Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
What rebound,.05.NO
................025.NO
..................0125.NO
All emotional issues aside, All technical predictions aside,
This is still trending down,
No short term pop
You should look for another play
You're not batting 1000
There was a time that I might have jumped on the message board bandwagon
Still looks like some buying pressure though
Bollinger Bands
MOSH's recent volatility has been greater than normal. This is evidenced by the increased distance between the upper and lower Bollinger Bands. These bands measure volatility using standard deviation and a large width is due to high volatility. Additionally, MOSH is trading above its upper Bollinger Band. Relative to recent price action, the stock is currently overextended and due for either a pause or retracement.
Parabolic SAR
Today, MOSH closed above the trigger point for the Parabolic SAR and is currently registering a bullish signal. The current Significant Point, below which a reversal to the bearish side would occur, is 0.19.
RSI
According to the RSI which is currently at 77.4% and above the critical level of 70, MOSH is overbought. While a stock that is overbought may continue to rally, investors should be especially careful when MOSH begins to lose strength and RSI dips below 70.
Looks a little over extended to get into now, I could be wrong but I'm watching anywho
No, I kinda just visited here to share that beer thing with you. Are you saying I should pay more attention? I'll take all the help I can get. I need some way to find the ones with potential.
100 @ .0051
Way to kick start that momentum
That's too funny
Well I hope you're right, and I can learn from anyone. I never really understood why this wasn't allowed to build up some momentum before the dumping started but I've seen just piles of shares dumped on the bid over and over again. Before the split I was flipping the hell outa this building a position. I was pretty positive that if I sold a portion at the morning spike they would accomidate me by driving the price down so I could rebuy more later. My flaw was I should have been skimming the change instead of rebuying more.
Believe me I don't see this as a contest to see who's right. I want to hear differing opinions.
I will say that tech indicators have been worthless here. An unsustainable selloff has proven to be anything but. If you look at the chart you will see that there can't be anyone selling at a profit, but selling they are. You can't see the resistance but it has been there consistantly. I'm guessing that at the next filing there will be another 20 mil or so outstanding
They've taken their hand off the top of our heads the last 2 days to let us get a breath. The bully will be back.
Good luck Brad
Sorry if I'm a smarta$$, You seem to be a gentleman
Who are they, just wondering
.05 ? even at .025 I think your being optimistic. Did you forget a zero in your post ?
But you can't tell by me, if you kick a dog enough times, he expects the boot.
Bark Bark
Up 42%+ to close at high of day
Shares are scarce
It ran a little longer than yesterday, few more fish in the pond I guess
0.0052 200000 OBB 10:30:50
0.006 50000 OBB 10:26:03
0.006 5000 OBB 10:25:38
0.006 50000 OBB 10:25:02
0.006 81800 OBB 10:18:31
0.006 8200 OBB 10:18:12
z 0.0061 5000 OBB 10:05:16
0.0061 100000 OBB 10:03:05
0.0061 100000 OBB 09:56:59
0.0061 87000 OBB 09:55:52
0.0061 100000 OBB 09:54:25
0.0061 50000 OBB 09:51:02
0.0061 88000 OBB 09:47:58
0.0057 1800 OBB 09:30:08
Almost the same time of day though, interesting
Exactly as I thought, always happens
Feed the fire, then dump
I hate being right
Not the companies, just the shareholders
Level 2 looks the same as yesterday morning
Lets see if it pans out the same
Give the fish a little line, them wham set the hook
I hope I didn't come across as an attack. I didn't intend that to be the case. I agree that there is potential to make short term gains with this one. It seems that as soon as the buyers stall out here come the shares at the bid. Happens over and over. Tech indicators seem to be ineffectual here because they keep increasing the float. They've added 50 million since the split. I know it's not the case now but oversold conditions mean nothing here. Every time the fire starts they throw a bucket of shares on it to put it out.
Good Luck
Hope you make some
How long have you been observing the trading activity of this? You are correct it opened this morning today at the hod but how long did it take for resistance to happen?
A few buys at the high then bam
0.0052 47897 OBB 10:18:12
0.006 5000 OBB 09:43:53
0.006 15000 OBB 09:43:44
0.006 100000 OBB 09:35:27
0.006 22855 OBB 09:33:18
I can count one one hand the days in the past 6 months when this was able to make any headway. It has always retraced, shares have always been available for sale. Be very careful
JMO
Char
I'm sorry maybe this is the one you were refering to
http://stockpromoters.com/default.asp
From the Laurus Fund web site
On The Go Technologies Group
"On The Go (OTG) has grown substantially over the past 18 months, and Laurus'custom-tailored financial service and catering to our unique needs over the past year, has been a definitive supporting factor. Their backing has allowed us the flexibility and certainty to go forth in every sense with complete confidence. Looking to times yet to come, together as a team we truly believe that they'll continue to take the lead in lending that hand in providing us the financial platform to always move to that next level."
Stuart Turk, Chief Executive Officer,
Grown Substantially... Holy Crap!!!
http://www.laurusfunds.com/portfolio_lobby.asp
Laurus Funds
http://www.forbes.com/home/free_forbes/2007/0212/064.html
http://www.thestreet.com/markets/hedgefunds/10259627_2.html
dlgf Dec.06 2004 $.35
dglf Dec.06 2007 $.03
http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=105&STORY=/www/story/12-02-2004/0002560974
grn (then amex) Dec 06 2004 $1.29
gmti.ob (now otb) Dec 06 2007 $.45
http://www.ewire.com/display.cfm/Wire_ID/2217
cybd.ob Jun. 6 2007 $.48
cybd.ob Dec. 6 2007 $.16
http://biz.yahoo.com/e/070629/cybd.ob8-k.html
I really could go on all day
No company doing business with Laurus is doing their shareholders any favors
Laurus Funds
dlgf Dec.06 2004 $.35
dglf Dec.06 2007 $.03
http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=105&STORY=/www/story/12-02-2004/0002560974
grn (then amex) Dec 06 2004 $1.29
gmti.ob (now otb) Dec 06 2007 $.45
http://www.ewire.com/display.cfm/Wire_ID/2217
cybd.ob Jun. 6 2007 $.48
cybd.ob Dec. 6 2007 $.16
http://biz.yahoo.com/e/070629/cybd.ob8-k.html
I really could go on all day
No company doing business with Laurus is doing their shareholders any favors
Laurus Funds
Are you promoting this as a positive attribute?
http://www.forbes.com/home/free_forbes/2007/0212/064.html
http://www.thestreet.com/markets/hedgefunds/10259627_2.html
I found an interesting website, I have the link but am unwilling to post it for fear of violating tos rules here.
It would be sufficent to say if someone did a web search for stock promotions it would come up.
It provides a clearing house for public companies looking for, promoters for their stock, investment capitol, etc.
Promoters looking for companies searching for promotional forums. Investors looking for companies
I can see now how it's all tied together. I believe that once a company has chosen this path for financing the future of the stock can really be out of their hands. Of course there are restrictions available however that could be determined by just how badly they needed the money. If a financier has a lien on basically 100 percent of your assets, well you get the picture. If you want the money, this is how we're going to do it. You will promote the shares we need to sell, you will provide the shares to us. I imagine the promotion is part of the deal from the very beginning. I won't begin to believe that I have a 100% understanding of this process, but I do know some people will agree to anything to move forward. It would be very easy to justify.
I know you more seasoned players out there are saying "Thank you Capt'n Obvious but I'm learning and I post this stuff to generate feedback.
Some more history
Symbol...Name................................Expiration Date
OGOH...On the Go Healthcare, Inc.
ONGO...On the Go Healthcare, Inc...(Common).11/16/2007
OGHC...On the Go Healthcare Inc.............08/10/2006
OGHI...ON THE GO HEALTHCARE INC.............10/04/2004
How many permutations of this symbol are there ?
Perhaps a better question might be how many will there be ?
If you look back a little farther
According to the OTCBB
52 week high 18.00
52 week low (were it's at now).005
http://www.otcbb.com/asp/Info_Center.asp
(enter symbol ogoh)
sorry re post
Happy New Year
Remember this, LOL couldn't hit this target even with 50/1 Reverse split
Equity Stock Analysis Announces Research Coverage of On The Go with a Rating of 'Attractive' and a Target Price of $0.095
Aug 9, 2007 2:10:00 PM
Copyright Business Wire 2007
DALLAS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--
On The Go Healthcare Inc. (OTCBB: ONGO) has received a rating of "Attractive" with a price target of $0.095 by Equity Stock Analysis (ESA). The report is authored by Senior Research Analyst, Kris Gupta, CFA. (This guy must be a figgen genius)
The full report is available at http://www.equitystockanalysis.com
In the report Mr. Gupta writes, "On The Go Healthcare Inc., is a North American business-to-business direct marketer of both software and hardware products. On The Go's customer base consists principally of small- and medium-sized businesses. A multiple expansion is possible as the company's growth profile and productivity metrics improve further as evidenced by the 2007 fiscal year trend.
On The Go's recent reiteration of its business model, including a redirected focus on those niches which generated the greatest return in revenue appears to be on target as evidenced by the increase in third quarter revenue to $27.5 Million CDN.
Our target is based on these projections: (Stupidity,Wishful thinking,We're paid to say it)
1. Gross Sales increase by twenty to twenty-five percent in 2008.
2. Cost of Goods Sold remains at eighty percent or less.
3. Selling, General and Administrative Expenses hold at ten to twelve percent of 2007 Gross Sales.
We believe On The Go can return to the shareholder the value of early August 2006, one year ago, of approximately $.095 per share and begin an ongoing retracement in shareholder value."(Why don't I just email you my address and you can come to my house and kick me)
About Equity Stock Analysis ( OMG,How could they even type this while laughing so hard)
EQUITY STOCK ANALYSIS ("ESA") is committed to the highest ethical standards and as such is not subject to external pressure that is sometimes experienced to issue biased research. This pressure is avoided by refusing to accept companies that cannot be recommended with objectivity, quality, and accuracy of research. ESA and its Certified Financial Analysts are independent, objective, and have a reasonable and adequate basis for our investment recommendations. ESA has established formal written policies supporting independent and objective analyst research. ESA has senior corporate officer publicly attest, at least annually, to adherence to the policy.
Disclosure: Pentony Enterprises LLC has been compensated a total of 3,209,220 restricted 144 shares of stock and $23,500. Pentony Enterprises LLC is not a registered investment adviser or broker/dealer. Pentony Enterprises LLC makes no recommendation that the purchase of securities of companies profiled in this web site are suitable or advisable for any person or that an investment in such securities will be profitable. In general, given the nature of the companies profiled and the lack of an active trading market for their securities, investing in such securities is highly speculative and carries a high degree of risk.
Source: On The Go Healthcare Inc.
This kind of stuff is very difficult to read for someone who invested in this company pre-split.
None of these wonderful facts or people have any bearing on the price action of the stock.
None of the positive moves the company has made, debt reduction, increased margins, reductions in staff, additional and repeat customers, have had any positive effect on the value of this company as an investment.
The shares of this company are currently being used as an atm, and every new shareholder has been a depositor
Correction,
301,292.82
It's snowing here in Chicago
If I can find a hill as steep as this chart my son and I can have some fun.
Every day the technical indicators express a bearish trend that should not be maintained
Every day they are wrong
Every day
Annual revenues
24,510,797
Current market value of outstanding shares
331,422.11
This makes a lot of sense.
Dump..Dump..Dump
Right now my shares wouldn't buy a steak.
Part 2. What have I learned,
Any stock purchases made during the period when this intangable asset was included in the balance sheets would now seem to have been made on an overinflated assumption of value.
An intelligent investor would have determined fair value without including the goodwill amount.
Who is responsible for this misinterpetation of value?
What type of accounting was used to access a value to these intangable assets.
What factors have changed ( I can only assume that these intangable assets have not provided the revenues that were originally associated to them )
So what have I learned ?
The company had assessed a projected value of certain attributes of their aquisitions and has now had to write off that projected value against income because...
1. The original value given to these attributes (brand names, employees, customer base. etc) has proven to have been over estimated and now must be accounted for.
2. The company is using this write off to offset an increase in profit. ( No, and that would seem to be misrepresentative anyway. )
I'm afraid I'm wading into new territory here and my interpretation is this is an intangable asset that the company has now had to remove from their balance sheet.
Please correct me if I'm wrong
If done correctly, this will provide investors with more valuable information. Balance sheets are bloated with goodwill that resulted from acquisitions during the bubble years, when companies overpaid for assets by using overpriced stock. Over-inflated financial statements distort not only the analysis of a company but also what investors should pay for that stock. The new rules force companies to revalue these bad investments, much like what the stock market has done to individual stocks.
The impairment charge also provides investors with a way to evaluate corporate management and its decision-making track record. Companies that have to write off billions of dollars due to impairment have not made good investment decisions. Managements that bite the bullet and take an honest all-encompassing charge should be viewed more favorably than those who slowly bleed a company to death by deciding to take a series of recurring impairment charges, thereby manipulating reality.
Impairment Defined
As with most generally accepted accounting principles, the definition of "impairment" is in the eye of the beholder. The regulations are complex, but the fundamentals are relatively easy to understand. Under the new rules, all goodwill is to be assigned to the company's reporting units that are expected to benefit from that goodwill. Then the goodwill must be tested (at least annually) to determine if the recorded value of the goodwill is greater than the fair value. If the fair value is less than the carrying value, the goodwill is deemed "impaired" and must be charged off. This charge reduces the value of goodwill to the fair market value and represents a "mark-to-market" charge.
Goodwill Write-Downs
Accounting rules at one time assumed that the value of intangibles depreciate over time, in the same way that tangible assets get worn out. Nowadays, in recognition that many types of goodwill don't wear out, companies no longer automatically take charges against goodwill each reporting period. Instead, they must re-examine the value of goodwill each year. If the goodwill is worth as much as what it was originally paid for, the value is left alone. On the other hand, if an acquisition eventually turns out to be worth less than what management originally paid for it, the company will then reduce its value or write-off its value entirely.
Quarterly filing out,
I'm trying to figure this out
Impairment Loss
Impairment loss increased to $2,042,274 for the three months ended
October 31, 2007 compared to none in the three months ended October 31, 2006.
The increase in impairment loss was a result of management determining an
impairment on future cash flow benefits of capitalized goodwill.
never mind.. pointless