Followers | 300 |
Posts | 13,009 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 01/30/2013 |
Twitter Profile: | Temporarily Unavailable |
Follow on Twitter: | Follow @ Temporarily Unavailable |
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Low volume pops - Big volume drops.
Traders know what that means.
We've seen it here for weeks.
Don't get trapped guys.
In what way does this justify the consistent losses resulting from the service's "trade recommendations"?
"It is fully invested by mandate."
"I don't blame anyone for being curious about 420 Investor, as it clearly is able to differentiate between some of the stocks in the sector that have a shot and the vast majority that don't."
Where the stock closed on the last day of 2014 isn't the same as the 52 week high.
But even the irrelevant measure stated in your post illustrates that the 420Investor service's performance has indeed been quite poor.
It's worth pointing out that I could have bought CANL at its 52 week high, still hold that position today - and I would be better off than if I'd followed all of the 420Investor service's 420 opportunity "trade recommendations."
To me - that says a lot. Do correct me if I'm wrong.
So no CANL trades, despite the hugely profitable pattern it offered? Afterall, penny stocks aren't for investing - they are for trading/profit taking. Is this idea new to the 420Investor service? Is the dismissal of this widely accepted rule amongst traders what ultimately led to the service's overall performance of -75% since inception?
75% losses is pretty pitiful for a service that is supposed to help subscribers avoid such mistakes. No?
Why did the service adamantly recommend stocks like PHOT, if CANL is essentially in the same boat?
Can't do a link because it would violate the TOS (google it), but here are the specs on the 39% LOSING trade: TRTC
Long
4,500.00
$0.189
$0.1135
$-339.75
-39.95%
04/08/2014
10/27/2015
Ouch. Look at the dates! The service "recommended" holding all that time, only to "recommend" cutting losses at -39% a year and a half later.
For a service that once touted this stock adamently, that's not much of a vote of confidence.
••IS THIS FOR REAL?!••
So TRTC's former biggest fan, the 420Investor service, which "recommended" folks buy and hold at prices as high as .58, now suggested folks cut their losses from the service's failed entry "recommendation" at .18.
The 420Investor service's "recommendation" was to take a ~40% LOSS on TRTC!? Crazy isn't it?
So TRTC's most adamant promoter doesn't even have faith in the stock hitting .18 again?
That's somethin else!
Glad we're not the only ones acknowledging the reality of this story any more.
What about the reviews like this one? "Following the trade alerts almost wiped out my portfolio. [...] I did better on my own."
Was it a CANL trade that "wiped out" this guy's portfolio? Or was it the many horrible "recommendations" by 420Investor in general? Just curious.
420Investor service = ~75% LOSS since inception?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but haven't the 420Investor service's "trade recommendations" resulted in 75% LOSSES since inception?
~200 such "trade recommendations" and the vast majority have resulted in losses exceeding 20%?
How many CANL trades did that include?
The 420Investor service's most "recommended" stock of all time was PHOT, which we all know was THE cannabis sector pump & dump.
IN FACT, if I remember correctly (I usually do), the service recommended its subscribers vote in favor of a drastic increase to authorized shares just days before the SEC suspended the stock for allegations related to a pump & dump scheme.
420Investor subscribers who followed the "recommendations" potentially suffered 80% losses almost over night!
From the start PHOT obviously exhibited all of the tell-tale signs of a pump & dump, yet this fact was rejected by the 420Investor service.
That being so, I question the service's authority to comment on CannLabs insofar as its viability as an investment is concerned. After all, the 420Investor service's performance since inception is marked by a 75% LOSS overall...right?
Just be careful folks - my grandkid is better at managing trades than the 420Investor service is.
•Wow• Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't VTCG up something like TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY PERCENT since this post?
"I'm feeling triple zeroes on VTCQ next week."
This is headed lower.
No value for shareholders = No value per share.
Remember - bagholder stocks are always the most adamantly promoted yet worst performing stocks on the market.
Don't be fooled.
•Wow• Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't VTCG up something like TWO HUNDRED PERCENT since this post?
"I'm feeling triple zeroes on VTCQ next week."
It's not non-public information because it's not information.
It's fabricated nonsense.
.24 isn't even a "key level of support."
lol Nice one.
lol So wrong. Always.
Every. Single. Time.
Chart says GBLX has VASTLY outperformed TRTC on every possible measure.
Don't have an opinion about this otherwise - just felt it was worth pointing to the facts.
VTCQ is up HUGE instead.
Nice one!:
I'm feeling triple zeroes on VTCQ next week.
We get it. The 420Investor service has become the laughing stock (no pun intended) of the cannabis sector...
...But a dedicated effort to point out the shortcomings of other companies isn't actually going to improve the situation for the 420Investor service...so I'd consider an alternate, less desperate looking strategy.
lol
Less than $10k volume a day. No one cares.
Just want some answers, that's all.
••*Article*••TRTC, Worst bagholder stock in OTC history?:
Just as we warned when we alerted our longterm exit at $1.39, TRTC is still headed much lower. This is a true pump & dump bagholder stock, and nothing could be more obvious.
So be careful. And don't be fooled by the constant fabricated hype.
http://tinyurl.com/OTCTRTC-BagholderStock-Nov2015
All this statement says is that the same individuals involved with Medifarm have operated medical marijuana facilities before.
"• The MediFarm team has operated licensed facilities in California for more than two years,"
We can only hope that folks are aware of the reality that there is no merit to this statement whatsoever AT ALL.
"Also, those in the know about the timing of the Blum Oakland acquisition will be continuing to accumulate up until the announcement."
No surprise there. TRTC continues to trade precisely according to our projections.
Looks like this week was a bit of a dud...
"Blum Oakland will be acquired."
•WOW• Is it just me or...
...does our level of accuracy continue to go unmatched?:
If by "the 20% rule" you're meaning to refer to the Pareto principle, I'm not sure how that relates in the context of "averaging up or down" (up?) and/or being trapped with .81 shares...
Please elaborate.
This looks like it'll break down any minute.
If by "the 20% rule" you're meaning to refer to the Pareto principle, I'm not sure how that relates in the context of "averaging up or down" (up?) and/or being trapped with .81 shares...
Please elaborate.
This looks like it'll break down any minute.
That might be deemed "really important" by investors who are already trapped with expensive shares, but to potential investors, there exist countless factors that more accurately depict the viability of this stock as an investment.
Potential investors are more concerned with whether or not the company operates in a way that is likely to benefit them. Fewer millions in losses in the last few months is fine to see...but in the grand scheme of things, it doesn't hold a match to the overarching issues for shareholders that happen to be inherent to the company's structure.
No value for shareholders = No value per share. Simple stuff.
Um. What?
TRTC's daily accumulation is quite impressive when one considers all the relentless daytraders
but TRTC continues to rise to continue under strong accumulation.
The 420Investor service's most "recommended" stock of all time was PHOT, which we all know was THE cannabis sector pump & dump.
IN FACT, if I remember correctly (I usually do), the service recommended its subscribers vote in favor of a drastic increase to authorized shares just days before the SEC suspended the stock for allegations related to a pump & dump scheme.
Again, correct me if I'm wrong...but 420Investor subscribers who followed the "recommendations" potentially suffered 80% losses almost over night!
From the start PHOT obviously exhibited all of the tell-tale signs of a pump & dump, yet this fact was rejected by the 420Investor service.
That being so, I question the service's authority to comment on MSRT insofar as its viability as an investment is concerned.
Just be careful folks - it appears that my grandkid is better at managing trades than the 420Investor service is.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but hasn't MSRT plummeted ~35% since the 420Investor service "recommended" folks buy and claimed a target of $4.20?
$4.20?! LOL
And haven't the 420Investor service's "trade recommendations" resulted in 75% LOSSES since inception?
If just about every stock 420Investor "recommends" plummets 50-75%, why would we be surprised to see MSRT doing the same? And why would anyone ever buy a stock touted by 420Investor in the first place?
The 420Investor service's long standing history of horrible "recommendations" is well known. IMO, that has something to do with the pitiful performance of MSRT.
••IS THIS FOR REAL?!••
So TRTC's former biggest fan, the 420Investor service, which "recommended" folks buy and hold at prices as high as .58, now suggested folks cut their losses from the service's failed entry "recommendation" at .18.
The 420Investor service's "recommendation" was to take a ~40% LOSS on TRTC! Crazy isn't it?
So TRTC's most adamant promoter doesn't even have faith in the stock hitting .18 again?
That's somethin else!
Glad we're not the only ones acknowledging the reality of this story any more.
My first post on the TRTC board wasn't on 06/05/2014, but interestingly, this stock has never again been worth .81. It has literally done nothing but downtrend -86% since that day.
Again - that didn't happen to be the first day we decided to initiate our adamant support for this POS though. Because thankfully, by 06/04/2014 we had long alerted our exit at $1.39 and already called our sub-dime downside target.
Interesting indeed.
On 06/05/2014 pps was .81.
Magnum7419 Thursday, 06/05/14 04:20:53 PM
Re: MonestHind post# 52225 Post # of 147572
I watched the presentation and TRTC answered all the questions quite clearly.........There is no issues except for someone who maybe short...
None of those things will happen. This "virtual investor conference" is just another desperate effort to retain current bagholders because the company is under pressure from the dilutive financiers.
More fabricated hype. No surprise there.
TRTC continues to trade precisely according to our projections. Look into it.
Big orders starting to hit the exit as expected.
Might see another low volume pop to .115 into close to preserve the chart and allow for more selling tomorrow...if the MMs are willing to stick their heads out again. There's been a lot of that lately though...so maybe not.
In any event - this is headed lower.
Both posts are 100% wrong.
Dominion didn't purchase shares until August of 2014.
And, of course, TRTC has never made a penny's profit since inception. Instead, the company has lost millions upon millions of shareholder dollars every quarter.
Fabricated hype and blatant inaccuracies do not help this situation. No one is fooled.
I remember a post identical to this after we alerted our longterm exit at $1.39 and called our sub-dime downside target. Seriously - look into it.
Strange to see it again at .11. What happened to this thing? Exactly what we warned would happen orrrrrr?
I would be terrified if I wasn't in the stock this week
It would be nerve-wracking to be hoping for the price to drop before buying in while the stock just takes off right before your eyes....
That is a very worrisome thought.
••Article••TRTC, Worst bagholder stock in OTC history?:
Just as we warned when we alerted our longterm exit at $1.39, TRTC is still headed much lower. This is a true pump & dump bagholder stock, and nothing could be more obvious.
So be careful. And don't be fooled.
http://tinyurl.com/OTCTRTC-BagholderStock-Nov2015
TRTC ultimately plummeted -22% from the purported .125 bottom, and still remains below that level by 10%.
IMO, .05 is a more viable candidate for a bottom because it is somewhat closer to a fair valuation IF there is no additional dilution and/or no other setback.
The hype phase that once sustained this stock is long gone. There is no one else willing to overpay for a long term position. We'll flip the techs when the techs are good, but this stock is vastly overvalued, overhyped and shows all the tell tale signs of a pump & dump death spiral in the long-run.
It's really quite simple: Flip it. But don't get trapped.
And being that TRTC is a known bagholder stock it is critical to ALWAYS CONSUME INFORMATION WISELY.
CANL - Barely $1,000 volume.
Things must be slow over at 420Investor. Does that have anything to do with the "trade recommendations" resulting in 75% losses since inception?
TRTC ultimately plummeted -22% from the purported .125 bottom, and still remains below that level by 10%.
IMO, .05 is a more viable candidate for a bottom because it is somewhat closer to a fair valuation IF there is no additional dilution and/or no other setback.
The hype phase that once sustained this stock is long gone. There is no one else willing to overpay for a long term position. We'll flip the techs when the techs are good, but this stock is vastly overvalued, overhyped and shows all the tell tale signs of a pump & dump death spiral in the long-run.
It's really quite simple: Flip it. But don't get trapped.
And being that TRTC is a known bagholder stock it is critical to ALWAYS CONSUME INFORMATION WISELY.