Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
It might be an under statement, but it is going to be interesting, regarding the outcome.
Revocation, and it is desired by UC. Its the only way to clean out the SLIM NS. People with CERTS and DIVIYS, will walk down the street into USCA, or SGGM, or CIM.
If the ((Naked Short Trading has been proven)), then only after revocation, can restitution be sought, by the responsible parties.
As long as CMKX is trading, you can not get restitution.
So much talk about a no nothing stock?
Has anyone seen so much FUSS over a .0001 stock EVER???
Why are so many different groups trying to dis~credit CMKX?
If this company was the loser that they say, "they"wouldn't be here. Uhmmm I'd say there is much more to this than everyone knows.
No NS you say?
From another board
Spoke with CEO of eagletech communications
By: snifferpup
04 Jun 2005, 10:56 PM EDT
Msg. 222043 of 222046
Jump to msg. #
From Jacee at the Pro~
jace98
Diamond Hunter
member is offline
Joined: Aug 2004
Gender: Male
Posts: 42
Location: missouri, u.s.a.
Spoke with CEO of eagletech communications
« Thread Started on Today at 10:08pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Had a very nice chat with the president and CEO of Eagletech Comm. today He called me about the Senator Talent had sent and wanted some basic info in which i gave him...He then Informed me that After Taking the SEC and DTCC to court...all the way to the New York Supreme Court to get his company's trading records has in his possession True evidence of his company's NSS and it involved several BIG NAMES. Some are definitely inside trades(which in itself is illegal) others are dignitaries of foreign countries. He cannot do press releases because he states he is on a black list and that all pr avenues have been closed. He was very happy that The Senator from Missouri replied favorably to my letter and was going to get information to him for further review. and was glad that someone in Washington was finally listening to the small company owners and investors. I did a goggle search on eagletech communications and found the letter to SEC demanding his own company information...We have a Brother in Arms in the same fight... Pray that he to can withstand the SEC,DTCC and their slowdown and do nothing tactics, He said it took 4 months for the DTCC info that was court ordered to start flowing just a little and that all info has not been released as of yet..
Did I hear somebody say, " CIM shares may be a blessing in disguise?"
160,000 count me in. IPO @ 3.00 HHHHMMMmmmmm
Even Institutions like CMKX
Holdings Summary
CMKX CMKX
CMKM DIAMONDS INC Other OTC
Institutional Holdings Description / Hide Summary
Company Details
Total Shares Out Standing (millions): 703,519
Market Capitalization ($ millions): $0
Institutional Ownership: 0%
Price (as of 6/3/2005) 0
Ownership Analysis # Of Holders Shares
Total Shares Held: 9 95,904,000
New Positions: 1 51,000,000
Increased Positions: 1 51,000,000
Decreased Positions: 1 2,500,000
Holders With Activity: 2 53,500,000
Sold Out Positions: 1 2,500,000
Click on the column header links to resort ascending () or descending ().
Owner Name
Select a name below for more information. Date Shares Held Change
(Shares) % Change
(Shares) Value
($1000)
SEGALL BRYANT & HAMI... 3/31/2005 51,000,000 51,000,000 New $0
PACIFIC WEST FINANCI... 3/31/2005 24,040,000 - - $0
MEAD ADAM & CO INC /... 3/31/2005 10,000,000 0 0.00% $0
BEATY HAYNES & PATTE... 3/31/2005 6,000,000 0 0.00% $0
NIAGARA INVESTMENT A... 3/31/2005 2,000,000 0 0.00% $0
1 2 Next
Page 1 of 2
Institutional Ownership supplied by EDGAR Online, Inc. Copyright 2005, EDGAR Online, Inc. All rights reserved. Insider Trading Data supplied by Vickers Stock Research (Vickers) © Copyright 2005. All rights reserved. Replication or redistribution expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of EDGAR Online, Inc and Vickers. EDGAR Online, Inc. and Vickers shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
Spitzers site
Join Eliot / Log In / En Español
SS funds invested in Manipulated Markets < Back to Discussion
[1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 >
Subject Author
Post 1
SS funds invested in Manipulated Markets
I believe the presidents idea is a great one after Mr Spitzer or someone reforms the SEC. Regardless of what eric frawly on here says about 1 stock TASER. There have been 100's of companies the SEC has help destroy by not enforcing their own rules, such as naked shorting and not delivering the stock. This alone has been devastating to 100's of good American companies who create American jobs and products.
Just look at the number of companies in the past 10 years the SEC has "decided, with help" to do an informal inquiry on. Then correlate them to how many had millions of shares "short". This will show you who is directing the SEC and their investigations. The numbers speak for themselves.
There are 100's of companies which the Social Security money would be invested in that are manipulated by the SHORT PLAYERS - WITH DEEP POCKETS and major influence through their TIPS to the SEC, Naked Shorting and or Short and Distort. This is as crooked as the UN taking billions for oil. Only this is being done under our own roof. Does not take a brain surgeon to look into this and find out it is happening. Terry Frost
02/04/2005 at
9:00:57 AM
Post 2
Go Away
You have no evidence of this horrible short selling plague you say is devastating the markets. My experience would tell me that the reason for this striking correlation between short selling and SEC investigations is that short sellers are attracted to companies with corrupt leadership, bad accounting, and ugly financials that could get them in trouble.
And your claim that it's 'devastated 100's of companies' couldn't be more misleading. The performance of a companies stock should in not directly affect the operations of the company in any way, shape, or form unless the company is straped for cash and needs to put more shares on the market.
Instead of incessantly whining about your bad investments to people who couldn't care less, you should try reevaluating your investment strategy to focus on more solid and less corrupt companies. Eric Frawley
02/07/2005 at
12:11:58 PM
Post 3
Terry Frost on 02.04.2005 at 9:00 AM
SS funds invested in Manipulated Markets
I believe the presidents idea is a great one after Mr Spitzer or someone reforms the SEC. Regardless of what eric frawly on here says about 1 stock TASER. There have been 100's of companies the SEC has help destroy by not enforcing their own rules, such as naked shorting and not delivering the stock. This alone has been devastating to 100's of good American companies who create American jobs and products.
Just look at the number of companies in the past 10 years the SEC has "decided, with help" to do an informal inquiry on. Then correlate them to how many had millions of shares "short". This will show you who is directing the SEC and their investigations. The numbers speak for themselves.
There are 100's of companies which the Social Security money would be invested in that are manipulated by the SHORT PLAYERS - WITH DEEP POCKETS and major influence through their TIPS to the SEC, Naked Shorting and or Short and Distort. This is as crooked as the UN taking billions for oil. Only this is being done under our own roof. Does not take a brain surgeon to look into this and find out it is happening.
Eric Frawley needs a life
You have no idea what evidence I have. Your opinion has NO CASH VALUE. You have no idea how companies work in corrolation to their stock price and all companies are not straped for cash or crooks. You have a negative outlook and need to focus on getting a life. Terry Frost
02/09/2005 at
10:52:31 AM
Post 4
Naked Short Scam A Fraud or Who Sent Letter To Bush
Had the SEC taken my SHO commentary to heart back in December 2003,(which can be found under a google search for the acronym 'naanss'or a google search for 'naanss davidson schwab' will lead diectly to my comments with those terms highlighted in the cache.
'NAANSS' stands for 'National Association Against Naked Short Selling' and it was housed in the Blaine,Washington office where Genemax penny stock was touted to $20 per share and dumped by insiders,(possibly through LOM of Bermuda's U.S. ACCOUNTS) to below a dollar about as fast.The 'national' in NAANSS title is suspiciously similar to 'NCANS' or 'National Coalition Against Naked Short Selling'who placed the ad or open letter to President Bush et.al. in the Washington Post. And Davidson has a history of political fraud. cyberfraud, and securities fraud,although for some reason he remains untouchable.
He iss friend of Richard Mellon-Scaife,Lord Rees-Mogg etc..Founder of National Taxpayers Union,Agora Publications, newsmax,etc.and his 'StrategicInvestments'
had ex CIA Chief Colby's name on letterhead when he sent mass mailing claiming Clinton killed Vince Foster.
I could go on and am willing to provide more info and documentation of the use of the 'naked short claim' to actually cover up massive pump and dumps.Overtock.com's Dr.Byrne has got himself in sleezy company with this naked short fraudstser O'Brien or dirtydirtydeeds' as he calls himself on yahoo's ostk and nfi message boards.His website originated in B.V.I. home of many penny stock scams and although he would not identify himself he appears to write in a style very similar to that of James Dale Davidson as well. Tony Ryals
02/22/2005 at
9:19:17 PM
Post 5
Terry Frost on 02.04.2005 at 9:00 AM
SS funds invested in Manipulated Markets
I believe the presidents idea is a great one after Mr Spitzer or someone reforms the SEC. Regardless of what eric frawly on here says about 1 stock TASER. There have been 100's of companies the SEC has help destroy by not enforcing their own rules, such as naked shorting and not delivering the stock. This alone has been devastating to 100's of good American companies who create American jobs and products.
Just look at the number of companies in the past 10 years the SEC has "decided, with help" to do an informal inquiry on. Then correlate them to how many had millions of shares "short". This will show you who is directing the SEC and their investigations. The numbers speak for themselves.
There are 100's of companies which the Social Security money would be invested in that are manipulated by the SHORT PLAYERS - WITH DEEP POCKETS and major influence through their TIPS to the SEC, Naked Shorting and or Short and Distort. This is as crooked as the UN taking billions for oil. Only this is being done under our own roof. Does not take a brain surgeon to look into this and find out it is happening.
Naked short selling - a problem Spitzer needs to address
Here are the facts:
1) The Reg SHO list is a list of companies that have been abusively naked shorted beyond a threshold of 1/2 a percent of their total outstanding shares.
2) Naked shorting has been illegal since the SEC was formed in 1933, and was believed to have contributed to the 1929 crash.
3) The SEC has not been enforcing the rules against naked shorting, hence the list.
4) The SEC is supposed to be enforcing the rules that were enacted to prevent retirees/shareholders and companies from being vicimized by predatory entities like hedge funds. See #3.
5) The SEC issued a pardon for all violations that pre-date January 7, 2005 - rewarding those who broke the rules and allowing them to keep their illegally generated income.
6) The DTCC (Depository Trust Clearing Corporation) won't tell investors or companies how big the problem of naked shorting is. There is no rule or reg that they can cite as a basis for refusing to disclose this material information required for any thinking investor to evaluate investing - they just won't divulge anything.
7) The SEC doesn't even recieve any granularity from the DTCC - they claim not to know the extent of the problem, and say ask the DTCC, who refuses to talk, as do their owners, the NYSE.
8) Naked shorting is legal for market makers and the Specialist firms. If they abuse that exclusion from the rule of law, they can perform "bear raids" and drive the price of Reg SHO companies into the ground in an effort to create "buy side liquidity" and essentially scare or stop out or margin call free shares to cover their fail problem with.
9) Naked shorting would be impossible without the active participation of the DTCC and the brokerages that make up the NASD and own the NYSE.
10) The DTCC has created this problem by abusing their "stock borrow program" and keeping clandestine C and D accounts at the NSCC to hide the fails. It is a huge source of revenue for them. They further have created a mechanism for failed shares to pay dividends so as to maintain the subterfuge.
11) There are cases right now where the DTC simply refuses to deliver shares to brokers, in violation of 10(b)5 and 10(a)2. Even after being sued for delivery, they still refuse. They feel they are above the law. And given that nobody is enforcing the law, they are correct.
12) The President and his administration are lobbying for privatizing a portion of SS and creating private accounts. This is absurd given the lawless abuses being perpetrated daily and sanctioned by SEC inaction and cooperation with the perpetrators.
So Mr. Spitzer, given that you are the defender of the little guy and are running on a platform to clean up the markets, how do you feel about a centi-billion dollar rip-off of middle america, Joe average, by about 200 guys in New York and their network of crooked cronies? How will you respond during your campaign when your opponents bring this up, correctly, to demonstrate that you knew about the problem, and stood by and did nothing?
That, I believe, is the question of the day.
What are you going to do now that it is a part of the public record - ignore the full page ads, ignore the articles, ignore this post? You won't be able to ignore your opposition when they bring it to the forefront of your campaign.
So, what are you going to do - are you part of the problem, or part of the solution? Bob O'Brien
02/22/2005 at
10:08:32 PM
Post 6
Additional thoughts on the Naked Shorting problem
It is interesting to note that one hedge fund, Rocker Partners, the largest independent shareholder in Thestreet.com (along with former hedge fund manager Jim Cramer, who ran money for Mr. Spitzer) when taking into account his OFFSHORE hedge fund Helmsman Holdings, is known to have been on the record as being short a whopping 30+% of the US Companies on the NYSE Reg SHO Threshold list. That is a huge part of the problem, and one guy is a big part, apparently. Documentation is available.
Mr. Spitzer has jurisdiction over Rocker Partners as they are located in NY. And David Rocker has sole control over Helmsman, so their records would be subpoenable through Mr. Rocker.
Mr. Spitzer also has jurisdiction over the Specialist firms like BofA on the NYSE, who appear to be conducting the aforementioned "bear raids" on Reg SHO list companies illegally, in an attempt to drive small investors out of the stocks so that the member firms of the exchanges can scoop up inexpensive shares to cure their fail problems.
Witness the precipitous drops in the Reg SHO companies where buy side pressure would be expected due to the forced buying, if the new rules were being enforced or adhered to. Except that isn't happening - and many are down significant double digits since the list was published.
All that would be required is to pull the tickets on those companies and see where the selling pressure was coming from - if it is the specialists, it is another illegal abuse from a group Spitzer has already gone after for lesser illegal abuses.
So again, given the jurisdiction and the size of the lawless predation, is this something our would be next governor should ignore, as it might involve those close to him, as well as powerful New Yorkers?
This is all my opinion, but I do have the proof on the Rocker issues, and the specialist misbehavior is easily testable - it's not like they haven't been guilty of other, equally onerous things just recently. Bob O'Brien
02/22/2005 at
10:23:10 PM
Post 7
SEC SHO Complaint re J.D.Davidson's 'naanss'
Below is google cache that can be found with google'naanss' search.Here Davidson,naanss,Schwab,O'Quinn or highlighted or color coded.
http://216.239.63.104/search?q=cache:sXJ5VwTlraMJ:www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/s72303/tryals121603.htm... Tony Ryals
02/23/2005 at
12:26:18 AM
Post 8
Terry Frost on 02.04.2005 at 9:00 AM
SS funds invested in Manipulated Markets
I believe the presidents idea is a great one after Mr Spitzer or someone reforms the SEC. Regardless of what eric frawly on here says about 1 stock TASER. There have been 100's of companies the SEC has help destroy by not enforcing their own rules, such as naked shorting and not delivering the stock. This alone has been devastating to 100's of good American companies who create American jobs and products.
Just look at the number of companies in the past 10 years the SEC has "decided, with help" to do an informal inquiry on. Then correlate them to how many had millions of shares "short". This will show you who is directing the SEC and their investigations. The numbers speak for themselves.
There are 100's of companies which the Social Security money would be invested in that are manipulated by the SHORT PLAYERS - WITH DEEP POCKETS and major influence through their TIPS to the SEC, Naked Shorting and or Short and Distort. This is as crooked as the UN taking billions for oil. Only this is being done under our own roof. Does not take a brain surgeon to look into this and find out it is happening.
'National Association Against Naked Short Selling' website
Old(2003)James Dale Davidson 'National Association Against Naked Short Selling'website which was used for fraud TOUTING OF GENEMAX AND ENDOVASC AND FINALLY OVER 100 QUESTIONABLE PENNY STOCK SCAMS USED JAMES DALE DAVIDSON'S NAKED SHORT FRAUD TO MASK THEIR DUMPING AT TIMES THE VERY MMS WHOSE ACCOUNTS THEY DUMPED FROM.SCHWAB,VFINANCE,REFCO,ETC. :
http://www.interchangemedical.com/SEC/NAANSS%20Report.pdf Tony Ryals
02/23/2005 at
3:17:00 AM
Post 9
Terry Frost on 02.09.2005 at 10:52 AM
Eric Frawley needs a life
You have no idea what evidence I have. Your opinion has NO CASH VALUE. You have no idea how companies work in corrolation to their stock price and all companies are not straped for cash or crooks. You have a negative outlook and need to focus on getting a life.
Terry Frost on 02.04.2005 at 9:00 AM
SS funds invested in Manipulated Markets
I believe the presidents idea is a great one after Mr Spitzer or someone reforms the SEC. Regardless of what eric frawly on here says about 1 stock TASER. There have been 100's of companies the SEC has help destroy by not enforcing their own rules, such as naked shorting and not delivering the stock. This alone has been devastating to 100's of good American companies who create American jobs and products.
Just look at the number of companies in the past 10 years the SEC has "decided, with help" to do an informal inquiry on. Then correlate them to how many had millions of shares "short". This will show you who is directing the SEC and their investigations. The numbers speak for themselves.
There are 100's of companies which the Social Security money would be invested in that are manipulated by the SHORT PLAYERS - WITH DEEP POCKETS and major influence through their TIPS to the SEC, Naked Shorting and or Short and Distort. This is as crooked as the UN taking billions for oil. Only this is being done under our own roof. Does not take a brain surgeon to look into this and find out it is happening.
What are you getting at Tony Ryals?
I'm not sure what you mean Mr Ryals? Are you saying the NCANS is a scam? why would it be a scam if you are saying that? Geoff Jarvis
02/28/2005 at
9:10:32 AM
Post 10
Terry Frost on 02.04.2005 at 9:00 AM
SS funds invested in Manipulated Markets
I believe the presidents idea is a great one after Mr Spitzer or someone reforms the SEC. Regardless of what eric frawly on here says about 1 stock TASER. There have been 100's of companies the SEC has help destroy by not enforcing their own rules, such as naked shorting and not delivering the stock. This alone has been devastating to 100's of good American companies who create American jobs and products.
Just look at the number of companies in the past 10 years the SEC has "decided, with help" to do an informal inquiry on. Then correlate them to how many had millions of shares "short". This will show you who is directing the SEC and their investigations. The numbers speak for themselves.
There are 100's of companies which the Social Security money would be invested in that are manipulated by the SHORT PLAYERS - WITH DEEP POCKETS and major influence through their TIPS to the SEC, Naked Shorting and or Short and Distort. This is as crooked as the UN taking billions for oil. Only this is being done under our own roof. Does not take a brain surgeon to look into this and find out it is happening.
This is a great posting
This shows Spitzer is invbolved with companies that are going around the REG SHO. I have a few freinds on Wall Street that have been talking about why the companies that should show UPSIDE PRESSURE with the new REG SHOW are all down double digits. They are close to getting the information to prove it. Spitzer, you better get on the right side of this fast. The Short Players you are connected with don't care about you and you will go down with them. Terry Frost
03/07/2005 at
6:59:47 AM
Post 11
Frost Owes Spitzer An Apology
Terry Frost,Didn't you say you have a blog that mentions 'naked shorting' ? Where is it ? As to naked shorting' as a scam to mask penny stock dumping,when you are really interested in the truth you will find it.
In the meantime take James Dale Davidson's, Brent Pierce's,and Grant Atkins' fraudulent, now disappeared,'NAANSS' or 'National Association Against Naked Short Selling' website I provide link to above.Had you heard of it before and did you know those running it were fraudulent penny stock touts ? Did you look at their'poster penny stock'Genemax,(gmxx),and how many shares outstanding it were dumped while crying 'naked shorting' ? Did you know shares were being dumped from LOM of Bermuda as they cried their crocodile tears ? Did you know that James Dale Davidson was under SEC investigation for touting through his Agora's 'Vantage Point' tout mail fraud and Brent Pierce convicted of securities fraud in Canada ? They are the criminals you defend.
I would be sympathetic to any losses you may have incurred in believing you were a victim of 'naked shorting' when it was really a penny stock pump and dump but you do not seem very sympathetic to those who don't hold your views,however erroneous.
At first you post as a seemingly confused investor asking for Mr.Spitzer's attention. And now you tell him he'd 'better be on the right side of this fast.' Then you end by making accusations and insinuations that 'Mr.Spitzer is connected with(naked shorters)who 'don't care about (him) and (that he)'will go down with them.'
I would say ethically and morally you now have the obligation to prove your,so far, unfounded accusations about Mr.Spitzer that,if you were correct,would now doubt prove your 'naked shorting' accusations as well.Why don't you do that or apologise to Mr.Spitzer ? And,by the way,just where is your weblog that mentions,'naked shorting' ? Tony Ryals
03/07/2005 at
8:49:52 PM
Post 12
Terry Frost's 'blog' mentioned on Reg SHO board
Terry Frost says:
Reg Sho - no teeth
I have been witting about the SHORTS and Naked shorts for weeks here , months on my blogg, and years since I was on Wall Street. If you write on here there are people who admittedly are short criticize you for witting. But the RE SHO is a joke just like the SEC is a joke. The SEC is used by the short positions at the last minute to cover their short. Taser is latest example, 30 million shares short, last few days to cover, they tip off the SEC to do an informal inquiry, stock drops 60% and now they cover. Newest numbers out yesterday - short position down by 10 million shares. The REG SHO is a non event as NO ONE can reign in the rogue short players in this manipulated market. The president better not have the young people put their SS money in this manipulated market. The SEC is no better than the UN. Disband both of these bribery taking organizations. Terry Frost
01/27/2005 at
2:50:52 PM Tony Ryals
03/07/2005 at
8:58:37 PM
Post 13
Terry Frost on 02.04.2005 at 9:00 AM
SS funds invested in Manipulated Markets
I believe the presidents idea is a great one after Mr Spitzer or someone reforms the SEC. Regardless of what eric frawly on here says about 1 stock TASER. There have been 100's of companies the SEC has help destroy by not enforcing their own rules, such as naked shorting and not delivering the stock. This alone has been devastating to 100's of good American companies who create American jobs and products.
Just look at the number of companies in the past 10 years the SEC has "decided, with help" to do an informal inquiry on. Then correlate them to how many had millions of shares "short". This will show you who is directing the SEC and their investigations. The numbers speak for themselves.
There are 100's of companies which the Social Security money would be invested in that are manipulated by the SHORT PLAYERS - WITH DEEP POCKETS and major influence through their TIPS to the SEC, Naked Shorting and or Short and Distort. This is as crooked as the UN taking billions for oil. Only this is being done under our own roof. Does not take a brain surgeon to look into this and find out it is happening.
I didn't say it, Jim did....
".... when market participants enter into naked short sales on a massive scale, they could have an endless supply of shares and "could drive down the price in an abusive or manipulative way."
- James Brigagliano, Assistant Director, SEC Division of Market Regulation. Alan Newman
03/09/2005 at
1:44:38 PM
Post 14
Regardless of James Brigagliano's quote.......
it is not adequate,in light of a large penny stock scam carried out in front of the SEC and other supposedly vigilant watchdogs in congress etc.,for at least the last several years blaming 'naked shorting' as a form of investor 'psy-ops' to deceive them to 'go long' on penny stocks as insiders to the scams dump all around them.
I have speculated elsewhere that naked shorting occurs through market makers at least in the rare occasion that penny stock shares through some scammy 'reverse split'etc. or an irrational bull market excceds supply.
But James Dale Davidson et.al. profited from using naked short claim to distract from his own offshore dumping through LOM etc.(and thus through Charles Schwab etc.)using cyberfraud as exemplified in his now disappeared 'National Association Against Naked Short Selling' or 'naanss' just as the newer 'National Coalition Against Naked Shorting' or 'ncans.net appears to do.
I welcome all disclosures includimg opening of DTCC records or whatever,but must say I find it strange of the Texas attorneys O'Quinn and Christian et.al. to have never requested the same of their clients,WHO ARE NOT THE 'INVESTORS',BUT THE QUESTIONABLE COMPANIES AND THEIR 'MANAGEMENT' THAT THEY GENERALLY REPRESENT.
O'quinn has allowed his name in businesswire prs to be used to tout based on his clients claims of 'naked shorting' and even encouraging suckers-investors into buying 'certs' to protect themselves supposedly from market makers such as Schwab Capital,Refco,Ameritrade etc..
Yet,O'Quinn and Christian have NEVER asked their clients to open their records and those of their transfer agents to scrutiny and I say from personal experience if that is not done the DTCC records alone are not adequate.
I have seen Endovasc dump shares that never appear until way too late and perhaps never in SEC filings and suspicious activity NEVER investigated where shares are dealt through a boiler room called Belladorgroup out of both Kuala Lumpur and Dubai as well I believe !!! I call this 'share-money laundering'.All under the claim of being 'naked shorted'.
Why was Endovasc's 'transfer agent'Alexander Walker paid $200,000 in freely dumpable shares after remaing 'gagged' about float over a one year 'reverse split' pump and dump scam followed by a fraudulent claim of being ''naked shorted' ?
Why did Charles Schwab remain silent when asked if the businesswire pr claim of ENDOVASC AND ATTORNEY O'QUINN WAS CORRECT ? Yes many questions few honest answers. Tony Ryals
03/09/2005 at
6:02:04 PM
Post 15
Is the legal system being used ?
Is the legal system being used by those who can afford to buy their days in court(or postpone them) and making a mockery of justice while those who really have need of it go unheard because of them ?
Below is a letter from 'famed trial attorney' John O'Quinn whose name appeared on Endovasc and other penny stocks companies' press releases who claimed to be 'naked shorted' by market makers like Schwab,Ameritrade, Refco,and on and on.The truth I believe,in retrospect,is that most all of these questionable share touting 'companies' were dumping instead.
But O'Quinn was a famous attorney and was also representing 'itis' and its law library and jag notes media,and although it took on r.j.reynolds for the Texas government it was representing little biotech Endovasc with their Stanford nicotine patents and on and on.
Below shows that in January 2004 O'Quinn was still misinforming the SEC by claiming that it was 'naked shorting' that had caused damage to these very companies that in fact were still dumping shares faster than 'naked shorting' could account for and O'Quinn was causing most all the damage by deceiving investors to go long on questionable penny stocks he represented as victims of 'naked shorting.
My biggest peave is that O'Quinn never answered my queries as an investor in Endovasc about insider dumping but worse he must have known about J.D.Davidson's involvement at time of 'reverse split'and about his tout business
publications and more so a link to offshore death spiral manipulations.He might have checked more deeply into shares supposedly 'naked shorted' by Charles Schwab and found that account for 'select clients'. And O'Quinn apparently never examined the records of his client companies themselves or their transfer agents to my knowledge,as if they were above suspicion.
And of course James Dale Davidson is a well connected man in Washington,D.C.....
From: Alexandria DonAngelo [Alexandria.DonAngelo@kswny.com]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 7:44 PM
To: rule-comments@sec.gov
Subject: File S7-23-03
Comments of John M. O'Quinn, Esq. on Proposed Regulation SHO
January 5, 2004
Mr. Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington DC 20549-0609
Re: Proposed Regulation SHO
Dear Mr. Katz:
Over the last couple of years, I have been representing people who have been
devastated by predatory and illegal short-selling. This illegal securities
misconduct has been cleverly concealed by the perpetrators for years. Recently,
the S.E.C. has acknowledged this reoccurring illegal conduct and taken some action.
While those actions are a step in the right direction, they do not go far enough
to protect vulnerable corporations and their legitimate stockholders from this
pernicious activity. If, as a nation of laws, we do not act now and forcefully
to stop this pernicious illegality and to protect such corporations and stockholders
from it, our stock markets will be viewed by investors as corrupt and faith will
be lost in our markets, both here and abroad. Naked short-selling destroys the
value of the small innovative companies that have historically been the powerhouse
of our American economy.
When we speak of "naked" shorting, we are referring the practice of selling
shares short without fulfilling the obligation to deliver the shares to the purchaser.
Opportunistic traders have learned how to take advantage of an overworked regulatory
system to manipulate stock prices and profit from virtually riskless trading strategies.
These current recommendations are not strong enough to give the protection
and relief to the hundreds of companies that have been, and continue to be,
victimized by unscrupulous naked-shorting. Unless the system assures the public
that every short position taken is backed by actual shares of the issuer there
will be no effective restraint imposed upon these manipulators. We depend on the
S.E.C. to protect these companies and ensure the integrity of the market. The time
has come for true reform in this area.
Sincerely,
John M. O'Quinn, Esq.
O'Quinn, Laminack & Pirtle
Houston, Texas Tony Ryals
03/12/2005 at
9:44:27 PM
Post 16
Senator Bennett,Naked Short Scam Is Of Washington,D.C.
('O'Brien',for those who don't know,is one of the aliases of the person who organized the paid ad-letter in Washington Post 'connecting' Social Security investing to 'naked shorting' and warning Bush to do something.I was ripped off in a 'naked short scam' and this is an exchange with him on blogmaverick.com.)
O'Brien,What about the retail investors who were screwed by the penny companies you still represent as honest and victims of 'naked shorting'? I have never once heard you lament that the 'naked short claim'and scam of James Dale Davidson and his 'naanss','investigatethesec.com' of Dave Patch,Financialwire of Essary,and whatever sponsors the 'faulkingtruth.com,erroneously made by and for over 100 penny stock 'companies' in order to con investors to go long awaiting 'famed trial attorney O'Quinn's et.al. judgements when all along it was a massive penny dump and dump scam ?
Have you visited many rb message boards of penny scam boards like rb's cmkx where your 'naked short'bs and Washington Post letter to President Bush is perhaps helping the mafia connected Mr.Maheu of Las Vegas and inspiring penny tout scams to be revived again on and on ? Why don't you ask Mr.Maheu or Congressman Bennett to give you protection so we can know who sends anonymous stock advise to our President from offshore ? Are you an American ?
I THOUGHT HOMELAND SECURITY WAS TELLING US ONLY YESTERDAY THAT ANONYMOUS MESSAGES OVER MASS MEDIA WERE OF INTEREST TO HOMELAND SECURITY BECAUSE TERRORISTS COULD BE PASSING SECRETS IN THE MESSAGE ? You,like a spoiled child,claim it a joke that your websites have originated out of B.V.I. rather than the U.S. where the message is targeted.
That's outrageous. And to top it all off the big penny naked short scam to mask offshore(LOM et.al.)and insider dumping originated,in many ways,IN WASHINGTON,D.C.COINCIDENTALLY - WITH JAMES DALE DAVIDSON - A BELTWAY INSIDER !!!!
In this post 911 era I would think that is the least we could ask of you,and Dr.Byrne,and Senator Bennett.It is obvious when your colleague Dave Patch states that Senator Bennett's interest in this 'naked short claim' dates further than the latest penny stock of the day(Global Link?) Financialwire had just touted as another poster child of 'naked shorting'.
Some here really do believe that your history with the 'naked short' issue dates back longer than NCANS.SOME BELIEVE YOU MAY HAVE A PAST WITH 'NAANSS' WHICH IN MANY WAYS IS A WASHINGTON,D.C. ORIGINATED STOCK SCAM IF YOU CONSIDER THE MIND BEHIND IT AND PROMOTING IT THROUGH VANTAGE POINT AND THE OLS NAANS WEBSITE WAS JAMES DALE DAVIDSON,WASHINGTON, D.C. INSIDER.
It would seem to me you are touting slightly higher market caps companies of questionable and precarious financial futures and playing the same scam James Dale Davidson and his 'NAANSS' website did with the pennies. Tony Ryals
03/14/2005 at
12:09:58 AM
Post 17
by Bob O'Brien of ncans.net
Posted Mar 15, 2005, 11:40 PM ET by Bob O'Brien
Hey Tony. Is your purpose to clog every blog where any meaningful debate is taking place on naked shorting? I note with amusement that your specialty is the classic paid basher's technique of cutting and pasting large chunks of irrelevant information in an effort to clog the thread with as little genuine creativity as possible.
Having been censored repeatedly by our good friend and enabler Mr. Cuban, I note with amusement the dross you are allowed to post, with no apparent restrictions on length nor libelous content (for instance that I or NCANS are in any way connected to an organization you know is not connected in any way but is guilty of it sounding vaguely like, or that I am Davidson, which credible eye witnesses have indicated I'm not). You are either a clogger whose sole intent is to render threads unreadable due to your drivel, or are genuinely bugfuck crazy, which while I will admit based upon your free form and incoherent rambles it is tempting to believe is the case, I am reluctant to give you credit for, as your clogging seems far too systematic for a genuine loon.
So that leaves clogger with an agenda.
Wonder why anyone would pay a guy to clog disparate threads all over the Internet whenever substantiative discussions about naked shorting pop up?
Anyone's "scamdar" going off yet? No? How uniquely and usefully selective.
What a surprise.
79. Posted Mar 16, 2005, 12:02 AM ET by Tony Ryals
'National Association Against Naked Short Selling'or 'naanss',ICI,AND THE PUMP AND DUMP 'GENEMAX'(GMXX),all conveniently located in one Blaine,Washington office. Why ?
I presume the fraudulent 'naked short' claim was unfortunately too profitable both as a tout mechanism and for conning many to go longer on their penny stock scams than they otherwise would.Otherise it would not have reincarnated as 'National Coalition Against Naked Shorting',or 'NCANS',now would it ?
But tell me is this a scam originating from the 'Beltway' ? Shame.
Ten Stix Announces Alliance With ICI
Business Wire, Nov 5, 2002
Save a personal copy of this article and quickly find it again with Furl.net. Get started now. (It's free.)
Business Editors
GOLDEN, Colo.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov. 5, 2002
Ten Stix, Inc. (OTCBB:TNTI) today announced that it has entered into an agreement to retain ICI, based in Blaine, Washington, to launch public relations efforts as well as to assist in certificated trading compliance with the market makers and clearing houses in TNTI.
ICI is a consulting and investor relations firm that has recently enjoyed great success with Genemax Corp. (OTCBB:GMXX) in curtailing illegal short selling.
"We are excited to be a part of the ICI family; it fits perfectly in our long-term business plan of creating shareholder value through internal growth and legitimate trading of our shares," says Tony Cranford, Director of Ten Stix, Inc.
Ten Stix, Inc. is a pre-eminent developer and supplier of Casino Products and Table Games including the "ProShuffle" deck shuffler and "Bonus 6" Poker table game. For more information go to: http://www.tenstix.com.
This news release may include forward-looking statements within the meaning of section 27A of the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and section 21E of the United States Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, with respect to achieving corporate objectives, developing additional project interests, the company's analysis of opportunities in the acquisition and development of various project interests and certain other matters. These statements are made under the "Safe Harbor" provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and involve risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements contained herein.
COPYRIGHT 2002 Business Wire
COPYRIGHT 2002 Gale Group
(www.blogmaverick.com) Tony Ryals
03/15/2005 at
11:55:36 PM
Post 18
from http://www.blogmaverick.com/entry/1234000823035399/
98. Posted Mar 18, 2005, 9:17 PM ET by Bob O'Brien
James.
So when NFI has to issue a secondary for $20 less per share than they could have absent the naked shorting, they and their shareholders haven't been hurt?
Interesting.
It sure will be fun to see the DTCC's records, along with the CNF and trading desk records, to get an accurate idea as to the level of damage created by this illegal practice. My hunch is that this theft - that's what it is when you take money and never deliver the goods - is pervasive.
Now I know that you contend that defrauding people isn't a problem - taking their cash and not delivering the merchandise - and I can appreciate that agenda is one you have to stick with. After all, you won't even acknowledge that something that is universally agreed is illegal actually is illegal, nor that it is real (even though there's a list of companies that have been abusively naked shorted), so why would you admit that people are being harmed?
99. Posted Mar 18, 2005, 9:57 PM ET by Tony Ryals
O'Brien,When you tout penny scams and lie about 'naked shorting' of NFI because you have no proof,how do you live with your lieing self ? How many in Washington,D.C. know about the frauds you have perpetrated with your cyberfraud ?
Will your Beltway pals cover up your fraud or tell us who sends anonymous messages to Bush that threatens investor security and the right to know the identity of one who wishes to unduly influence the U.S. President ? Tony Ryals
03/18/2005 at
8:04:15 PM
Post 19
National Taxpayers Union Founder Defrauds Americans
and sends money offshore to avoid taxes on what he steals,his pal Steve Forbes,must be proud.
To Create Your Wealth Offshore
For investment in sums in excess of $100,000 contact Lines Overseas Management.Headquartered in Bermuda with offices in multiple offshore jurisdictions.Lines Overseas Management provides a full range of brokerage and investment banking banking services.For information contact LOM's head office at 73 Front Street,Hamilton HM 12 Bermuda;phone 441-295-5808.Or visit the LOM page on the World Wide Web at www . oceanis . com.
For offshore money management available to Americans as well as other nationalities,contact Strategic Advisors Overseas at PO Box HM 3053,Hamilton,Bermuda.Phone 441-295-1989 or toll free from the United States,800-678-0785.You can also reach Strategic Advisors Overseas at http://www . sao . com.
from :'Soveriegn Individual' by James Dale Davidson & Lord William Rees-Mogg 1989 Tony Ryals
03/19/2005 at
6:36:17 PM Tony Ryals
03/19/2005 at
6:40:50 PM
Post 20
will W Bush allow J.D.Davidson to
pull another stock fraud using Bush name in paid Washington Post ad because he enjoys the 'newsmax' political tout fraud website of J.D.Davidson ? Tony Ryals
03/20/2005 at
2:26:53 PM
Add New Post
First Name: *
Last Name: *
Email Address: *
Post Subject: *
Post Message: *
* Denotes required fields.
T. 212-529-2006 / F. 212-979-2607 / Email. Spitzer@spitzer2006.com
Spitzer 2006 Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
Interesting thoughts
« CMKX Message list / Reply to msg. / Post new msg. « Older / Newer »
By: dickydoo3
05 Jun 2005, 07:06 AM EDT
Msg. 980537 of 980539
Jump to msg. #
A MUST READ READ READ! By: billyun1
04 Jun 2005, 02:55 PM EDT
Msg. 221909 of 222128
(This msg. is a reply to 221898 by sportsman93306.)
Jump to msg. #
something to consider over the weekend:
Before you listen to those of questionable character and motive on this board, ones who continually allude to fraud on the part of urban and/or continually test the waters with questions like how many of you would be happy right now with a .0003 or .0065 buy-out? Before you listen to these folks and their agenda’s, step back, take a deep breath and look at the big picture: the big picture is what’s important here. I’m not going to get into all of the details but I am going to explain in general terms what I think happened and is happening to our company. So, for everyone that has his or her shorts in a knot over the sec’s latest submittal to the judge. Consider this:
You wouldn’t get much of an argument if you said that urban wasn’t the smartest, most accomplished businessman in the world but you can’t question his integrity. Integrity is a hard thing to fake. Many who try, come off appearing like car salesmen. Many have gone to the races and have been truly impressed with urban’s genuine sincerity, kindness and concern for the shareholders. They can’t all be mistaken. Hence, one must concede that the urban is pure at heart, an honest, kind and generous man who has a dream to share the wealth and create a million millionaires. His dream, although riddled with land mines, is still alive and kicking. Urban may not possess endless business savvy, but he knows prospecting inside and out and the cutthroat nature of the mining biz. That’s why he placed the claims in the name of a longtime, personal friend, one with impeccable character that he could rely on if and when the going got tough. When you start talking about the claims in the fort ala corne area, you start talking about enormous land valuation and wealth. Anytime you talk about the prospect of incredible wealth, the predators start coming out of the woodwork to befriend you. being the trusting soul that he is, urban took them at their word and trusted the initial financial backers of his dream. As history has shown, along with some excellent dd by phxgold, these insiders turned out to be more foe than friend as they started naked shorting cmkx into the ground. Their plan was three-fold, 1) to weaken the share price and 2) to dry up urban’s ability to generate needed capital to continue drilling and growing the business and 3) to cause urban to lose the claims through his inability to pay the renewal fees on them in the hopes that they could pick them up for a song. This is i believe, is why the relationship with smith barney/citicorp came into existence. Smith barney/citicorp instantly had a vested interest in cmkx when they purchased knight securities. Remember knight securities? they were the bad guys who shorted cmkx to the tune of 300bil shares. I still remember urban saying that we would be pleased when we all learned why he increased the o/s by 300bil. He said it was to help the company and I believe he was telling the truth. The evidence seems to confirm this. urban raised the o/s by 300bil to sell those shares to smith barney/Citicorp to get them out of the huge short they inherited from knight. smith barney/citicorp in turn, agreed to pay urban a higher than market price for those shares. This in effect, eliminated a huge chunk of the naked shares and allowed urban to get anywhere from 100 to 300 million dollars in cash to protect the claims, to finance future drilling, to continue growing the company (new hires: maheu and others) and to fund any future legal battles. No one can question this association as many have been to the races and have seen first hand the smith barney/citicorp name on the racecars. In addition to insider attempts to steal the company from him, urban has also had to deal with a crooked securities system and the sec who are fostering and protecting the criminal element. He got into this mess with the sec for two reasons, 1) he spent big bucks hiring folks (recommended by questionable insiders) to prepare, complete, audit and submit the required financials in accordance with sec regulations. Some of these folks, like the insiders themselves, had other agendas. They lied to urban about the progress of said filings and 2) urban tried to work with the sec and not against them in resolving the reporting deficiencies. In doing so, he revealed the claims and proof of the naked short to the sec. When he revealed his hand to the sec, the sec went into cya mode and began the attack on cmkx. Think about all of this for a minute. If urban didn’t have the goods and our best interest at hand and if he didn’t truly care about the shareholders, he wouldn’t have spent all the money he has to right the ship and he surely wouldn’t have blown half a million dollars for a party where all was to be revealed, only to have death threats and a gag order placed on him. what a waist of money this would've been as it only enraged the investors, cast doubt on cmkx and made urban look like an idiot. No one does that sort of thing to himself intentionally. He had a lot of help from folks who were supposed to be his business partners and working with him, not against him. Why do you think urban was so shocked and angry that the sec would without warning, file the motion to revoke registration against cmkx? urban said on record, that cmkx had open and daily dialogue with the sec and that they had no indication or prior knowledge from the sec that such actions would occur. Then the hearing occurs and it appears as though everyone is an idiot, has amnesia and/or their tongues are tied. I submit to you that sometimes, things are as they seem. The gloves came off when urban hired IBM. the sec knew right then and there that they were in for a fight. The three stooges routine in the courtroom was all for show and choreographed for two very good reasons, 1) courtroom dialogue is public information and they don’t want discussions and/or admissions by the sec of a naked short going on public record and 2) there are discussions progressing behind the scenes for a solution to this issue. Remember, the only reason the naked short was even entered into discussion was because of frizzell. He is the attorney representing the shareholders. He adds some significant credibility and power to the equation but at the same time is not in on all the private dealings/discussions between the company and the sec. With frizzell, we have the trump card, the ability to blow the whistle on the sec if the need arises without repercussions against cmkx. the owners group is an entirely different entity that must be addressed separately. we must be respected and even feared by the sec because as they say, we are beholdin to no one. I suspect and am confident that maheu is using this fact to cmkx’s advantage in negotiations with the judge and the sec. Look around you. Can’t you see and feel the tide turning? the evidence is all around that heads are rolling in high places. Everywhere you look, you see leaders of the sec, major mm’s and investment firms who have direct links to naked shorting, resigning in droves as well as hedge funds getting sued by the sec and major mergers between brokerage houses. I, like many of you, have sent countless letters and articles (many provided by the good folks on this board) directly to our state senators and the prez himself. I know this is having an effect. Politicians are like sharks when they smell blood. They are keenly attuned to the desires of the masses. When they see large groups of people united in a cause, they see the opportunity for future votes and act to secure those votes. I may be lucky in that I have an ex-sister in law who is near and dear to the prez. I told her about all of this, my letters and ideas. She was recently invited to the white house. Got pics of them talking, laughing and hugging. In a few of those letters i offered the prez a hypothetical course of action that would benefit him and the republican party greatly. I said prove to the american people that you truly care about them. I won’t go into all the gory details but it involves a full covert investigation into the markets, cleaning house of the fodder and putting some integrity back into the system. This would make the blue-collar worker take notice and be more receptive to his social security reform plan. Think of the economic stimulus this would provide to the markets and our economy. Anyway, we are now seeing big dogs like William Donaldson getting fired. The news said he resigned but make no mistake, he was told to resign or face criminal charges. the proof is in how quickly his replacement (mr. cox) was appointed. It was all pre-planned. Hence, It goes without saying that the government has to handle this matter behind the scenes. They can never reveal the truth to the public for fear of mass hysteria and a possible market crash. Just look at some of the gloom and doomers on this board. They start crying like wounded rabbits at the first sign of disagreement or trouble. Getting back to the big picture though, since mum is the word, don't expect cmkx's rebuttal on june 17th to reveal anything earth shattering. this is to be expected if it is to be in line with what we saw in the courtroom. There is a full scale smear campaign going on right now to shake loose every share possible to reduce the naked short. That’s why many of the brokers won’t sell but will gladly buy your worthless shares of cmkx. Ha! Ha! Their actions are so blatantly obvious. be confident in the fact that urban has secured those claims for the future. He is protecting them vigilantly because they have value. needless to say, I am extremely confident in cmkx and it’s ability to come out on top. One thing’s for sure, the bashers wouldn’t be here if they didn’t need to be. based on this alone, I firmly believe that we will make out handsomely in this investment. Remember what urban said, if you’re in you win. If you’re in doubt, get out… Don’t let weak hands and bashers compromise your beliefs and talk you out of your destiny. It all comes down to where your faith lies. Either you believe in what you are doing or you don’t. besides, no one ever said that becoming a millionaire would be easy. Stay the course and you will be rewarded… IMO
Congrats Longs!!! My wife been talking again I see.
Maybe this explains things
Claude ResourcesSt. George Metals Inc.JNR ResourcesSkeena ResourcesGolden Arch ResourcesDeBeers CanadaShoreGoldUS Canadian Minerals Inc.Yellow River MiningJuina MiningCod MineNV MagneticsTeam CMKXtremeJ-Pacific GoldEL CapitanDiagemShane ResourcesMorgain MineralsNorth Star DiamondsWar Eagle Mining Crystalix kensington Aztec
CMKX UCAD
Look into Gary Walters, Rick Tauli and especially BBX Equities. Where do I begin...Pull up a chair. In Nanosignal, BBX equities acquired a large position of the company somehow, Gary Walters also acquired alot of shares. John Edwards won a settlement from NNOS for $200,000 for services rendered..Anyway, it was rumored that NNOS was being pumped by Tauli and Walters all the time they were shorting against their almost majority position in NNOS. From what I read, they did this to a few other companies to..RAMO comes to mind...Ok, so I believe that before Barrington Foods became UCAD, our Boy Rendall went to BBX equity (run by Walters) for financing. Somehow BBX equities, IMHO, gets it's grip on a large portion of UCAD....I think through the Crystalix Connection (Dhonau, Woodward, BSIC Investors etc..)....and they in turn set their sights on CMKX. Now, I don't think Rendall is that smart, and I don't think Ed is that crooked, but I do think they would not be apposed to having the Sasketchewan Claims fall into their lap. At the same time, I think they realize that the good folks at BBX are going to do the same to UCAD, and Nevada Minerals if they can, so they see a benefit in playing along. Ed makes a mineral rights for shares agreement and UCAD buys an interest in CMKX.
So, Woodward and Michael King are involved in Crystalix. BBX Equity has a Michael King listed as a director.
Michael King runs Princeton Research website a stock touting operation.
He was also appointed to CMKM board in Nov 2002 along with Richard Taulli
Richard Taulli is also listed as treasurer of UCAD.
John S Woodward is president of UCAD.
John S Woodward is also listed as president of Crystalix, though
'resigned'
These guys have their fingers in CMKX and UCAD and CRYSTALIX and...THE PUMP IS ON FULL BLAST! All the while they are shorting the HE** (double hockeysticks) out of all of them. Then Crystalix screws up and they cannot buy Lazer Tek..Lazer Tek is awarded Crystalix's assets and assumes the name Crystalix with a new man in charge who grabs Woodward by the throat and takes away his voting rights...Kevin T. Ryan, partner in Global Intelligence Network with one Iron Bob Maheu...and they realize what is hapening. They see why Crystalix was in trouble. And I believe they hold grudges too. Meanwhile back at the ranch, Urban realizes that the insiders are short selling his company into oblivion. Oh my, he needs help..and he needs a plan. IMHO, he and Kevin Ryan hook up over some hotdogs at the race track. Its about this time that D Roger Glenn comes into the picture. Hmmmm. Now, I know that Roger has taken alot of heat...I still say he will be redeemed at some time. Roger sets up the dividends and traps the NSS. In September, CMKXTREME loans Crystalix a few Million. Then , In MY humble opinion, Roger calls in the SEC when he realizes that forces are trying to prevent the companies from filing. I think the party was supposed to reveal the Board of Directors and major share holders for both companies...and those people do not want their identity known. So much so that they threaten Urban and Rendell, and leverage information which might put the claims in jeopardy. UC is trapped and stays gagged. The SEC steps in because RG and IBM have given them info regarding the manipulation of these stocks. We watch USCA skyrocket and split and then get stopped. Now we're in a "quiet period" and RG tells Dhonau..."Ed, get out of CMKX or you will put it all in jeopardy and I'll introduce you to Bubba, your new roomate personally". Ed gives back the 75 Mill in Certs and they go into Urban's hands. "Check"...SHO is coming, you'll have to settle soon shorty Finally in February, IBM has had enough, sho is ineffective. Urban brings him on board as Co Chairman..and Roger goes onto USCA...but he's never announced as their compliance attorney..hmmm. Langley is introduced somewhere in there...Its just really messy. Well, if you've been in since January, you can put the rest together. In February or May, UC sets up a private trust. In April that trust loans Crystalix another $Million.
Woodwards leins against Crystalix are to be subordinated to the leins held by Kevin Ryan and Urban.
I'm intrigued to see where this is going, but I've got a feeling tha all of UC's moves are carefully scripted.
A group of investors in the stock market, have requested that the SEC appear in Los Angeles on June 11th, 2005. The place and time to Judge the SEC has not been determined at this time.
The Sec is to show cause why they should not be de-listed as Federal regulators of investors and companies involved in the selling and buying of investments.
This request has been made, as it has been found out, that there are abnormal book keeping practices taking place with-in the SEC agency.
The SEC will be given 120 days to reply, and file statements which shall show reason, why they should be allowed to continue in putting forth regulations, or remain regulators pertaining to investors and public stock companys.
52 hours to what ? EOM
SEC will just say, " Do not do what we do, just do as regulated by us, as we are special." Ha, Ha
Anbody buy that GVRP SCAM, I hear there is
nothing under the moose pasture, Really, all I heard is they make gloves for diamond miners in Saskatchewan, Canada. Small world! Ha, just kidding, will be interesting on this one.
PinkPlunger, English please, do not know what the he-l your talking about.
I noticed some time ago, just posted now regarding it.
Who is behind frizzell, as a OG member I can ask? You will notice that on Frizzells website, an oil drill bit is pictured, whick kind of looks like 3 gears on an angle.
This is the same oil drill bit that Howard Hughes Father patented and made millions from. Then there is Mr. Maheu, who worked for Howard Hughes for 17 years, and ran his operations, but never met Howard Hughes. And of course, Mr. Maheu is the Co-chairman on the BOD for CMKX.
Just find the drill bit picture kind of strange. Is there a hidden meaning here?
http://www.cmkxownersgroup.com/index2.php
Hedge funds headed for BUST
http://www.thisislondon.com/news/business/articles/timid400673?source=ThisisMoney#
Yes, but I mean i shareholder onward, would have to report to the sec (FILINGS)
Wrong, the SEC would not allow this as they have only the best interest of investors regarding public companys.
So you see, your wrong, next you will be staing hedge funds, which they can not keep track of, are frauds to, but allowed to trade, but who knows where they are due to electronic trading. (Progress)
Hey SEC, I got a brain storm. Why not make all public companies report from the getGo, or is that cramping your style? You would not want to have to reduce your staff, now would you?
Was posted earyler on 1 million millionaires today, but thats fine.
Update on the MSNC and SMO.V. Was corrected and MSNC not involved, but stone mountian still in the running.
This taken from another board post, regarding talks with E-Trade. They are suppose to have said, "that by the end of the day, some things may become clearer, on whats going on."
Just passing this stuff on, take it or leave.
This may be a waste of time here, but
STONE MOUNTAIN HOLDINGS INC (CDNX:SMO.V) Delayed quote data
Last Trade: 0.14
Trade Time: Jan 26
Change: 0.00 (0.00%)
Prev Close: 0.14
Open: 0.14
Bid: 0.105
Ask: 0.25
1y Target Est: N/A
Day's Range: 0.14 - 0.14
52wk Range: 0.10 - N/A
Volume: 0
Avg Vol (3m): N/A
Market Cap: N/A
P/E (ttm): N/A
EPS (ttm): 0.00
Div & Yield: N/A (N/A)
1d 5d 3m 6m 1y 2y 5y
The Science of Star Wars
Add SMO.V to Portfolio Set Alert Download Data
HEADLINES Change Display [ hide $$ edit ]
No headlines available for SMO.V.
REPORTS
No reports available for SMO.V.
Stone mountian (SMO.V )and Malers(MSNC) EOM
As seen posted, E-trade is telling a member of E-trade, that there is a 3 way merger in process with Malers, Inc, and stone mountian, with Casvant mining.
I know, it sounds far fetched.
Perhaps of interest from Frizzell
Frizzel's response to my e-mail re: NSCC
XXXX,
Good observation. I was sent a post by another attorney yesterday that basically said this
type of rule would never be upheld by the judiciary. Nice try SEC, but they will not be
allowed to simply make a rule absolving other entities from liability. Incidentally, if you
closely examine what the NSCC is doing, they would be found liable for gross neglect
and intentional conduct anyway......
Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: XXXX *****
To: bfrizzell@tyler.net
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 8:24 AM
Subject: NSCC
Dear Mr. Frizzel,
first as one of your clients please allow me to thank you for bringing new hope to the shareholders of CMKX. The impact that you have already made in a short period of time is nothing short of empowering.
I am contacting you because I am concerned about a recent change to the NSCC's rules. It is a change that has been approved by the SEC. I imagine that you may already be aware of this issue but I wanted to be sure. Please note the timing of these changes as they correspond to the recent hearing dates for CMKX.
http://www.nscc.com/impnot/notices/notice2005/a6029.pdf
I have not seen any explanation, but then I have a life, and do not spend most of it here. But perhaps I should. As a stockholder, I do not spend as much time here as people that do not own the stock. HHMMmmmm
I take it as they would go into another Pink, merge, etc.
Read here, If the commission forbids us from giving information through filings, we will comply.
CMKM Diamonds Comments On SEC Administrative Proceeding
LAS VEGAS
CMKM Diamonds, Inc.
Andrew Hill, 306-752-3755 or 877-752-3755
cmkxir@mail.casavantmining.com
On March 16, 2005, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deemed it in the public interest that a public administrative proceeding be instituted pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") against CMKM Diamonds, Inc. (Pink Sheets:CMKX) to determine:
-- Whether CMKX is required to file with the Commission current and accurate information in periodic reports under Section 12(g); and
-- Whether CMKX failed to comply with Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder by failing to file required periodic reports.
CMKX, pursuant to the Commission's order has been provided 20 days in which to respond to the allegations in the order. Upon CMKX's filing of a response, a public hearing will be convened at a time and place to be fixed for purposes of taking evidence on the issues set forth in the Commission's order. At the hearing, an administrative law judge will determine whether it is necessary for the "protection of investors" to suspend or revoke the registration of CMKX's securities from the Exchange Act.
In accordance with Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, a company that has total assets exceeding $1,000,0000 and a class of equity securities held of record by 500 or more persons must register the class of securities under the Exchange Act. CMKX (then known as Cyber Mark International Corp.) voluntarily registered its common stock under the Exchange Act in August 1999. Pursuant to Section 12g-4 of the Exchange Act, a company registered under 12g may terminate its registration requirements if the number of stockholders of record is reduced to less than 300. In July 2003, CMKX filed a Form 15 in an attempt to terminate its registration under the Exchange Act. However, this filing contained an error in the stated number of record stockholders, which was discovered by CMKX's new securities counsel in February 2005.
"When the error in the Form 15 was brought to the board's attention, it was incumbent upon us to take corrective action, regardless of CMKX's ability to file all delinquent reports within the stated 60-day timeframe. We could not continue to have a clearly inaccurate document filed with the Commission, when we knowingly had more stockholders of record than was stated in the Form 15 filing," stated Robert Maheu, co-chairman of CMKX. On February 17, 2005, CMKX filed an amended Form 15 to revoke the previous filing and reinstate its reporting obligations under the Exchange Act. Management does not believe the filing of the amended Form 15 had anything to do with the Commission's decision to institute the administrative proceeding.
CMKX believes that it is required to have its securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act as a result of the number of its stockholders, at least 698 in July 2003 and in excess of 2000 in February 2005. Under the current rule, the number of stockholders is determined by the number of stockholders of record. Although CMKX has securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, according to the Commission CMKX is delinquent in its filings.
"We only want to comply with federal regulations and do what is right for our stockholders. If the Commission deems it in our stockholders best interest to forbid us from providing information through filings with the Commission, we will comply," stated Urban Casavant, president of CMKX. Replying to the Commission's administrative proceeding is a high priority for CMKX's management, which plans to take the following actions.
First, CMKX will be providing a response to the Commission within the time set forth in the Commission's order.
Second, CMKX acknowledges that all of its stockholders have a right to access public information on CMKX and to that extent, is prepared to present CMKX's response via a public proceeding as ordered by the Commission.
Third, CMKX believes it is in the best interest of its stockholders to be informed about the securities in which its stockholders invest. There can be no doubt securities markets best perform their function of setting fair and accurate prices where buyers and sellers have full and complete access to all material information. Recent changes to the federal securities laws mandated by The Sarbanes-Oxley Act have increased the implicit and explicit cost of providing information for reporting companies. Unfortunately, from the time of CMKX's filing of a 14C Information Statement in February 2003, CMKX has not been able to rely on either previous information or current information relating to its financial statements. As a result of its inability to provide accurate information about its financial condition, CMKX has retained the services of individuals who have been promulgated with the task of rebuilding its financial records and providing the public current periodic reports as required by Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. The implicit costs associated with Sarbanes-Oxley is that current management will not file the required periodic reports until such time as the accuracy of the information required in such reports has been verified, inclusive of the financial aspects of CMKX, stockholders equity reports, and the mining claims and other corporate assets.
Although it is CMKX's intention to continue to pursue the effectuation of periodic reports in compliance with Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act, management realizes that the Commission may prevail in suspending the registration of CMKX's securities for a period not exceeding twelve months, or revoking its registration altogether.
"Unfortunately management and others involved in CMKX's previous operations were not blessed with the trait of being perfectionists. Past professional guidance has left a void which prevented the Company's ability to prepare complete and accurate periodic reports under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act," stated Maheu.
CMKX's stockholders should realize that among publicly traded securities, two different standards exist for providing disclosures to investors. First, companies with a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act that are current in their obligations as a registrant ("reporting issuers") provide annual, quarterly and periodic reports on Forms 10-KSB, 10-QSB and 8-K, in addition to other reports for small business issuers such as CMKX. The second category contains companies that do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act ("non-reporting companies").
Reporting issues are required to provide their stockholders and the investing public with annual audited financial statements, whereas non-reporting companies do not have to provide their stockholders or the public audited financial statements. Further, companies traded on the Pink Sheets that are not reporting issuers are not required to have audited financial statements in order to continue trading on the Pink Sheets. If the Commission were to suspend or revoke CMKX's registration under the Exchange Act, CMKX would be considered a non-reporting company and would continue to trade on the Pink Sheets. In this event, CMKX intends to provide material information to the public, when available, through press releases and postings to its website.
Casavant went on to say, "We are committed to pursuing the corporate cleanup required to allow us to provide periodic reports to our stockholders; however, in the event the SEC determines that a suspension or revocation is in order, then aside from our compliance with such order, we will utilize our best efforts to provide minimum basic information to our stockholders, allowing for CMKX to continue trading on the Pink Sheets."
Although CMKX currently anticipates being able to continue to trade on the Pink Sheets regardless of the outcome of the administrative proceeding, it is unclear at this point if the Commission will take further action in an attempt to prevent the trading of CMKX's common stock on the Pink Sheets or any other medium.
CMKX is not allowing these regulatory issues to divert management's attention from its primary operational goals of claiming new land and continuing its drilling activities. The future of CMKX lies in the continued development of its assets. Consistent with this statement, Urban Casavant added, "Creating stockholder value is a primary concern to us. We have some very positive operational things happening, both in Canada and in Ecuador, and are extremely optimistic about the future of our operations."
In the time preceding the administrative hearing, CMKX intends to continue its development activities and anticipates filing operational updates on Form 8-K, as required, when they become available.
Forward-Looking Statements:
This press release may contain statements that constitute "forward-looking statements" as defined under U.S. federal securities laws describing the reinstatement of CMKX's reporting obligations and the expected impact of these obligations on CMKX's operations. Generally, the words "believe," "expect," "intend," "estimate," "anticipate," "establish," "project" and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, which generally are not historical in nature. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from CMKX's historical experience and its projections. Such forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain, and actual results may differ from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Consequently, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they are made.
CMKX's actual results could differ materially from such forward-looking statements because of factors such as: impact of the results of the administrative hearing on CMKX's stock price; impact of the hearing on CMKX's operations; CMKX's ability to continue to trade on the Pink Sheets; uncertain further regulatory scrutiny; the current state of operations, both in Canada and Ecuador; unavailability of documentation and corporate records; changes in the number of stockholders of record; the impact of failing to meet Exchange Act reporting requirements; the ability to rebuild financial records; timing necessary to comply with reporting requirements; lack of adequate internal controls; unforeseen capital deficiencies; unavailability of insurance; changes in the mining and metals environment, including actions of competitors; the effectiveness of CMKX's development and drilling programs; regulatory and legal changes; and other risks associated with companies in similar industries. CMKX undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect current events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Copyright © 2005 Business Wire. All reproduction, other than for an individual user`s reference, is prohibited without prior written permission.
Anybody figure why the SEC told UC for the best interest of shareholders, do not show valuation?
Hasher, you should know the answer, Frizzell is just acting like an. attorney. He is trying to get whatever for the OG members, and your trying to get???
Do alot of you really think that 60,000 shareholders, total just up to 703 billion.
5,000 OG members have 300 buillion, so I guess the other 55,000 just bought perhaps 250,000 shares each on average, where the 5,000 OG members, average 59 million each. DUH
I think the point is that the street name is where the NS would be.
DTCC, Not my fault
http://www.nscc.com/impnot/notices/notice2005/a6029.pdf
Ok, it explains nothing, it is just theory, but it might appear to have more substance, than about 85% of other post on this basher board.
This may explain alot
Pages: 1
Author Topic: PhxGold's CMKX Theory of Friday the 13th May
CONTAINING PHXGOLD'S ORIGINAL POST OF THE THEORY IN STERLING'S CLASSROOM
(edited for spelling & grammar by jawz)
COMMENTS ON PHXGOLD'S STERLING POST @ CANUCK'S
A WRITTEN SUMMARY OF THE MP3s BY 0000 0000
AND MANY COMMENTS ON THE MP3s AT CANUCK'S
phxgold gets RAVE Reviews as Best Explanation yet!!
2 MP3s @ PHXGOLD's SITE: http://www.cmkxpics.com/phxgold
Thanks to gregz for the notice!
beerflow's reaction is typical:
Wow !!!!! This is the most intriguing post I have read yet. It was
like reading a who done it book.
RICH is the only word that comes to mind after reading this post.
I have to believe IBM did not just come on board because of the naked
short, I think he is still here because CMKX has something huge and
this problem needs to go away before CMKX realizes its full valuation.
by diamonddog:
It sure does put a whole new light on Urban..
and what a great book/movie this would make..lol
by Alex:
This guy is an absolute genius. I have heard a lot of things in the
past year about CMKX, but this takes the cake. This has to be what's
going on!!!
long winded explaination of some dd part 1
After a conversation yesterdaythat showed me my thinking on "the
sellers" in the 14c and theyre holdings was flawed I was forced to
dig deeper. this is what I came up with.
"the sellers" as referred to in the 14c are people that uc owed
money, they loaned him the money that uc used to stake the claims is
what I gather. I do not believe they knew where the money was going.
uc then went into default on the payments.
The cmki shell was bought and uc allowed the sellers to come in under
forbearance agreements meaning they bought a 4.9% stake in the
company for 2million a piece. for all of the forbearance agreements
it was a total of 85.8% of cmki. we all know this.
Now thinking logically, one would deduce that as the a/s increased
the sellers would have theyre shares increase to maintain theyre
percentage of holdings, I mean who in theyre right mind would vote to
dilute theyre stake in a company?
Well here is where it gets interesting.
Who in their right mind would settle for 4.9% of very valuable
diamond claims when they can have the whole enchelada?
"How?" (you ask) since it specifically states that the sellers were
bound under a share pooling agreement and couldnt just vote to boot
uc out. Here's how: in document 4 of the 14c subsection 8.3 under
bankruptsy and recievership if the company goes bankrupt or any of
its assets are placed in recievership (heaven forbid uc does anything
that could wind him up in jail) the sellers get the claims, uh oh
here we go now.
So, the sellers vote to increase the a/s thus diluting their
ownership but also devaluing the shares on the market they hook up
with an mm and a hedgie then they short cmkx against theyre own
holdings which are unregistered.
btw so it would have to be done in such a way it dosent hit the tape
hmmmm how do you do that? lol
ok as they are shorting their own shares and driving the price down
they also buy on the open market regaining majority control. once
that control is regained they vote to increase the a/s again and it
continues. and there is nothing uc can do about it. he only holds
8.3%.
A good way to verify this may have been what was happening is to look
at the articles of ammendment in the 8k recently filed. in Feb
majority ownership was 51% IN MARCH AFTER AN INCREASE THAT WOULD HAVE
DILUTED MAJORITY OWNERSHIP THERE WAS ANOTHER VOTE WITH 56% MAJ
OWNERSHIP. Ok so in march 2004 cmkxtreme uc's private company
invested into csii who had just bought deleeuw and associates.
deleeuw and associates tracks money laundering and works in patriot
act stuff and securities tracking. LET THE GAMES BEGIN.
PART 2
long winded explaination of dd part 2
so the cmkx o/s is no 500 billion and we know that the sellers held
at least 51% at that time. there was a meeting in canada and uc came
back from that and ammended the articles of incorporation to increase
the a/s to 800b but note that document was the only a/s increase not
voted on by majority shareholders.
so I looked into the rules on the nevada sos site. In the rules it
states that ammendments must be voted in by maj shareholder vote
unless included in the amendment that it would not be and was decided
on by the entire bod. now when did desormeau get the boot?
so now we have an a/s of 800b think back to uc's 8.3% in escrow 5% of
that is 5% beneficial owner under royaltie stipulated in the 14c so
8.3% of 703b is 60b add that to 300b makes 360b which just so happens
to be majority ownership.
I believe that is why we arent seeing any share retirement and uc was
saying he was buying every share he could get his hands on. He wasnt
lying imo he just cannot retire and give up his newly regained 51%.
Also I was wondering why all of the claims were migrating to the 025
sask ltd company out of all the other companies. its simple, the 025
company isnt in the 14c. so even if something happened to uc or the
company went #### up the sellers dont get jack.
now to the naked short.
If the sellers were shorting against theyre own shares those shares
were unregistered so they would need to be part of the hedgie they
were utilizing so they would be essentially selling to themselves.
Now if it looked like the company was dumping which it would to the
mms it would become a feeding frenzy and they would short the heck
out of it thinking they could cover if need be. but there is now way
they could because the only real shares were being recycled from
seller to seller thru hedgie. so the nss are real and that means all
of them.
Now that uc holds 51% and the sellers cannot increase the a/s in
order to cover their short position thru the hedge fund. and their
shares cannot be registered as uc wont sign off on them to let them
cover their short position with them. They're stuck - and the market
makers are stuck with the nss.
That would make sense of all the bashers sure there are disgruntled
shareholders but there are paid bashers - both sent by the sellers
and the mms see who is now in competition to cover their position?
Thats right! the mms and the sellers who tried to burn uc!
Isnt it funny that the only thing holding us back from making this
happen is the financials that desormeau has?
Remember that cmkx has filed taxes and desormeau was cfo so he has
them. why would he be holding out on handing them over? Because if
and when we file its all over the sellers are ruined and will
probably go to prison and the mms will be their biggest competition
for shares.
wanna see someone squirm? order your certs not all but if we do have
60,000 shareholders and everyone ordered 10 mill in certs this thing
would be primed for takeoff.
All jmo but I can't find a question that isnt answered easily by this
scenario. so whatcha think?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY THE 2 MP3s OF PHXGOLD'S THEORY by 0000 0000
remember all this is simply theory...
There maybe incorrect information here but I have tried to follow as
close as possible:
Here is a summary....
Jan '03 UC had many loans outstanding therefore he signed a
forbearance agreement with his creditors (herein referred to
as "sellers").
The creditors would each get up to a max of 4.9% stake in CMKI (at
the time). This enabled them to have 85.8% (in total) control of the
company as there were approximately 17 of them.
UC owned 8.3% at the time and the rest of the Casavant family owned
2.4%.
Therefore at that time insiders held a total 96.5 percent of the
company.
Here is what phx is saying, he thought there is a clause in schedule
14c that says that if CMKI went bust or something happened to UC then
they would gain full control of the company and get all the claims.
So obviously realising that the claims are so valuable it makes sense
for the sellers to collude and in an attempt to send the company down.
They could have done this by teaming up with some MM's and offshore
hedge funds in order to NSS the stock big time or to short against
their (inaccessible) shares. This way would cause the price to drop
and buy back from the open market at these low prices in turn
increasing their majority ownership even further.
Now don't forget UC is 5% beneficial owner and sellers aren't. So
every time there is an increase in the A/S the sellers fixed amount
of shares will not increase automatically whilst UC holdings will
increase by 5% of the increase in A/S automatically.
Once UC figured out what these sellers were trying to do (March 2004)
it looks like he hooked up with a company called Delluna Associates,
they deal with anti-money laundering they use software to track this.
UC could have used this company to check who was dealing with his
stock by hedge funds etcÂ…
Increased in AS Feb. 2004 – 51% ownership increased to 200B
March 200B to 500B – Voted by 65% majority ownership
Therefore you can see that the sellers have increased there holding
since Feb by 14% (sellers must have been buying to increase their
holdings)
If you want to make an amendment to articles of incorporation to
increase A/S without majority voting all members of the BoD need to
sign off. After the Canada meeting UC realised what was going on and
he increased the A/S to 800B immediately after. This is the only
amendment to the articles of incorporation that doesn§t have a
majority vote on it.
This extra 300B must have increased his holdings to 51%.
He tried to increase his holding to where he could have majority
ownership. This would occur by him having to increase the A/S and
then buy back a large proportion of that to increase his holdings. Of
course the increases in A/S would probably not have been objected by
the sellers (they would agree because NSS was going on and it would
cover that up and allow them to buy more as well), however they would
approve such increases as they didn§t realise what UC was doing.
Now the MM§s are in trouble…they cannot vote to increase their
shareholdings through increasing the A/S, because UC has majority
voting rights again.
The reason we may have a co-chairman is because of that bankruptcy &
receivership clause that allows the sellers rights to claims to if UC
goes into jail or messes up. This way with a co-chairman this cannot
happen.
All the sellers signed under the forbearance, but there is a clause
under the 14C that states that should the sellers wish to register
their shares with the SEC they need to get a signature from the
secretary, president and treasurer (i.e. all UC). Even if they do get
this signature from UC there is still a clause that states their
shares are in a 180 day lockp-up period. After which they can only
sell a small percentage of their shares that can be sold at any given
timeframe (I forget the amount, but it is clearly stipulated in the
14c).
The sellers are going to have to wait a while now before they can get
their shares to cover their own shorts they created with the off
shore hedge fund.
0000 0000
PS
of course...don't forget guys this would also explain why UC has not
dealt with the NSS issue yet...he needed it to continue in order for
him to gain majority ownership.
I forgot to mention this point...the claims we havehave been slowly
moving to the ......025 Saskatchewan Ltd...this is the only company
that is not within the forebearance agreement with the sellers. Hence
all our claims have now been protected from all this mess..
This latest PR was simply a signal that we have tranferred everything
to 025....now we are OK to dsiclose the operational side of things
IMO...
0000 0000
PPS
One more point i forgot to mention...take note everyone one....UC's
8.3% stake in the company is held in ESCROW...meaning they cant be
touched/sold until 2006...
this information has been dug up by phxgold for quite a while now...
ITEM 9. REGULATION FD DISCLOSURE
On April 15, 2003, Casavant Mining Kimberlite International, Inc.
("CMKI") entered into an agreement with Urban Casavant, President of
the Company, whereby Mr. Casavant agreed to place his shares of CMKI
common stock in escrow for a period of three (3) years. During the
period of time in which Mr. Casavant's shares are in escrow, Mr.
Casavant has agreed not to sell, pledge, or otherwise dispose of any
of the shares placed in escrow. However, Mr. Casavant does retain all
other rights afforded to him by virtue of owning the shares,
including voting rights and rights to dividends and other
distributions.Mr. Casavant's shares are being held in escrow by the
Law Offices of Thomas C. Cook, Ltd.
ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS
(a) Share Lockup Agreement dated April 15, 2003
http://tinyurl.com/dmz2h
Re: PhxGold's CMKX Theory of Friday the 13th May
« Reply #3 on: Today at 12:55pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TWO AUDIO MP3s OF THE THEORY BY PHXGOLD @ HIS SITE
Great stuffium.......take the time to listen
http://www.cmkxpics.com/phxgold
If Phxgold's theories are in any way correct, then he is worthy of
our sincerest thanks. To have someone onboard who is willing to take
on this kind of research is just extrordinary! The MP3 truly was
inspirational and most gratifying.
=========================================================
COMMENTS on phxgold's two MP#s @ CANUCK'S http://tinyurl.com/daue5
by hermannmaier0 http://tinyurl.com/89ohe
evenup/settleup
looks like you have the truck ready to take out the trash. Hopefully
Global Intelligence can dig enough up on Desormeau to convince him to
relinguish cmkx financial records, if indeed he holds them. Perhaps
even our newly resigned auditor Levine, and cybermark seller John
Edwards are in with Desormeau and against cmkx early on. Here is a
post segment from Pedro regarding Levine and Edwards.
"The Auditor (that quit) testified that he does a lot of work for
John Edwards, auditing quite a few of John Edwards Companies.
Our attorneys started to question the Auditor about John Edwards
Holding in CMKX and how many shares John Edwards holds and/or held in
CMKX.
The SEC Jumped Up and Objected to the CMKX questioning about John
Edwards. The SEC argued that John Edwards position in CMKX was not
relevant.
The courts decision was ~~ how many CMKX shares that John Edwards
holds (or held in CMKX) has no relevance as to why CMKX has not filed
~~~ so the questions stopped.
What was interesting about the direction of questioning by the CMKX
Attorneys was that the Auditor seemed to become very uneasy in the
direction the questions were heading."
above was a re-post segment from Pedro http://tinyurl.com/cehxt -
since deleted(?)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
by tramp
in phx's part 1, i had heard the same thing last june, and we could
not move, until the 3 insiders were out of the way, i was told, there
were 3 wotking with mm's and hedgefunds.. phx has it almost word for
word the same thing.. and this part here, i just heard btw 1 and 2
months ago, and thats fact, things are being traced and have been..
'Ok so in march 2004 cmkxtreme uc's private company invested into
csii who had just bought deleeuw and associates. deleeuw and
associates tracks money laundering and works in patriot act stuff and
securities tracking.'
and thats why no news on diamond finds, not till this is cleared up.
would you want to announce big finds and everyhting, if you knew what
was going on, and someone wanting to back stab you?
i wouldn't. - tramp
--------------------------------------------------------------------
can anyone get a copy of this 14c agreement. I would really like to
read more into it.
Go here: http://knobias.10kwizard.com/main.php
Type CMKX in the ticker symbol field and you'll get all filings ever
submitted by CMKX.
Unfortunately the 14C is not printer friendly (at least not when I
tried)
ANOTHER URL FOR THE ABOVE FILING: http://tinyurl.com/3m2l3
--------------------------------------------------------------------
by Gordon Freeman
As the A/S increases have been done to fuel the greed of
the "sellers" we can assume that the float would be maximal in
regards to the 703B. Probably all extra shares have been sold
excluding the 5% beneficial to UC.
The current float will depend largely on the number of shares UC
would have bought on the open market and what his intentions are with
those shares.
LOTS MORE @ CANUCK'S - SPECULATION ON FLOAT AND
POSSIBLE NOTIFICATION OF NSS TO FBI BY JUDGE BRENDA
http://tinyurl.com/dezqy
____________________________________________________________
As the Jude Brenda P. Murray slammed her fist down, she said, " .02 is fair for the shareholders, considering that the PPS, has been held down due to NS. Then she said, " thats per each share.' Then I awoke from my nap. Must of been dreaming.
The Judge an Ex-Marine, Marine Marathon runner, look at ladys picture (NOT HER) but list on left lower. Brenda P. Murray.
http://www.marinemarathon.com/newsletter-december12-03.php#club
Oh, what will bashers do, after tomorrow? EOM
Just skip the jumk, you know where the content is, correct?
One mans Junk, is another mans treasure.