Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
So, according to Stratey's "FACTUAL" 1.6 trillion share, market value now is $14,400,000,000
Before I end this never ending back and forth discussion, let me put it this way...Lets say this...You are married and file joint tax return. Year later you are divorced and this year you pay separate tax or would you add your ex wife's income to yours and pay her tax to. You would argue with the IRS to death to file separate tax...correct? So, combining two company's A/S as one total is outrageous notion...especially pre r/s.
So you are saying they are two separate companies...correct?...Oh forget it...lets just agree to disagree.
You left out part of the post...So, is EFGO still trading and I'll add this...do they claim those two companies are under their management so they can combine two accounting books?
Fine...two companies were formed from one. Is EFGO still trading your so called fact is from original company. Unless these two companies have same accounting books, I believe you are trying to mislead people.
wow...you still don't get it...you can't post that as fact...they are two different companies post split.
O.K...since they did r/s, why are you posting pre r/s shares of those two companies now. Since it is post r/s now, you shouldn't be posting your so called 1.6 trillion shares. So, it is not true fact that you claim to be.
I know. I don't know why he is combining these two company's shares.
If you insist on combining two company's A/S, it is 450 million plus 650 million equal to 1.1 billion, not 1.6 trillion. You can't use r/s to calculate this.
Also, A/S does not mean O/S...totally different.
As I said before, those two companies are two different companies...Why are you combining two company's accounting books.
you are correct on spin off, but they are not using same accounting books. So, you are not correct when you add shares of both companies.
Why are you combining stocks of two separate companies and you don't know all of those shares are outstanding. You are adding apples and oranges and calling it appanges juice.
Your logic is inverse error logic...You take the original statement and negate the whole statement and state it as true.
If P then Q to you is if ~p then ~Q
lol.
well said!!!
I think you should move the decimal to the lest about 6 spaces...1,000,000,000,000,000?...lol. I think you need to recalculate that.
I was the last person to buy MONA at .02. I guess I am bad luck... This always happens when I buy a stock. Difference is I usually sell within two days if it doesn't go back up and take the 0-50% loss...but with this stock, I am not selling.
This is just my opinion...
This is not company's doing...I believe their intentions are good.
I believe cause of price drop is do to MMs playing games and people not buying on ask.
Please note that if I made mistake buying this stock, that is my mistake to make. I will not take other people telling me I made mistake buying this stock by message board ranting.
At these levels, I hope it's the company buying back the stock.
MMs still playing the game!!!
O- .019
HOD .027
LOD .017
C .025
I had to call in to trade MONA with TDAmeritrade.
Is this mean our pps will be .20 faster then expected?
do you have prove of that statement?
I got my shares at .02...and not planning on to sell until at least .10. I have all the time in the world.
what's up with $2.40 trade to bring down the price?!!!!
Sorry guys/gals...every time I buy a stock, it goes down...it didn't fail me on this either...I bought at ask(.02) and it went down right away...:(
o.k...i have my 100000 shares lets rock.
Here are some great reviews from babies r us...
Average Customer Rating:
5 stars
(based on 7 ratings)
100% of respondents would recommend this to a friend.
Customers most agreed on the following attributes:
Pros:
Easy to use (7), Hygienic (6), Reliable (6), Accurate (5)
Best Uses:
Infants (5), Toddler (4), Newborn (3), Preemies (3)
We'd like your opinion! Rate and Review this Item
Worth the money!!!
By Soon-to-be mom of 3 from connecticut on 5/10/2008
Pros:
Hygienic, Easy To Use, Accurate, Reliable
Best Uses:
Infants, Toddlers, Older children
Describe Yourself:
Medical Professional, Parent of Multiples (Twins etc)
Bottom Line:
Yes, I would recommend this to a friend
I have several digital thermometers and have tried to use them every way (axillary, oral, rectally) but nothing has worked to get an accurate reading for my 3 year old. Nothing has worked, especially when she is sick and fussy!
This product is WONDERFUL! Its easy to use and accurate. It doesnt wake her when she sleeps and she thinks its fun to use when she's awake. I'm expecting twins and I'm glad I'll be able to use it to check bath water, formula, or baby food too. The only drawback is it needs to adjust to the room temperature wherever you are, so plan ahead if you have a sick child.
DEFINITELY INVEST IN THIS!! Shop around, too, some drug stores carry it and I found mine on sale.
worth the cost accurate reading
By isa from miami, fl. on 5/9/2008
Pros:
Easy To Use, Hygienic, Reliable, Accurate
Best Uses:
Infants
Describe Yourself:
First Time Parent
Bottom Line:
Yes, I would recommend this to a friend
I purchased two thermometers of the regular ones. one told me one thing and the other an another. I have a six month baby girl and when it's the first time she gets a fever you need something reliable. The thermo scan is a bit expensive but it's worth the money "you get what you pay for". The doctor told us that at 100.4 you have to go to the doctor, so decimals matter when it comes to tempeture.
[1 of 1 customers found this review helpful]
WONDERFUL EVERYONE NEEDS ONE!
By TRIPS MOM from GILLETT, ARKANSAS on 4/22/2008
Pros:
Easy To Use, Hygienic, Accurate, Reliable
Best Uses:
Preemies, Newborn, Toddlers, Infants
Describe Yourself:
Parent of Multiples (Twins etc)
Bottom Line:
Yes, I would recommend this to a friend
QUITE ALOT. WE HAVE TRIPLETS AND THEY WERE SICK A COUPLE OF TIMES AND ITS SO NICE NOT TO WAKE THEM UP. AND BELIEVE ME EVERYTIME WE WOULD STICK THE OTHER THERMOMETOR UNDER THEIR ARMS THEY ALWAYS WOKE UP, BUT NOT WITH THE Kidz-Med Thermofocus Non-Contact Thermometer by KidzMed Inc
Wonderful product
By Shauna from Seattle, WA on 1/24/2008
Pros:
Easy To Use, Accurate, Hygienic, Reliable
Describe Yourself:
First Time Parent
Bottom Line:
Yes, I would recommend this to a friend
As a new mom, this made my job a lot easier. You do not even have to touch the baby. I even showed my doctor who said that the reading you get is in fact accurate. I only have one child,
so I can imagine what a mother of multiple children would feel
like if they had this product -it really just makes your life so much easier.
Amazing Product!
By Caring Mom from New York on 7/31/2007
Pros:
Durable, Good Value, Quality Construction, Easy to use, Fun
Best Uses:
Everyday use, Gift, Travel
Describe Yourself:
Parent of Two or More Children
Bottom Line:
Yes, I would recommend this to a friend
My daughter was running a temperature and we were monitoring her closely. We didn't want to bother her while she slept, and the Thermofocus allowed us to watch her temperature without disturbing her. It was fabulous, and I am so thankful we had it.
What are the chances of this going back up to 52 wk high of .29?
Please try to keep the pps at this lvl until Monday afternoon. Then you can walk it up slowly.
Thx Sheff
Hi Sheff, I have been monitoring your board. I am impressed with your picks. I am not able to post on your board, so, I'll ask you here. What do you think ASFX will end up in few weeks. I'll have funding in my account by Monday afternoon. I'm thinking about buying this stock. Any opinions?
every fiber of my body hopes that you are right.
according to your chart,
2001-2006(5 year span)
high = 70
low = 25
2006 - 2008(2 year span)
high = 150
low = 50
if you are going to pull numbers off the chart...do it correctly.
In our Statistics class, what we call what you did is called biased data you pulled to convince one sided audience.
Where did you get 113 from...seems it went higher then that...you are pulling numbers off the chart like dem.
I only have one more post left...so, just vote me as president and I will be war mongering and turn about 7 u.s. friendly countries into U.S. state and take over the world...lol.
Oh wait...this is for both side of politics...sorry.