Quote: Then... WALA! We read that permits were granted.
______________________________________

To some extent that seems to be the only thing he's been successful at. When it comes to finding shipwrecks/treasure, well, that's another story.

Quote: For those who haven't yet seen the new technology used by Seafarer:
______________________________________________

One: There is no supportive evidence that a "shipwreck" has been found. In all likelihood upper deck flotsam debris.

Two: There is no supportive evidence that the CEO's Tinker Bell even found that. Strange how this see all , know all technology is supposedly credited for finding trash and trinkets but where are these tons of gold and silver? Not even one cannon on a 32 cannon shipwreck. Very strange. Sorry if I'm disrupting the bedtime story.

The deepest mag hit they investigated was 60'....per

reports to the Bureau. The site is not a deep water site.

This was submitted to the Bureau by the company.
____________________________________

It continues to be hilarious how now the armchair experts are seriously describing how this is an entire shipwreck; upper deck portions exposed and, of course, there is a lower deck/hull below it. If that were even the case, WHERE ARE THE 32 IRON CANNONS, presuming this fantasized find is the 1715 'Concepcion'? The clown show - endless performances.

Quote: Could you show me where it's stated it's a shallow wreck? I missed that? Thanks
_____________________________

Presuming its in less than 100 feet of water it's a shallow wreck.

Quote: I guess, like you are now. That yes your intitled to your opinion. Nothing more, just an opinion for now. And this is just my opinion. Did you notice that so called balloon is moving higher?
__________________________________________

The difference is I've been there and done that (really). Have you? I didn't think so.

As for the ascension of the 'hot air balloon', it's a understandable example of physics.

Barnyard bullshit = methane gas = hot air. Pretty close, isn't it?

Quote: I appreciate you pointing out it is all upper deck material.

Makes perfect sense now if you can connect the dots.

BTW, there's only two dots. One on the upper deck, one on the lower deck.
____________________________

Sorry but the naive would make a statement like this. That's simply not the way it is on shallow water wrecks. They say there's allot of money to be made writing children's fiction books.

Quote: I think it's amusing that you still don't know how the SeaSearcher works and continue to ask the questions you do.
________________________

And in all likelihood, neither do you. The probability is that it really doesn't work and I could elaborate on that but it would likely be to no avail. So many sheeple getting all giddy over upper deck scattered flotsam.

Quote: Need to update the ole checklist:
_____________________________________

Simply defined as the 'huff and puff' list. Impressive non-performance.

Quote: So, we have a large variety of artifacts
_________________________

Besides upper deck type flotsam, please explain what that large variety of artifacts are? Somehow I missed that.

Quote: If the SeaSearcher found this wreck or they have a least scanned the area (surely they have) then it should be telling them what is below the upper deck. I would think if the wreck went down intact and slowly 'decayed', the first thing they would come across is the upper deck material. Which would then need to be reported to FBAR and PR'd to the public. So far, so good.
__________________________

Incredible how people with no experience can make assumptions that are if anything, very misleading. If what you're assuming was anywhere near true, then the flotsam that you presume to be a shipwreck certainly isn't the 1715 Concepcion which violently hit a shoal off Cape Canaveral and broke apart. That's fact based upon archival research. What is your assumption based on?

Quote: Thousands got around via horse and buggy before the car.
______________________________

Here we go again with horse and buggy analogy again.

Every noteworthy treasure galleon (I've listed them numerous times) was found with magnetometer surveys. SFRX and its tinker toy hasn't found crap. If its this see all, know all marvelous technology, try and explain why they're digging on some upper deck level flotsam junk instead of some real shipwreck targets perhaps like even treasure. Fact is they haven't found crap. This is an obviously 'hot air balloon' stock but as the saying goes 'different strokes for different folks', so if the 'hot air balloon' is making you money what else matters right?

Quote: I really don’t believe Kyle is as stupid as he pretends to be, though his marks hold him in high regard.
__________________________________

You have got to be kidding. Right?

Quote: Non-ferrous metals coming up! Watch.
_______________________________________

Fortune telling just might prove out to be a better option than the Tinker Bell, see all, know all that apparently sees nothing.

Quote: Would, in your expert opinion, use those words to describe FLOTSAM?
__________________________________________

Yes indeed I would. Everything mentioned is upper deck 'this and that's'. FLOTSAM.

Note: standing rigging, ships fittings, rope and wood fragments.
_________________________________________

......and the flotsam play continues. So what's new? Is the best the tinker toy can do?

No ships ballast, no lower hull structure, no olive jar shards (inevitable telltale signs of a Spanish shipwreck), no cannons, no anchors, no cross-section of artifacts and no treasure.
Is that what the Tinker toy indicated to excavate? FLOTSAM.

Quote: Looking at the most recent filings, I see that two different family members (one on the board) put in an additional combined $110,600 in August and continue to not convert their notes.

Do you think they think the SeaSearcher works?

Yeah, I'll continue to follow their lead.
_______________________________________________

As the old saying goes; 'The blind leading the blind'. I see no exception in this case.

As to your question 'Do you think they think the SeaSearcher works?'. I wonder. As for me, no, I don't think SeaSearcher (the Tinker Toy) works. Why? There is not one piece of evidence shown to date that it does. All talk and no performance.

Quote: Bottom Line; they have identified targets, have the permits/equipment to collect & 5 years to carry it out. Get your 16% discount on SFRX while you have the chance.
_________________________________________

They've identified what targets? All talk. Armatures such as these, without experience, wouldn't be aware that 3D sub-bottom profiling identifies multiple geological parabolas but they wouldn't know the difference.

Quote: You know that SeaWatcher gizmo that is supposed....

to give them the latest greatest weather forecast? Yeah, that newest game changing unproven technology.

What if only real shareholders got an alert each day they were going out?

Maybe call it the GuilibleGalleon alert or something similar. It could sync up the SeaWatcher and boooooooooooom, shareholders would know.

BTW....Kyle said seas 6' and under are right up their alley now.

Finally, I wonder if they'll throw in a SeaWatcher with the purchase of a Tinkerbell 2.0 when they hit the market.
____________________

It's all laughable. As I posted before, there are a number of oceanographic companies that are making sea buoys that transmit all that data, so all this SFRX new innovation garble is another load of crap.

Quote: What actually matters is that the SeaSearcher works and Seafarer has targets that were found by the SeaSearcher.
_______________________

Bull Crap. You have no evidence whatsoever that substantiates that statement.

Quote: Ohhh, today may be the day that something is dislodged

To be picked up by SeaSearcher next week!!

Today is the Day!!!
__________________________

Ohhh.....I seriously doubt it. But then again, come to think of it, that's about the only way the Tinker Toy might happen to find something. Dislodged and lying openly exposed on the ocean floor.

In the meantime, dream on.

Quote: Today is the Day!
________________________

In 4 to 6 foot seas, I doubt it.

Quote: Where is the holiday spirit?
_________________________

Sorry about that. In these trying times, a Happy Thanksgiving wish to all.

Your Check, Check, Check's are meaningless. All based upon all talk and no performance. The history of this company.

So when you say "Since we are being redundant"..., how right you are. Check, check.

Quote: Time to get back on the water. Hopefully, conditions permitting,
______________________________________

Not likely. Actually, bad weather (sea-state) may be saving grace for these amateurs in so much that the Tinker Toy remains FACTUALLY unproven and the area under contract in all likelihood contains nothing more than wreckage flotsam. To date, no evidence has been produced to prove otherwise.



AMZ552-242130-
Volusia-Brevard County Line to Sebastian Inlet 0-20 nm-
334 AM EST Tue Nov 24 2020

SMALL CRAFT SHOULD EXERCISE CAUTION


TODAY
Northeast to East winds 10 to 15 knots. Seas 4 to 6 feet
with a dominant period 8 seconds. A moderate chop on the
intracoastal waters.

TONIGHT
East winds 15 to 20 knots diminishing to 10 to
15 knots after midnight. Seas 4 to 6 feet with a dominant period
9 seconds. Choppy on the intracoastal waters.

WEDNESDAY
Southeast winds 10 to 15 knots. Seas 4 to 6 feet
with a dominant period 9 seconds. A moderate chop on the
intracoastal waters.

WEDNESDAY NIGHT
Southeast winds 10 to 15 knots diminishing to
5 to 10 knots after midnight. Seas 3 to 5 feet. A light chop on
the intracoastal waters.

THURSDAY
Southeast winds 5 to 10 knots. Seas 3 to 5 feet. A
light chop on the intracoastal waters.

THURSDAY NIGHT
Southeast winds 5 to 10 knots. Seas 3 to
4 feet.

FRIDAY
Northeast winds 5 knots. Seas 3 to 4 feet.

FRIDAY NIGHT
East winds 5 knots. Seas 3 to 4 feet.

SATURDAY
North winds 5 knots becoming northeast in the
afternoon. Seas 2 to 3 feet.

Quote: YES! Precisely 5 more years!
_____________________________________

These clowns could have ten years and it would make little difference. They've proven themselves to be amateurs in every aspect. What, near fifteen years in the so called treasure hunting business and have never found a wreck, never worked a wreck and its questionable they even know what sunken treasure even looks like. Oh, excuse me, but the Tinker Bell does all that. What a long running joke.

Quote: New Technologies to collect and report sea conditions... CHECK

Several targets identified which can now get a diggin’ on.... CHECK
__________________________________________

To be lenient, I shall just focus on only these two of your CHECK IT OUT LIST.

Apparently you aren't aware of who NOAA is and what they do. The initials stand for National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. They just happen to produce marine forecasts on weather and sea conditions. Going further in narrowing that down, there are a number of ocean technology firms that already produce (place anywhere) sea-buoys that are equipped to measure and transmit data on sea state, current direction and velocity, wind direction and velocity and ocean temperature, etc. So, from what I can see, this so called 'New Technologies' is about equivalent to more B.S. just like the see all, know all Tinker Bell.

Well, with 'several targets identified', if Tinker Bell is all that its said to be, they already know what the target is, how deep under the sub-bottom it is buried, and of course its size and content. So, as the old saying goes, it's 'shit or get off the pot' time wouldn't you say?

Quote: Most of us understand the new equipment is a game changer!
___________________________________________________

A game changer. Really. How so? All talk and no proven performance whatsoever. No factual evidence that it does anything. No shipwreck and no treasure. Hey, no sweat, there's aways next year.

Quote: Well we have 5 year permits in hand and the CEO said the Sea-Searcher works.
________________________________________

Wow. What's that worth? 'The CEO said the Sea-Searcher works'.

Quote:Explore the targets, I thought this took a picture of the target ?
Wouldnt they see what the target is ?

Now Im scratching my head.
_________________________________

You are one of the few that seems to have common sense here and says it the way it is.

Tinker Bell is suppose to be the greatest see all, know all technological development ever in the field of treasure hunting. Sees to phenomenal depths into the sub-bottom, measures the precise depth of the target along with dimensions of the object, and more importantly, analysis of the metallic content be it gold or silver. May even have the capability of counting the coins. With that said, it should be so easy to go to one of these multiple so called 'targets' and its BINGO on the first hole they dig.

Let me give you my forecast. I have little doubt the Tinker Bell has 3D sub-bottom capabilities. Something they didn't invent but incorporated into their vehicle package. As they stated a very long time ago, they have hundreds of targets they detected and will check out. Well, those hundreds of targets in all probability are sub-bottom geological point-source reflectors, but they don't have the experience or common sense to know that. I've been on these kind of surveys and I've seen these similar results. When I say the photo of the CEO sitting at the controls of his Tinker Toy, it said allot. Well, in any case, its show time, isn't it?

Quote: For now it's all up to sfrx to find treasure with the new equipment!
____________________________________________________________

About as likely as reaching the moon in the SFRX hot air balloon.

Quote: I have millions of reasons I believe the equipment works! Jmo
___________________________________________________

It's quite common in the world of treasure hunting that people do indeed make poor judgment calls when investing.

Quote: ? If one doesn't own shares does it really matter? if a tree falls in the forest and nobody is there to hear it, does it make a noise? Jmo
__________________________________

Nothing like having a philosopher to provide clarity to failure.

I don't own shares and could care less. I do enjoy blowing the old whistle on things so frequently misrepresented here.

Quote: Agree

Quote:
I have a feelin’ that somethin’ a brewin’..... never know what’s right round the corner.
___________________________________

You've been believing that for years.

I'd say the only thing brewing is the coffee pot in Kennedy's office.

Quote: Lobster eating! and I believe your buying one day!! JMO LOLO
_______________________________________

I doubt that. About as likely as me eating that proverbial crow sandwich. By the time that could happen, the crow will be an extinct bird.

Quote: Lolo, well that's a new one! Keep your eyes on the balloon!! The view is just going to keep getting better from here!!! JMO
_________________________________

You've been saying that for years. Other than 'hot air' surges, this certainly appears to be a dud. There's always lobster fishing.

Quote: No fuss. Just making a point. Juno.....
_________________________________________

Wasn't referring to you but rather SFRX who will naturally make a fuss about it as they don'y have anything else going for them. You know the routine. Oh, but just you wait and see. All that gold just sitting out there. These clowns jumped into the wrong business and are still in the wrong business. Actually, it's not a business at all.

Quote: I will say I think the Juno Beach area is grandfathered as rights were given and it was not contested by Spain in 1988. SFRX spent 2 years to legally obtain those rights to Juno. But as we all know Dr. Tim Parsons at the Bureau says Juno is now a preserve area and a permit cannot be issued by Florida. The Juno claim is linked at the bottom.
___________________________________________

Why the fuss? The Juno site was a loser, and would continue to be a loser. Amazing that this is where this great highly successful treasure hunting company (SFRX) was launched. A dead game but we can't forget about that secret magnetometer survey that may have defined the shipwreck location. What a joke. Now in this instance the magnetometer is A-OK

I'm so surprised Spain didn't consult with Kennedy the treasure hunting / treasure finding expert before they made the decision to go world wide to find and recover their own lost treasures.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/spain-treasure-ships-b1645088.html

Quote: It’s over the sheep’s head.
________________________________

Incredibly, they just don't get it. The quest for Spanish treasure ships is a very dead industry.

Quote: So as we have been told by our self proclaimed posters. The entire ocean is off limits!! Lolol such narrow thinking in my opinion. Glad I own shares! JMO
_______________________________________________

Do you not understand what the UNESCO Underwater Cultural Heritage Treaty is? Are you aware that near every country in the Western Hemisphere with coastlines (areas pertinent to Spanish colonial shipwrecks), with the exception of the U.S.A., Bahamas, Dominican Republic and Colombia have signed the treaty? Those that haven't signed are not issuing private sector contracts for treasure hunting. So its not too far off the mark to say 'the entire ocean is off limits'.