Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
well i figured with all the crying going on....why not
9 months from oct i believe
Has anyone tried calling les ?
your right
Why Are Market Makers Important?
Like it or not, your fate is in the hands of market makers since they essentially control the stock market. Your order placed to buy or sell a stock on the OTC Markets will usually pass through one of the more trusted sources like NITE, ATDF, ETRF, and ARCA. Seeing a level 2 screen which only has these on it is what’s referred to as a “Clean Level 2” – one with no dirty hands on it. Typically, these four are there to do what markets makers are supposed to do which is simply fill buy & sell orders without attempting to manipulate the behaviour pattern of a particular stock.
When I see these four market makers on a level 2 screen, usually I will investigate the orders that have recently gone through to see if they were sells or buys in an effort to gauge the psychology of those involved already with the stock. Since there is a high probability these trades are being done by traders and not the market makers until given some reason to see otherwise, it gives some clearer insight as to an expected direction/momentum for stock on a given day.
There are a few things that you need to know about the market maker NITE. Knight Securities uses the ticker $NITE. This market maker is known for being one of the most abusive market makers in the penny stock market. Most of the popular penny stock brokers route from NITE because they are quick to execute most orders. One thing that I’ve noticed is that NITE tries to screw you over. You have to realize that each market maker has it’s own complex algorithm that tries to make them money. Sometimes they make money by shorting the ask and then covering on the bid. Sometimes when a stock is running and you place an order on the ask and you don’t get filled, it is actually the market maker taking shares on the ask. Then they move up the bid and ask and tries to bait traders into hitting the ask again to sell the shares that they just bought. You’ll also see MM’s shorting a stock as it runs up because they know that it will eventually come down. Think of it this way. If they are able to short a stock at .01 and it runs to .10, you will hear people on the stock forums saying, shorty is going to get burned, or this market maker is short. In reality, it really won’t matter because naked shorting really isn’t enforced and any short will eventually be able to cover if they just keeping shorting more. If they short at .01, .02, .03…to .10 it appears that they are really short.
Then what happens is they keep shorting more at the top say at around .10. Then the promotion is over and then over the next few days the MM is able to short more in the .06 to .08 range. People keep buying because they think more is coming, but the promo is over. The price keeps decreasing over the next month back to .02 to .03 range where the MM is able to cover for a profit. So as you can see the market makers like NITE never lose and it is only the bag holders.
Are angel investors good for the company
3 month chart shows a little cup and handle forming
Maybe more then one
Are we trading. Looks like it's not.
That is correct !!!
Celgene International Sàrl, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Celgene Corporation (NASDAQ: CELG), today announced that the European Commission (EC) has approved REVLIMID® (lenalidomide) as monotherapy for the maintenance treatment of adult patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who have undergone autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). REVLIMID® is the first and only licensed maintenance treatment available to these patients.
The REVLIMID® Marketing Authorisation has been updated to include this new indication, which expands on the existing multiple myeloma indications as combination therapy for the treatment of those not eligible for transplant who are newly diagnosed, or have received at least one prior therapy.
Multiple myeloma is an incurable and life-threatening blood cancer that is characterised by tumour proliferation and suppression of the immune system.1 It is a rare but deadly disease: around 39,000 people are diagnosed with multiple myeloma in Europe, and around 24,000 people die from the disease each year.2 The median age at diagnosis in Europe is between 65 and 70 years.3 In Europe, patients who are fit and in good clinical condition are typically considered eligible for ASCT.4
For patients who are newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma and eligible for ASCT, key treatment goals are to delay disease progression and ultimately achieve long-term control over multiple myeloma.5 These patients typically receive induction therapy and high-dose chemotherapy with melphalan followed by ASCT. This treatment approach has been an established standard of care for over 20 years.6 Considering that over half of those patients who relapse do so within 2 to 3 years of ASCT,7,8 the approval of a maintenance therapy for use after ASCT that may delay disease progression represents a major advance for these patients.
“After ASCT, most patients will still see their disease recur or progress. We now have an opportunity to enhance immune function and delay disease progression by controlling residual malignant cells and slowing tumour growth. REVLIMID® has been shown to increase progression-free survival after ASCT in clinical trials. Having a licensed therapy for use in this very important setting means we now have the opportunity to delay disease progression by sustaining the response,” says Professor Michel Attal, Executive Director of the Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole and Institut Claudius Regaud, France.
The EC decision to approve REVLIMID® as monotherapy for multiple myeloma in the post-ASCT setting was based on the results of two cooperative group-led studies, CALGB 1001049 and IFM 2005-02.10
CALGB 100104 was a phase III, controlled, double-blind, multi-centre study of 460 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma undergoing ASCT who were randomized to receive continuous daily treatment with REVLIMID® or placebo until relapse or intolerance.
IFM 2005-02 was an international, phase III, controlled, double-blind, multi-centre study of 614 patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma who were randomized to receive a 2-month consolidation regimen post-ASCT of REVLIMID® monotherapy, followed by continuous daily treatment with either REVLIMID® or placebo until relapse or intolerance.
In both studies, the primary efficacy endpoint in the study was progression-free survival (PFS) from transplant to the date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. REVLIMID® monotherapy as maintenance treatment post-ASCT significantly reduced the risk of disease progression or death in patients with multiple myeloma, leading to the studies being unblinded based on passing their pre-specified boundary for superiority at interim analysis. The updated PFS, using a cut-off of 1 February 2016 continues to show a PFS advantage:
CALGB 100104: after 81.6 months of follow up, median PFS was 56.9 months (95% CI 41.9, 71.7) in the REVLIMID® arm versus 29.4 months (95% CI 20.7, 35.5) in the placebo arm (HR=0.61; 95% CI 0.48, 0.76; p<0.001).
IFM 2005-02: after 96.7 months of follow up, median PFS was 44.4 months (95% CI 39.6, 52.0) in the REVLIMID® arm versus 23.8 months (95% CI 21.2, 27.3) in the placebo arm (HR=0.57; 95% CI 0.47, 0.68; p<0.001).
Individual studies were not powered for an overall survival (OS) endpoint. Using a cut-off of 1 February 2016, a descriptive analysis showed that the median overall survival in the CALGB 100104 was 111.0 months (95% CI, 101.8, not estimable) for patients who received REVLIMID versus 84.2 (95% CI 71.0, 102.7) in the placebo arm (HR=0.61; 95% CI 0.46, 0.81; p<0.001). In the IFM 2005-02 study, median overall survival was 105.9 months (95% CI, 88.8, not estimable) for patients who received REVLIMID versus 88.1 (95% CI 80.7, 108.4) in the placebo arm (HR=0.90; 95% CI 0.72, 1.13; p=0.355, not significant).
In both of these phase III studies, the safety profile was in line with other clinical data in newly diagnosed non-stem cell transplant and a post-approval safety study in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. The most commonly reported adverse events in these two studies were haematological, and included neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. The most commonly reported non-haematological adverse events were infections. An increased incidence rate of haematological second primary malignancies (SPMs) was also observed in the REVLIMID® group compared with the placebo group in both studies. However, the EC decision confirms that the benefit-risk ratio for REVLIMID® is positive in this expanded indication.
Tuomo Pätsi, President of Celgene European and International Operations, said, “We are glad to provide a treatment option for these patients with multiple myeloma, who have previously had no licensed medicine available to them for maintenance treatment following ASCT. This latest approval underlines the important role of REVLIMID® in the treatment of multiple myeloma, extending its use across the disease spectrum, and demonstrating our commitment to multiple myeloma patients. We continue to invest in research and development as we strive to turn multiple myeloma – and other currently incurable diseases – into manageable conditions.”
The EC decision for the use of REVLIMID® as monotherapy for the maintenance treatment of adult patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who have undergone ASCT follows the positive opinion issued by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) in January 2017.
Celgene announced on 22 February 2017 that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has expanded the existing indication for REVLIMID® to include use for patients with multiple myeloma as maintenance therapy following autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant in the U.S.
Learn
I Agree
Could be . But i feel the news started when 22 million shares traded the other day HOLD....Something seems to be happening.
Time was 16:56 Price was .6434
114300 trade just went through
LOL Thanks I wasnt going anywhere. I have been adding all the way down. GLTA
Hi TC what do you make of that
Hello Mr Flipper, Happy to see you back again.
how do you view this
You will be missed Mr Flipper. Thank You for all your work I will continue to remain positive and hold to the end. Enjoy your time away
New York as well
lots of snow
What is the date that Linda is giving the Keynote Presentation
Same to you !
Has H.C. Wainwright & Co and NWBO done business before
Thank you.
Mr Flipper after sleeping on it I think what nwbo was doing is raising the funds needed to start the Direct Phase 2 study. while i dont like the price i think its a good sign. Hopefully, PRs in early 2016 included this, Phase3 enrollment completed, and then positive P3 results. Then stock propels b4 more money raised.
Any thoughts
I concur . Merry Christmas.
Well Mr Flipper I hate the financing but im staying put. Any thoughts?
If thats your purpose for being here then write away and have a good time while lots of us are looking for a better answer to save some lives from cancer. But by all means keep looking in the mirror and keep telling yourself your doing the right thing.
I still have one question. Why is adam so consumed with nwbo if the company so bad. AND WHY SO MUCH NOW.
what is your take on the article
Yep.... Smells like pyrr. I have a question. If all the naysayers hate the company
so much then why all the attention from them. Stay long. They know its just a matter of when not if.
well said Classless in many ways.. god speed for nwbo and all the people it may help.
Just out again on ymb NEW YORK, NY--(Marketwired - August 28, 2015) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, reminds investors in Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc. ("Northwest Biotherapeutics" or the "Company") (NWBO) of the October 26, 2015 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action lawsuit filed against the Company and certain officers. Interesting dead line date
So we hire Michael Meehan a big PR guy and the law suit shows up again. HOLD weeks hands with law suit play.