Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Wechselberger still doesn't seem to be qualified. His resume indicates he is a consultant in Security and Marketing:
"Broadband and multimedia consulting services. Specializing in technology strategy and management (identification and development of core technologies, IPR leveraging, positioning, make/buy/partner), business and strategic planning, value creation and market development. Satisfied clients in broadband/Internet security, content delivery networks and systems, IPR assertion, digital rights management technology, technology management and planning."
He probably lives in an area covered by Cox. Internet comes with an email address and mailbox when you sign up with Cox. His resume shows he's an expert in digital security. Not sure how that qualifies him as an expert witness in this case.
That sounds like completely separate technology that doesn't seem to relate to high speed channel bonding. It sounds like the patent below relates to security settings.
Ahh. you think they're referring to assets of the 13 if the court will not allow an injunction? Sequestration of assets in lieu of injunction?
Gotta be a witness for the 13 just based on his resume. Not sure his resume qualifies him to be a(n) [impartial] witness in his case.
Yeah, I wonder if the 13 brought that up. I've heard of jurors being sequestored, but not plaintiffs. Essentially, the inventors are the Plaintiffs. Seems a bit absurd.
Is Wechselberger a witness for the 13?
Sounds like the 13 are trying to delay again.
Okay, maybe not a transcript, but a filing. They had a court reporter present.
There should be a transcript. May take a few days, though.
Seems like they're leaving a lot of money on the table with the exclusion of Docsis 3.1.
That's just heartbreaking. I was hoping he would pull out of it and find a wad of dough in his account. He's been holding since IceWeb days, 12/13 years now.
We used to have Cox where I live. They were terrible. They were replaced by two other providers who are just as terrible.
Likely it will be their contemporaries in Delaware.
The jury is the biggest hurdle for the 13. I hope they see that...
That's what you call going for the jugular. Instead of losing .26 to $1.06 per box per month, they lose $70+ per month.
Thank you for downloading everything, PillSkill.
The parties are presenting their final cases and exhibits to the court for review at the pre-trial hearing. The judge will do a final examination of exhibits, expert witnesses, etc. and set the trial rules and schedule at the pre-trial hearing on the 2nd.
I don't understand how Cox is even still planning to take this to trial, and still trying to invalidate the patents after all of these years and all of Chanbond's wins in PTAB, Federal Circuit Court, Appeals Court and the Supreme Court. Common sense just isn't that common, I guess.
The one with stolen technology for which you are paying a little more than double what you paid previously while the owners of the tech get nothing. It looks like the discussion is not completely off the table.
Cox is denying that Chanbond is not entitled, which leads me to believe it must have come up at least in conversations if not in filings.
You just need to scroll down.
I thought that's what you posted. My mistake.
Wow. It looks like Chanbond is asking for "injunctive relief."
I must have missed that post. I think the relisting conversation, though, came from a conversation with the patent creators at one of the hearings he attended. I recall it was offered as one possibility. I don't honestly think it will every happen.
I don't think Zomby has ever claimed to be in touch with Carter. He did meet the patent creators at one of the hearings.
Remember, Billy Carter and Eric Spangenberg already have a patent company started with patents from previous lawsuit settlements.
They have institutional investors in IPwe.
Carter and team have always rolled the patents they didn't sell in settlement into IPWe, which is privately held. Personally, I think they (Carter and Spangenberg) will send out a private offering to institutional buyers and buy out UOIP shareholders before going after the remaining infringers in the U.S. and abroad.
I'd settle for $2 a share. Before August 18. If they insist on going to trial, I hope Carter goes for the jugular.
That will be on the agenda. Judge Andrews will bring it up. Remember, it's required by the court -- the parties must make an earnest attempt to reach a settlement -- this is true in any court proceeding.
If it goes to trial and we get $2-$5, it would likely be knocked down to what we would have gotten in a settlement anyhow on appeal.
I just have one piece of the info you were asking about in your PM, and it won't help much.
I fostered a wolfdog once (of course, they didn't tell me that before they asked me to pick him up), so I have a pretty good idea how vicious wolves can be...
I think Goodbuddy's been holding that long as well. He still hasn't replied to my pm on Twitter and still no posts from him since May 28.
UOIP isn't the first time I made that same mistake. But it's the only time I haven't regretted it. How do you know you would have gotten back in at all, let alone lower? We knew they would be delisted, we just didnt know when, or at what price...
My first buy was .0082 back in June 2017. I think it was June 1st. I averaged down for awhile, .0019 at one point, and averaged up when I could for an overall average of .01.
Of course, that was the goal. Franken wrote the net neutrality legislation that was repealed right after his resignation. Dems were the most vocal about Franken's resignation, and they were the largest beneficiaries of Cable/ISP providers' campaign donations. Crooked bass turds wanna charge more. The $70+ per month they're already making from this stolen tech isn't enough, I guess.
Looks like his last post on Twitter was May 28, a day after his last post on the board. I'm worried. I sent him a PM. He's been holding since IceWeb days. I hope he's okay.
No. Though I did that before I bought in. UOIP was at the top of the breakout board and I jumped in, combed the board posts and started digging through financials. Cisco and Arris both disclosed in their 2015 Q3 financials. Arris mentioned Chanbond directly in the legal section. Cisco had a footnote in the legal section referencing a footnote at the end of the notes section that never mentioned Chanbond, but it was clear what they were referencing. Comcast, Charter, Cox, they all have deep pockets. Personally, I'm not worried about Cisco, Arris/Comscope or the cable providers shareholders at this point. I'm focused on UOIP shareholders. The 13 and their payouts are covered.
Investors can find filings on Cisco's investor relations page on their website.