Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Is the alleged merger the same?
Your right, as I have thought all along, the silence is deafening
That's really cheap by UK prices and you have the sunshine
Yes I mentioned it in my post within the hour of the "interview" being released
I was thinking,could the posters who have been in direct contact with Brand E asked them to release RTGV from the NDA?
This would clear away a great deal of the doubt and negativity
In the case you put forward ( which I agree with) why on earth would Brand E want to be part of RTGV (they haven't actually said that they will be).
If they for some reason they do they need to release all parties from the non disclosure agreement which will go some way to stopping rumours and manipulation
Then the only way to put right the remaining problems is to change the Management and by that I mean all the cuurent top management and leave it to Brand E. to nominate others.
I think that their clothing client is looking like a good deal and will run
Take it or leave it, but a lot are listening and demanding action
ke it or leave it but a lot are listening and demanding action
Not true, you just speaking for your self here
I expected a visual interview at the very least not difficult now is it.
All dependent on finishing an as yet to be finished product which seems like it will be a glorified version of twitter.
Fan app has a limited release and Pulse will need to be successful before celebs adopt it, says Steve. He does not sound convinced to me that they will at anytime
Yes it is, but at last I have a conference booked with Barristers next week on a no win no fee basis
You would not think it is quite so funny if you had been defrauded of everything you had
You can talk to me privately on my e-mail rogerbailey2010@gmail.com.
But for now as it is just gone midnight in the UK I am off to bed now that I have seen Linda shoot herself in the foot again
At has been already suggested by others. So maybe it will happen
Thanks for introducing some common sense
Have a look at my reply
So is my reply
NOT a good job for the truth look at my reply
As to the truth, just look at the SEC Filed, binding, Definitive Agreement between ANHL and RTGV as to my contractual interest in RTGV
The Valuations referred to were all to subsidiary companies of ANHL and were fully audited, twice, without Query and I has sight of them signed off by Consor as did the Auditors.
I resigned from ANHL in 2008 due to the illegal activities of fellow Directors and RTGV Directors, all of which have been raised with the Authorities on both sides of the Atlantic.
The matter of Consor was only raised as a deflection tactic, like I referred to yesterday, when I tried to get the Euro shareholders on my side in 2009. I called for the Statement to be provided but nothing was forthcoming. People got frightened and stopped just short of deposing Perry then. Now she repeating the same tactic again; she must be scared!
Roger Taylor was part of the conspiracy to defraud me and if I had the cash that is due to me ( I am taking legal action but it is a slow process) I would take out proceedings for defamation against RTGV and the author of the e-mail
This has all the hallmarks of a Linda rant and she would do well to take her own advice regarding name calling nonsense and lies
The drafting of the first paragraph is disgracefully inept ( but there is nothing new about that as far as RTGv is concerned) as it implies that I too have a record.
For the sake of the record I have never been prosecuted or ever involved with Taylor's other activities. He was just a paid consultant to ANHL by way of a minority stake in the company until I was forced out by his illegal activities with the co operation of the Board of RTGV.
As to conditions of closing Perry kept changing them and Taylor went along with her behind my back. All a matter of record with RTGV's then Attorney, Paykin of NY.
NOT true. Many "naysayers" have been turned over by Fludgate and Perry over the last 5-9 years and want to see a stop to their scamming machine.
I am personally down over US$1M in cash and much much more in lost/worthless Stock.
Then what do you call the vast increase in the Outstanding Shares over the last few months
The immoral thing is that it is not the first time they have done this.
They have been lying about everything since 2006 and probably before.
Probably on the trips to LA which is OK given a merger is underway. If thats so, as you say, why not be proud and explain.
Answer; Linda's on going manifest arrogance
This has been the case since January when some shareholders were looking to replace the management and deal with the company as a Shell but it should not have taken this long for others to realise
The increase in the OS and dumping has all the hallmarks of Barry Fludgate's tactics in another company in which he was involved for a while. That one no longer exists but it could have flown but for the greed by the manipulators and "tacticians"
He is watching the board and occasionally responding, must be for a reason!
But that is Linda all over for the last 6 years and more; rude, arrogant and worst of all stupid
But if you had experience of Linda like I do then you would have expected it. I have to say to many of you I told you so and a long time ago
Because he is no better
There is one obvious answer which I have stated before as have others; trust in the management.
What needs to be tried is the changes talked about in January because there has been nothing tangible from the company since
looks laike some are still on the strong kool aid
Problem is that there are so many "Revolutionaries" already further advanced tah this company
Problem is that there are so many "Revolutionaries" already further advanced
You're right, but I had hoped that their may have been some glimmer of light in the Regulatory system that I had not seen from here in the UK
I disagree,
something more substantial is needed;
like a wholesale change in management
I have had these thoughts from the outset.
I have mentioned this privately before and I am surprised that it has taken this long for someone to catch on.
Any view as to why the SEC seems to be so toothless both there, in your example and here
Linda's history is the problem more than anything else
That what I said.You have misunderstood it is obvious that it cannot be "announced" unless it is signed. Two Nations divided by a common language
But details ARE still missing and this cannot go any further without them