KOP:

I guess when I watch streaming and the bid and ask is 100 and 50 that that is in the hundreds also. Don't think so, of course I could be wrong. Not first time and won't be last. But then there are some who take pride in saying I told you so, especially on these boards.

sannwinds:

Did you notice the shares for the last bid and ask price?
bid 100 @ .0043 ask 50 @ .0045

who would think about buying or selling that few of shares for so low a price?

definitely looks like price manipulation between the MMs

mick:
I do not limit the potential of this product to just women's healthcare. This happens to be where AMHI management have targeted right now, but this has more opportunity as the funds come in and additional markets/applications can be developed.

Chonata:
Send to Dave and ask him if they did attend. I see that it was over yesterday. Maybe Castle was represented.

B BALL GUY:

I understand your frustration, however this appears to be different as there are sales that go along with the product availability. It takes time to build a sales team, especially when you have a health related product.

That is why I say:
"Time and the Creator of it are my friends"

B Ball Guy

My real time stock states .01 with almost 1 million shares traded. Up 25%.

I am glad you don't have a real gun, you seem to want to pull the trigger too quickly.

Get real, get real time. You won't panic so quickly and try to discourage others

Remember this:

Disappointment doesn't come from what you find in life; disappointment comes from what you "expect" to find. If you are disappointed, change your expectations.

nwsun:
I agree with you on this as I have always stated the dtcc failed to do their job and are responsible. But Megas exasperated the problem with not immediately reporting the crime hoping that he could trust Pino to pay him 2 million dollars for an empty shell(worth only about $150,000 at best) with a faith down payment of $50,000 that has not been reported as BCIT non-operating income nor the certificates of BCIT not being registered.

I just get tired of people saying Megas has nothing to do with the problem. What Megas is guilty of is not reporting the identity theft in May 2005 because he was trying to work out a deal with Pino and hopefully cover up the crime thinking the nightmare would go away. Nothing illegal here by Megas except if you are trying to cover up a crime, something like obstruction of justice. But the SEC/DTCC have not charged Megas with anything. They probably think he has received enough punishment. But, Megas knowing what he had done, sues the shareholders saying he has to hurt us to help us. I am still waiting on the help part of this equation. Not holding my breath though.

nwsun:

this is a light bulb moment!

ditch:

Here is the email for the $50,000 from Megas himself

RE: bcit fraud announcement
From: Thomas Megas (tpm14@hotmail.com)
Sent:Sat 7/30/05 9:36 AM
To: aphoenix31@hotmail.com


Cc: tpm8@harolds.ch

pino has nothing from me save an e mail thanking him for his co-operation and best efforts reference any gold deal he may ultimately produce, matters right, reminding him of the matter of unsettled damages, and asking him for a list of all bcit statements in the market. (Up to this point I had not yet put him with the bad boys i-e- carter lessor thompson as he claimed he was one of the victims like yourself) ). The SEC have copies of these e mails, and I cannot in any way see how these constitute a contract. Neither does the $50,000 initial good faith payment on account of damages and legal investigation expenses constitute a contract, there is nothing in writing with him, though he did sign the payment annex to the settlement agreement. I have learned that part of Pino`s technique in such situations is to operate and communicate with victim both investor and company as if he has a thick pile of provenance. There are three distinct aspects of my exposure to Pino. His original attempt to hijack the company, the attempt to reach a settlement, his attempt to foist on me a gold deal so he could sell the bad shares he got from carter. I remedied the first, made little progress apart from $50,000 on the second, told him would consider seriously the gold deal on the third and would only begin due diligence after I had met President Chavez, having done all that might be prepared to sign an loi. Sytner mentioned in the CD was empowered by me only to investigate the crime and act for the company in that capacity. He had no power to committ the company. This is probably the only straw he could grab. There are no agreements anywhere that have any currency. Apart from all of this I seem at least to be doing something right if the cd`s continue to come in.

Janice:

Thank you for your responses.
By the way, did Megas ever report the $50k in financial records for BCIT? Or did he forget that little detail as well as forget to register the BCIT certificates?

Guess he was too busy on the slopes in Switzerland.

Have a Happy Thanksgiving

Etrade response follow-up:

Just finished talking with an Etrade service representative concerning the status of the name change. Here is the explanation, the share exchange for the name change is still in process. The process is manual, not electronic for Castle Technology security certificates. This takes longer than 2 business days. Currently there is no estimated time of arrival from the DTCC for the new certificates.

I inquired as to why other brokerages have theirs but not Etrade. He said he could not speak for them.

I guess the positive outlook on this is the exchange is in manual process, but this is certainly slower than snail mail.

By the time the shares get exchanged though, CSTL will be in trip 0's. It seems this name change has taken longer than the first name change.

What a way to kill a potentially good stock, 2 name changes in same year that take longer than the normal 2 days. Does anyone know what a company has to do to have the shares electronically processed with the DTCC? Hopefully something other than cost.

Have a Happy Thanksgiving.

ETrade Response:

"Thank you for the message regarding name change of your stock. This matter will need to be addressed through a telephone call due to the complexity of your inquiry. I attempted to contact you at the telephone number listed on your account but was unable to get a hold of you. I was able to leave a voice message with the customer service contact information of E*TRADE Securities. Please contact a customer service representative at 1-800-ETRADE1 (1-800-387-2331) to address the situation."

This is incredible! First I am told it should only take 1 to 2 days for a name change. Now I am told the question is too complex that I need to talk to a representative to 'address the situation'. If this was so complex, why didn't they call me a month ago when the issue arose? And Etrade wants me to pay fees for this service?

2late :

you can play words with an analogy all you want. The fact is you can't handle the truth. You have to create false analogies to try get your point across. It will not work.

I am not trying to place blame or guilt. I am just stating what Megas said happened in emails to Art2Gecko. From that, one can reasonably conclude he did not report the crime to SEC/DTC in May 2005.

That is all I am saying. Nothing more. Nothing less.

You are the one using a shotgun style to confuse the issue of just simply, did Megas report the fact bogus shares made it into the market to the SEC/DTC in May 2005? Simple answer Yes or No. That is it. from the facts of document trail Megas did not.

End of story. Have a good day

nwsun:

when you select BCIT to search, there is the bcit link on the left. on the right under silicon investor there are some links.
One is ENERGY SOURCE......Formerly BCIT (bcit.pk)

Select that. in that link you will see an article by art2gecko from moneymade. inside that is a list of emails of conversations between Art2gecko and Megas.

2late:

The problem with your analogy is that Megas did not tell anybody when he saw it happen. So your analogy is wrong!
Nice try.

You are the one distorting the facts. The fact is Megas told 'nobody' for two months after he saw the crime.

Mastaflash:

After three and a half years from the known identity theft and the comment from the CEO that he "has to hurt us to help us", that is a really tough question. Especially now that the SOL ran out, or has it? Megas has stated publicly that he knew of the incident in May 2005 and then did nothing to address the issue with the SEC/DTC until July 2005.

Ditch:

Yes DTC made a mistake, but your denial of the fact Tom Megas delayed reporting the identity theft to the SEC had nothing to do with people investing in July and August 2005 is what is ridiculous. If Megas would have been responsible and reported this to the SEC/DTC in May 2005 when he has stated he discovered the problem, the halt may have occurred sooner by the SEC/DTC and thus those that are here now that invested in July/August 2005 wouldn't be on this board today. They wouldn't even know what a BCIT/Energy Source is.

The mistake was made bigger by Tom Megas not being a responsible CEO and doing the right thing and report the crime when it occurred, not months after. You typically want to catch the crook when he robs the bank, not wait for months and give them an opportunity to spend the money. Then you have no chance to recover the money. Hmmm. That sounds like the BCIT story.

Or can't you understand this or maybe you do not want to understand this?

2late:

Sorry, but your point of view does not take away from the fact we are in the mess first, because DTC didn't do their job and second because Megas didn't do the right thing and that was to report the crime when he first discovered it in May 2005. These two failures contributed to the continuation of counterfeit shares being traded in the market until the SEC stepped in and stopped it.

Your attitude towards your opinion being the only thing that counts and that anyone that does not agree with it to not reply is absolutely numbing. There is a thing called freedom of speech as I believe I am still in America and have a God-given right to express my opinion and that is you are only speaking partial truth and to me that is a whole lie. If you disagree, just ask anyone that invested in Enron about partial truth.

makeamint:

don't waste your time. however, might be a good walk though to take off some steam after you read their email response regarding reorganization of Castle Technologies. Seems to be standard answer as follows:

"Thank you for your message regarding the name change for CASTLE TECHNOLOGIES INC . After reviewing the account, I see that CASTLE TECHNOLOGIES INC has undergone a Name Change. Whenever there is a reverse split, spin-off, or name change, it may take one to two business days before our website is updated. ..."

I responded back to them that it has been more than a month and inquired as to what was wrong!

2late:
And as a matter of fact, was perpetuated by Megas delay in reporting the crime in May 2005 to the SEC/DTC for 2 months.

molson:

IMO, Megas will not go public because it will reveal the true character of the CEO. This is where he neglected to report the incident when he first discovered the identity theft in May of 2005. The unanswered question is why did it take so long?

When the snow comes, we can make plenty of snowmen at the mine and use the coal lumps for the eyes. Plenty of acreage for an army of snowmen. And when the spring comes, we can watch the snowmen melt away just like our investment in QMNM, I mean QMLM.
Or we can put the lumps in Eugene's silk stockings that he will hang over his marble fire place lined with gold, where he is nice and warm sipping on a latte.

I have seen 11,100 shares traded so far for QMLM.

bid .025 ask .039

Aussielad:

I was expecting $1.00 per share next year also, but before the reverse split. Didn't see that one coming. But Dave had to do what he had to do. Etrade still slow in providing certs.

glaszman:

Did Megas sue Louis Lesser? As I understand it, Pino obtained the original cert from Louis that was used in the initial forgery where the DTC did not perform due diligence.

CSTL increases 133%!
This is just the beginning while the rest of the market is falling apart.

buzzbomb20011:
IMO, this time next year you will be saying "I can't believe I got rid of the whole thing"!

Pennimon:

Don't feel alone. This is what I have been saying since I started posting along with a few others, but this type of message does draw a lot of fire and wrath. Be thankful they are shooting only blanks.

glaszman:

Everyone one of legal voting age will have an opportunity to do just that on Tuesday November 4, 2008.

buzzbomb20011:

400% gain, sounds better. Etrade is basing % gain on incorrect value in formula.
49,900% sounds better though. Someday!

Etrade: 49,900% change?
Must be using pre R/S .0001 not .01 post R/S value

R/S purpose:

IMO, R/S is a ploy by management team to get rid of the negative posters of the last month. I agree when you are at .0001, who wants to sell? But todays volume obviously chased away some.

Someone got some cheap shares today. Did they weigh the risk of the reverse split against the potential gain? This cheap, 10,000% gain is not unthinkable.

stocksniperz:
Make sure it is a cold shower. Need to preserve some of the cost on hot water tank to buy more shares.

Thoughts on upward move to otcbb possibly with this RS?

makeamint:

Good news. You cracked the 10000th post mark for CSTC board.
Congratulations!

splash59:
Maybe what William Shatner got for promoting PriceLine.com -lots of shares.

Lance Armstrong: a possible spokesperson for AMHI?

IMO, this would be a tremendous boost for AMHI Omnibodyscan product.
Lance said he is getting back in the race, specifically to promote the fight against "cancer". What better product to detect early stages of cancer.

Thoughts, opinions?

vort:
I bought some last week thru etrade. So therefore no.

MastaFlash:
I agree. However, the hearts of men tend to repeat the same mistakes of the past.

But, we will see if the Energy Source(BCIT)leadership will set the course of change. It starts at the top.

Only time will tell and time and the Creator of it are my friends.

Kruy

Typically the blame game is used by the one who is responsible, to get out of paying for their mistake. That is why the ones responding to my posts keep trying to flip and twist the issue of responsibility.

Yes Megas has paid a heavy price for a wrong choice made early. There 'are' consequences to wrong choices.