Followers | 646 |
Posts | 10,669 |
Boards Moderated | 2 |
Alias Born | 03/07/2015 |
Twitter Profile: | Temporarily Unavailable |
Follow on Twitter: | Follow @ Temporarily Unavailable |
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
yes....but neither teens nor 0.4s near term
hello MODS...can one of you sticky INSTA's post #22445 please!!!!
(the current comprehensive sticky "#21033" should stay too IMO"
I was too busy today to follow closely or enjoy the action...however monday I will have more time and possibly get some good entertainment and the EOD tickle
if so then it is a very short and very late short
If so then it was really a confused effort...WHO would try stop a car rolling down the hill by stepping in front of it at the very last moment...nice steady day for us
go to the IHUB menu:
click TOOLS
select data tools
select trades
you see it all Bids Asks trades etc
(the first time however you will be asked to install Java)
I am a skeptical person...next month IMO
0.0125 vs 0.013 ??? Nice teeny paint brush...won't affect our weekend...no morons exist on this board :)
thanks jayjas...this close to nothing volume resp.$ AH recorded trade (not a t trade, not a voluntary intraday trade but prob. just an intraday correction) confirms that the debt payment - triggered trades have truly ceased.
Most likely all Tarpon Tranches converted now and gone for good.
Also great...strong EOD close confirms that no OTC typical day flipping occurred.
Nice weekend everyone
what I found really funny about 10 months ago: Claytrader posted his videos on a different ticker (greatly appreciated) but then he also tried to communicated over that board and soon after other posters begged him to just post his videos but not post his (so so) messages, anymore.
Remember the beepers and the honkers from the muppet show
Or possibly just smarty pants that want to get the pps lower to finally get in...shorts might have sporadically have posted before, but these guys just show up now to throw in their wisdom without full DD
I think that is even better since if restructuring is successful and ANR is standing coinciding with sector improvement then the company has an advantage toward competitors (that are all in the same shi*; just started later or take longer)
got it...so far all was delivered that under the circumstances could be delivered...no one says its a sure thing but over the next year the pps could creep up to 30cents and after that who knows what happens should the coal market stabilize or revive...chinas industry is in consolidation...we will have a new president with certainly more concern for miners or the whole industry alltogether....russia and allies are creeping out of the recession....south america is growing slowly on all levels etc..all the unknowns can't predict a boom but stabilization and survival of the fittest - no doubt among the companies standing ANR is one of the fittest
oh my....yes there is between 50k and 150k toxic debt left (and the annual revs are only 15M)...now I know what to worry about
dont be overprotective unless you are in retirement age or play the typical OTC
from what I know about EBW and most longs and ME: we all are all in 5 digits in the green...and in no rush to materialize because our ave is ~50% of the current pps and after DD or just observing for a year you will see WHY
not the typical bankrupsy, not even the typical precautionary and voluntary well-planned bakrupsy
even if 50% of the assets are on paper and even if only 5% of the remainder will feed back to the common stockholder (among which are management and employees) the pps is still completely unjustified
yes, we may see some big swings down or up but what a great (high) risk, yet (enormous)reward potential
Look at the sectors affected earlier in this millenium (banking, auto)and their return...esp metallurgical coal will be crucial forever and ANR is one of the best positioned in this sector
2016/2017 ANR position! Why?:
Simplified:
1. I am confident that the BK procedures will, starting from Nov on, lead to well thought through and judicially approved consolidation through the first half of 2016(first steps and court appearances were positive)
2. Most Lenders are in good faith negotiations to guarantee business contingency (has already started; see previous posts/news)
3. Prices for metallurgical coal (ANR is a big producer) are expected to see a turnaround in 2017 (several forecasts by many analysts; can be googled). MET coal can't be replaced and will in asia and elsewhere see a bottom demand this fall and then an increase again (just inevitable with 2 billion people in these regions in continuously modernizing countries)
4. Although thermal coal is in overproduction, and the coal prices may still drop, the heating gas and oil prices are expected to rise (several forecasts by many analysts; can be googled) which in the past was indirectly correlated to the chances for coal prices to rise...especially after temporary reduction of production, adjustment to new EPA standards and shedding of inefficient mining which is all in swing.
Supported by:Businessplan, outlook, estimates under INVESTORS/RESTRUCTURING DOCUMENTS http://ir.alphanr.com/Cache/1500077488.PDF?Y=&O=PDF&D=&fid=1500077488&T=&iid=4100842
Excerpts from Zacks: Brokerages Give $0.61 Consensus Price Target to Alpha Natural Resources (NASDAQ:ANRZQ)
http://www.wkrb13.com/markets/877659/zacks-brokerages-give-0-61-consensus-price-target-to-alpha-natural-resources-nasdaqanrzq/
Posted by Scott Davis on Oct 29th, 2015: Analysts have set a one year consensus price objective of $0.61 for the company and are anticipating that the company will post ($0.78) earnings per share for the current quarter, according to Zacks. Zacks has also given Alpha Natural Resources an industry rank of 169 out of 265 based on the ratings given to related companies.
depends on how its stacked...but, yes, it would fall right back to 0.0085...sick of this nr.
Rethorical question: For heavens sake...can someone with powder left place small limit buys at 0.0087 (or 86) in to get past the 0.0085. If the first try won't do and not more are exposed on the ask then repeat?
I am a grumpy investor today :)
yes...I have 15% of all my stock assets in ANRZQ just in case it explodes earlier than mid-2016
where would the buyers come from these days to support your suggestion?
News came out already.
I agree that buying now, despite the gambling impression, bears enormous mid term potential and allows immediate flipping if desired by "non-longs"
does anyone know how to get free real time L2 for RXMD???
also, it might just need few 50K limit buy ask slaps at just 0.0002 above the ask to get to .009+ (but again I don't see real time right now)
they or I for that matter will possibly incrementally sell....that scare comment does not apply to the longs here holding ~150M in semi-locked position
thanks.....in 50 k increments working they way up from 0.0076 would possibly have had an lasting effect....slapping the ASK all at once in the current situation is absorbed or reversed within minutes.
anyways, congrats to your "enormous" position...all I can do is wait now with my 2+M
right...like me..but now we are all out of resources at the same time????....too much debate for too little retain purchase right now IMO
I was pretty much at the financil limit by the time I had 1.5 M shares...yet over the last weeks I slapped the ask several times at higher than my ave pps and now hold 2.2M shares....I don't understand why all the other longs here debating don't add more, too...unless they are all underwater????
That would really help the pps to get out of this 10 day bracket that we are stuck in (and certainly minimize the risk that one funny sell sets off a pps decline below 0.0075)!!!!!!
Ok....fine....let the pps of all these big brands suffer and drop...just because of the "decline in growth". Meanwhile ECIG doesn't have to adjust but simply grow accordingly based on hurdles in this segment. AND I believe that is what they are doing already because they are inadvertantly already ahead due to recent problems. In addition,should regions like the mideast (eg. egypt via Mansor) or in africa kick in then the life-style effect that ceases here now will lead to growth elsewhere. The UK customers and conditions are also less difficult then here and small growth there can (as the did already for ECIG) quench adversive effects here.
No concerns from my end looking at gross profit development over last 4Q......
Period Ending Sep 30, 2015 Jun 30, 2015 Mar 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014
Total Revenue 15,401 12,012 11,092 12,148
Cost of Revenue 6,096 5,221 5,830 10,635
Gross Profit 9,305 6,791 5,262 1,513
So revenue has steadied to an annual ~15M (even without starting programs such as 340B) which alone justifies a market cap (4x annual) of ~60M (or a pps of ~4+ cents.
great...if there were minimal merits to the claim than a settlement makes sense for both parties
there is nothing wrong with flipping small positions, with the intend to get even MORE shares at a slightly lower pps....just don;t outsmart yourself with flipping
I don't necessarily agree with the "rocket" proposal of some fellow longs here but RXMD will get into copper and silver steadily, no doubt
typically all longs on a triple zero OTC stock seeing an opportunity add little positions if they see it as an opportunity. Even though conversion/dilution has ended and, clearly, no RS is coming (AS was increased instead)the $volume traded here is so minimal that, apparently, longs dont anything?! Why not???? (sure, some like me have no resources or big positions but what about the others?) Come on guys...potential or not potential that is the question>
the last thing on O Neils mind is uplisting...if the platform is there it will be so solid that the pps is prob. already at times in the several dollar range...now if there is a SOLID pps established and all the other factors come together then the IPO could be at $8 for example immediately after a RS from whereever it is on the OTC (4:1 at $2..or 6:1 at $1.5...no reason to do a !0:1 and then fall back under the 10 dollar range soon after)
far in the future anyways....also miracles happen such as a climbing OTC pps of a global mid cap comp planning to uplist [heard that one before] so that no RS has to be carried out :)
i did not say it takes two years....but if the pps climbs quick (lets say after feburary due to annual and Q4 financials) there could be the typical OTC volatility anywhere from 50 cents to $2 over a year and who knows to which price...then it may take another half year to "find" a stable pps...if this is under $8 a RS is recommended (and at minimum would have to be 4$ to uplist anyways)...and once that step is reached a small RS would be safer before uplist