Feeding village children in Mindanao Philippines and watching my boy and girl grow up.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
HGEN was down 8% as well. INO was down 4%.
Personally I will wait for the technicals to give me a green light. I believe the sector is weak because of the possibility of a vaccine which is probably why PFE has held up much better.
But I believe in the science if Leronliman and eventually the technicals will green light again. In the meantime I have a core position.
Trend is still positive in the market. Sorry Chump, but I have been a believer in TA for 50 years but I know human nature. When the picture does not paint a picture one wants to see it is best to discredit the TA.
I do not know what motivates Hopester to harp many times a day on the chart. I do not do that. Perhaps he craves attention.
Can't get experience without getting older. Yet.
Congrats. 50 here.
Well, I can see this is a very friendly, helpful board. Don't be so defensive guys. If you have faith in your stock you should not be fearful of legitimate questions.
Thanks for the DM but I can not reply. I am trying to find the price and time of the acquisition of the other 80 million shares. Thanks.
P.S. I have a sizable position based solely on the chart but looking to add to the position.
Janet Shell?
Nope, only 28,500 shares bought at .079 then.
https://www.insider-monitor.com/trading/cik792935.html
I see the CEO bought 28,500 shares on the open market at .079 in 2018. Were the other 80 million shares gifted to him as compensation? I can not find anything in 20 years of how it was acquired. Thanks. I am long, looking to add but want to dot my i's.
You have to know my wife ;)
Cydy, INO comparative chart. Give it a break.
http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=CYDY&p=D&yr=0&mn=5&dy=10&id=p25092884461&a=831395488&listNum=1
Come on Hopester. You throw stock charts at me all the time that I look at despite not following the stocks. You are trying to pigeon hole CYDY as being the lone biotech under pressure and I give you numerous examples if identical charts in the sector and your reply is "I dont know them?
As did HGEN and INO.
I admit there are some charts performing better. I said before that PFE was doing better. Looking at PSTI chart I would say it is in the same category as PFE Chart looks good. However you are finding anamolies. The majority in the sector are hugging the 200 day sma or are below it.
Why is INO down drom 34 to 10? Why is HGEN down from 34 to 12?
Nice to see you admit to the weakness in the sector, although you did it on another board, lol.
Please show me one problem with Leronlimab.
Thanks Chump
The comparative chart I showed compared INO, CYDY and LLY. You could throw HGEN into that as well. It does not mean that each day they make the same moves.
Also, I usually use HGEN, INO and CYDY to compare specifically because I believe that is comparing oranges to oranges. HGEN has negative 1.09 per share earnings. INO has negative 1.70 per share earnings and CYDY has negative .29 per share earnings.
I had added LLY because I mistakenly thought that you liked that stock, as you mentioned their trials. Nevertheless LLY is charting similarly but it is unfair to compare a company with $6.15 per share in earnings to the previous three. The same applies to MRK that has earnings per share of 4.13 per share and JNJ with 6.25 pr share in earnings and PFE with 2.46 per share in earnings. Never the less they are all sitting near their 200 day sma.
I will add at 2.00 if we get there.
Probably "" would have wirked.
Anyway, I get it now.
This part.
"CYDY Shareholders: Nothing gonna happen here for months so I sold my shares. This is going lower so I’ll get back in at $2."
As much as I understand your decision, I think it is dangerous to be out 100%. I choose to trade around a core position to build up my position. But to each his own.GLTU.
I do not think Nader can win on this one. If he has too many CC's (without meat) he will be criticized. If he is quiet he will be criticized.
I am not a fan of Nader's bloated compensation but (redundancy inserted here) I also see many others in the sector suffering pps erosion equal to ours so in that respect I do not put as much of the blame on Nader for that as others do.
I still have faith in the science until that is disproven. So my strategy is not to hold but rather to trade around a core position until such time that the chart pattern improves. I still think it is dangerous to be 100% out as it is possible that on any given morning a buy out offer could be received. All imo.
Ok. Thanks brother.
I believe we will test the 200 day sma on the next rally. We shall see.
Broke support so those following TA will stop out. Next support 2.00. Way oversold so a countertrend rally will come but countertrend plays are for the nimble.
Today much of the weakness is GILD approval related imo. HGEN down, INO down.
We are testing May 4th low at 2.53. A week later we were at 3.69.
Me, too but I am just saying it does not have to be that bad.
I use the 200 day sma as my north star. CYDY is 10% below it while HGEN is 36% above it. I am in both at the moment as are u.
Yes. In fact it hit 34 in July. It was one of the stocks I used to compare to CYDY as the pps moves were almost identical until recently.
http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=HGEN&p=D&yr=0&mn=8&dy=10&id=p02200439914&a=828008426&listNum=1
HGEN announced 1 for 5 R/S on Sept 4. The stock closed at 9.25 (adjusted pps). The split took effect 9/11, stock closed 9 75 that day. 3 weeks later the pps was 16 and it is still 13.67 with a target price of 31 by HC Wainwright.
RS is not always the boogaloo you want to make it appear if there is substance. I will stick with the science.
It is not a good looking chart but I am pointing out the oversold nature of the Full Stochastics. I bought today for a trade. I do not usually trade when the pps is below the 200 day sma but I am making an exception. Yes, we could break and go to 2.00 but remember, we were at 3.09 Tuesday. If we did break and go to 2.00 I would be a bit more aggressive as a slingshot move to test the 200 day sma would be a high percentage bet in my book considering where the RSI and Full Stochastics are.
Based on the oversold condition of the FULL STOCHASTICS and RSI and that we are sitting on strong support, my money is on a tradable move to the middle BB.
The last 4 times the FULL STOCHASTIC were this oversold we rallied 400%, 120%, 50% and 50%.
http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=CYDY&p=D&yr=0&mn=7&dy=10&id=p22208772445&a=830092031&listNum=1
Agree. I do not blame them. There is just so much misinformation out there.
My household can be like George and Kelly Ann Conway's.
It came down and tested the 50 day sma and middle Bollinger band and held.
http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=HGEN&p=D&yr=1&mn=9&dy=10&id=p86946802831&a=826716868&listNum=1
Knowing Nader's views on the subject my money would be on "no". If we did not do it at .28 why do it at 2.80?
That said....judging by HGEN's performance after their 1 for 5 R/S last mobth I would say it is not necessarily a bad thing IF it happens BUT I have never been a proponent of R/S.