Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Correct woog.
4.99% in total everyday if they've sold the others.
I look at all the form 4s.
the comment was about the free Form 4 and S-8 give aways that equal over 200 million shares. Look at the edgar filings and get back to me about the lie.
I did make the remark, you just don't understand it.
Let me simplify. Under load, like towing a heavt trailer, engines will over heat. It's because under that specific load the engine is running too lean at 14.7/1. A properly mapped engine will regogzise the load and richen the AF ration to around 14/1. The richer AF ratio enables the engine to work under load without over heating. Thus the richer ratio cools the engine. In an hho injected engine the mapping also needs to be tested and set under all loads and RPM ranges. End of story.
They can once the shares are cleared per 144 restrictions.
I thought I posted that the product is over priced in relation to the competition. Also that competition is everywhere and with any success hundreds more will produce hho units for a lower retail price that produces more hho and doesn't over heat. At least i think that was me postin. Anyone who thinks low amp draw is the needed market advantage needs to be just like the 99.99% you describe and stay away from tech talk.
Grant for what? Hydrolysis?
Are you serious or is this the first time Arkansas has heard the term? Is it a job creation grant or a technology grant they applied for? Better hope it's job creation.
Here's the problem you all face as optimistic shareholders. HLNT has no unique technology. That's just the facts. Look at Youtube or use Google and you'll find hundreds of hho units for sale. Do you enter that market as a Public Company and think your unit will capture a huge market share? I suppose it's possible if your pricing was superior and you had a finished product usin hho technology. Let's say a generator that produces more energy for less cost than any others on the market. That's called beating the competition and if you market it right you will sell units. Some might even start to think and buy a aftermarket add on unit to put on their engine. Most will get interested and do what all consumers do, shop around to see what the competition has to offer. That's a problem cause at $1800.00 bucks a pop they will find dozens that produce more hho for half the price. There goes the sale. One poster stated that the HLNT advantage was that their unit draws less amps. It costs about 5 bucks to have variable amp/voltage capability. End result is you lower amps and produce less hho. Positive result is you keep your water from gettin too hot. Problem is that a pulse width modulator will do the same and produce more hho. That's the HLNT problem. i suppose the HOSS could sell thousands of units when in production if it's a better product and priced right. I don't see truck beds bein a big seller. HLNT needs to look hard at these realities or go the way other hho public companies went. Down and out. Do your DD guys before you go off on sound advice. This is not an easy market for this technology and as soon as someone gets a foothold another thousand hho unit producers will pop up over night. Update your model.
Here come the S-8 and Form 4 dumpings.
It's now a race to see who gets to dump the free shares they got first. Shares are being dumped under the bid. That means " get what you can while she sinks" Expect to see .12 early next week.
That sounds like you want to pick and choose what to believe regardless what the facts are. I bash lies and misinformation. I don't tolerate either. I don't control who you believe. actually don't care. If you post and you're wrong it gives me the opportunity to show your lack of knowledge. At the end of the day I'm gonna be right and you're gonna look foolish. If that's where ya wanna go, have at it. What facts that I've posted would you like ta debate?
What are you talkin about?
Air/fuel standard gasoline ratio is 14.7 to 1. It's called stoichiometric ratio or lambda. A lean AF ratio produces less power and more heat. That is unless hho is present. When hho is present you can run at a lean gasoline AF ratio with ever lower heat that runnin at stoichiometric without hho.
Detonation happens because hho burns so fast that the piston is still rising at combustion. Early combustion tries to drive the piston down prior to top dead center causin detonation which can break rods and crack pistons. timing must be changed when using hho to run properly.
The rich AF mixture is used in many applications outside of normal driving. A lean mix increases heat. A rich mix, say 14/1 doesnt cool the engine once past the 14.7/1 stoichiometric optimal. It does use more fuel and produce more emissions.
The point of this whole discussion on A/F ratios is that hho allows you to run lean with positive effects, not the usual negative. Less fuel consumed and less emissions. If that hho addition allows the effective stoichiometric ratio to be optimal at say 25/1 a rich mixture needed for towin etc would fall in the 20/1 ratio. Far better than the 14.7/1 stock gasoline ratio. again better milage and less emission because you have less gasoline to burn and hho is present to burn it more complete. That's the bottom line on hho hybrid fuels. It also relates to my posts on fuel management throughout all RPM ranges.
I'm very familiar with the company past, the debt, the technology and the court cases. If you're interested in factual information just ask some pointed questions. you'll get real facts. As I said in another post, no pink sheet company has as interestin history and technology as ECMH. It's not even close. This Marshall dude is feedin ya sht. Look up those court cases. read the exhibits filed. Notice that Encompass filed suit against Daly and Lanham. Encompass will beat them ta death in court. Encompass doesn't want out of anythin. They are the Plantiff. Encompass also beat the hell outta the same two dudes in bk court. Wanna discuss it Marshall? I'd be happy to just like we did on R. Bull when you decided to come back as another name because ya looked so foolish.
The U of I Study is pretty accurate.
In your summary #4 and #5 are in need of explanation.
#4 There is no storage challenge. On demand electrolysis produces plenty of hho. 2 liters per min. should be the goal.
#5 electrolysis is not experimental and is the effective method of choice.
There are several important items in the study that I’ve told you need to be implemented. The study failed to test a properly tuned and managed engine. It does state that the proper use of hho is with an ECU that has the ability to vary hho percentage. I posted this long ago and it was called bashing.
A timing advance is also critical. I’d never run the risk of detonation with the introduction of hho.
The lean burn capability of hho is important to a degree. Gasoline burns best at a 14.7 to 1 air/fuel ratio. hho burns just fine at a much much leaner ratio. A very lean gasoline ratio would be 20 to 1. The addition of hho makes this and even leaner ratios possible. The hho burns so fast and complete that it burns virtually all of the gasoline present at combustion. The result is better gasoline efficiency because it’s burned more complete. More complete burn means lower emissions. The addition of hho means even learner gasoline ratios due to the hho fuel source or btu’s.
I’ve posted a lot on the same things said in this report. The science that you now see confirmed in other studies was taken as an attack. Therein lies the problem and needed objective. The public has almost zero understanding of hydrogen gas as a fuel additive. You need to work through so much nonsense in order to educate that it becomes virtually impossible to accomplish to any acceptable degree. I’ve also presented the best way to educate, which is visual. Not many will study technology in written form. When I posted that it was taken as pumpin another company. That wasn’t the case. It was demonstrate a technology in a manner that would garner attention. We live in a “watchin TV society”
Nothin has changed my view. I’ve been involved in the study of fuels and engine design for longer than any of these companies existed. Study the U of I report. Compare it to my technology posts. You’ll find very similar evaluations except mine are more current and positive. I tried to make the posts very low tech so all could understand them. As I was postin them I was getting the “I know what you’re tryin ta do” type responses. It never dawned on me that what I was postin was way over the head of some readers. Their paranoia seemed to take over their minds.
Good post D&S. I am the ultimate tech dude. Study what’s out there and then reread those posts and the replies. You’ll see what I mean.
rotary dude is a funder. He put a lotta dough into the John Deere, RPI engine R&D. I was there to evaluate the technology and potential apps. I believe you go back to the power surfboard developement, don't you? By thr way hhonow, I also believe in the potential of hho. It's a gas anyone can make very easily and has some great effects as a fuel combination. It needs to be managed correctly and you aren't gonna build a public company around electrolysis units priced at $1800.00. You'd better have an end product runnin on hho gas. Every company that tries the after market add on crp fails. These Highline boys just don't get it and this one dude with his karma talk is a great example of those who believe otherwise.
.175 and fallin? Who doubts Tobin's word?
Has anythin he's posted actually happened? This guy ranks as the most flagrant pumper liar ever. He can't help himself. He still tries the CHTL misdirection even at this stage. A true moron. A pu--y ta boot. i wanted that debate with him when the pps was at $1.55 and he had every advantage possible with a scam. He wouldn't touch it. Now you all know why. I took a lotta heat on Yahoo and got booted for tellin this story. I wonder who listened and saved their life savings?
Sparks another HLNT PO'd poster.
I love readin their posts prior to postin here. Kinda puts their agenda in focus. None know a thing about either company. Chart players are the best. Expect more as their problems mount. I'm tryin ta help them but they don't get it yet.
Do you have the terms of the companies Convtable Notes? Post them if ya do and I'll tell how NIR looks at the investment. Remember this, we all suspect third party shortin on NIR's behalf but it's not been proven yet. The NIR past 2nd in command is now singin in court ta save his ass. Pressure is bein put on him to fess up on the shortin claims. He was fired by NIR and this is his chance to get revenge and save his own butt. Pressure is on him from both sides. If shortin is proved NIR is history, finished. Not one company with a no shorting clause in their notes would convert a share from that point on. NIR would not be able to sue them all. They'd be done. Investors in NIR are known by the ex NIR dude D. Dworkin. His job was to smoose them in the past. Will he spill the beans a seal their fate? That's the question. The Feds want NIR's ass. We'll see how Mr. Dworkin handles that pressure. He's due to be sentenced in Jan. Probably actually happen in March. If he wants ta play dick he'll go down for 20. If he plays ball I'd say less than a year actual time served. He's not the fish they want. Dworkin reads every word posted here. so does every other NIR associated person. Everyone one of em knows the score and the cards they hold. I'm thinkin Dworkin likes freedom a lot. Also look for deal makers like Envision Cap. to enter the pic. All of em are scamblin and dealin right now. No one especially the feds believe any of em as honest folks. It's gonna come down ta who wants ta save their own ass the most and who's willin ta admit their guilt. It won't be NIR. It's up to the others and they believe the end is probably seales anyhow.
Why would you ask me what to invest in?
Do your own DD or read the real DD posts and make up your own mind. Are you askin me to do that for ya? I don't really care if ya buy shares or not. I already told ya I don't tell other posters ta buy or sell. It aint my bag.
More DD needed cuda.
Ya don't have a handle on the NIR business model yet. Don't use what ya think now as a tool ta invest in NIR funded companies.
Tryin ta raise fear?
are ya off your rocker? I suggested a 1 to 45 Reverse Split because it makes sense. I also find that questions don't get answer in a non-biased manner from the company. Talk is cheap. I like to see and discuss what they do, have done and should do next. If that cause fear with you there's a simple solution. Don't read my posts. I like to ask questions and here the answers from various posters. Mostly the ones who post about a 5 dollar pps in 30 days and billions in future purchase orders for hho units. I'm dyin ta here the backup for those claims. Is there something unique at HLNT that I'm missin? Don't think so.
Loandude are ya lame?
Multiply the share activity here by 45 or so and it would be comparable to a 1.8 billion OS. I don't care if ya buy ECMH shares or not. I don't tell anyone to buy or sell just think. You're not gonna learn much by readin posts here. hhoguy has facts, rotaryguy has facts some others do too. Others are here cause they got fired by the Data Center or like yourself are mad at me. That's all fine with me. I can show that the uninformed are clueless, post facts and the conversation is just plain good for all ta read. Some here know my postin history well. I don't post lies or make up facts. I don't post ta make friends. They should be able to confirm that.
Here's how that works.
When I see interestin technology I sometimes post. I don't care if the company did an RS or not. I do expect companies to make sound business decisions based on the hand they have ta play. The other company you mention did an RS for some very good reasons. I was all for it. It made sense. They also have technology with no direct competition. More technical stuff than hho but that's not the point. Makin sense is. They had good reason and so does HLNT. I've posted that they've discussed an RS because any BOD with any smarts at all would have discussed all options to clean up a 1'8 billion share OS when the pps is .015 +-
Ryan seems to think I've called HLNT. I haven't and don't intend to. Don't worry, they read all of my posts. They need to quit caterin to and talkin with day traders. They need to get control of the OS. I've told them how. I'm not gonna call up and argue with the guys on a private call. That's not what I do. You should be able ta see that tossin out advice right here works much better. A private call leaves nothin to answer to. Aint my fist trip to the rodeo goatguy. I like shinnin the light a little brighter than a phone call. Seems that others don't like the light at all. Just want it ta go away.
No cookin books.
The auditor lost his license to audit. Funny thing is that it all revolved around an hho scam. See Hydrogen Hybrid Corp and a Ken Owen. Might be humphries twin. He's bein sentenced this month for securities fraud. I posted about the Hydrogen Hybrid plan and mistakes on the HLNT board. You dude should pay more attention to my content instead of goin bonkers every time I post. I'm tryin ta help ya avoid some real grief. ya just don't get it yet. Homework pal. Do it.
So, no you don't know a thing.
Gotta do that DD bro or you're gonna get crushed. at least get some knowledge of the subject on the table. Gimme a little advice on how ECMH should move forward. I did that for you at HLNT. Ya all blew a gasket when I said an RS was their only logical clean up option. you dudes call that bashin. I call it needed business. Now if ya wanna stalk where I post at least do so with some class. Some knowledge and some advise. You're just comin off as a pssd off willin ta say anything but facts. On this board they let folks speak their mind whatever it is. Nothin ta hide. No facts to delete. Actually Hlnt is not too different from ECMH history wise. The new HLNT dudes have just had less time ta clean up and a whole lot easier a task. They just need ta follow my advice.
Another po'd HLNT shareholder.
Look at these boys steppin up. They got shares in a company with a 1.8 BILLLLLON share OS. I posted about a needed RS and this is their response. Hey loanguy, what do ya know about ECMH? Gives us your take. With some facts.
Haven't heard anything about grants. I'd imagine if theyb thought they qualified and no negative strings were attached they'd apply but have not heard one way or the other.
Glad ya posted that cep.
32hp is their smallest engine. A single rotor engine. Add another rotor and it doubles to 64hp. Add a turbo add probably a 100hp. It's logical to start with their smallest engine and get it certified and in the Xboard. That same 32hp engine would have plenty a power to run these: tractor, gererator, pump, motorcycle or 3 wheeler (on or off road), forklift, compressor, boat, jet ski, Xboard, large lawnmower and on and on. Nice market right there. Get it tested and approved like they are doin now and sales is a given. Remember this thing is half the size of a 32hp piston engine. Think that might appeal to some? Has two movin parts. All engine people know the rotary movement is the most efficient. Study turbines and electric motor movement. You do it it right though cep. 32hp rotary engine with low emissions and best suited for gasses like nat. gas, methane, hho and propane. 32hp with virtually zero emissions just might grab some attention. I'd be wathic this development real close pal, if I were you.
What lie?
Read the last company PR. They're sendin the engine to get EPA and CARB certs. It's pretty clear to those that read that the company says it passes and sent it because it does. Nothin is complete until it passes at the certified Test Lab. Are ya clear now dude?
Mr Racoon.
Is it not reasonable for a real company to plan 6 weeks into the future? A solid dongfeng PR would be the needed news for the RS option.
Reverse Splits are done all the time, are legal and work great when done on the back of quality news. Any company that does an RS is doing so for a reason. Question is, is it a good reason with a sound business plan behind it. HLNT is already in dire straights with their 1.8 billion share count. One poster says the company could or should retire stock and use it for future business. What stock? Who is gonna step up and say "retire my stock for everyone elses benefit"? Any stock outside of S-8 and some Form 4 are restricted for 6 months to a year dependin on who is issued those shares. Both increase the OS. A forward split option is just plain ridiculous. HLNT is not even close to doin a forward split. What do you want the company ta do. Give you shares and increase the OS that is already out of hand? Aint gonna happen.
I've made comments on Preferred shares and super voting rights in other posts. I suggest the HLNT boys study that option very close. You don't need to own 51% of the shares to have votin control.
About 50% of the Pink Sheet companies have gone through an RS and as you can see survived. Many were for no reason other than to gain shares for executives to issue to themselves. Others were for good reason with companies like HLNT that actually have a product. I've read posts by the dozens about the fantastic news coming, the totally honest management team and 5 dollar future pps claims. It appears that many posters don't really believe that or they'd be totally behind a company clean up usin the RS route. The only senseable route.
In my post last night I said the pumpers and traders would hate the idea. They don't care about long term growth. It's time HLNT stop listening to those kinds of posters. They aren't long and don't believe in the future success of HLNT.
Do this for me forward split promoters. Lay out your Forward Split model and explain the logic behind such a misguided action. Let's compare the logic of the RS vs FS action. The company needs to make the right decision in the end. All of the claimed longs that bought shares a .0001 or whatever should be behind long term logical growth and an exit from the structural mess HLNT now faces. All they need is that great news you all say is comin and the RS will work like a charm. The smart folks will get my picture but many probably never will.
Toad.
You forgot the rotary engines from 32 hp to 3000hp runnin on alternative fuels and passin Californis emissions with out a cat. converter. They need to be aware of that too. i'm guessin you're watchin real close now. You're a trader bro. can't help yourself. watch that pps pal. I expect you'll quiet down real quick.
Read this for real info.
You'll quickly see that a forward split is pure nonsense logic for HLNT. A 1 to 5 forward split would increase the OS to 9 billion shares and decrease a .015 pps to .003. That's gonna be some real nice numbers to go to investors or JV partners with. Read below and you'll see the logic of a Reverse Split ON GOOD NEWS.
Best dividend stocks
This stock split two for one at $40 a share and ran up to $40 again, all within six months. It is just incredible how fast this company is growing. The stock is now at $42 a share, and there is talk of another two for one split. It has been great to have more stocks like this one?.
This is obviously the sound of happy investor. Stock splits are looked upon as being good news because the price will often continue to increase, given time. However, even though many stock splits are positive sadly that is not always the case. Many times the price will soar for the split only to fall back to previous price levels adjusted to the split.
II. MECHANICS OF A SPliT
Stock dividends and splits have basically three occurrences: announcement date, record date and payment date. To qualify for split the investor must be the owner on the record date. Therefore, the stock must be purchased at the appropriate time before the record date to qualify.
Announcement date
This can be considered the most important date because it tends to have the greatest positive impact on a stock?s price. Even companies that do not react well to a split tend to move initially higher on the announcement. Rumors of a split sometimes leak out ahead of the announcement date, which also tends to push the price higher.
Stock split and stock dividend announcements are given to the media on the announcement date. The company provides all the important details of the split and often a brief history of the company?s previous stock splits, which it sends out in the form of a press release. The company considers a forward stock split a positive event and wants to get as much free media publicity as possible.
III. PRICE WEAKNESS
It is not unusual to see some price weakness either after a split announcement or shortly after a payment date. Any number of things can cause a price to drop. For example speculators could be exiting and taking profits especially if the price has been flat for a time. Some investors might fear that the price action is over and expect a drop and they would rather sell too soon than too late. Obviously others see this price weakness as a buying opportunity and they are the investors who drive the price upward. ON GOOD NEWS ONLY FOLKS
IV. WHY DO COMPANIES HAVE STOCK SPliTS
Ordinarily the reason a company decides to split its stock is to make it more attractive for investors to purchase. The logic is that more people will buy the stock at $ 30 rather than $60. Obviously as more people buy the stock at the lower price the stock will rise in price. The split makes the stock more affordable to individual investors. WHEN YOU HAVE A .015 PPS AND 1.8 BILLION OS THE RS IS THE WAY.
Whereas a $120 price might be too high for many, a $60 or even $30 price will get them to buy the stock. However, there is no assurance that stock will continue to rise in price after the split. Often a stock price declines in price after a split which can be true particularly if a stock splits more than once in a year.
Another reason for a company to have a stock split is to make more shares available thereby broadening its stockholder base. The stock becomes somewhat more marketable and liquid. Somehow positive publicity also fits into the stock split scenario. A company might use a stock split announcement to soften the blow of some negative news. On the other side of that coin a company might use other good news GOOD NEWS GOOD NEWS GOOD NEWS to soften the blow of a reverse stock split.
V. NOT ALWAYS TWO FOR ONE
Not all stocks split two for one. Some other frequent ratios for stock splits are three for one, three for two and five for four. However, regardless of the ratio used the stock price will decline and the amount of shares outstanding will increase directly in proportion to the amount of the split. Splits do not give the investor something for nothing in terms of financial gain. Splits do not give the investor something for nothing in terms of financial gain. Splits do not make a company better or more financially sound.
VI. WHY DOES THE PRICE RISE
A price can rise for many reasons, due to pressure from one fact or several factors combined. There are still novice investors who do not realize the price is adjusted to the split. Brokers often hear the confused and complaining phone calls asking what made the price drop so suddenly especially on a three for one split. Though this group is small it is part of the picture.
Speculators buy either before or soon after an announcement because they believe the price will rise. These short term traders pick an early exit price at which they will take profits. Their actions account for much of the price weakness that appears shortly after many splits, where they sell. Investors in general still believe the publicity that a stock split is good news for a company. Although the stock does become more affordable for the individual investor, a forward split does nothing to add real value to a company.
VII. REVERSE STOCK SPliT
One of the primary reasons for the forward split of a stock is to lower the price. The opposite of a forward split, the purpose of a reverse stock split is to raise the market price. LIKE HLNT NEEDS TO DO, FAST. Companies believe that raising a price will make the stock more attractive for trading. Commonly reverse splits are one for three, one for 10 or one for 20 but they can be any quantity. In the one for 10 situation, one share of the new stock is received by the shareholder for every 10 shares owned. Instead of having the original amount of say 100 shares, an investor ends up with 10 shares, but the new price is 10 times higher.
Reverse splits are often considered a death knell for a company, but that is not always he case. ON GOOD NEWS LIKE EVEYONE SAYS IS COMIN Some companies reorganize and pull themselves together to become successful. One of the major difficulties is the selling by disappointed investors. Even though the reverse split significantly increases the market price, active selling frequently hammers it back down. To counteract this tendency companies will sometimes try to time a reverse split announcement to coincide with good news. NUMERO UNO PEOPLE IS THAT GREAT NEWS THAT IS COMIN. PPS WILL HOLD AND CLIMB ON GREAT NEWS. COMPANY THEN HAS SHARES TO WORK WITH. LIKE GETTING RID OF 6 MILLION DOLLARS OF DEBT.
Some good advise.
It’s pretty clear to even the most clueless long-term shareholder that HLNT had better implement some corp. changes. The OS is massive and needs to be reduced in order for the company to have any future credibility. Lately I’ve seen posts about a reduction and email quotes on the subject from management. I’m sure they are sick and tired of answering emails and phone calls from traders telling them what needs to be done so the traders can make easy money and be gone. It’s time to stop that communication and act like a real company. You claim to have big things comin down the pike and want to clean up what past management has f’ed up.
If you really expect great news then prepare to do a 1 for 40 Reverse Split. That would get your OS down to 45 million shares and based on a .015 present pps your new pps on day one after the reverse would be .60. 60 cents. Most of your posters will scream like mad about this suggestion because they have seen share price drops after a reverse. In most cases they are not longs but traders actin like longs while trading daily. Look at your buy/sell numbers and you can see that’s true. Those that are longs claim they intend to hold for a long time and would not sell a single share.
This company was basically a dirty shell with a massive Issued and Outstandin share count. You have 6 million in debt that needs to be paid and a share count that needs to be reduced. Stating that you intend to buy back shares is total bs. No company that needs working capital ever does that nor should they. I’m sure you’re also worried about a post-reverse share collapse. What you need to do is time your RS so it is followed by great news. You claim great news is coming. Do you really believe it? If so and it comes your post RS share price will hold just fine when backed by great news. All that matters and is needed is that great news. You end up with a 45 million share OS and about a 40 million float All good there. You also end up with a .60 pps. Real great news may get that to a buck. At a buck you pay off debt with 6 million shares, which increases your OS to 51 million, and float to 46m. You trade volume will back off by about the same multiple but great news kicks that up fast.
At the end of the day you have a company with a bright future, a cleaned up share count and debt being paid by shares with a minimal OS increase. This is dream come true stuff for any Pink Sheet Company. You’ll also rid yourself of the 100% Day Trader types that could care less if you even have a product. You have many other share options available when you have room ta use shares.
You’re gonna hear a lot a screamin about this logic. It’s all based on self-serving traders that want no dilution that could affect their trading. Longs should not care. They should be believers and have a business building mentality. The traders just want to hide any negatives and pump while they trade. You know damn well you have a share count issue that needs to be addressed. Forget the screamers and make long-term solid business decisions. I spelled out your best route in simple terms. If you have an SEC attorney talk to em and formulate a plan. Just do it on the back of good news. Revenue news is best.
That why quadrant fired you dude.
You're deadwood and dumb ta boot. activity is good though bro. Keep postin, ya fill a need.
MM's to Tobin.
"Pick up that soap pump boy. We've kept the pps up today dispite 95% selling. Now do your part."
Don't blame ya for that dude.
Very interestin story here. It would take ya sometime ta get up ta speed. From both a technology and history standpoint this is by far the most interestin pink sheet company I've ever followed and I've followed this technology as long as I;ve followed and recomended hho as a hybrid fuel component.
Do your DD ryan.
Quadrant was not in bankruptcy. Data Center assets were purchased out of bankruptcy by Encompass for 5 million bucks. They then moved to a new facility and fired up the new business model based on the Virtual platform. Hyperbackbone is one of the resultin new ventures. If you're actually in that fiels you should understand the concept. I do suggest ya do some hardcore DD so you have real facts as your ammo. You should have needed footprint numbers for virtual vs colo opperations as well as operating cost reductions. Quadrant can expand to any size needed in their present facility. I've only read a little on their technology and business direction but it's clear they are sellin bandwidth now not cabinets as their revenue producer. With all that said, I really think the engines are their key to riches. Quadrant is a nice revenue center.
Good post Nic.
There is actually some hope for ya. Your cognitive abilities are a step up from the board avg. I am a company asset, Coats was right there. did you think that offended me? You still seem to be caught between the love or hate PD personal feelin. That will change. Sometime tonight I'll post my diretional suggestions. It will tend to weed out the true believung longs from the Day traders that prey on them. Test the "this is real" belief of HLNT management and posters. As you see, that group is ever changin. They are here as your best friend when the free candy is bein handed out and then gone lookin for new friends and free candy. You're lucky I'm a tech motivated dude or I'd leave too.
I got OS numbers from the post slit PR and my calcs. on note conversions based on watin certain sell numbers over the RS to now period. You can be sure I'm correct within a couple a million.
Data Center revenue numbers are based on the old financils from 2009 contained in BK exhibits. They were showin around 200k/month revenue. I took the latest Hyperbackbone PR, new facility operatin cost reductions from PR's and the latest Hyperbackbone revenue projections of 60k per month additional revenue within a year. I've asked about the break even numbers at the new facility and got an answer of around 120k gross revenue/month. I figured they lost some colo clients by goin virtual and to a smaller facility so I plugged in 140k gross monthly sales added the 60k conservative Hyperbackbone 60k/month and got 200k/month gross revenue. That number was based on gettin only 30-40 new customers in the next 12 months. I believe they will get at least 70 in that area alone. What makes a 5 million dollar Data Center is customers and revenue along with hard assets. Hard assets only last a short while in that business so my 5 million is based on the revenue side and standard sales/buyout multiples in the industry. 5 million is a conservative lowball number. Try buildin a Data Center and gettin 240k revenue a month sometime. Gonna cost ya more than 5 mil.
I got OS numbers from the post slit PR and my calcs. on note conversions based on watin certain sell numbers over the RS to now period. You can be sure I'm correct within a couple a million.
Data Center revenue numbers are based on the old financils from 2009 contained in BK exhibits. They were showin around 200k/month revenue. I took the latest Hyperbackbone PR, new facility operatin cost reductions from PR's and the latest Hyperbackbone revenue projections of 60k per month additional revenue within a year. I've asked about the break even numbers at the new facility and got an answer of around 120k gross revenue/month. I figured they lost some colo clients by goin virtual and to a smaller facility so I plugged in 140k gross monthly sales added the 60k conservative Hyperbackbone 60k/month and got 200k/month gross revenue. That number was based on gettin only 30-40 new customers in the next 12 months. I believe they will get at least 70 in that area alone. What makes a 5 million dollar Data Center is customers and revenue along with hard assets. Hard assets only last a short while in that business so my 5 million is based on the revenue side and standard sales/buyout multiples in the industry. 5 million is a conservative lowball number. Try buildin a Data Center and gettin 240k revenue a month sometime. Gonna cost ya more than 5 mil.
Test it Toad.
Got balls?
Redstick.
The FLOAT is a bit different than you described. It's the shares available to trade daily. Unristricted shares can be held in certificate form. Say in someone safe. Those aren't float shares cause they aren't in the potential trading mix. The important thing to know is, how many shares are trading or may be traded on any given day. Two things all traders want to know right up front. How many shares in the FLOAT and what is the daily avg. trading volume. If I have those number and an active chat board it's like free money. Don't let these dudes tell you this is a low AS, OS, Float at HLNT. It's pink sheet common but not real company common. I'm a technology dude at the core. That's what interested me here. What I've seen daily is that HLNT is attemptin ta become a tech leader with a amature pink sheet mentality. Any business consultant that looked at HLNT would barf. I said long ago that they are goin about this all wrong and I see it's actually worse than I thought 2 months ago. after tradin today I'm gonna poat a template that HLNT should follow to become real. Thr Day Traders will screem like mad starin with this post. Too bad, I could care less. HLNT management now knows they need to do somethin to get things under control in order to be considered somethin besides a P&D company. They've painted themselves into that corner and I'm gonna do em a favor and give em some sound advice. They will read it and are wonderin what ta do as we speak. If they really consider their technology cutting edge and believe they have big things comin they will listen hard and act.