Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Sorry Senti, but when an admittance fee is required to gain entry to the presentation, that should not qualify as full public disclosure - it is only being disclosed to those few who pay the fee to gain admittance.
Almost perfect call Sojo. At the last second before close they dropped it by a half penny to #1.625 -- congrats on that call.
Thanks for the response, but I am not sure I am understanding correctly. To simplify, if our universe (at OTC) consists of three MMs, A, B and C and all the investors who can only place orders through them. Then each of A, B and C have a computer they are in contol of that takes the orders from their clients, The MMs get to show what they please on their computer of the orders they get in. Then there is a computer from the "OTC" (ie those in charge of what the investing public sees) that queries the computers of A, B and C for their respective bid/ask and then OBJECTIVELY publishes in real time the highest bid/lowest ask for us to see that we all know as the bid/ask.. When you say "the inside" you mean what exactly?
That is not what I was asking about. It is the investor placing the bid who decides if it will be and iceberg order or not.
Do any of the cognoscenti on the board know who is in charge of what we see when we check the bid/ask in real time on the OTC? Is there ant monkey business going on behind the curtains in what we are allowed to see? Are MMs (or some other) in charge of this and do they get to show us only what they want or is there some objective computer using a well known algorithm that spews out the bid/ask as it comes in from investors? Do many bid/ask's never show up in what we see as the "broadcast" bis/ask to us but only eventually show up if an actual transaction occurs?
I am sorry to hear about your circumstances.
Hi Sojo, I'll take parabolic, but I would rather have HYPERbolic or better yet exponential. ;Short term is looking rosy - long term never in doubt.
So perhaps some 2M of the legit short covered today and some new investors rushing to hop on the departing train -- that leaves some 23M shares left to cover PLUS who knows how many naked shorts.
You too, Hoffy
Well put PM.
That is a cool stat. Thanks for that. It certainly show a tremendous amount of interest. If only LP would get off the pot and ....
Yup, it is a snapshot chart of the history produced by the many buyers and sellers, but with NWBO it is now clear that the future price movement of NWBO is totally dependent on the whims, timing and actions of one mind only - that of LP - and the news she chooses to announce or withhold. All the charts in the world will not be able to predict her actions and the timing of her actions, and the potency of the news she releases.
Whether TA works in other situations, this is certainly a situation where it does not. It will never be able to predict WHEN she will release TLD. Mind you, it might predict price movement in the meantime until TLD for example, as that is a product of the market and the actions of many investors in the meantime - so long as LP does not issue news. But IMHO WHEN she will issue such news is beyond TA - a TA layman's thoughts on the matter.
But keep on predicting, sooner or later, you will be right - I HOPE.
Thanks DD
Is there an archival recording of this Zoom meeting?
Thanks Jerry.
Could it be that NWBO is waiting for the final publication by the FDA OF the guidelines that they hope will in fact further clarify more of the details on the selection and assembly of an external control?
Could anyone discuss and elaborate on what these "challanges" to assembling an external control arm might look like.
I was kidding of course. No minions here - just little old me.
You must have good minions. My minions have NOT been happy with me of late!
Your email says differently!
I like the impressions you got from your talk, They are xonsistent with my hopes for the stock - but, I want more.
I need information I can hang my hat on and not just blind faith. I need for the information flow get muxh more regular as all other small biotechs do.
If the argument for the policy of silence is that the shorts will play and bring down the share price, well that is happening right now any way with a daily decline for the last chunk of time sue to NWBO silence.
I would rather decline having info that reassures me that their is lots of light at the end of the tunnel, rather than a decline while I am holding shares while in the dark based on blind faith that things are well.
DD, I am not asking for immediate TLD. I am only asking for credible reassurances that we are on track. If a month from now, we are not yet their, then we need reassurances once again that progress is being made and some hint of what has been accomplished over the last little while (no need for details) and a glimmer of why we need to wait a bit longer and promises that this is not some long term plan that will require trust into the longer term future. As investors we deserve information on which to base our investment and rely on faith - this is not a religion.
I hope that in the current runup to ASM, ASCO and Conferences we finally get TLD this time around. I now believe that continuing this policy of silence will do far more damage than good. We are down from over $2 to $0.68 or so. If they are afraid to provide a target for the shorts which would damage the share price, the same is happening nevertheless by holding to this policy of total silence. Everyday now, for a long while, we suffer a steady 2-5 cent loss EVERY DAY without let up. Thus this policy is giving us the same results anyway. I have no doubt that they could craft a framework for regular disclosure of information, without giving away any super secret stuff and yet satisfy the need for public reassurances that things are going well. They need to do a Zelensjy, and take a small amount of personal risk of nuisance suits, and put out info that is meaningful in the sense that it is reassuring that we are on track and that the climax IS coming soon - and is credible. The time has come where they can no longer hide behind the cover of silence. This is no longer a viable long term option. ALL other public companies provide some info to their investors - NWBO must now do the same or the company will die of slow starvation if this strategic silence continues much longer. Until now, NWBO had the unwavering support of the true longs. You can see that that unquestioning support is starting to wane. Investors are slowly succumbing to their doubts. NWBO must change course shortly as the consequences of the status quo can be dire.
And how do you know that LP won't move the goal posts further back once again and wait for either BLA submission, or worse yet for approval by the RA?
Is anyone aware whether LP has devotes any significant time to INMB lately? The stock is not doing well of late. It was at one time trading as high as the mid $20's but is now $6.80. Anyone familiar with what is happening there?
Thanks Ex.
Can you provide a copy of the text?
Follow up to my previous post. I wrote:
I for one, would vote against any new share authorization unless more info or at least reassurances that things remain on track for a near term disclosure were given, If they remain mum and ask nevertheless, I would vote against it. If Les were to call personally, I would probably accept his assurances that things are on track and vote to authorize - but they would have to be such assurances that clearly put his own credibility in question if they are simply ignored.
Mathematically and rationally you are right of course - it should make no difference. However, it is a psychological reality (mob psychology) that invites shorting a fat multi dollar target rather than a skimpy penny stock - providing the company is truly weak and an easy target- they will often be shorted back down to pennyland. Not rational - back a fact of life.
Well, by definition, it can not go down, so it has only one place to go - UP! The only question is how fast.
This is looking like the Olympic spirit has rubbed off here - such amity!