InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 122024
Next 10
Followers 39
Posts 5491
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/30/2013

Re: @realToothFairy post# 110108

Thursday, 05/09/2019 9:13:45 PM

Thursday, May 09, 2019 9:13:45 PM

Post# of 122024
You said "several defendants" were named for deceiving SEC and Court, yet only one individual mentioned for deceit and sanctions ordered for such in court documents.

The jury should be instructed that they may consider evidence of the defendants’ discovery violations and Epling’s deception about his personal tax returns along with all other evidence in the case in reaching their verdict. 

Only one person... not several, but maybe you were confused?

There were multiple defendants ordered sanctions for discovery violations, but only one for deceit.

Remains to be seen on how the sanctions help SEC substantiate basis of original claims.

However, because the defendants’ discovery violations do not threaten the rightful decision of the case on the merits, the court will not recommend terminating sanctions.