Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
My trades are my own business. I do not publish them anywhere, in any form. Only my brokers know my trades.
Pretending that you know my trade history when you obviously do not is just further proof of your being full of shit, bitchass.
I don't pick winners, I don't pick losers, I don't make picks at all.
You wouldn't be so concerned if you weren't so afraid that some may believe me.
Calling me a fraud doesn't make it true. Prove it, bitchass.
Oh that's right, you can't.
Cry more, bitchass.
What are you going to do? Oh no, not a nasty private message! Anything but that!
Oh wait, those just get a screenshot and an add to my Wall of Lame.
Congratulations on your first day watching level 2 and times and sales.
Welcome to the OTC.
Pretending to care so little while being compelled to compose a vehement rant with a bunch of exclamation marks is hilarious.
When Cutler tried his appeal his plea was also "we're different people, we're a different company, it's a new thing now". Well, it did not work.
It's entirely possible that the SEC had an idea of what may have been found in those missing financials whose timeline jibes with a known scam crew from back then. Hence the demand to produce them for inspection or you don't pass Go.
Still in 2019 the SEC wouldn't let Cutler skip those 2008-2013 reports.
Here we are years later. Is that just water under the bridge now? Or is still a concern to the SEC? There is no statute of limitations that has run out.
So, was their problem only with Cutler? Was the problem the shell? Both?
If it was only Cutler that was the problem then sure, a new review could be aces. But if skeletons ready to walk among the living are in the missing years then that might still be a problem that the SEC is cognizant of.
George's not releasing details of the agreement might be a clue to how significant it is. I contend that it should have been made public if it was of importance going forward. Not releasing it is either a sign of it being trivial or of George playing games. I like to think that George would not play games. Then again, I like to think that chicken nuggets are healthier than they are.
There's nothing wrong with posting positive things. As long as they are true.
Once the lying starts in then yes, you are a piece of shit pumper.
Tell me again how withdrawing an appeal suddenly magically transforms the reason for the appeal into a non-issue.
Hint: it doesn't.
Anyone saying that it does is a piece of shit liar.
Tell me how I'm wrong. Go ahead, try.
And no, I'm not paid. I enjoy calling out your bitchass for free.
Cry more. Your tears are delicious!
And pumpers will cry to their mommies about cut and paste before market opens.
Such is life.
Oh, I saw it. I guess I have higher standards for DD than some on the board, though.
"Watch and learn" just doesn't cut it for me, sorry. You have to be extremely naive to think one can hang one's hat on that.
"Yawn. I was told this wouldn’t get pink current without 2 years of financials.. um wrong again."
I'm sorry you're sleepy. Maybe take a nap or something. As far as OTCMarkets, let me know how they respond when you complain to them they did not follow their own published guidelines that should represent how things work. Maybe they updated the guidelines but forgot to hit the "publish to website" button or something.
"Funny still never picked a winner on iHub yet go around and preaching what not to buy."
I've never picked a loser either. That's because I don't "make picks" at all. I have no interest in being responsible in any way for recommending some stinky pinky no matter how legit I may even think it might be. They can all be instant rugs for all kinds of lovely reasons. I also do not "preach what not to buy". Everyone here should be adults with intact faculties. Well, should be. Buy what you want. Don't buy what you don't want. Knock yourself out. I do however feel that investors should have proper factual information to work from. I know some do not like that. Suck it.
"What a complete hoot."
Calling out like an owl every post seems like an interesting tactic for trying to scare away what is obviously a pest problem around your house. I think they have actual decoys and sound things to automate what you are trying to do. Gotta pay for them though, that's the thing. Ooooooohhh, I just got it. Going the freebie route. Well, good luck.
Have you tried paying for an actual exterminator? Oops, forgot - the pay thing ain't happening.
"Another paid basher. Yawner material."
Nah, not paid to post, sorry to burst your fantasy. As far as yawner material, do you like maybe sleepwalk or something? Or more specifically, sleepharass? Stalking me on other boards and sending nasty private messages and then reblocking hardly seems like yawn material, more like a sick obsession.
What do you mean "per agreement"?
No one knows what the agreement is.
Or has George been feeding insider information to pumpers?
The ONE bit of actual DD you present still does not negate the original problem of the 6 missing years of financials that prevented the last attempt at a GVSI merger and name/ticker change.
Withdrawing an appeal does not fix the problem that the appeal was trying to fix. Quite the opposite - it is an indication of failure to fix the problem.
In George's own words, it was "unwinnable".
The only hope is that the so-called "agreement" plays a part in this. There are some things to consider, though.
First is that if it was anything of consequence then it would need to be released to the public within 4 days, even as an OTC alternative reporter.
That then begs the question, is it of consequence but George has not announced it? Then why? Is he incompetent and does not know he needs to release it? Or does he know it needs to be released but is intentionally hiding it from investors and the public?
So which is it?
Is the agreement a nothingburger that doesn't need announcing because it has no affect? Something like "yeah George you file an appeal withdrawal and we'll grant it - deal"?
If the agreement actually has any bearing then which is it?
Has it not been announced because George is incompetent?
Or has it not been announced because George is intentionally withholding it even though that goes against his duty as CE?
Thanks for the latest news from February, appreciated.
https://twitter.com/OTCpinkGVSI/status/1622965172888301568;
Wow, "news" from May 2022. How did the numbers look when it was included in the balance sheet?
The rules don't seem to have been followed to the letter, but hey close enough for government work, I guess? Listing the proposed publication places would have been handy for tracking whether they were actually happening.
https://casetext.com/rule/nevada-court-rules/nevada-rules-of-civil-procedure/commencing-an-action-service-of-process-pleadings-motions-and-orders/rule-44-alternative-service-methods
You won't find any current attempt at merger and name/ticker change either.
Soooo, no answer explaining how I am wrong.
That's exactly what I thought.
Thanks for the confirmation reply!
What am I wrong about? Let's all hear it.
They ignored the summons so George just gave up.
LOL
I'm quite right. Which is business as usual, I might add. There is no mention of AI in their big "investment thesis" they put out.
They only now realized "hey maybe we should start making AI a talking point" after the entire rest of the business world has been obsessed with it for so long?
It's such an afterthought it's laughable.
Also FACT: the missing financials that put a halt to the last attempt at a merger and name/ticker change have never been filed.
Years and years of extensions were even granted for the rectification of the problem. But nope - it was "unwinnable", in George's own words.
LMAO, their big "investment thesis" makes no mention of AI whatsoever.
It just now occurred to them to finally start throwing the term out there in tweets? After months and months of AI being the biggest thing to ever hit the entire business world, much less one so tech-involved like their outfit is, supposedly?
That's truly pathetic.
The deficiency was the missing years of financials. Withdrawing the denial appeal does not magically make those financials appear. They are still missing. The deficiency itself still exists. The situation is in fact "unwinnable" in George's own words.
As long as George has no need for a merger or name and ticker change then that deficiency does not pose a problem.
Hey, awesome.
Oh wait, but isn't that what investing in GVSI is all about? Being in for a merger and name/ticker change?
That's kind of a bummer. Might actually get a better return from that nice sleepy bond fund that keeps being brought up. Oh, the irony.
Sooooo, they would reply to emails....
Wow. Awesome. Amazing. Incredible.
I see that untruths are being told on the board again.
Clara's verbiage was "liaised", not "met".
"Met" implies that the ICOA team flew across the planet to New York for a personal face to face sit down meeting with OTC Markets, which is bullshit.
Instead, Clara used the wonderfully vague term "liaised" which in reality could mean something as lame as they shot over an email.
The missing filings put a halt to GVSI's last merger attempt and that problem has not been remedied.
Bullshit. It applied to Cutler and he was not the former management. He had to give up and walk away after being given multiple extensions over years to fix it. He realized it was "unwinnable".
That's because there is no open merger or name/ticker change attempt at the moment.
What happened last time they tried? Oh that's right, they got denied because of the missing 6 years of financials.
Has that situation been remedied yet?
I just checked - nope. The missing financials are still missing.
Unfortunately, that is not something that can be just swept under the rug no matter how deep one sticks one's head in the sand.
There also isn't a current request for merger and name/ticker change.
Guess what? Those are what elicited the FINRA denial and proceedings/cases.
Just sitting around doing nothing doesn't
Just like one can't get a speeding ticket when the car stays in the garage.
Of course, that also means going nowhere.
Nope, not a "huge insider holder", it's the exact same 5 billion shares that were added one year ago for Kristin's shenanigans that all fell apart.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=169582909
The sharp-eyed will notice that the AS was not adjusted down along with the OS a couple days ago. Frank can whip those shares up again any time he wants.
Different brokers operate differently.
That's it. That's all. There is no secret conspiracy you have stumbled upon where certain MM's are trying to keep the price of ICOA down.
They just don't want you to enter an order with a price way out of whack, it's a safety feature meant to protect dumbasses that enter orders with a decimal point out of place, for example.
Not all brokers do it but some do.
Have you read the document you posted?
It's not George unwinding anything. It was Cutler's attempt to get the SEC to reverse FINRA's blocking of the corporate actions.
And it failed. They were even given many extensions over several years to make good.
George finally withdrew it because it never worked and was never going to - it was unwinnable in his own words.
It's tough to tell because we don't know the status of HD's holdings. According to the last filings he has none. But he is not supposed to be able to have sold them all in the meantime. So what gives?
We don't know the full story.
As far as finger pointing at Frank, the dude has had like 5 out of 20 of his tickers or something get a Caveat Emptor designation.
At some point one has to realize that maybe it's not just a coincidence.
There was a time when "Frank merger!" was a hot topic, but now is a different time and place. Plus a lot of Frank's things have bagged a lot of people.
It's a good thing that some folk at least have realized that just being a Frank ticker doesn't mean riches. Kinda the opposite in fact.
Actual assets don't really matter in a pump campaign. Most penny investors don't check those numbers and don't even know how to, sadly.
It seems that the plan is for the offering to provide cash for paychecks and working capital and Frank gets out once he gets $475,000.
After that, it's a group of broadcast stations that are already known. Kinda awkward that other stations related by the same management are going bankrupt these days.