Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Industrial hemp has potential to be a big cash crop for area farmers
By Mike Averill Tulsa World
The majority of the buzz around the cannabis sativa plant in Oklahoma is focused on the legalization of medical marijuana.
Overshadowed are the steps at the federal and state levels to allow the cultivation and interstate trading of industrial hemp, something that could provide an alternative crop, and financial relief, to area farmers.
Industrial hemp was farmed quite successfully in Oklahoma during the 1940s, and many are seeing the potential for the state to be a major player in the industry.
It’s not marijuana
Hemp and marijuana are often confused, and the visual similarities are one of the biggest reasons hemp has been a dormant industry for decades.
To be clear, marijuana and hemp are cousins, both coming from the cannabis sativa plant. They are however, different strains of the plant.
By law, industrial hemp must have less than 0.3% THC, the chemical that produces the euphoric effect or “high” of other cannabis plants, according to the Oklahoma Department of Agriculture.
“It is a totally different product,” said Bruce Peverley, agriculture educator with the Tulsa County OSU Extension. “It’s not a mind-numbing drug.”
In the colonial days, hemp was used for naval cordage.
In World War II, the Hemp for Victory program was launched after the U.S. lost its major source for cordage when the Philippines fell to the Japanese. The idea was to encourage farmers to grow hemp, and many farms across Oklahoma joined in the effort.
At the conclusion of the war, hemp basically disappeared from the agricultural landscape across the country. The “Reefer Madness” mindset and the vilification of marijuana led to farmers abandoning hemp as a crop because of its close resemblance to the drug.
“It’s a crop that proved itself to grow very well in Oklahoma,” Peverley said. “The problem is distinguishing hemp from marijuana. Most people can’t tell the difference. Nobody tried to grow industrial hemp anymore, because obviously they were trying to sell illegal drugs, even when that wasn’t the case.”
Green light to grow
The 2014 Farm Bill created the possibility for states to create their own pilot programs to research the viability of hemp as an agricultural crop, on a federal level.
Oklahoma adopted its pilot program, and in 2018, 28 growers received licenses to grow hemp through the program.
With the 2018 Farm Bill, hemp was taken off the controlled substance list, and interstate commerce became permitted throughout the country.
Then, just two weeks ago, Gov. Kevin Stitt signed a bill expanding Oklahoma’s pilot program into commercial industry.
“Hemp has come back into the consciousness of the United States in the last couple of years,” said Clark Phipps. “Historically, hemp was a hugely important crop because it has broad uses, grows easily, grows in many different environments and conditions.”
Phipps, a Tulsa-based attorney and co-creator of Somatic Hemp, has overseen the care of his family farm for years.
The Kay County farm, purchased by his grandfather in 1956, has primarily been used to produce wheat, winter wheat, soy beans, corn, alfalfa and other traditional row crops.
Phipps said he and other farmers he knows are always looking for new crops to help sustain the farm.
“Farming is a tough business. It’s up and down, and the margins have become, for most grain crops grown in Oklahoma, very slender. So it’s expensive and difficult,” Phipps said.
“Farmers have been looking for alternatives, and hemp offers some opportunities for that.”
This month Phipps will be planting what he hopes will result in his first harvest of outdoor industrial hemp. He is planting on about 20 acres of farmland.
Farming styles
There are two types of farming approaches for industrial hemp. One, which is primarily done indoors, is designed to grow hemp with a high cannabidiol content that can be used to produce CBD products.
Those products are usually grown indoors so that the buds, containing the highest percentage of CBD, don’t get fertilized, which leads the plant to prioritize its energy use for seed production instead of flower production.
“Because of the CBD gold rush, the price of CBD hemp flower is very high,” Phipps said. “So most of the current strategy is to try and get flowers to produce CBD.”
The other approach is to focus on all the other products hemp can provide. The stalk, for instance, is a strong fiber that can be used for rope or to strengthen structural components.
The seeds can be harvested like a grain and used as food or pressed into oil for consumption.
That approach lends itself to traditional row-crop style of farming and is the route that Phipps is going to take.
If his first crop is successful, Phipps said, the plan is to increase the amount of land dedicated to hemp to 60 to 120 acres. He also plans to share what he learns from his first crop with other farmers so they can also start farming industrial hemp.
“None of this may pan out, but this has the potential to bring our farm into the next decade of farming,” Phipps said. “Because we really are on the cutting edge, we have the opportunity to provide other Oklahoma farmers with some information about an alternative crop they can put in their rotation.”
In need of infrastructure
Peverley said some questions still need to be answered before hemp can become a mainstay crop, such as: Where to haul bales of hemp? What is the payment schedule? Where is the market?
“It takes no imagination that if you raise several tons you’ll have to ship it somewhere. We already ship wheat all over the country, but where are we going to ship this? How do we have to handle it? There are a lot of questions I don’t have answers to,” Peverley said.
There also needs to be a processing plant.
Bruce Perlowin, CEO of Hemp Inc., said he predicts Oklahoma will become a major player in industrial hemp.
Hemp Inc. is a publicly traded company with four processing plants, including what it says is the largest one in the country, located in North Carolina. It also has plants in Oregon, Arizona and Nevada.
“Oklahoma will be rivaling other states as the biggest producers,” he said. “When you hear this much buzz, you know that when there’s smoke, there’s fire. I’ve been hearing buzz from Oklahoma for a good solid year.”
Perlowin said his company is aggressively seeking partners to build a processing plant in Oklahoma.
“Imagine instead of making $1,000 an acre, you could make up to $30,000,” Perlowin said. “No other crop touches that; and once the farm bill passed, it took away all the deterrents.”
Perlowin admitted that those kind of prices won’t last forever. While demand is outpacing supply now, the supply will catch up.
Source: https://www.tulsaworld.com/business/industrial-hemp-has-potential-to-be-a-big-cash-crop/article_b6b1549a-b1bb-5059-8106-3e9be291bf7f.html
Hah... ok, twist and spin is the way. Kinda deceptive imo.
Just trying to bring facts...
And again,
However, because the defendants’ discovery violations do not threaten the rightful decision of the case on the merits, the court will not recommend terminating sanctions.
Gonna be interesting how Jury sees Eplings failure to file personal taxes as violation of rule 144... lol
Twisty twisty, McNothing Burger.
Junior sized issues for junior sized competition.
You said "several defendants" were named for deceiving SEC and Court, yet only one individual mentioned for deceit and sanctions ordered for such in court documents.
The jury should be instructed that they may consider evidence of the defendants’ discovery violations and Epling’s deception about his personal tax returns along with all other evidence in the case in reaching their verdict.
Only one person... not several, but maybe you were confused?
There were multiple defendants ordered sanctions for discovery violations, but only one for deceit.
Remains to be seen on how the sanctions help SEC substantiate basis of original claims.
However, because the defendants’ discovery violations do not threaten the rightful decision of the case on the merits, the court will not recommend terminating sanctions.
Nope, same version. You can read your own post? Only one individual mentioned as being deceptive, not several, as deceptively stated in previous posts.
Again, it remains to be seen how Epling's tax returns or the decorticator agreeement has anything to do with share registration rule 144.
But hey, a junior sized victory for SEC, so they wont leave empty handed. Prevents evidence from being introduced and gets to tell the jury that Epling didn't file tax returns for a few years. Wonder if jury members file returns on time.
I try to understand "twist and spin" when I see statements like "several defendants caught deceiving SEC", because that just wouldn't be true.
One person named, and it remains to be seen how Epling's tax returns will be of any significance when it comes time for the SEC to substantial the basis of their claims in front of a jury.
Twist and spin
Short and distort
Junior sized glass of water, for a junior sized Nutt'n Burger
The entire document is 52 pages long, and, unless you would like to direct me to the right LINK, has NEVER been posted in its entirety on this board or elsewhere, expect PACER...
And I have the docket.
Actually, only need last two pages, line 9, page 51, "CONCLUSION" which states:
But only one person mention as being imposed with sanctions due to deception, not the "several" that you claimed. I feel like that was very deceptive, imo.
The facts should be offered in an unbiased fashion, but might be a hard pill to swallow.
The way Short and Distort rolls.
The SEC’s Motions for Sanctions (ECF Nos. 92, 97) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The SEC’s request for terminating sanctions is DENIED.
The SEC’s request for terminating sanctions is DENIED.
The SEC’s request for terminating sanctions is DENIED.
The SEC’s request for terminating sanctions is DENIED.
The SEC’s request for terminating sanctions is DENIED.
The SEC’s request for terminating sanctions is DENIED.
The SEC’s request for terminating sanctions is DENIED.
The SEC’s request for terminating sanctions is DENIED.
The SEC’s request for terminating sanctions is DENIED.
The SEC’s request for terminating sanctions is DENIED.
The SEC’s request for terminating sanctions is DENIED.
The SEC’s request for terminating sanctions is DENIED.
The SEC’s request for terminating sanctions is DENIED.
The SEC’s request for terminating sanctions is DENIED.
6 yr old, non-binding LOI?
Only illusion I see is what is being labeled a "grand illusion", which, so far, has been a major non issue, nothing burger.
Please name the "several key defendants" caught decieving SEC.
Federal Agency Updates Rules On Trademarks For Hemp And CBD Products
Published 14 hours ago on May 7, 2019 By Kyle Jaeger
A federal agency responsible for patents and trademarks says in new a memo that it is implementing updated guidelines for registering hemp products in light of the 2018 Farm Bill, which federally legalized the crop.
In an examination guide released last Thursday, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) emphasized that it would not register goods and services, including controlled substances, that violate federal law. But it recognized that while marijuana remains prohibited, the agriculture legislation signed last year did remove hemp and hemp-derived products from the Controlled Substances Act (CSA).
Applications for trademarks for products that meet the definition of hemp, which cannot contain more than 0.3 percent THC on a dry weight basis, could therefore be accepted, USPTO said—with certain exceptions.
First of all, the applications must have been submitted on or after December 20, 2018, when President Donald Trump signed the Farm Bill into law. Trademark applications for hemp goods and services that were submitted prior to the signing will be rejected “due to the unlawful use or lack of bona fide intent to use in lawful commerce under the CSA.”
“Such applications did not have a valid basis to support registration at the time of filing because the goods violated federal law,” USPTO wrote. “However, because of the enactment of the 2018 Farm Bill, the goods are now potentially lawful if they are derived from ‘hemp’ (i.e., contain less than 0.3 percent THC). Therefore, the examining attorney will provide such applicants the option of amending the filing date and filing basis of the application to overcome the CSA as a ground of refusal.”
There’s another caveat. Just because hemp and its derivatives are legal, that doesn’t mean the agency will approve all trademark applications for related products; it will instead defer to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for applications involving hemp that’s added to the food supply, for example.
“Applicants should be aware that even if the identified goods are legal under the CSA, not all goods for CBD or hemp-derived products are lawful following the 2018 Farm Bill,” the new memo says. “Such goods may also raise lawful-use issues under the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA).”
Because FDA has said that it is presently unlawful to market hemp-derived CBD in the food supply—due to its approval as an FDA-approved drug in the form of Epidiolex and also because it hasn’t been previously introduced to the food supply—applicants seeking a trademark for such products will also likely be denied.
That could change if the FDA identifies and pursues an alternative regulatory pathway for hemp-derived CBD, which it has repeatedly said it is doing. But until then, USPTO will adhere to FDA guidance.
“The U.S. Patent & Trademark Office’s relatively quick recognition of the revised legal status of hemp and hemp-derived CBD is both commendable and encouraging,” Larry Sandell, a registered patent attorney with Mei & Mark LLP, told Marijuana Moment. “Although a clear pathway for some businesses in the CBD space to protect their branding has been confirmed, many CBD businesses are still unable to federally register their trademarks.”
Sandell recommended taking a preliminary step as the FDA determines how it will regulate CBD. He also offered an overview of intellectual property considerations for cannabis businesses in a sponsored article for Marijuana Moment last year.
“Ultimately, the best course of action for most CBD businesses seeking to secure their brands may be to join the rapidly increasing number of cannabis entrepreneurs that have filed ‘Intent to Use’ (ITU) Trademark Applications at the USPTO,” he said. “These ITUs applications serve to stake ground until the USPTO considers each cannabis-related trademark to have been legally used in commerce under (future) federal law.”
Another federal agency made a similar point about its FDA deference in post-Farm Bill updated guidance last month. The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau cited FDA policy as the reason it would not approve formulas for alcoholic beverages that contain CBD, regardless of its source.
Source: https://www.marijuanamoment.net/federal-agency-updates-rules-on-trademarks-for-hemp-and-cbd-products/
CBD coming to a cookie jar near you: report
Postmedia News, Postmedia News
Published: a day ago
Updated: 19 hours ago
Could CBD — the cannabis-based miracle elixir — be coming to a cookie jar near you?
According to the New York Daily News , Mondelez International — which own brands like Chips Ahoy, Oreo, and Cadbury chocolate — is considering adding the chemical found in hemp and marijuana to some products.
But Mondelez CEO Dirk Van de Put told CNBC not expect a little extra in your Oreo just yet.
“Yes, we’re getting ready, but we obviously want to stay within what is legal and play it the right way,” Van de Put said, adding that CBD may go against the company’s wholesome image.
However, CBD doesn’t make one high and is different than the buzz-inducing THC.
CBD has been hailed in a wide array of research, including helping children who suffer seizures that can’t be fixed by other medicine. Anxiety and insomnia can also be helped, some research suggests.
The chemical has been trendy in recent years, being added to everything from gummies to chocolates.
U.S. President Donald Trump legalized most products containing CBD in December, but the FDA still prohibits adding it to food or drinks.
Source: https://www.trurodaily.com/business/cbd-coming-to-a-cookie-jar-near-you-report-308656/
Federal Agency Clarifies Rules On Adding CBD To Alcoholic Beverages
Published 1 day ago on May 6, 2019 By Kyle Jaeger
Another federal agency has weighed in on the rules governing hemp-derived products in the food supply. Specifically, a division of the Treasury Department clarified lat last month that CBD from hemp cannot be added to alcoholic beverages at this time.
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) said in an industry circular released on April 25 that it had received “many inquiries from industry members” asking whether they can add ingredients derived from hemp, which was federally legalized under the 2018 Farm Bill, to alcohol.
While the agency said it is in the process of revising its guidelines, for now it is deferring to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with respect to adding CBD to beer, wine and liquor. The FDA has stated numerous times that hemp-derived CBD currently cannot be lawfully marketed, though it is also investigating alternative regulatory pathways to change that rule.
“After consultation with FDA, as set forth in more detail below, TTB has determined that, at this time, it will return for correction any applications for formulas containing ‘hemp’ ingredients (other than ingredients derived from hemp seeds or hemp seed oil),” TTB wrote. “Applicants will have the option of resubmitting the formula to TTB upon receipt of a favorable individual determination from FDA on the regulatory status of their ingredients. TTB will continue to process applications for formulas for alcohol beverages that contain ingredients derived from hemp seeds or hemp seed oil.”
The National Law Review first reported on the TTB memo.
Before hemp was federally legalized—and regulatory responsibility for the crop shifted from the Justice Department to the U.S. Department of Agriculture—TTB issued earlier guidance stipulating that hemp ingredients (except hemp seed or hemp seed oil) couldn’t be added to alcoholic drinks because the prior version of the Farm Bill prohibited hemp from being used “for the purpose of general commercial activity.”
TTB left open the possibility that formulas containing hemp-derived CBD could be approved down the line if FDA determined that it could be lawfully marketed in food products. Companies would still have to submit formula applications to TTB before selling the products, though.
For companies that want to market alcoholic beverages containing hemp seeds or hemp seed oil, which is permissible, they must first “submit laboratory analyses of ‘hemp’ ingredients to ensure that the ingredients are not controlled substances.”
“TTB will not approve any formulas or labels for alcohol beverage products that contain a controlled substance under federal law, including marijuana,” the agency wrote. “In determining whether an ingredient is a controlled substance, TTB will continue to consult with the Drug Enforcement Administration where appropriate.”
Further, “TTB may require formula applicants to obtain documentation from FDA indicating that the proposed use of an ingredient in an alcohol beverage would not violate the [Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act].”
The agency made clear that it will be following FDA actions and guidance on CBD closely as it continues to review its existing policies. That includes monitoring what comes out of a May 31 public hearing the FDA announced that it will be holding to gather input from industry stakeholders.
It should be noted that while FDA currently prohibits hemp-derived CBD products from being added to the food supply, and TTB said it also won’t allow CBD-infused alcohol, multiple companies continue to market such products. The FDA explained that it was prioritizing enforcement in cases where companies make exaggerated and unsanctioned claims about the health benefits of their products.
Source: https://www.marijuanamoment.net/federal-agency-clarifies-rules-on-adding-cbd-to-alcoholic-beverages/
Oreo-maker considers line of CBD snacks
POSTED 7:08 AM, MAY 5, 2019, BY TALIA NAQUIN
Oreo-maker Mondelez is looking at adding CBD snacks to its product line.
Mondelez makes Chips Ahoy cookies, Nilla Wafers and Nutter Butter cookies, among others.
“Yes, we’re getting ready, but we obviously want to stay within what is legal and play it the right way,” CEO Dirk Van de Put told CNBC on Wednesday.
You won’t likely see CBD-infused Oreos.
According to Van de Put, the company’s traditional brands will likely stay family oriented.
The company will likely instead create new products.
Van de Put predicts the ingredient will hit the mainstream food market in the “not-so-far future.”
Source: https://fox8.com/2019/05/05/oreo-maker-considers-line-of-cbd-snacks
Next Meeting:
Thursday, May 23, 2019
10 a.m.
A public meeting will be held via telephone conference. Access to the conference call can be made at http://go.ncsu.edu/industrialhemp or by calling 1-929-205-6099 (U.S. toll) or 1-669-900-6833 (U.S. toll). The meeting ID is 902-151-173. Participants will be prompted to enter their name and email address to enter the meeting via the website, or prompted for a unique participant ID for the call. They should press # to access the call.
Purpose of this meeting: Approve research pilot program applications.
If you have questions about the meeting, please contact Beth Farrell at 919-707-3014.
CLERK'S NOTICE that this case is randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler for all further proceedings. All further documents must bear the correct case number 2:16-cv-01413-JAD-BNW. (no image attached) (MMM) (Entered: 05/02/2019)
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that92 ,97 the SEC's Motions for Sanctions are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The SEC's request for terminating sanctions is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 4/30/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)(Entered: 05/02/2019)
WOW, INDUSTRIES AREN'T BUILT FOR FREE???!!!
WHAT AN OUTRAGE!
I THOUGHT ALL THESE ASSETS WERE SUPPOSED TO JUST APPEAR WITH ZERO UPFRONT COST!
AND WE WERE TOLD HEMP HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH INDUSTRIAL HEMP????
"WHAT A DISASTER", THE COMPETITION CRIES!
HEMP INC going where the competition can't.
ALL OVER.
Coast to coast, multi state operation with MILLIONS and MILLIONS in future earnings.
The hemp-derived CBD market was $390 million in 2018. HEMP INC grabbed a couple million in the process, and market share should continue to rise and the HEMP brand flourishes state to state.
USA has YUGE appetite for hemp, and Bruce is the King, former BILLION DOLLAR cannabis distributor.
He is still at it, and no one knows more about moving hemp than Bruce.
Quarter over quarter growth, and the Q1 should be out in a few short weeks. Gonna have to take a wild guess and say the fins will be extended, as usual, and it might not meet Q4, '18 expectations, but we should have everything set and in place for another FANTASTIC year.
2019 bottom in?
I know what is not in...
FLOODGATES
CVS, WALGREENS, RITE AID, WHOLEFOODS...
WHO'S NEXT?
I hear CBD is good for aches and pains... especially for golfers...
https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/02/golf/cbd-bubba-watson-golf-pga-tour-spt-intl/index.html
Let's see... so now CBD is in HIGH DEMAND from athletes all over the world, in ever sport, and those are just "pros" with celebrity power. What about the "average joe" "weekend warrior" athlete, or the guys that played ball in high school but still got beat up and have aches later in life...
hmmm, where could I find some CBDees!
Wait, you're telling me I can just walk into a CVS, WALGREENS, RITE AID, WHOLEFOODS, or any other corner market in the US and simply locate the aisle with IBUPROFEN, ACETAMINOPHEN, NAPROXEN, and ALSO find SHELVES FULL of CBD????????????
WHAT?!?!?!
WHO IS GOING TO PROCESS ALL THAT HEMP??????????
TELL ME?!?!?!?!?!?!
FLOODGATES
And the MULTI YEAR UPTREND continues...
That's right folks. HEMP INC in a multi-multi month uptrend, and longs are delighted. We are now seeing a company generating healthy revenues, QUARTER after QUARTER. In the closing quarter of 2018, HEMP posted revenues of $1,596,406!!!
That's right, folks! $1,596,406 in THREE MONTHS!!
Does anyone where make that kind of money? lol... probably not. Even at $100k per quarter, Hemp Inc doing much better than most.
There may still be a couple of speed bumps along the way, with the biggest being SEC, but it looks like the case is dying on its way to a jury, and the overall negative effects have been priced-in, with HEMP holding 2-3 cents.
The market is GROWING.
MORE states.
MORE hemp.
MORE business for PROCESSORS LIKE HEMP INC!
WALGREENS, CVS, RITE AID, WHOLEFOODS....
All have big, American mouths to feed.
Who's there building the supply, creating the jobs, and shipping it to and from???
HEMP INC!
FLOODGATES
And TEXAS, YEEEE HAAAAAA!
https://thetexan.news/hemp-farming-makes-historic-progress-in-texas-legislature/
FLOODGATES
Applications to grow hemp in Illinois pour in
http://www.news-gazette.com/news/2019-05-02/applications-grow-hemp-illinois-pour.html
Yisssssss, FLOODGATES
Was that information printed in a tabloid?
December '18 "run" was notably better than April '19.
And what 27 seconds are we referring to?
I'm not the kind of guy who is bothered by intra day, seconds long runs.
Multi month runs, however, do catch my attention.
You say another 2014-sized run coming?
The 2019 lows are in, so UP is where we go!
With floodgates opening....
You call last few weeks a run? Lol... ok...
And why would someone sell lower than what they paid for? Isn't the idea "buy LOW, sell HIGH"?
2.06 - or whatever - billion and now over TWENTY MILLION in ASSETS, and MILLIONS in QUARTERLY SALES.
Geez, never thought 1800% sales growth would be such a downer for some...
Hemp permits available in IL, but no PROCESSORS...
Yeah, doesn't look like "run" is over, either.
2019 lows in?
Looks like it. Now, a steady climb up.
24 month uptrend. Look, even if you bought in Sept 2016, your investment would be in the green today. So, this summer, could very well be a 36 MONTH UPTREND in the making. It's a money maker, no-brainer for long investors.
Seems like the base is in, and sales and assets continue to rise.
Run is going well, and maybe it starts to speed up with more sales and contracts ahead? Harvest? More assets? More farmers? More retail stores? More processing facilities?
HEMPINC "the #1 public hemp company, who talks the talk, because is walking the walk to millions in sales per quarter". But others just talk... full of lies, deceit, and hidden agendas.... definitely not HEMP tho, with dozens of verified news articles from CBS, NBC, and ABC, to name a few. The news also talking the talk and it's ALL ABOUT HEMP!
I've always wondered why it gets so quiet
once the FACTS have been presented.
Medford is in Oregon, FACT!
When did JV's ever get itemized in Hemp's books?
Is this some sort of new thing that Hemp is required to do, adding JV equity to reports?
What line item are you referring to?
The JV is mentioned in the report, and I'm sure future reports will have further releases on what's happening at LPC.
Looks like a big Non Issue.
24 MONTH UPTREND. 24 MORE GREENHOUSES.
The 2018 annual report was a smash.
Growth over growth, in virtually all the important areas. CASH. ASSETS. RECEIVABLES. INVENTORY. PP&E. SALES.
Wow, and all BEFORE 2019, first year of legal, nationwide hemp sales.
The competition is way behind, and obviously hurting way worse, as Hemp is coast to coast, teaching, training, ARMY OF FARMERS ready for TENS OF THOUSANDS of hemp acres.
Competition might have, what, 10... 20 acres...? Next to pesky, potential hazardous cross pollinating xmas trees, or other floral foliage?
All things that EXPERTS like those that come to HEMP U, and help HEMP INC's farmers get ready for the Great American Growoff.
FLOODGATES
Hidden? OR don't know where to look?
It's in the assets.
Assets continuing to rise some sort of phenomenon? What's hard to understand, the greenhouses were built (in 90 days) and now MORE are coming, most likely in time for 2019 harvest...
Now, why would 2019 assets show on 2018 statements?
?
Future earnings?
Market value and book value, here we go again.
Why does this subject keep popping, as if the share structure were even an issue.
I thought HEMP was diluted back in 2013, or at least that's what some were saying... but then the most epic of runs happened, and it was industry wide.
Why?
and again? Now with hemp legalized NATIONWIDE, coast to coast, and international.
Back then, the floodgates were sealed shut, locked, with maybe a little hose that would spittle a little bit of hemp trade in special programs across the US. Now, the gates open, and the sales keep rising and rising.
And so will the value, both market and book. We can see it already beginning in the books.
1800%
YOU LIKE ASSETS?
Hemp Inc has 20,714,017 of them, at a 1800% sales growth rate.
You like?
24 MORE greenhouses for a total of 32 greenhouses in one town, processing hundreds and thousands of pounds of green gold cbd...
Assets going up, or down?
You like?
or was this industry supposed to just appear magically overnight at zero upfront investment? Help me understand, while Hemp Inc makes millions per quarter?
RITE AID, CVS, WALGREENS, WHOLEFOODS...
LPC IS IN MEDFORD, OREGON. HUNDREDS AND THOUSANDS OF CBD HEMP PROCESSED. MORE ON THE WAY...
WHO'S NEXT?
FLOODGATES
24 MORE GREENHOUSES???!!!
FOR A TOTAL OF 32 GREENHOUSES, LPC, MEDFORD, OR????!!!!
FLOODGATES