Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
NAK is looking good as it sits. Fingers crossed!
Clear it up for us. When were they received?
I saw the company made an announcement today. Your response didn’t answer my question which was, if it clears it up, when were they received?
As did I.
I merely copied the Company's sloppy language from the 10/2 press release
lol. Ok.
There’s a shit ton of shares for sale between the SP and 36 pennies.
Say what?
Showing .36 on L2 if we get thru about 250,000 on the ask.
Clears it up? As you’ve pointed out, they’ve reported receiving written responses twice now. If it clears it up, when were they received?
So those figures don’t reflect the past year as your initial post eluded to. Now you’re telling us you’re grabbing the info from here?
https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/NDM/company
I gave you the correct link from SEDI once. Here it is again.
https://ceo.ca/api/sedi/?symbol=ndm&amount=&transaction=&insider=
Sure they have.
“the FDA has reviewed study protocols within 24 hours in many cases and has reviewed single-patient expanded access requests generally within three hours.”
"Confirmation of the meeting being granted by FDA, with return of written responses, has been received."
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-continues-accelerate-development-novel-therapies-covid-19?utm_campaign=Coronavirus%20Treatment%20Acceleration%20Program%20%28CTAP%29&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Eloqua
http://www.ipharminc.com/press-release/2020/10/2/innovation-pharmaceuticals-announces-pre-ind-meeting-request-granted-by-fda-for-the-study-of-brilacidin-for-the-treatment-of-covid-19
No facts have been presented, either here or by the Company, to show that it isn't.
Yes. There was. I read the email and then saw it was removed from the content of the post. The post was addressed to you.
The c&p was removed from the content of the post. Disinformation at its finest.
there was a copy and paste of the email.
i don't see the c&p anymore,
So did I.
I answered that once already......but what makes you think they did and when did they make the submission?
Which FDA goals for an IND application couldn’t possibly have been met at this point?
Which FDA goals for an IND application couldn’t possibly have been met at this point?
What makes you think so?
When?
Of course the IND application has been submitted. Is there reason to think it hasn’t? Which FDA goals for an IND application couldn’t possibly have been met at this point?
Once again you are implying that the IND application has been filed....at least I think that's what you're implying***....and once again I have to ask:
What makes you think so?
Good question.
Well I didn’t sell a single share on that pop. That gap is like a SP magnet. Lots of shares for sale at 21 cents.
Without a doubt.
Don’t kid yourself. She’s on the payroll. All talk.
desperation by a few green senators as they know they are powerless to stop the permitting process.
Not an accurate stat either.
Not a bullish stat , I'm afraid.
#filltheipixgap!
$Ipix
Slap that ask
Done! Go IPIX!
Pebble hosts 90 years of durable rhenium
Special refinery needed to recover critical superalloy metal Critical Minerals Alaska 2020 – Published October 29, 2020
https://www.miningnewsnorth.com/story/2020/10/29/critical-minerals-alaska-2020/pebble-hosts-90-years-of-durable-rhenium/6512.html?fbclid=IwAR3rG_CA2wb0hKNd0983en3nQIcitEke5C8lAXnnoiFgEKkO4WzIq9wTNgU
Clearly.
I'll tell you straight up, stock trading isn't what I know
Lmao. Thanks for the update.
#filltheipixgap!
$Ipix
October 2, 2020
Innovation Pharmaceuticals Announces Pre-IND Meeting Request Granted by FDA for the Study of Brilacidin for the Treatment of COVID-19
Brilacidin
WAKEFIELD, MA – October 2, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) Innovation Pharmaceuticals (OTCQB:IPIX) (“the Company”), a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company, today announced that earlier this week the Company submitted a pre-IND meeting request to the FDA in advance of a planned study of Brilacidin, a defensin-mimetic drug candidate, for the treatment of COVID-19. The request for the pre-IND meeting follows the FDA guidance issued in May 2020, “COVID-19 Public Health Emergency: General Considerations for Pre-IND Meeting Requests for COVID-19 Related Drugs and Biological Products.” Confirmation of the meeting being granted by FDA, with return of written responses, has been received.
http://www.ipharminc.com/press-release/2020/10/2/innovation-pharmaceuticals-announces-pre-ind-meeting-request-granted-by-fda-for-the-study-of-brilacidin-for-the-treatment-of-covid-19
Thanks for the follow up! Consider this a formal no response.
The failure to acknowledge your reference to B-OM (even though there was no reference to 2014) exhibited some senility on my part.
How do you explain how you "personally believe the IND was submitted weeks ago and our 30 days is near" on 10/27 when the Company hadn't "submitted a pre-IND meeting request to the FDA" until the week of October 2?
"Weeks ago" would have been 10/14 at the latest.
Was there time for the....
1. FDA to respond to the pre-IND meeting request.
2. The meeting to have been conducted.
3. The Company to have prepared and submitted the IND incorporating the meeting results
....between the week of 10/2 and 10/14?
Does your 2014 B-OM example address that in any way? Or was that just an example of how the Company had failed to provide timely disclosure at that time, so there's no reason to expect them to provide full, timely disclosure about their IND submission this time?
I think that the only reason for the Company NOT to announce the IND submission in real time is to avoid having to explain why the trial isn't starting 30 days after that submission date, should that occur. Can you think of another good reason?
The "approval" rule is a simple default. Basically it's "If we don't tell you that you can't ("clinical hold") within 30 days from the submission date, you can proceed with your clinical trial. We MAY advise you prior to 30 days that you may proceed."
If the submission is not announced in real time any approval prior to the 30 day point could be announced if and when it occurred. Would the same be true if there was a clinical hold?
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=312.42
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=159150499
WAG. Wild-Ass Guess.
so did the company definitely proceed with the IND for Brilacidin/Covid?
Thanks for the follow up! Consider this a formal no response.
loanranger Member Level Tuesday, 10/27/20 08:38:29 PM
Re: TheHound post# 329904 0
Post # of 329932
"I must be getting senile in my old age."
One of us is.
So in 2014....
1) They submitted an IND for B-OM on 9/8
2) They announced the submission on 9/24
3) They announced that it became effective on 10/13. You say "IND became effective 30 days after it was submitted."
I guess your point is that just because they haven't announced an IND submission for B-CoVid and on 10/2 said "earlier this week the Company submitted a pre-IND meeting request" that doesn't mean that you are necessarily wrong about this:
"I personally believe the IND was submitted weeks ago and our 30 days is near."
When do you believe the pre-IND meeting was held?
Do you question the credibility of the post from yesterday evening that said "I have seen an email from Leo to a fellow investor dated on 10/23 stating he is waiting on feedback and comments from FDA still on the pre IND filings. So IND has not been submitted yet unfortunately."
LoL. I posted and BOTH responses were over an hour later AND contained MY statement that cited BOM. How do you suppose that happened?
... that post was updated. We can't BOTH be crazy... ;)
Historical PR’s and company updates.
Perhaps. I provided this example today to show how the company has handled IND announcements in the past.
You’re welcome.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=159150419
if the company pr'd the pre-ind, they would pr the ind submission (IMHO)
Holy shit. I must be getting senile in my old age. I farted dust just yesterday.
I thought I referenced B-OM in my post. My bad.
“Here's how the company addressed the IND submission and IND effective announcements for B-OM”.
A little DD upfront goes a long way.