Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Thanks for the .028's !!! She's coiling again! $ZVTK $$$$
This could hit .05 today.. wow sweet move! $ZVTK
Dip and Rip.. Who's buying down here?? This will turn GREEN is a heart beat.. $CNGT
No kidding! Ask is pretty thin here... looking good! $ZVTK
Good morning! $CNGT just about to launch! Easy $$$$$ here..
$1,000,000,000 /total outstanding- 305,778 = $3270/share
..and $1bill is nothing for these companies! imo
$SECI
OFFICERS, DIRECTORS AND FIVE PERCENT SHAREHOLDERS
Common
Peric DeAvila 11,391 3.72%
Laurence Madison 10,896 3.56%
Sector 10 Holdings, Inc. 151,616 49.58%
All officers and Directors as a Group (2) Persons (2) 22,287 7.28%
Including officer, directors and 5% shareholder 173,903 56.86%
Total outstanding- 305,778
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SECI/profile
$SECI $$$$$
OS 305,000///float 175,000??? Multi billion dollar company overnight possibility. Considering the Billions stolen from the patent and technology. Settlement could be Billions plus royalties.... The Jury could award more
Great day here!! $CNGT $$$
You're probably correct.. last updated in 2018
WOW!! What a day!! ..and its only Monday!!! $SECI $$$$
Respectfully, there are a few problems with that interpretation of the court filings. First....the "settlement conference" your post refers to is AKA the pre-trial conference, which was CANCELLED. The 4 day bench trial was also cancelled. Reason: Case was SETTLED. The Judge in this case did not....and would not have taken it upon herself to dismiss the case with prejudice prior to the pre-trial conference and 4 day bench trial in which all evidence would be heard. It just does not work that way. It was the defendant who filed a STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS (which followed the motion from the plaintiff to classify all documents as private being granted by the Judge.....THIS WAS THE SETTLEMENT). In a "stipulated motion to dismiss" BOTH the PLAINTIFF and the DEFENDANT must agree to the motion for the Judge to NOT issue a judgement AGAINST THE DEFENDANT. Thus, the Judge did not make any ruling here, both parties themselves agreed to the motion to dismiss. Why? Settlement. I have been through many of these kinds of cases. The legalese to me is like reading the morning newspaper. Shareholders WILL see SETTLEMENT.....and it will be substantially higher than where we are now.
#6 most read board!! $SECI $$$
More than likely a one time dividend.. imo $SECI $$$
HUGE pay day coming for shareholders!!! Its been worth the wait! $SECI
Puzzle Solved read highlighted text:
Direct from Case Docket: End verbage from case docket that was emailed to me:
10:02 AM Ms. Porter presents argument on the motion.
10:16 AM Mr. Bergman with response.
10:34 AM Mr. Rahmeier with response.
10:40 AM Mr. Bledsoe with response.
10:41 AM Ms. Porter with reply.
10:53 AM The Court takes the matter under advisement and
will issue an oral ruling.
10:56 AM First, the Court notes that Sector 10
misinterprets and misconstrues the Court's oral ruling and
the written memorialization of that ruling on Defendants'
motions for summary judgment in October 2018 and February
2019. The Court considered all of the Defendants'
briefing. as well as Sector 10's responses thereto, and
granted all of the Defendants' motions for summary judgment
on the trade secret issues and related claims, and its
ruling was not solely with respect to Dutro's motion for
summary judgment. The Court declines to exercise
discretion to reconsider its prior rulings on the summary
judgment motions because (1) the matter is not being
presented in a new or different light, (2) there has not
been a change in the governing law, (3) there has not been
the discovery of new evidence, and (4) the Court does not
have a conviction that the prior decision was clearly
erroneous based upon the record and arguments made before
it on the motions for summary judgment in October 2018, and
Sector 10 either did or could have raised the arguments at
that time. Therefore, for the reasons set forth on the
record, which are incorporated herein by reference, the
Court denies the motion to reconsider.
This is the Order of the Court.
09-29-2020 Filed order: ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RECONSIDER
Judge KARA PETTIT
Signed September 29, 2020
09-30-2020 Filed: Return of Electronic Notification
10-05-2020 Minute Entry - PRETRIAL/STATUS CONFERENCE
Judge: KARA PETTIT
Clerk: katherf
TELEPHONE CONFERENCE
10-29-2020 11:26 AM Page 58 of
CASE NUMBER: 119907606 Debt Collection
59
Defendant's Attorney(s): AARON BERGMAN
Audio
Tape Number: W35 Tape Count: 3:37-3:40
HEARING
3:37 PM The above-entitled case comes before the Court for
a telephonic pretrial conference to discuss trial.
Counsel make appearances for the record.
The Court informs parties that the case will not proceed
in-person at this time due to the pandemic.
Counsel provide update. Parties are attempting to resolve
the case, offer made by Sector 10.
3:40 PM Court in recess.
10-14-2020 Filed order: Order Granting Trial Plaintiffs Motion to Classify
Documents as Private
Judge KARA PETTIT
Signed October 14, 2020
10-14-2020 Filed: Return of Electronic Notification
10-21-2020 Filed: Motion: Stipulated Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice
Filed by: JOEL A BASS
10-21-2020 Filed: Order (Proposed) Granting Stipulated Motion for
Dismissal With Prejudice
10-21-2020 Filed: Return of Electronic Notification
10-21-2020 Filed order: Order Granting Stipulated Motion for Dismissal
With Prejudice
Judge KARA PETTIT
Signed October 21, 2020
10-21-2020 FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE Cancelled
Reason: Case has been settled.
10-21-2020 4 DAY BENCH TRIAL Cancelled
Reason: Case has been settled.
10-21-2020 Case Disposition is Dismsd w prejudice
Disposition Judge is KARA PETTIT
10-21-2020 Filed: Return of Electronic Notification
Any guesses on closing price today?? $CNGT
$1,000,000,000 /total outstanding- 305,778 = $3270/share
..and $1bill is nothing for these companies! imo
$SECI
OFFICERS, DIRECTORS AND FIVE PERCENT SHAREHOLDERS
Common
Peric DeAvila 11,391 3.72%
Laurence Madison 10,896 3.56%
Sector 10 Holdings, Inc. 151,616 49.58%
All officers and Directors as a Group (2) Persons (2) 22,287 7.28%
Including officer, directors and 5% shareholder 173,903 56.86%
Total outstanding- 305,778
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SECI/profile
$SECI $$$$$
OS 305,000///float 175,000??? Multi billion dollar company overnight possibility. Considering the Billions stolen from the patent and technology. Settlement could be Billions plus royalties.... The Jury could award more
300mill= $981/share & 750mill= $2452/share :) $SECI
Consider This: I highly doubt it would be that high. I would estimate anywhere between 300,000,000. and 750,000,000. Just my opionion.
Its not easy for companies to just cough up 1 Billion Dollars... also consider a large part of this settlement will not only be a monitory settlement but also revenues of millions of dollars a year in Royalties. SECI may be moving to Nasdaq soon. IMO
Wow! $CNGT holding strong.. hopefully this hits .03+ today! Riding free shares now $$$$$$
No kidding!! It's about time! $SECI $$$$$
#6 on most read!!! Could see $200 today! Lots of eyes on this.. $SECI
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/most_read.aspx
WOW!! She's flying!!! $CNGT $$$
ALL that matters!! $SECI $$$
Respectfully, there are a few problems with that interpretation of the court filings. First....the "settlement conference" your post refers to is AKA the pre-trial conference, which was CANCELLED. The 4 day bench trial was also cancelled. Reason: Case was SETTLED. The Judge in this case did not....and would not have taken it upon herself to dismiss the case with prejudice prior to the pre-trial conference and 4 day bench trial in which all evidence would be heard. It just does not work that way. It was the defendant who filed a STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS (which followed the motion from the plaintiff to classify all documents as private being granted by the Judge.....THIS WAS THE SETTLEMENT). In a "stipulated motion to dismiss" BOTH the PLAINTIFF and the DEFENDANT must agree to the motion for the Judge to NOT issue a judgement AGAINST THE DEFENDANT. Thus, the Judge did not make any ruling here, both parties themselves agreed to the motion to dismiss. Why? Settlement. I have been through many of these kinds of cases. The legalese to me is like reading the morning newspaper. Shareholders WILL see SETTLEMENT.....and it will be substantially higher than where we are now.
Huge GAPPPER!! Wtach for .02's.. $CNGT $$$
All the matters! $SECI
Respectfully, there are a few problems with that interpretation of the court filings. First....the "settlement conference" your post refers to is AKA the pre-trial conference, which was CANCELLED. The 4 day bench trial was also cancelled. Reason: Case was SETTLED. The Judge in this case did not....and would not have taken it upon herself to dismiss the case with prejudice prior to the pre-trial conference and 4 day bench trial in which all evidence would be heard. It just does not work that way. It was the defendant who filed a STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS (which followed the motion from the plaintiff to classify all documents as private being granted by the Judge.....THIS WAS THE SETTLEMENT). In a "stipulated motion to dismiss" BOTH the PLAINTIFF and the DEFENDANT must agree to the motion for the Judge to NOT issue a judgement AGAINST THE DEFENDANT. Thus, the Judge did not make any ruling here, both parties themselves agreed to the motion to dismiss. Why? Settlement. I have been through many of these kinds of cases. The legalese to me is like reading the morning newspaper. Shareholders WILL see SETTLEMENT.....and it will be substantially higher than where we are now.
$SECI won 11 year court case
$SECI
#2 on breakout boards!!! $SECI $$$ flying this month!!
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/breakoutboards.aspx
#6 on most read boards!!! $SECI will fly next week!! $$$$
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/most_read.aspx
It will be paid out as a one time dividend.. imo, insiders own 57% of the outstanding.
$1,000,000,000 /total outstanding- 305,778 = $3270/share
..and $1bill is nothing for these companies! imo
$SECI
OFFICERS, DIRECTORS AND FIVE PERCENT SHAREHOLDERS
Common
Peric DeAvila 11,391 3.72%
Laurence Madison 10,896 3.56%
Sector 10 Holdings, Inc. 151,616 49.58%
All officers and Directors as a Group (2) Persons (2) 22,287 7.28%
Including officer, directors and 5% shareholder 173,903 56.86%
Total outstanding- 305,778
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SECI/profile
$SECI $$$$$
OS 305,000///float 175,000??? Multi billion dollar company overnight possibility. Considering the Billions stolen from the patent and technology. Settlement could be Billions plus royalties.... The Jury could award more
GOLDEN!! $SECI $$$
Respectfully, there are a few problems with that interpretation of the court filings. First....the "settlement conference" your post refers to is AKA the pre-trial conference, which was CANCELLED. The 4 day bench trial was also cancelled. Reason: Case was SETTLED. The Judge in this case did not....and would not have taken it upon herself to dismiss the case with prejudice prior to the pre-trial conference and 4 day bench trial in which all evidence would be heard. It just does not work that way. It was the defendant who filed a STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS (which followed the motion from the plaintiff to classify all documents as private being granted by the Judge.....THIS WAS THE SETTLEMENT). In a "stipulated motion to dismiss" BOTH the PLAINTIFF and the DEFENDANT must agree to the motion for the Judge to NOT issue a judgement AGAINST THE DEFENDANT. Thus, the Judge did not make any ruling here, both parties themselves agreed to the motion to dismiss. Why? Settlement. I have been through many of these kinds of cases. The legalese to me is like reading the morning newspaper. Shareholders WILL see SETTLEMENT.....and it will be substantially higher than where we are now.
Bingo!!! $SECI $$$
What Is a Shareholder?
"A shareholder, also referred to as a stockholder, is a person, company, or institution that owns at least one share of a company’s stock, which is known as equity. Because shareholders are essentially owners in a company, they reap the benefits of a business’ success. These rewards come in the form of increased stock valuations, or as financial profits distributed as dividends".
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/shareholder.asp
THIS is GOLDEN! $SECI $$$
Respectfully, there are a few problems with that interpretation of the court filings. First....the "settlement conference" your post refers to is AKA the pre-trial conference, which was CANCELLED. The 4 day bench trial was also cancelled. Reason: Case was SETTLED. The Judge in this case did not....and would not have taken it upon herself to dismiss the case with prejudice prior to the pre-trial conference and 4 day bench trial in which all evidence would be heard. It just does not work that way. It was the defendant who filed a STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS (which followed the motion from the plaintiff to classify all documents as private being granted by the Judge.....THIS WAS THE SETTLEMENT). In a "stipulated motion to dismiss" BOTH the PLAINTIFF and the DEFENDANT must agree to the motion for the Judge to NOT issue a judgement AGAINST THE DEFENDANT. Thus, the Judge did not make any ruling here, both parties themselves agreed to the motion to dismiss. Why? Settlement. I have been through many of these kinds of cases. The legalese to me is like reading the morning newspaper. Shareholders WILL see SETTLEMENT.....and it will be substantially higher than where we are now.
The irony in all this is why are the defendants still trying to push down $SECI ??? The case was settled, $SECI won, and the narrative is still being twisted... I wonder why??
Settlement figures will be revealed within the month of November when filings are released... can't wait!!! Hold tight!!
$1,000,000,000 /total outstanding- 305,778 = $3270/share
..and $1bill is nothing for these companies! imo
$SECI
OFFICERS, DIRECTORS AND FIVE PERCENT SHAREHOLDERS
Common
Peric DeAvila 11,391 3.72%
Laurence Madison 10,896 3.56%
Sector 10 Holdings, Inc. 151,616 49.58%
All officers and Directors as a Group (2) Persons (2) 22,287 7.28%
Including officer, directors and 5% shareholder 173,903 56.86%
Total outstanding- 305,778
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SECI/profile
$SECI $$$$$
OS 305,000///float 175,000??? Multi billion dollar company overnight possibility. Considering the Billions stolen from the patent and technology. Settlement could be Billions plus royalties.... The Jury could award more
Is it Monday yet?!?! This will break $100+ next week imo.. $SECI $$$$