InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 31
Posts 3458
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/30/2015

Re: logic-commonsense post# 136321

Monday, 07/17/2023 9:01:52 AM

Monday, July 17, 2023 9:01:52 AM

Post# of 173000
When Cutler tried his appeal his plea was also "we're different people, we're a different company, it's a new thing now". Well, it did not work.

It's entirely possible that the SEC had an idea of what may have been found in those missing financials whose timeline jibes with a known scam crew from back then. Hence the demand to produce them for inspection or you don't pass Go.

Still in 2019 the SEC wouldn't let Cutler skip those 2008-2013 reports.

Here we are years later. Is that just water under the bridge now? Or is still a concern to the SEC? There is no statute of limitations that has run out.

So, was their problem only with Cutler? Was the problem the shell? Both?

If it was only Cutler that was the problem then sure, a new review could be aces. But if skeletons ready to walk among the living are in the missing years then that might still be a problem that the SEC is cognizant of.

George's not releasing details of the agreement might be a clue to how significant it is. I contend that it should have been made public if it was of importance going forward. Not releasing it is either a sign of it being trivial or of George playing games. I like to think that George would not play games. Then again, I like to think that chicken nuggets are healthier than they are.