Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Sure ya were dude.
You've claimed ta be everywhere. Now ya were in the buildin talkin to someone about Enron and apple pie ladies or somethin like that. I'm buyin it all.
Will they be interested in 90 days?
That's the big call now isn't it?
hen Dead Wood gets cleaned out ya start gettin some funny posts.
Now it's Enron and applesauce ladies. Doesn't that make a load a sense? I may start writin about the neighbors dog. Naw. I think I'll just wait for those EMISSIONS NUMBERS that are about ta change the engine industry. What a we got left? Two maybe three weeks until that news hits the wires? Better be waking up early ta read PR's folks. This one's gonna create quite a stir.
Was that said before or after you got fired?
What COO said that Marshall? Where were ya when that was said? I think you're makin the whole thin up dude. are ya claimin ya worked at Nacio or Quadrant at one time? Probably don't want ta talk about it now, right?
The fish were caught weeks ago.
Look at that tradin start today. 99% sells. The MM's tested the waters with a .0145 Ask early. that kicked in the fast sellin of shares. It's really best to just face reality here. The run a month ago was on hype and hype along. No substance, no technology. Posters have been gaming each other and potential buyers for weeks now tryin to push that ridiculous .02 possible pps. Those that bought into last months hype are sellin fast, everyday now. Posters are tryin to tell you that this is healthy and huge news is comin. Ya right. A letter to shareholders? Not even PR worthy material? sit up like big kids and look at reality happenin right before your eyes. It's a no confidence, poor technology sell off. Fool em once, and you did but don't expect the fed up public to buy smoke and mirrors again. Like yesterday and every day for the last 30 you'll see it happen today.
Companies have no control over my posts.
I post on the HLNT board about their business model and suggestions I think they need. Do ya think that CEO likes what I post. Do ya think he can stop my posts? ECMH is in the same boat. I just happen to love their technology and prospects. I doubt they agree with all I post but so what? If companies controlled what posters posted on Ihub, I doubt we'd get much two sided information. Given the choice I'm sure ECMH would kick you off this board. On second thought, probably not. You open up a lot of opportunities to post fact in response to your nonsense.
From an Aviation website. Lots of rotary engine interest. Especially from one who makes it even more efficient. Like ECMH.
The wankel engine was invented way back in the 1930's by Dr. Felix Wankel. I will use the term wankel engine in the generic sense to differentiate it from all other rotary engines. It was not before about 1950 that Dr. Wankel was able to build a running prototype. Many companies became interested in the engine and undertook development. Among them was Toyo Kogyo AKA Mazda Motors. Mazda installed a state of the art computerized test facility in 1963 for the express purpose of developing the engine. After an intensive development period Mazda started selling cars with rotary engines in 1967. The first of the six rotary engines cars that I have owned was a 1973 RX2 bought new. It was a very zippy little car. My current car is an RX8.
Many problems came to light over the years. Only Mazda persevered and perfected the engine. All but Mazda gave up. Mazda had a strong belief and good understanding of the superior kinematics of the engine and adopted the Churchillian attitude of never ever give up. Kinematics is the branch of theoretical mechanics that deals with motion. Eventually Mazda sold over two million rotary engine powered cars. Eight hundred thousand RX7s were sold alone. The RX8 is now selling at the rate of about 2,000 to 3,000 a month in North America.
Reciprocating motion is the Achilles Heel of the piston engine. Things stop and start up again in the other direction twice per revolution. This causes tremendous stresses on connecting rods, pistons, piston pins, valves, valve springs cam shafts, lifters, push rods and crankshafts at high RPM's. The crankshaft in a piston engine is a stress analyst worst nightmare with twists and turns every which way. The worse part about it is the stresses reverse. Metal fatigue occurs when stresses reverse. The wankel engine has no major internal parts that have reversing stresses. In theory the life of the major parts in the engine such as the e-shaft and rotor have unlimited life. The failure in the catastrophic hand grenade mode is highly unlikely with a wankel engine.
There are no reciprocating motions in the wankel engine. Absolutely nothing stops and starts up in the opposite direction in a wankel engine! Every part moves in a circle or keeps moving in more or less the same direction. Many engineers and mechanics that should know better still think the rotor translates, reciprocates or wobbles somehow in the rotor housing. Nothing could be further from the truth. Some think the radius of the rotor journal on the e-shaft is somehow equivalent to the stroke of a piston engine. Also not true as stroke is defined as a back and fourth motion. The key is to think only of the center of the rotor. That is the center of gravity of the rotor and what that does is all that counts. The rotor CG rotates around the center of the eccentric shaft pure and simple much like the earth rotates around the sun. In fact some call the wankel a planetary engine. Needless to say the wankel is a subtle engine and difficult to fathom.
There are only three moving parts in a two rotor wankel engine. The eccentric shaft and two rotors. The eccentric shaft is analogous to the crankshaft in a piston engine. Unlike a piston engine the eccentric shaft is straight through, extremely strong and has demonstrated the ability to live in a highly turbo-charged 800 HP two rotor 10,000 RPM Mazda racing engine of stock displacement. The bare engine weight of this engine is only 200 pounds not including the monster turbo charger and other accessories. That is an unprecedented power to weight ratio for all but a turbine engine. Nobody in their right mind would think of asking 800 HP from a two rotor Mazda wankel in a general use aircraft of course but it might be fine for air racing at Reno. I mention this as it illustrates the extreme robustness of the Mazda wankel engine.
The rotors are cast iron and unlike pistons in a piston engine are nearly impossible to melt. They can be made from heavy cast iron because they do not reciprocate. There are no exhaust valves to melt or burn. Burnt exhaust valves are a common problem in aircraft piston engines. The piston engine exhaust valves run at cherry red temperatures and are slammed open and closed 1200 times per minute. Is it any wonder they are highly problematic? No camshafts to gall. No lifters to score. The essential valving of intake charge and spent exhaust gases is done by the rotor moving over openings in either the rotor housing or the end housings. This is similar to a two cycle piston engine but the wankel is definitely not a two cycle engine. It is indeed a four cycle engine and like a four cycle, four cylinder engine it fires twice per output shaft revolution.
The engine is in perfect balance just like a turbine or an electric motor. It is impossible to perfectly balance a piston engine as the CG of certain parts necessarily oscillate or reciprocate. The rotary is always much smoother running than any equivalent piston engine with the same number of power pulses per engine revolution.
The engine never catastrophically fails in the hand grenade mode as is common with piston engines. The worst thing that can happen is an overheat due to loss of coolant but the engine will still run and usually get you to an airport. Cold pressure checking the coolant system before flight is very effective in detecting incipient leaks before they can cause problems. High quality AN aircraft plumbing is mandatory. Wiggins couplings and aluminum pipe are used in place of automotive hose clamps and rubber tubing. There is no possibility of the cast iron rotor expanding and seizing in the aluminum rotor housing. A common problem with two cycle piston engines.
Mazda was the only Japanese company to ever win the 24 hour race at Le Mans France outright over all contestants. They did it with a four rotor version of the two rotor RX7 engine in 1991. There was little or no wear on the four rotor engine after completing and winning the 24 hour race. The other contestants included the who's who of European exotic car makers fell by the wayside. Rotary engines were outlawed the next year at the Le Mans race. It would be embarrassing to let a rotary engine win the race year after year. Demand for the engine might have increased in Europe forcing car manufactures to scrap billions of dollars worth of piston engine manufacturing facilities and piston engine parts sales and support infrastructure. Currently Mazda rotaries are either severely handicapped or only race against other Mazda rotaries as the engine apparently has been deemed unfair to piston engines. Mostly for durability reasons as they tend to outlast piston engines ten to one in racing situations.
The increasing popularity of the Mazda wankel engine for use in aircraft has several reasons. Low cost is not the main reason. The main reason is durability. The stock engine will run for many many hours at high power with little or no wear. The FAA certification requirements are only 150 hours on the dyno with a prescribed power duty cycle test. Any Mazda rotary engine could easily pass that test. The problem is the FAA requires a quality control paper trail on the engine parts as they are manufactured and Mazda would never agree to that. Mazda rightly reserves the right to make changes and improvements at any time. Apparently Europe has different rules as I know of one converted German diesel auto engine that is sort of certified for use in aircraft. The FAA has a reciprocity agreement with most European countries so there appears to be a loop hole in this arrangement. Be that as it may there is a company in Switzerland called Mistral that is certifying a Mazda based turbo two rotor for aircraft use by making all new parts in house.
Audi's long range rotary/electric car is comin pal.
You can pretend it isn't all day if ya like. So are the new Mazda rotaries. Now ECMH has been the first to eliminate those emissions and fuel consumption concerns. News doesn't get muck bigger than that. Now does it? From the information contained in the last ECMH PR I'm thinkin there's like two weeks left until this news hits the wires. Confirmation numbers are comin from the EPA/CARB approved test labs. Can't wait ta see those numbers. Have ya ever read how interested the aviation industry is in rotary engines with their non catistrophic failure advantages? I'll post somethin on that. It's stuff even a model airplane dude could understand. Well most could.
O I didn't miss that buddy.
The ECMH patented technology reduces rotary engine emissions to below California standards. The worlds toughest standards. Without a catalytic converter. They also lowered fuel consumption by 50% I believe. That was in a PR too. What we have here is technology that fixes all of the rotary past negatives. BIG NEWS.
You can also stop askin me about an agreement between ECMH and Audi. There is none that I know of YET. You don't seem to be able to read and understand that I've been postin about an agreement between Wankel and ECMH. Pay attention please.
That make no sense at all.
ECMH has developed it. No one else has been able to do so. The technology is patent protected and the emissions results will be public in weeks. You're tryin very hard but falling way short with your attempt to minimize technology that will revolutionize the rotary engine world. You've got quite an uphill battle tryin ta make that sound like no big deal.
a musta missed this part. Mazda's NEW rotary cars.
"Those worries have now been put to rest. Mazda will develop a next-generation rotary engine for its vehicles from 2010 that has improved power and fuel efficiency. Hopefully this will debut in the successor model to the RX-8.
Keep readin smart guy. Are you here to make me look good?
The article is talkin about their 2010 plans. That's right now. ECMH has the rotary engine in for certification right now. Audi is publishing it's rotary engine plans for 2012 right now. Ausi is mentioning Wankel who is waiting for the ECMH technology to improve rotary engine performance. Yep the ROTARY ENGINES are big news right now. I find the timin of all of this and the players quite interesting. Those emissions numbers are coming in November. Do ya think they might have a pps effect? I do.
Postin false info Josey? Or did Mazda miss your memo to drop rotary engines. Notice the hydrogen part pal. Notice the last ECMH PR about hydrogen rotaries. ECMH technology and Wankel Germany. Audi Germany has new rotary engine electric car on board charger. Naw, nothin goin on with rotary engines, right josey? Ya got two weeks, I'd say until emissions number hit the wires. Call Audi and ask them. Tell em you're joseywales and ya demand an explaination concernin their rotary engine plans.
Mazda confirms next-generation rotary engine, outlines future vehicle technologies
Alex Kaufmann March 22nd, 2007
By Alex Kaufmann
More details on the new Rotary here. Mazda has released a ‘mission statement’ of sorts, revealing some crucial details about its future model lineup. Like every other car manufacturer, Mazda has realised it needs to develop more eco-friendly cars and has stated that it will continue working on hydrogen technologies rather than pursue hybrids. With the RX-8 being the only car on the market with a rotary engine, fans have been worried that Mazda was planning to dump rotaries and concentrate on traditional engines. Those worries have now been put to rest. Mazda will develop a next-generation rotary engine for its vehicles from 2010 that has improved power and fuel efficiency. Hopefully this will debut in the successor model to the RX-8. Petrol engines will get an upgrade from the beginning of the next decade, too, while Japanese market cars will get an engine start-stop system to reduce emissions in peak hour traffic. A set of new automatic transmissions and diesel engines are also in the pipeline to increase penetration in the European market. Mazda also emphasized that vehicles need to be made lighter and said that the new Mazda2 weighs approximately 100kg less than the previous model – a tough task considering how small the car already is.
Mazda confirms next-generation rotary engine, outlines future vehicle technologies
Enlarge PhotoUpdate: More details on the new Rotary here.
Mazda has released a ‘mission statement’ of sorts, revealing some crucial details about its future model lineup. Like every other car manufacturer, Mazda has realised it needs to develop more eco-friendly cars and has stated that it will continue working on hydrogen technologies rather than pursue hybrids.
With the RX-8 being the only car on the market with a rotary engine, fans have been worried that Mazda was planning to dump rotaries and concentrate on traditional engines. Those worries have now been put to rest. Mazda will develop a next-generation rotary engine for its vehicles from 2010 that has improved power and fuel efficiency. Hopefully this will debut in the successor model to the RX-8.
Petrol engines will get an upgrade from the beginning of the next decade, too, while Japanese market cars will get an engine start-stop system to reduce emissions in peak hour traffic. A set of new automatic transmissions and diesel engines are also in the pipeline to increase penetration in the European market.
Mazda also emphasized that vehicles need to be made lighter and said that the new Mazda2 weighs approximately 100kg less than the previous model – a tough task considering how small the car already is
What number are ya callin? Audi's?
You called Audi?
To get information on an agreement between Wankel and ECMH? With all CAPS yet. No wonder you are the last to get it.
The NIR short search.
Look toward S. Florida for that search folks. Paul Kravitz and friends from Medgen would likely produce results. Envision Capital and Eric Noveshen are fish that swim in that pond. Dworkins good buds. Now Dworkin is tryin ta save his azz from a long stay in a place he doesn't want ta visit. Ask the man the right questions guys. He's not there to volunteer information. He's in savin his butt mode. Frame the questions right and it'll be golden.
It was posted back when they first started workin with Wankel. After Webber traveled to Germany to meet with the Wankel Board of Directors. They don't send me the Agreement. Just report on the relationship. You seem to post a lot about writin the company. Go for it dude and see if I'm postin facts.
The new Audi rotary engine is 253cc.
The ECMH low emissions rotary is 407cc. The patented technology could and should be used on the smaller Wankel that Audi is usin. The intersetin thing is that ECMH has an agreement with Wankel to provide technological support and engine to sell in Europe. Wankel is German and so is Audi. I'd like to know the weight comparison between the 253cc and the 407cc. The smaller Audi 253cc is powerin a 15kw generator/ charger to rechare the batteries for their new electric car. How much larger charger could the 407cc power? With low emissions and no catalytic converter. Add another rotor to the 407cc and you double the hp. Engine gets about 4 inchs longer and additional weight is minimal. What would that engine run? A CITY CAR.
2x sells to buy ratio. Volume has tanked.
Not consolidation. Dumpin into MM's hands is the reality. Been watchin go on for the third week now. Go back and read posts durin that period. Your chart boys always post that huge breakout tomorrow junk. My chart says the public has lost interest like they always do with this business plan. Traders are holdin the bag and are tryin ta get buyers to bail them out. The big news that has been pumped was nonsense like the Grant and financials. Now it's down to some letter to shareholders. About what? This company needs PR's to the public. News, real news. Real technology. Real sellers of the company product that will actually post sales numbers and margins. Right now i'm readin phony excitment from concerned bagholders. Some talkin about their own big buys comin up or why they are so sad that they don't have more money to dump into HLNT. Ya right. I suppose We'll have the .02 by weeks end posts, chart readers and pleas for help to look at this week. How nice. Stop the pretending and start talkin about the needed changes folks. Business model is a proven loser. Product is just another of 100's and over priced. AS is way too large. Convertable Notes of 6 million bucks that need to be paid with shares that don't exist. Still some talk about a share buy back with cash. Total nonsense. Never happen. Anyone wanna dispute that prediction?
I suspect all hell will break loose in less than 3 weeks when those emissions numbers are published. Think it might has an effect on the pps?
Yah I think they will be callin after the emissions results are final. They can run the logic of makin that call through the super computer after it counts the atoms in the Milky Way.
Audi, 2010 rotary engine, hho?
Audi Resurrects the Rotary Engine
It could Extend the E-REV's Range
From the November, 2010 issue of Motor Trend / By Paul Horrell |
Audi is looking at an unusual engine for an E-REV. It is testing prototypes of its A1 subcompact with an electric drivetrain and a Wankel rotary range extender. "We will start a pilot project at the end of the year," Michael Dick, head of research and development, told us. "The first prototype car is running very well at the moment. We hope to make a small series at the end of 2012 or the beginning of 2013."
Apart from Mazda, Audi's predecessor brand NSU was one of the very few companies to mass-market a rotary-engine car, the brilliant and elegant -- if unreliable -- NSU Ro80.
Audi's e-tron EV department is developing the new car, as it works on the e-tron all-electric supercar. Audi unveiled an A1 rotary-extended electric at the Geneva show last March, claiming that under electric propulsion it has a range of more than 31 miles in city traffic. The electric power is 102 horses, which ought to give decent performance in such a small car.
The single-rotor Wankel is exceptionally compact and smooth running. Because it can run at near-constant rpm in this configuration, it avoids the emissions issues that have plagued rotaries. In the A1 e-tron it charges the battery at 15kW, or 20 horses -- enough for fluctuating demand in city driving but obviously insufficient for sustained high-speed running.
"It is a big favorite for me personally, this concept, because it works perfectly with this city car," Dick says. "We have the full space, it remains a four-seater, and it has full space in the trunk. It's designed to drive pure electric, but this takes the fear away from people of losing power when they are driving. The range extender is like the auxiliary engine in a sailboat. If there is no wind, then you motor in to your harbor."
Read more: http://www.motortrend.com/features/auto_news/2010/1011_audi_resurrects_the_rotary_engine/index.html#ixzz13xIrZLWy
I already posted the humphries links on this board. They got deleted. Use Google yourself. I agree with you. It's real company news and should be left alone. The other company doesn't seem interested in buildin hho units. they have more important development goin on, however they are interested in developing a complete engine package usin hho as a fuel additive. See their last PR. I don't have any game plan to get your posts deleted. at one point all of mine got deleted and then were bein reposted. I like an open dialog. i have lots ta say. I originally posted here cause i was interested in HLNT. I post cause i want to. are ya up ta speed now?
You're not Audi that's clear.
The ECMH technology in the test lab now will likely have a huge effect on future rotary application like that Audi is briggin to market. Maybe audi has a blog where you can disuss your technological insight. I'm sure you'll gather quite a following.
I also evaluate company and the potential of various technologies. Me nor anyone i know of has ever described ECMH as anything but future potential. I don't think you'll ever find a pink sheet company with more upside potential. I don't tell posters how to invest. I provide accurate information that I feel has importance and investors should look at. This happens to be a technology I've been evaluatin for a long time and have followed it's evolution at ECMH and prior companies tryin ta cure rotary problems. I always give my opinion and respect that of others as long as it's based on facts. These Audi links I've posted are about technology use I've posted on and suggested many times. I'm sure you've read some of them as well as my City Car posts. They go way back. I've posted and emailed my thoughts on this to ECMH. Until today I didn't realize Audi had picked up that same view. I received an email on Audi and rotary engines last night. I find it very interestin that Audi is gonna lauch their rotary technology in 2011 or 12 and that ECMH has sent the new rotary technology for approval this month. I have no idea if there's a connection but the timing is interestin to say the least. wankel is also involved with ECMH. You opinion on all of this is up ta you and that's fine with me. I suspect you'll be watchin close and realize what's at stake. I don't see much risk for investors interested in ECMH right now. these are guys that don't lie, are very use to takin care of business and do have very cuttin edge technology. i advise those interested to watch developments on a daily basis. Invest as you see fit. At todays pps there isn't a whole lot a risk invilved here. As a DD type a guy I'm bettin some of my earlier posts on ECMH and hho use are startin ta hit home. I even went to the length of requestin the CEO of Encompass to call hho company HLNT. My intent was to help HLNT and produce news that would drive their pps. I think you can see that ECMH has their plate full right now and has bigger fish ta fry. The call was made and the two CEO's talked. I got an accurate report on what was said. It was much different than some posters would like you to believe. These posters are their own and your worst enemy due to lack of knowledge and the willingness to follow those even less informed. with that said, i have no problem with your last post or the position you've decided to take.
I posted some very interestin articles on the Encompass Holdings ECMH Ihub board regarding hho potential use in electric cars being produced now by Audi and charged with an on board rotary engine powered battery charger. Hydrogen gas would only improve that concept and it appears the concept is the electric car future.
I'm startin ta wonder if Encompass, Wankel and Audi have had more contact than any of us know. These are some smart dudes that a very patient. Read this about the future in electric cars.
http://www.allsmallcars.com/blog/1049485_audi-to-bring-back-a2-name-with-electric-rotary-power
rotary engine blog on Audi rotary
This buzz is about to grow when the ECMH 407cc rotary gets EPA approved with their superior rotary technology. Technology that allows them to pass California emission with no catalytic converter. Confirmation numbers should be out from the test lab within weeks. Blogs like the one pasted below will go nuts. I also suspect Audi, Mazda and any other company usin engines will be bendin ECMH's ear. GM, Ford, Mercedes and many more tried the rotaries from the past because of the rotary advantages. The disadvantages stumped their engineeres. I think we're seein a new chapter for the rotary engine right here, right now. Nice timing ECMH.
http://rotarynews.com/node/view/1083
hhonow and rotaryguy?
You two seem to stay more in touch with the development between ECMH and Wankel than me. From what I've heard Wankel is dyin ta work with ECMH, sell ECMH engines in Europe and utilize the new ECMH technology. There were some old PR's on that and I had email back and forths about it in the past. I haven't brought it up lately until now. What do you dudes have on it?
Looks like Wankel is producin the Audi engine.
ECMH has a development agreement with Wankel though. Wankel is waiting for EPA approval for the ECMH rotary. ECMH has not shared their new technology with Wankel yet. Wankel has the same problems as all past rotary mfrs have had. ECMH has solved those problems. you can write all the nonsense posts you want about ECMH but some very special, cuttin edge technology is coming from them as we speak. They are about to enter a high stakes, high return game with superior technology and they know what they have. so do I and that's why I've followed them for all this time. This is not "in you garage" build it overnight stuff. your question is legit this time. No I don't believe ECMH has anything ta do with the Audi rotary. I do know that ECMH has superior technology patented and being EPA tested right now. They can build a far superior engine to that which Audi now has and hho would even make it all better. Are ya seein the potential here Sparks? The video that will be made and the impact it should have? you might even start to see my logic on Business modeling and promotion soon.
More on Audi rotary City Car
I mentioned this concept on an hho board here on IHub. The response was enlightening. they thought the idea made no sense and I was attackin their choosen company. It appears Audi agrees with me. I still believe the 3 wheeled city car with a rotary hho assisted charging systems is pure gold for and company that has the ability to produces such a product. My though has always been a joint venture between two or more companies. A three wheeler is registered as a motorcycle and would be a perfect city car with and extended range. Very interestin technologies and opportunity in this sector as far as I'm concerned. Golden opportunity.
http://www.motortrend.com/features/auto_news/2010/1011_audi_resurrects_the_rotary_engine/index.html
2010 Audi electric car with rotary engine.
The link below is very interestin. Despite what some vindictive posters would like you to believe the rotary engine is of huge interest to all manufacturers that depend on combustion engines. Audi is usin this small 250cc engine to power a battery charger. I've posted on this application for rotaries before. Space and weight is the rotary advantage here. The ECMH patented new technology will improve any rotary. I believe they should also develope a small rotary for this type of application that is fueled by hho (hydrogen gas) The rotary is the perfect engine for this clean fuel. at a fixed RPM such as this application there would be very little engine ECU set up needed. In this application the engine runs at around 1700 RPM's constant. With the rotary movement advantages, hho, ECMH seals and air fuel system this type of engine would last forever. Emission would be almost zero because of the new ECMH technology and hho use. Fuel efficiency would be fantastic. Could even run on Nat. gas or propane with hho assist. This is the future in the near term for electric car extended driving range.
http://www.globalpost.com/webblog/wheels/audi-a1-e-tron-rotary-engine-range-extender
In your case, management.
they are the ones that fire deadwood employees. NIR is just a lender who provides money at a cost for further development. So the ability to fire those they don't want is really the ones who have the power ta do the most damage to inept associates. ECMH management has a history of gettin rid of the inept, criminal and deceivers. From your perch that's probably painfull.
Not a zillion it's 750m authorized as it always was. Read the PR from the company below. If there's anythin ya don't understand help is available. It's best ta read these before ya post. Otherwise ya look uninformed and desperate.
Encompass Holdings, Inc. (Pink Sheets:ECMH), www.encompassholdings.com, reported today that it has begun the process and has received initial approval to restructure its Class A Common Shares by a factor of 1 new share for every 30 existing shares.
The Encompass Board of Directors, in order to meet the requirements for the new funding necessary to meet its business objectives, unanimously voted to reduce its issued and outstanding common stock from approximately 740 million shares to just under 25 million shares; a reduction factor of 1 for 30. The exact numbers of new shares will be determined when the actual share adjustment is completed.
The new funding will be used to meet the requirements of the Encompass subsidiaries, Rotary Engines Technologies, Inc., (rotary engines) Aqua Xtremes, Inc., (XBoards) and Quadrant Data Systems, Inc. (additional virtual platform hardware purchases) as previously described in the Encompass press release of May 20, 2010.
Scott Webber, CEO and a Director of Encompass, stated, "This new funding is an absolute requirement for our businesses to succeed. Having reached our total Authorized Shares, we had no other options other than increasing the authorized shares or decreasing the issued and outstanding shares. If we would have increased the authorized shares, we would continue to see 10s of millions of share conversions at sub-penny prices. However, by reducing the issued and outstanding shares, the existing convertible debt held by the NIR Group can be paid down more quickly and with fewer shares and less dilution by maintaining a lower float and a better share price. A share reverse, as opposed to an authorized share increase, results in lower share conversion numbers with each debt conversion."
Webber continued, "We are just as concerned about the impact of our actions on our existing shareholders as we are in meeting our obligations to our creditors. Our future success depends on receiving these new funds to rapidly complete our business initiatives. We know the challenges and the importance of maintaining the new share prices after this action takes effect. We believe that this new funding will give us the ability to meet that challenge to support the share price and values our existing shareholder base deserves. Our new investors are very positive about our actions and the future of Encompass."
Forward-looking statements in this news release are made under the ''Safe Harbor'' provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Certain important factors could cause results to differ materially from those anticipated by the forward-looking statements, including the impact of changed economic or business conditions, competition, the success of existing and new product releases and other risk factors inherent in product development and other factors discussed from time to time in reports filed by the company with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
I didn't say it was a sale of shares.
It's a sale of equity. Could be shares, debt relief trade, cash sale, whatever. It only says it's a sale of assets. I know a lot more about Humphries than you might imagine and i'm pretty well versed at readin between the lines. I've done the same here at ECMH. They had guys as bad or worse than Humphries. It's you who needs to do more DD and read between the lines in my opinion. If you really do respect those that come in and clean up the dirt you'd never have posted what you have about ECMH. Hlnt is not even in the same clean up universe as these guys. you got locked into your nonsense posts because of me. i post with an objective always. I've been paid a lot over the years to be a fact finder and you might say an information provider. Even did some a that in the lovely state of Arkansas.
Post my lies if ya want to talk about my claims.
If ya can't do that i don't care what ya post or think. Right now you're just "white noise" ta me. Background static that says or means nothin.
pdidgood is Tor's handle on Yahoo.
I've been kicked off Yahoo when I posted about a scam named Chinatel. CHTL. Everythin I posted was fact and has come true. The pps went from $1.84 when I put out the message to .17 today. that's another long story there but I had some bones to pick with some lawyers that were involved. They had messed in areas they shouldn't have messed in. Tor took over on Yahoo when I got booted. He picked his handle and it means PD did good. Email him if ya want to talk to em. Maybe he'll answer.
The in house and independent test results have been published by the company. Now the engine is in a certified EPA/CARB test lab and those confirmation results are expected in mid Nov. as stated in the company PR I posted for you. Once confirmed by them, the emissions numbers become set in stone is most peoples minds. Remember that the guys in charge now are the same that went to california and removed the same engine from the same test lab cause they knew it would fail. They did their fuel inj, ECU, air/fuel control thing and just sent it back. They didn't do so without knowin it would pass. At least 99% sure cause there are variables to consider. Really only one. I've also posted the Xboard video. Our latest posters like to post that the Xboard is a toy and not very interestin. all who view the video can see the nonsense of those posts and their ulterior motive. It's all about my hho posts. The Xboard you see in the video is powered by the 407cc engine now in testin. This testi is what has held the Xboard up. ECMH also owns a Data Center in the S.F. Bay Area. The new management also totally cleaned up that company and brought in all new people. As you can see from posts here that also PO'd some folks that got let go. Today's ECMH dudes have been in cleanup mode for over 3 years doin the abouve stated tasks. Read the engine, Xboard and Quadrant Data Center PR's and you'll see what's up with them.
I did post that and I do think the company (Highline) has a flawed business model that ensures failure. I suggested ways to go and drove guys like you nuts. You will be late to the party but will eventually get what I'm sayin. That's just how it is with me. I've been down this road many times. In fact I went down it in the 90's with hho. 15 years later people act like the technology and apps are brand new. Neither are. You can be sure of a couple of things. I don't lie and when it comes to opinion mine is based on knowledge and experience. I stand behind both and don't care where you post them. I do find your concern and tactics tellin. In my world technology speaks for itself but needs to be explained when not main stream. That's what i do and that's where I invest. Eventually the public cathes up with emerging technologies.
I've always said you're entitled to your own opinion.
So am I. The technology here is very real. Very advanced and applicable to any product that uses a combustion engine. The impact possibilities of what ECMH has is massive. I also have many years behind me in the hho science. So does ECMH. Probably not as much but the Webber interview shows his interest and knowledge on the fuel. They've done nothing with it yet as far as I know. The last PR was the first time I've see ECMH public mention of it. I was very happy to see it. i am not Tor Mang. Tor is an associate of mine, a friend. Mang is his family name on his mothers side. Just call me PD.