Linda is biotch...! LOLz JayKay
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Buy P, forget H (unless...) . imo eom
7) Commons get everything because preferreds don't deserve it and because VooDoo & Willingham hold commons.
8) Commons might be kind enough to take a small 5% haircut for perferreds since "we are all family..."
... but they didn't say what year... ha ha eom
Click on the IHUB sticky post of DanBB, go to the whatever page DannBB the hearing archived, then click on the file you want. A menu will pop up and ask what program you want to play the file with (if you do not have a default program).
Alternative: Save file to your desktop and move the mp3 file to your microSD card wher your music is and play the file using your music player.
BTW, if you just got your DroidX, return it and wait for the Nexus Prime/Droid Prime (which might be unveiled this Oct. 11, 2011). It will have the latest next generation Google Android OS called Ice Cream Sandwich, dual core processor (1.2 or 1.5 GHz) and 4G LTE. This phone will be the bar all other manufactures will have to build upon.
imo
never-again: Seriously, I believe we are talking about two different things.
I have been saying: Shorts have nothing to do with the available funds in an ESTATE to its creditors/equity. If there was a short squeeze, and I say if, because it is not guaranteed there will be one, it still does not make a difference to the Estate. What is guaranteed is, is what I said above... "Shorts have nothing to do with the available funds in an ESTATE to its creditors/equity."
For a person holding and watching the market, if there is a short squeeze, they can sell, but the market seems to know 99% of the time are in the know of what is going to happen (Insider Information? yes, I do believe).
Do I believe in short squeezes? Yes. Do I believe in naked shorts? Yes. Do I believe it will happen here? No.
Your theory is Rosen/BK is protecting these shorts or somehow related. I know when a company is going to go BK, the tactic is buy bonds and short common, but to go as far as Rosen/BK protecting shorts, I personally do not believe in those types of theories.
In the market, there are traders and there are investors. I am both and choose to trade some securities and invest in others. I am a conservative speculator and realist. I do NOT believe in the hype theory some have mentioned. I do not believe in "trader talk."
As in the food chain, i.e., secured creditors, senior unsecured, senior subordinates, junior subordinates, equity (pref then common), the LOWER you go down on the food chain, the louder the complaint and the theory is and the more wild/exaggerated they become.
Like I said, we are talking about two different issues that are not related to each other.
Lets not talk about this subject anymore since we are just going round and round.
imo of course.
We are both talking about two different things. We will just leave it at that and not go back and forth and go round and round.
After your responses, I just hope you are not of the $24 camp.
Good day.
LOL, agreed! The song "Bonehead, Bonehead" comes to mind. eom
PooPoo, I believe in naked shorting, however, it has nothing to do with us in BK. Read my lips (typing): It will not help us in BK, that is all trader talk about short squeezing, etc. Shorting is not a BK core issue. BK is NOT interested in Shorting. The attorneys are Not interested in shorting. Shorting does not effect the distribution of funds that are available to the waterfall.
Bring this up in bk court: get laughed at.
Bring up to a bk lawyer: get laughed at.
etc.
Only traders benefit from shorting...
imo
Please tell us how "shorting" a stock will benefit common shareholders in a bk as far as assets available for distribution to creditors and equity holders?
Please exclude any "trader talk."
Thanks in advance.
I am sorry VooPoo, but we don't get control, we just get closer or more distribution from what is available. Shorts have nothing to do with us, except for traders. imo/eom
I am sorry, but it really does not effect us at all. That is all conspiracy theory that Rodent is trying to help shorters. imo
wamuMooMoo, are YOU serious what that reply??? That is not how it works... If the float is 1.7 billion, then the distribution will be for 1.7 billion, NOT more. If there is a fail to del situation that creates a situation where there are not that 1.7 bil floating, the entity/individual is responsible for the the excess distribution, NOT the BK Estate.
There is more to it, but I rather not go into it and talk about something that does not effect us. It will only effect traders, ie short covering.
This is not a BK issue.
No one cares who profits from shorts... it is not a BK core issue and it has nothing to do with any funds that are available for distribution from a BK estate.
imo
Shorts have nothing to do with $$ in the BK Estate or the flow to equity. imo/eom
LOL, good point. eom
No one cares about "shorts" (or naked shorts) in BK (it is not a core issue). Susman will laugh at you if you bring it up. eom
I think some people need a new prescription for their "rose colored glasses". People need to adjust to changing times... example: Eastman Kodak might go BK because they did not adjust to changing times... i.e. everyone is getting "digitized" while Kodak's core is "film"... imo
Apply the same principal to any company...
Adapt or be left behind...
imo
Like I said: WMI = carcass imo/eom
The problem is that you have a greedy troll as a CEO w/ access to an unlimited cash dispensing ATM machine. imo/eom
I know HF implicated (in their appeal/brief/whatever) "other creditors" had the same information HF did. The finger pointing has begun, however, I do not know if JPM will also be implicated.
AS for the GSA, without "new admissible" evidence (agree w/ clawmann), imo, the GSA will continue to stand. We need to adjust our "glasses" to the present and future...
Who knows, JPM may be waiting on the final settlement agreement (between HF/EC if there is one)to see if they "may" contribute "something" (veiled as more interest on the $4.x billion on deposit) to seal the deal if there is a deficit.
... or ... who knows,,, all this could have been resolved "on the cheap" before Stern, ANICO, etc. in 2009...
imo
I concur 100%. imo/eom
I concur! eom
Nope. imo eom
First I like to say it is nice to see you have more words in your vocabulary other than "Cheepies, come to poppa" and "who is selling now is so dumb?" LOL
Oct. 7 vs. Oct. 6 is 1 day. (Keep in mind, Oct 7 is a Jewish Holiday and Rosen is a Jew).
I think you meant to say, that is why Rosen tried to move the Med status to Sept. 27 (?) (but EC had a conflict that date) because HF were not cooperating, therefore the need to push forward the status hearing... and not waste time if Med is proving to be fruitless...
imo
I am affiliated w/ JP Morgan Chase, but don't tell anyone. I don't delete posts.
Wow, 'gyspsy' is officially WamuVooDoo II. j.k. lol z eom
Don't have PM, but very true! LOL eom
Don't have PM, but LOL! eom
HF can sell their shares by going through an designated MM to sell short w/ a contractual promise of delivery of shares to cover once the tendered shares have been released.
Watch on Lvl II: CRTC = Starke
imo
Thanks for the info. I was unable to listen to the hearing today. eom