scenario, the SEC will not announce that the investigation cleared Plant of anything. It will send a letter to him stating that they have, and Plant can do what he wants with the information in that letter (I'm willing to bet it would become public knowledge, very quickly).
The SEC will also announce nothing about any changes in the reporting of information that Plant and they agree on. They will do the letter thing, and Plant would make the changes (one would hope) and be free to announce the end result of the SEC investigation.
In the worse case scenario, the SEC will send another letter to Plant (and whoever else may be involved) that tells him they will be filing a civil suit filed against him and CyberKey, as well as against anyone else they may be going after in the case (other company officers?).
So, in the scenarios in which the SEC will not be pursuing further action, Plant will be responsible for letting the world know about that. In the scenario in which the SEC will pursue further action, the filing of the civil suit will be how they tell the world what the investigation discovered.
How long would any of these scenarios take is anyones guess. The better scenarios should conclude rather quickly, while the worst case can take quite a bit of time: in the case of the SEC investigation of USXP, they started their inquiry in August of 2003, and filed suit in March of 2004.
keepthfaith: Even if Hudson does want to sponsor the stock, the form requires that they report that they have an accurate source of information about the company's financials, and the source of that information. The application is then reviewed by NASD for approval.
As long as the SEC is still investigating those financials, that is something it is impossible, at least as far as I can see, to claim any accuracy for without auditied financials, thus I seriously doubt the application would be approved.
Everything depends on audited financials.
Well, looks like Monday should be close to a lock to close green...
NoHome: Since it is absolutely impossible to tell what the company's actual book value is at this stage, I think you need to go with 'panic selling.'
stock_observer_77: Thank you. That was one of the funniest, and most refreshing posts I've seen in years.
fenian: You'd want to talk to Mike Bongiovanni, CEO (I believe).
You probably saw it in a later posting, 3/5/07.
Tom P: Altomare of USXP has been doing if for years. Others have done conference calls that have been laced with pure, unadulterated crap.
But you are right about the financials. If they are audited by a company registered to audit publicly traded companies, they will tell the tale.
Birds: Thank you, that was really sweet of you.
Right back at you.
msgbrdinfo: I prefer to post my honest opinions. I may occasionally be wrong, but honestly wrong, and very willingly admit that when I am.
And one thing I know - whatever I post, good, bad, or indifferent, will have zero, zilch, zip, nada affect on the pps, and thus it costs me nothing to be honest about what I believe to be happening. The only info that can appear on these boards that will have any affect is documented, independently verifiable facts.
Everything any of us say is immaterial. It is all up to Plant (always has been).
msgbrdinfo: Please go back through my posts for the last few weeks. You won't find me rehashing anything over and over and over.
Today's posts have to do with a comment about slorke's post that provided inaccurate info. Yesterday, about a 5000000 sale at .003. One day, most of my posts were an attempt to get someone to stop rehashing something over and over and over.
I'm still a 'stuck' who got trapped in a 500,000 share swing trade. Do I like the company's fundamentals? Nope. Do I trust anything that Plant says at any time? Nope.
My posts now are simple and directed strickly to false info in posts, or just curious info (like the lack of pricing in slorke's post today).
Best way to keep me from rehashing anything over and over and over again, is to just ignore my rantings. My 'bash' post today was simply to point out to Post that my comments about the lack of pricing in slorke's post was not an attempt to cast any doubt, that there are a lot of better ways to bash this stock, that bashing isn't needed anymore.
Post Toastie: Exactly where does it indicate in slorke's post that the info is from 2 months ago? Please enlighten me.
Actually, to assume I knew prices were there is dead wrong. You would be better to assume that I don't give a rat's ass one way or the other whether prices are there. Just found it odd that there appeared to still be no prices based on slorke's post.
There are a lot better ways to cast doubt if that was all I wanted to do. But I don't need to - Jim Plant has done a far better job of casting doubt on this company than anyone else can do.
The pps is telling the story right now. Nobody needs to bash it, it's doing a good enough job on its own.
Post Toastie: You did notice that slorke's post showed the prices still at XX.XX, didn't you?
Since it was reasonable to assume that he was posting the most recent info, it was reasonable to assume that the prices were still undetermined.
slorke: Still no prices cited, so nobody is able to buy from that site yet.
Wonder what the holdup is on getting prices in place?
They redid the terms of financing with Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. And they granted Laurus 2,426,870 shares of the Company's common stock at $0.01 per share, with such warrant being immediately exercisable.
The good news was they don't have to make the payments they were supposed to make for the next few months - They'll have to make them eventually, but not right now. And the credit avaialable went up 150K. And the warrants frome 2005 and 2006 have been repriced from .0001 to .01 (I wonder how many of those were left to reprice).
Looks like most of the restructuring was due to the fact that French couldn't make the payments. So now there is another 2,426,870 shares coming to a OS near you...
http://biz.yahoo.com/e/070308/thphf.ob8-k.html
FHanen350: A Buy is a trade that occurs at the Ask. Anything less than that is considered a Sell.
In addition, in order for someone to buy at .003, someone has to sell at .003.
Looks like someone just dumped 5M shares at .003. Went from 18,732,xxx to 23,732,xxx.
Interesting: Over 2 hours since the last trade.
They are probably trades that happened earlier that are being reported late. Happens.
Yep. He saw a need, and came up with a solution.
Playtowin: The guy is selling his version of the medical ID flash drive for 25.00. That would be a tough price to complete with.
onlyone: I'm curious - How many people do you think will actually be interested in paying any money at all, never mind 250K, for 1/300th slice of a service that may gross 4M in revenue this year?
And how much of their 300th of a slice of that pie will they be kicking back to RA?
LEAP is a totally bogus idea that RA hopes can sucker people into buying USXP shares.
15,983,xxx,xxx as of 12/31/2006, and growing at about 700,000,000 per month.
ralphkaz: Sorry. You're right. You can point out every single flaw you can find, if that's what you need to do.
I just think you'd be better served fighting the big battles, and not by nit-picking.