Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
yea yea the same subliminal message everyday ..why say you're long at all? ... whenever the air gets a little thin here and the altitude extreme ...it's good to be reminded of the reality
AT THIS POINT THE MKT FEELS NO SETTLEMENT IS IMMINENT
if if if but yet everybody should hold or buy? but not flip ..i say flip flip flip the CIRC stock and take your profits every day; ....the rainbow is not as bright or as big as you think - take that to the bank
If the Playboy licensing dispute is not resolved satisfactorily to us through a negotiated settlement or litigation, PlayBev may be required to terminate its beverage distribution activities, which are currently the source of our principal revenues.
- Iehab J. Hawatmeh, President
Relevant Then Relevant Now
....or you recv your lifetime subscription to playboy mag as CIRC comp
safe harbor disclosures? not in their context ...brilliant tho if it happens; and there would be nothing you can do ...
mission complete
you warned them
4 plus yrs down and quite a few more to go? ...the following is a cute excuse for this "offspring co" to rip off shareholders a "second" time ...several of us pointed out the first rip being the great "deal" that settled us out of BK in the first place ...lol
never underestimate the power of greed ...where there is a wil there is a self righteous justified created way to steal [...ask any liberal]
Compliance with laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and new regulations enacted by the SEC, are resulting in increased compliance costs. WMIHC, like all other public companies, is incurring expenses and diverting employees’ time in an effort to comply with such laws. WMIHC is an accelerated reporting company, and has completed the process of documenting its systems of internal control and has evaluated its systems of internal control. We expect to continue to devote the necessary resources, including internal and external resources, to support WMIHC’s assessment and disclosure obligations. In addition, during the bankruptcy. WMIHC adopted so-called “Modified Exchange Act Reporting” under the SLB 2. Upon emergence from bankruptcy, WMIHC continues to rely upon the guidance set forth in SLB 2 and we have filed and will continue to file the Exchange Act periodic reports for all periods that begin after the Effective Date of the Plan. If WMIHC is not able to follow the Modified Exchange Act Reporting under SLB 2, much more extensive historical disclosure requirements could be imposed on WMIH, which would have a material adverse effect on the Company, including but not limited to, substantial compliance costs and sanctions. Compliance with different or evolving standards will result in increased general and administrative expenses and may cause a diversion of our time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities and could subject WMIHC to sanctions or investigation by authorities
I respect your IMO
sure sure
Ready Set Go ...did anyone forget to take CIRC profits earlier today?
LOOKS LIKE AT THIS POINT THE MKT FEELS NO SETTLEMENT IS IMMINENT
LOOKS LIKE AT THIS POINT THE MKT FEELS NO SETTLEMENT IS IMMINENT
never said the pps would not move ...the lawsuit will go forward
ROTFL
Nothing more than Venue or Intellectual Property Licensing rulings; meat of contract is dispute regarding if EITHER SIDE violated terms of contract; to be decided, most likely, in trial
3-0? no surprise as venue was clearly outlined in contract and parameters of intellectual property rights were part of a distributor contract ...so since we're sticking to the terms of the contract which determined 3-0? outcome lets see what happens in a trial concerned with the terms of a written contract
what/ no leaks ...there's always a leak in such a HIGH PROFILE case such as this...aren't there? lol
Don't look so good, or does it? lets see what the trade data says for today
actually Prop Trading, not the MM
ready set go ...a little late but always take profits; who gives as*&% bout tomorrow
Hibernating like BEAR
ready, set , go ...everyone take profits
there's always a false sense of security in the courts as there are never equal outcomes
this is the sub penny on topic, but I'll designate my post UNIVERSAL
as i pointed out ...but the longs are long for the dream, not short term; that is unless they are actually flippers claiming to be long...one thing to be long and waiting, another to claim long when actually flipping
another insignificant ruling [either way] on Playboy strategic time waster [yes, some short term effect on pps] ...the meat is the contract dispute not intellectual property infringement [intellectual property license part of contract]
another insignificant ruling [either way] on Playboy strategic time waster [yes, some short term effect on pps] ...the meat is the contract dispute not intellectual property infringement [intellectual property license part of contract]
tell that to him ...he needs to listen
nothing has changed ...he still knows it
Not as fast as Cirtran will if the case is not resolved in their favor; even Iehab J. Hawatmeh knows that ... p.s. without the Playboy brand cirtran sales numbers would have been "0"
If the Playboy licensing dispute is not resolved satisfactorily to us through a negotiated settlement or litigation, PlayBev may be required to terminate its beverage distribution activities, which are currently the source of our principal revenues.
- Iehab J. Hawatmeh, President
If you look at PB recent history they have been going down the drain so for another company to walk in and show another money making opportunity like what Playbev done and the distribution, distributors over how many country again... They need to Pay Up and suck it up. Just what I think. Look at Playboy market share price then tell me they were doing great on there own.
no there not ...there here living on a dream
look again ..these are the boards; I'm sure there is someone ...lol
4 plus yrs down ...a few more to go; maybe ..if you're lucky
fact is bod didn't get there on a whim ...they knew where the money was, [some have history] and that was being on the board, thus the settlement - collect their money over time ...until it's all just a shareholder memory ...yet someday, there might be a token merger or acquisition
imo
fact is AAPL has lost its edge ...several co's now compete in the world, no-matter what your cup o tea teck is ...i'm more interested in what aapl will do with the stashed money; that's what shareholders should be concerned with
for anyone to think that cirtran itself was the selling point and not the playboy brand - well [silence]... with or without the horny goat weed
Absolutely ...playboy could have asked anyone to mfg this drink and the brand name would sell it ... weak DD on Playboys part
D stays on 20 business days ...I've seen certs MIA up to 90 days ...resumed trading depends when individual brokerages recv exchanged certs, sometimes some before others
I'll get back in when this hits a lower 4 ...hopefully before next months announcement of $$plans - will be interesting to see how they allocate? stashed $$ overseas
too simple, had that from day one ...... you make that sound like a major accomplishment ....you're no closer to a settlement or win ... now find out exactly what happened
Another Judy Garland "Penny" Somewhere over the Rainbow R/S
If you don't know that? I see you can show a donkey the H2O, but you can't force'em to drink ...end of discussion
there's always hope ...I've heard that on the eve of each of the previous two judgments
lol ... probably why previous involved management of playboy are history ...imagine giving a co like circ a 10yr contract with a brand such as playboy lol
playboy attorneys are well aware they can't put the cart before the horse [or should be otherwise they are just totally inept]...infringement filings just time wasters
IMO
that's right ...stay OFL