The trouble with that is the best price takes it no matter what unless government prevents the sale for one reason or another.

I want to be rewarded for my 5 year wait.
I want to know what is in the ground (everything) and then sell or collect dividends
But if it's not to be oh well. Sigh

Do you mean the pipeline location and construction etc?

IB DOWN 5 cents.
Perhaps cashing out to cash in on NB

No gap. All is good closed now. Cdn

I agree. My understanding is the only permits required now is the processing plant and any surface construction.

I hope the gap closes
I don't want that to worry about. LoL

Fantastic news. Thanks AO

How do you get an Ask price if it is halted. Should say 0

Trading halt. Yesssss

Why is it you remind me of LCP7777?
He was always able to sound knowledgeable to some, but never, EVER backed up his pessimistic views.
He rarely had anything positive to say about NioCorp and constantly mentioned Pom Pom's in use by investors.
I find it very difficult to believe your a shareholder.

Tell me what you like about NioCorp, after all you wear the Nebraska name like a cheerleader

Actually I meant the 4th quarter, my apologies ,but this month would be welcomed also.

Army Corp as per Mark S ("any day now") .... Any / all metallurgy completions... Off takes... FS ...Etc.

It would be nice if we got something this week, as per WalterS's suggestion to open up the Conference next week.

LoL. That's pretty specific, but I won't hold you to it.
08,09 11,12th are acceptable deviations.

Well I don't think the 20% or the gains waiting for spring will be on the agenda for NioCorp this go round.
Not cyclical and too much news expected this quarter.

Jmo

http://mobile.tmxmoney.com/quote/charts/?symbol=NB&chscale=3y&chtype=FinancialBar

and Bill Murray as well, ha-ha

Which came first? Chicken Little or the Egg

Soon the Sharks will be eating each other, I'm sure!

Todd? That's a scary thought,
He starts drinking @ 5 oclock(somewhere)

I don't even care to answer your Post. But I will say the bid that showed up moments after this fiasco ended with AK74's post was the same quantity as the close yesterday. So as people wake up? LoL. 171 board lots

Coincidence

Todd, I also find it interesting that the heavy bid late yesterday was not there this morning but is back again now after this fiasco is over. So why don't we talk about that? After all he/ inversor did say it doesn't affect trading in any significant way?

Can it be coincidence?
Or a feable attempt at scaring some mom and pop reading this board into selling 2 cents lower.

Todd I also ring it interesting the the heavy bid late yesterday was not there this morning but i back again now after this fiasco is over.

And if it seems not good then let's post it. We can always claim confusion.

No owner of shares would have posted that on here unless they wanted more shares.

Just my effusive opinion.

Maybe because it's part of an agreement he has made.
Most of us longs are not letting ours go.

Somebody with clout thinks he has too many shares perhaps.

The reality is, nobody else is selling due to the SEC Filing.

Well the market seems to think things are fine. Almost all the miniscule amount of Shares sold are from one seller/broker. Whoopty do !

Good luck Landmark
Perhaps Walter can help you out with this non effusive crowd.
I know what we have!

You seem very knowledgeable on gold propjoe, is this move by Germany to bring their gold home a reaction to the makings of a economic bubble of sorts?

No big deal
https://www.rt.com/business/336405-germany-gold-reserves-return/

Very interesting that HC WAINRIGHT & Co. Is the Marquee sponsor of the conference.

I took his comment as a figure of speech, or rhetorical. I assumed he meant the sp movement or the chatter one might hear if your within earshot of what's happening out there. Or as Todd put it, the calm before the storm

I'm sure Bernice will appreciate that comment. (Not)
But it was a rather well delivered insult to me and any females on this board nonetheless.
Good job.

I have to say, I sure appreciate all contributors, no matter how annoyed they make me. lol j/k.

Landmark I must say you rock on the business end of this board.
I swear if it wasn't for guys like You and Todd keeping us thinking about the light at the end of the tunnel, I think LCP and his like, would have driven me crazy (which is his job).
So, thanks man!

and everyone else too, what the hell.

Could that actually happen considering the metals are strategic to USA and CBMM would dominate the market?

It is illegal. Proving or catching someone is another story.
I guess some folks like the risk/reward percentages.

The same thing happened on the day of the reversal.
Buying and selling shares to and from yourself creates the illusion that there is lots of volume and the prices dropping. By the end of the day in my opinion someone will buy the shares back up. It's just one more strategy to accumulate.

If it is contrary to what has been published. Back it up with documentation
It's pretty simple to do, if it's true.

For instance. Re the high flyer, You can glamorize someone so that everyone says wow, but where's the beef?

I like your analogy landmark.

Another analogy comes to mind also ... Information
Accepting PR information and documentation vs hear-say and innuendo's is comparable to...
Eating a lovingly and finely prepared meal vs. Eating scraps from the kitchen garbage can.

To each their own, but keep the garbage servers away from my plate.

no, that's Walter's description that I reiterated. (I think)
He saw them, I only heard about them! .. haha

You threw her credentials in my face after the fact.
My response earlier was to masslandings request to have her findings posted.

this conversation has nothing to do with board posters credentials.

As far as I'm concerned the only credentials required by posters is they are shareholders or officers of the company we are invested in.
You brought up some woman you met on an airplane, and didn't give any specifics as to her knowledge or education but Massanding wanted you to post what she has to say.

He obviously has higher regard for your liaisons, then I do.

Inversor
I was questioning the credibility of your mile high liaison period.

You never said anything about her company or credentials, and it is just like you to leave that kind of information out until you can use it in an insulting manor

Read your moderator rules again,

Cheers

I respectfully appreciate your comment, but there is a big difference between bickering and protecting the sanctity of your investments from innuendo and hearsay.

Masslanding asked him to post it.
That is why I responded to his post!