Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Proof of service still has to be provided to the court, even in the case of service by publication.
So whether one sees the actual notifications or not, proof will be found in the court register of actions.
If they are published they are to be entered into the case register just like personal service attempts are.
I said that based on memory. I was quite surprised when I actually looked at the recent filings.
Have fun tracking them down. Me, IDGAF.
A couple filings back he had some commons. The most recent he has none.
I dunno, what happened to the shares other than selling them?
Did he sell them? Previous financials showing him owning commons but recent don't.
Have you seen the previous financials available on kuora.net?
Maybe check them out before making assumptions about future "blow-out" numbers.
It's still Frank's ticker. Mitch owns some stock, that's all.
Let's start here: do you fully understand that "the surveillance team" refers to OTC Markets?
Who said it matters, because it did not come from OTC Markets or from ICOA.
The only place it was said was in an ihub post.
OTC Markets did not say they were confident the CE would be lifted.
Clara did not say that OTC Markets was confident the CE would be lifted.
"I believe it that's all that matters!!!"
And I do not. It was not said by OTC Markets or ICOA. The only place it exists is an internet post by an anonymous user.
"Her message does not say the OTC Markets are confident the CE will be removed"
Correct!
"She says the surveillance team is confident it will be"
Incorrect!
That is not in the quote at all. The actual quote is "we are confident that the surveillance team will lift the CE"
The surveillance team is obviously OTC Markets. One would have to be extremely delusional to think that ICOA has the power to lift it's own CE.
Here, read it for yourself
The lie was claiming that she said OTC Markets was confident in CE removal.
What she actually said was that the company was confident in CE removal.
The lie was in this post: https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172185273
The APPEAL has been closed. Because it failed. It was "unwinnable" in George's own turn of phrase.
That does not change the original underlying problem of the missing financials. They are still missing.
As I have explained before, those can be checked at https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/GVSI/disclosure.
One can also go direct to the SEC if one wants to check for only those filings, https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001068618&type=&dateb=&owner=include&count=40.
The issue of the missing financials has not been resolved.
I just checked again. Yup, they are still missing.
That is the appeal being closed. Because it failed. It doesn't magically fix the underlying problem.
Take the example of someone being convicted of a crime. They then appeal the conviction but cannot convince the court to overturn their conviction. They finally withdraw the appeal because they realize it is "unwinnable" and no further efforts will change that.
This person is not magically let out of prison.just because they withdrew their appeal.
The appeal failed. They stay in prison.
Pointing to the fact that the appeal is no longer active does not mean it was won.
The person is still guilty and still remains in prison. They just no longer have an active appeal ongoing.
That does not fix the missing financials problem. They are still missing.
The appeal FAILED.
That's why the appeal was withdrawn and subsequently the appeal was dismissed.
That does not make the underlying issue of the missing financials go away. Those years did not magically appear. They are still missing.
There's a world of difference between stating that the company believes the CE will be removed and the lie stating that OTC Markets believes the CE will be removed.
The deficiency was the missing 6 years of filings.
That has not been corrected.
That's not what she said.
In 2019 they wanted the missing filings from 2008 to 2013. The filings have still not been submitted, and there is no "statute of limitations" where these issues magically disappear after an amount of time..
It's not just "water under the bridge" to be ignored. Pretending that it is is disingenuous to say the least.
The appeal had also been based on "we're a new company, those old financials don't even pertain to the current GVSI".
It didn't work then, why would it work now? Heck, George even publicly said the situation was "unwinnable".
That's a pretty brutal word. He didn't use "tough" or "a steep climb", he went right to "unwinnable".
The missing financials are the problem.
What false info have I posted? Please, go ahead, tell everyone.
Oh wait, I haven't posted anything false.
Oh okay, so as long as no one wants a future GVSI merger and name/ticker change then everything is fine.
Bummer. I think most investors were hoping for those.
Have the missing financials from 2008 to 2013 been filed? You know, the ones responsible for FINRA halting the corporate actions?
I just checked. Nope.
EDGAR is closed to filings "over a long weekend". Just like it's closed every non-long weekend too. And just like it's closed every night even.
Yes, that is right.
That must be why it's been CE for over a year.
Those are sells.
As of now it's looking like just a lamer smaller version of that other recent pump attempt.
I did not say they don't exist. Pretending that I did is disingenuous to say the least. In fact that's a straight up lie.
But any that might be operating sure as hell wouldn't waste their time in something that has done only $27,000 in 2 hours when there are many tickers out there doing millions of dollar volume where they could operate.
The exact same reason you gave yourself several posts ago regarding HFT's:
Yes, a link to OTC Markets. That's where one can find the filings, both SEC and Alternative Reporting.
I said I had just checked for the problematic missing years and found that they still haven't been filed and you asked for a link. That's where I went.
You can also go straight to the SEC if you're only interested in filings there,
https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001068618&type=&dateb=&owner=include&count=40
You're welcome.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/GVSI/disclosure
Nope, the missing filings still haven't appeared.
Oh wait, I just remembered, George already said he can't produce them. Well then I guess it would be silly to keep checking for them every 10 minutes.
Anyone having a problem with what OTC Markets publishes as their guidelines should take it up with them.
As far as FINRA, I just checked again. Nope, the 6 missing years that prevented corporate actions still haven't been filed.
When will they be filed? Should I check again in like 10 minutes?
FINRA denied the corporate actions due to the missing 6 years of filings.
I just checked. The missing 6 years still have not been filed.
Ignoring that does not make it go away.