Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Your stated thoughts and facts seem flawed because they're based on an assumption.
You can't find facts when you blindly believe an
assumption;
you can, however, make assumptions based upon
known facts.
You're thoughts/facts are based on the assumption that this is a legitimate operation;
previously stated facts indicate otherwise.
Nevertheless, you're free to take any chances you choose with whatever you
choose to believe.
It's not cool, however, to try
to persuade or lead others
to ruin based on your
"fear & feelings"
which are not
based on facts.
.
.
.
.
Facts are facts, and indeed I will continue. Thank you.
I would strongly advise any newbie to steer clear of this company or any like it.
If you're going to get your epic parabolic to da moon spike,
it will happen due to an orchestrated effort by the company....
as always.
Facts posted here won't "hurt" you, so stop being so afraid.
.
.
.
This isn't a game of choosing what you "want" to believe.
It's a situation where there are facts and discrepancies right out in the open that you simply refuse to recognize; however,
that doesn't make it go away.
When some of us post negativities, we back them up with facts.
When we post suspicions, we characterize them as such.
We don't mislead or give
false hopes.
"Ere on side of caution" has always been good advice.
Not only do you not wish to ere on the side of caution,
you're seemingly a
proponent of ignoring
all red flags
and known facts
altogether.
.
.
Well stated. I couldn't have said it any better. Thank you.
I don't know but I've got some feelers out there looking into it.
The timing of his sudden resignation, Khatri's(Ayrton) direct connection to Karen Leung Foundation, the former delcath BoD member, Gabriel Leung and other such "coincidences" are very intriguing to me.
I thought it was indirectly pertinent to look at Antony due to the frequent Anthenex rumours and references here.
Leung is a very common name and any family connections are very difficult to trace even when name is uncommon.
I'm never comfortable with any business or investment venture that involves the lovely Hong Kong simply b/c it is well-documented as a hot-bed of fraud for banks and registered charities.
I'm merely presenting this as an intriguing development that I'm watching and researching.
.
.
Keep an eye on this guy.
Antony Leung just resigned from Athenex BoD on March 16th without any given reason shared to investors.
Among many other things, he served as Financial Secretary of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) before resigning as a result of an embarrassing scandal.
A good friend of Pedder's,
let's see where this particular "Leung" turns up next.
.
.
I'm in agreement with you in that only a person of low character would defend this company's actions.
That being said, however, I don't believe that a company is corrupt or shady simply because shareholders' investments didn't pay-off; there's always a risk.
However, the risk involved in investing with delcath is not governed by your typical
caveat emptor.
There has been egregious abuse of shareholders here and needs to be investigated for known procedural errors at least.....
and for egregious findings of misrepresentation which are still being discovered and developing at worst.
.
.
.
You say, "I have come to believe that timing, luck and skill can be very important".
This, of course, is true....
and although it remains true when one's trading equities of companies, whether they're legit or shady,
your statement cannot begin to excuse this company's actions simply by blaming the shareholders' trading-skills.
Again, for someone who supposedly has no skin in the game (much like the BoD), you're going to suspiciously great lengths to defend this company.
.
.
.
I care. I care about Simpson's character even if it spikes to $23/share tomorrow and only goes up from there.
Character matters.
Regarding stalled trials;
that is suspect.
I'm investigating that presently.
Are they stalled due to lack of voluntary enrollment?
Or, are they stalled because of company orchestration.
That's right; you don't know.
Or do you?
I have some leads.
We'll find out.
You may be surprised, unless, of course, you're being
scripted by insiders.
.
.
.
Orchestrated? The only thing I see that's orchestrated is the orchestrated pumps and false hopes perpetrated here as if representing on behalf of a legitimate company.
I have no idea who any of you people are.
It's obvious, however, that there are many here who've discovered shady activity.....
and then there's the clan who attempts to make excuses for it......
and none of the "excusers" contributions have proven accurate for months.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I've not posted anything about phase 3. Perhaps you responded to the wrong person.
I personally am not studying future successes until current corruption is addressed.
That is what would be "backwards".
.
ImClone: Yes, I believe Simpson was at ImClone from 2008-2012.
Wonder if she's friends with Martha Stewart?
Just keeps getting better!
.
.
.
What am " I " alleging? I have alleged several things and I've proven others in my posts.
Many things I've not posted yet.
However, I wasn't alleging "anything" in the post you're replying to;
I was, instead, simply stating that I saw no incidence of anyone "throwing shade" (except of course the pumpers).
It seems like many here are very nervous at seeing the disturbing evidence that has been shared and terrified that other allegations or suspicions may be true.
That's understandable...
but don't blame the messenger.
Denying the facts presented and denying the possibility that more disturbing facts may be uncovered is not going to recover your lost investment.
Your investment is most likely lost for good, so if your gonna spend time engaging in discussion, you may as well discuss facts and logical
possibilities.... even if they're unpleasant.
.
.
Throwing shade? No one is "throwing shade" in order to be purposely vague.
This is a "SHADY" company.
Therefore, most anything we'd like to uncover via research/discussion is going to be "inherently" vague.
.
.
You do indeed stand alone, except for within your miniscule realm of advocate-apologists.
No one, that I know of, wants to "take down the company" per say.
It's the management that needs to go down- - or, at least...
be reined-in.
https://delcath.org/
Whacked? What does that mean in regards to my post(s)?
You don't have a taste for serious discussions?
I respect that.
Good luck to you :)
.
I'm not deterred from fighting fraud due to fear of losing money.
You supposedly have no skin in the game, yet you've still not explained your motivation for excusing the company.
Strange.
.
.
.
Who would "fear" delcath? Why would you fear a company?
As for quality, the only quality they have is Chemosat (if that even passes muster) and it's being stifled by mismanagement.
.
.
Pretty sure you don't know the definition of the word "theory".
All of my phone calls were legally recorded. I'll worry about my own liability, but thank you for your concern.
Regarding financial restitution, I never said that any legal action wouldn't involve financial restitution;
I was merely responding to the user who stated that "many people aren't aware that financial restitution usually doesn't go very far to make a wronged investor whole again."
I am very much aware of the legal process involved here.
Your statements ring hollow.
The time is drawing near
and I, my friend,
have nothing
to fear.
.
.
No financial restitution requested. Only wish to end the corruption and free-up the product.
You are in denial or either you're simply an advocate-apologist.
Your posts are in debate of an issue that doesn't exist. You're trying to legitimize the company.
The corruption has been proven and that is not debatable; neither is it defensible.
Carry on.
I could blow you out of the water with one loaded post.
The time is near.
.
.
.
Rap, then perhaps you'd be interested in hearing a few of my 50+ recordings. When I can be sure that all of my "sensitive" information (i.e: my phone#, full name, SS-number, etc)
is not attached to the files, I will upload them here.
At that point, you'll have a very difficult time explaining-away any of the relevance of this evidence.
The files, in there current format have all been shared with the authorities and trusted parties, however.
Good luck
.
Rap, why do you object to anyone showing any interest or concern with the facts regarding delcath's company malfeasance?
I suspect it's b/c you're afraid this information will deter people from investing, therefore adversely affecting the pps.
That's understandable, but anyone of character is not afraid of facts, negative nor positive, when considering the big picture.
No one declared that iHub or any other forum exists simply to be used for pumping & bashing for the sole purpose of manipulating pps.
I submit to you the last portion of one of Joshua Rodriguez' articles...and remember,
before he heard my phone calls, he was an advocate of this company and a proponent of the last RS.
The Bottom Line
(by Joshua Rodriguez)
The bottom line here is that when investing in a company, investors expect that the company will do right by them. However, in an attempt to continue living the lavish lifestyle, DCTH management seems to be throwing its own investors under the bus, making sure that every wheel hits! It’s one thing to make financial mistakes. It’s another to bully and blatantly lie to your investors. I don’t know what’s going to happen with this reverse split anymore, and quite frankly, I don’t care. At the end of the day, Delcath Systems is clearly being managed by a team that doesn’t care about their investors. They live a lavish lifestyle with ridiculous salaries, yet they have no skin in the game. When they need more money to continue, they find a way to get it at the expense of their investors. At the end of the day, while I love the product that the company has created, I hate to see investors treated this way. Frankly, I’m puzzled. My friends, I think it’s time to either count your losses or push for changes in management, because this is simply not what investors should expect to see out of management at a publicly-traded company!
(end of previously cited article)
.
.
.
Updated as per suggested: https://delcath.org/ has now been updated with at least one recorded conversation with IR acting-rep, Tom Johnson....
as well as a CNA article commenting on at least one recorded call which was shared with the editor.
I took the liberty of forwarding this suggestion to the site admin, and I see that it has now been updated.
Thank you for the suggestion, H2004.
.
.
.
I can't understand why anyone here doesn't want to discuss it.
I have a pretty good idea of why it's not been added to the delcath site, however.
As for myself, I know that any recordings I shared were "legally" taped.
Altho the individual who taped the call you've shared was willing to post his recording publicly, delcath shareholder site admin(s) have no knowledge as to whether this call was recorded "legally".
At least one of my own "legal" recordings was shared to a CNA contributor and he actually published an article regarding the content of the call.
He described the call as shameful and appalling.
https://cnafinance.com/delcath-systems-dcth-stock-i-heard-the-call-its-a-shame/16435
Point made - just one of many radiating from this death star.
No, not totally altruistic but,
the goods are there;
they can take it from here.
.
Correction last sentence:
Bots, not boys
My gosh, Rap! We've been in the process of taking action for over 6 months. It takes time and there's power in numbers.
Madoff was reported several times over the years by credible sources and still took SEC years to sit up and pay attention.
No Madoff here, but the premise is the same.
It takes time.
I wouldn't care quite so much if it weren't a bio company touting a life-extending product.
I try to keep my emotions out of it. Trading and investing is not my preferred way of contributing to charity.
However, when it's brought to my attention as this has been, I take great exception at seeing this type of fraud being perpetrated especially with all the evidence we have in hand.
There's a high profile lawsuit against RIOT blockchain right now and the 2 or 3 weak allegations against that company are literally Nothing compared to what has gone on at delcath.
Totally different operation, totally different market sector, but think I made my point.
Make some calls, file complaints, write some letters.
Whether you want some return on your investment or whether you just wanna see justice done; do something.
Your dd, your charts, and your averaging-down is not gonna get anything accomplished.
If you have a clean slate and you just wanna make some money, wait till the boys and the sun and stars line up just right and scalp you some.
.
.
.
.
What are we here for? Short answer to a long thought:
We "should" be here to bust this up b/c if they don't go down, the product doesn't stand a chance.
And the proof is all there...
or
I
wouldn't be
Here.
.
.
Oh, I get it alright. Entiendo, Mi amigo! You see, I have free time on my hands today and unlike some,
I very much enjoy
engaging in
a battle of wits
with an unarmed man.
His arguments are weak;
I like easy prey
when I'm
hungry.
Bon appétit !!
.
.
.
Good point. BTW, don't leave.
You can cherry-pick your DD & ignore whatever doesn't suit your narrative,
but what "you" care about
and what "you" don't care about
doesn't change what's
relevant with respect to DD.
.
.
Not so fast, DonDon. You jump to too many conclusions.
Complaint's been filed and the SEC is very familiar with delcath shareholder site.
In fact, it was shared with SEC before being shared with any other shareholder here or elsewhere.
.
.
I do have proof. They continued to use the address as their mailing-address even though they'd not stepped foot in there for 2 years.
If you "don't" care about that,
you should, because it's now part of your due diligence. You may not have known it for 2.5 years, but you know now....
or you're free to "verify" it for yourself now.
For at "least" one of those years, all mail sent to them at that address was returned to sender.
Mail is only forwarded for one year max when a forwarding order is even placed.
There's a good chance it was not even forwarded during the first year of vacancy.
Yet, they still used that address on their website and filings as their address/contact info.
Since you're so diligent, you'd be wise to give pause -
It's only one tiny tidbit of misrepresentation and squandering of funds.
.
.
Focus on the positive...sure.
What future does the "positive" hold if they continue to squander millions?
History repeats itself.
.
.
Verified empty. No doubt whatsoever. Don't believe me, though;
you can easily verify it yourself.
You're resourceful, aren't you?
.
Thank you for sharing publicly.
This is important and is indeed entertaining.
I don't know the identity of the shareholder, but I recognize the delcath employee's voice as that of Tom Johnson as I spoke with him myself on several occasions.
Awe; such a darling little dance around the maypole of misinformation.
.
.
.
.
.
Unacceptable. Whether one's here to scalp a windfall and run,
or whether one's here to hold long and strong,
there is never any excuse for squandering funds the way this company has done.
You cannot explain that away.
Many of us are here b/c of poor choices and/or we became trapped in an endless cycle of corruption perpetuated by misleading information, false hopes and that tear-jerking, misdirected emotional attachment that comes from feeling like we're somehow contributing to needy cancer patients.
On the other hand, many are here b/c they feel like Chemosat will indeed eventually make it's mark on the world -
yet they still can't bare to just sit still and watch funds be squandered.
That's a waste of precious time and, possibly, lives.
.
.
You make a good point. We should indeed do our own DD.
I've found the timeline of events and links attached to the site to be spot-on accurate, insightful and hence - a very helpful addition to my own DD.
Personally, I'm not at all deterred by the foreign registration. All that seems pertinent to me is the accuracy of the information.
Everyone, of course, is free to vote how they choose.
IMO, it's not going to matter much b/c I think the BoD knows they'll get their way regardless of our vote-count.
My first impression upon visiting the site was Not that it was meant as a bully-pulpit touting a No-vote, but rather as an informative, concise compilation of a series of events that's steered us to where we now are.
Actually, I think of it more as a shareholder "awareness" organization.
You may be surprised at how many are Not aware of this company's history of questionable procedures.
Perhaps the remedy for that is better individual-DD to some extent, but much of this company's activity is not readily discoverable in the realm of typical due diligence.
.
.
.