Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yes, Uncle Sam can accept test data from CCTC. However, if DOE is going to belly up to the bar in a substantial way,(I'm talking at least a million dollars here) some measure of indepentent evaluation is necessary. An outside, contract lab, doing a gas spectrometer test of Pristine processed coal to verify claims may be in order. DOE may have this ability in-house through NREL.
I perfectly agree and have been patiently trying to explain that IF it is needed it can be easily done in short order to meet the requirements of "A large Defense Contractor" as noted by the ACS webinar briefer.
What happens 6 June then? Sorry but I'm confused about these legal issues.
If you ae right, Sing/Tel will be concerned. They rolled out 2FA/OOBA secure mobile banking throughout Asia and may have larger aspirations based on their acquisition of Trustwave.
I don't believe that information to be public knowledge. I believe we will be kept in the dark until the DOE allows a PR detailing those test results, good or bad, and what the next move is for CCTC bankruptcy or a move to WY as we hope.
Agreed. However, I perfectly understand Uncle Sam must conduct the final lab analysis in his DOE lab before any commitment of funds. I also believe those results will be close hold. When there is any PR it will come only with DOE release authority. The way the Feds operate, they would have had him sign a US Government Confidentiality Statement at this point which has the same legal force as a civilian NDA. How do I know this? I did so as an Air Force contracting officer with civilian contractors.
Nope! Not even 6 weeks! Until the Microsoft setttlement SFOR couldn't sell its product since Phone Factor/Microsoft were giving it away via infringment. The company had to rebuild sales starting in Feb 16. ACS only announced dealing with "A large Defense Contractor" in the webinar LAST MONTH. It is presumptious to reactivate the Federal Government certification without a firm order in hand from "A large Defense Contractor". If that happens so would any necessary paperwork.
The DOE lab test results could be unsatisfactory so the ride could go either way IMHO.
O.K. then the DOE and WY must be awaiting the ongoig test results before they invest one red cent. Much depends on those tests! I wish I was a fly on the wall of the DOE certification lab checking the finished product to see the final lab analysis figures. GLTA.
Something I particularly like is that the modules use off the shelf components. They did the engineering for the modular design right!
Sorry meant to write 10-Q. Any idea when that 1st quarterly report might hit the wires?
Those MFA/OOBA patents and products are SFOR's crown jewles. They won't go for cheap!
Checkmate? Hardly, the next move is SFOR's to make once they get a firm order from "A large Defense Contractor" that ACS (our fully vetted US Government vendor) is dealing with. This chess match is only in mid game.
I agree. The 10-K may not be good and depress the pps.
Valid point. This is where Government steps in to prime the pump in a classic Government/Industry partnership. These help bring a needed product or process to market.
Sorry to split hairs here but I just wanted to underscore the correctness of the chemical engineering in regads to the Pristine process itself. You are correct that it produces a suitable feeedstock (as an end product) for CTG & CTL projects.
No, the show goes on just as soon as the reinstatement paperwork is processed. Once there is an order from "A Large Defense Contractor" for SFOR product they can renew their SAM registration. This is an administrative matter that is all. It is not some insurmountable barrier particularly in light of last years SBA initiated & passed legislation to ensure small business gets an even playing field in competing for DoD dollars.
I never wrote "It's a done deal" in regards to my letters to the former or current POTUS. Please repost any message that had those exact words you are quoting came from me. Thank you!
Agreed. Gemalto/Safenet really stepped in it when they rolled out their improvement to the DoD SIPRNET, MFA/OOBA! Gee, I wonder which little company has the patent on that stuff?
What e-mails? I wrote and sent hard copy letters. Original responses on letterhead, with watermark are on file at SFOR for review by in-person request to Mark Kay. As far as wasting tax payer money on it,the DoD is working this vital COMSEC issue. They are fully aware of the mobile device problem they have and since the DoD/CIO took the ACS briefing, aware of the potential SFOR MT solution to it. Mark Kay can verify that briefing took place but without any details. A fine example of your tax dollar at work!
This can be reinstated in short order when needed whenever "A large Defense Contractor" as stated by the ACS (our fully vetted US Government vendor) briefer states it is necessary. This paperwork is not a show stopper as implied, merely an administrative matter. SAM registrations are updated/reinstated on a regular basis.
Nope. Because paperwork can be done quickly. A mention of SFOR's patent on MFA/OOBA or OOBAAS in the National "Anti-Hacking Plan" is entirely appropriate. Uncle Sam, unlike others, respects IP rights and does not knowingly deal with infringers.
From a chemical engineering viewpoint sorry but no. The current, unmodified process is different. Pristine drives off and captures volitile liquids not gases. I think what confused you is the treated coal being co-mingled with other fuel sources for a burn as clean as natural gas IMHO. If the pyrolysis process is modified where old fashion coal gas is captured then that's a totally different story.
Well, I did send President Trump a copy of MT two months ago via Amazon. No, it wasn't returned. Amazon allowed a brief note where I recommended it to help secure his mobile device. My hope is that some West Wing staffer put it in Mr. Joyce's in-basket. This ex-NSA Hacking Division chief is the new WH cyber security adviser. Consider sending one. If a bunch get to the WH one may land on his desk. Since he is a key player in the national "Anti-Hacking Plan" he should be made aware of SFOR's MFA/OOBA and how it could help cyber secure our country. At least consider writing the man a letter at his West Wing office as I have.
Particularly when they work on contingency as Blank Rome is on the Duo, Trustwave and Centrify cases!
True, "There are not many horses left in the race" but there are some that DOE has poured money into for years, such as carbon capture. In one last desperate attempt at a win they may throw even more down that drain. CCTC is the new stead in the DOE stable IMHO. Much depends on the ongoing tests as to how many apples may be thrown that horse's way until the bag is emptied on 1 October (with reappropriation toward nuclear and applied research only according to President Trump's proposed DOE budget). So, unless Eves snags some at the mining conference by bundling matching private investment, it's over! Let's hope he makes the best sales pitch of his life there or face it, shareholders turn into bagholders.
Yeah, Blank Rome & Ropes and Gray lawyers didn't just fall off the pumpkin cart yesterday. I believe they know a bit more of what's going on with SFOR than many others.
Great observation that CCTC is the "only horse in this race with clean coal technology" at that 4 hour "Focus on the Future" event. There are no other clean coal or carbon capture companies in attendance. This speaks loudly to me! I can only hope Eves speaks well. IMHO This is the company's last best chance, particularly if he can state DOE is on board IF private investment is. That's the way it works. The Feds are attracted to a matching grant situation. They hesitate footing the whole bill because they want to share the risk. They want others to have some skin in the game.
Same here. Long & Strong SFOR!
Too bad Kay is forbidden by the DART/Citgo note stipulations from diluting "billions of shares". That scenario just went up in smoke!
KAY WILL BE RETIRING ONLY AFTER PROSPERING STOCKHOLDERS IMHO.
AS THE Q COMES CLOSER, INVERSTOR ARE SANGUINE. jmho YOU CAN SELL, I'M NOT!
Neither do I.
Good chart analysis IMHO.
So do mine!
Speak about a target rich environment for the SFOR legal team!
Possibly in two weeks we will see what settlement deal the Blank Rome/Ropes and Gray legal team have achieved with: Duo,Centrify and Trustwave. You have your hope, I have mine!
Don't completely discount Eli Bebout. As the President of the WY State Senate he has influence over State financial incentives such as tax abatement and perhaps some business development funds.
You're right! In war I learned an important thing. Morale wins battles. The morale of the longs is high based on our solid DD.
Others do not believe in SFOR or its IP. We do. Positions on this board are polarized. Nothing we post on this board will determine our company's future. That I entrust to the care of our quiet, competent CEO, Mark Kay. You either trust the man or you don't. That's your option. I patiently await near-term future positive events to unfold. I remain long and strong with an iron grip on my shares. Weak hands can give up on the future of our company, panic and sell. That is their option. GLTA.
You're absolutely right! However, until news hits the wires about settlements or signed licensing agreements Hates Liars is absolutely right. Flippers will dominate this board. We need news to completely change the nature of conversation. Until then, the pps stays in this narrow channel IMHO. So what? We know what we own. It's only a matter of time before our convictions are fully vindicated. Long & Strong SFOR!