Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
excellent point- That must be it. He started the trial and has not announced it to the shareholders. He has told us every step of the way and has been wrong 3 times now on trial start but you must be right- already underway, folks, but he neglected to mention it.
Let me see: It's going to start q 4. It's going to start in January. It's going to start next week.
Oh guess what everybody - it already started I just forgot to send out the PR
As if! LOL. You just cannot make this stuff up. Thanks for a laugh to start the weekend.
act the victim? Nonsense. Just describing the sad fate of the average IP investor, most of whom bought very many shares at much higher prices.
Not a vicim at all, just a poor investor.
I have been a crummy investor for the most part. My tale of woe here will only bear fruit if B v C succeeds. I fear the company will not have money left over for B v UC if B v C bites the dust. Then it'll be game over for IP. That would make me pretty sad, overweighted portfolio with IP
if I had wanted shares I woulda bought 'em at 20 cents. I consider this high risk and high reward and I own way too many shares already, most at higher prices, sadly. Still praying for a miracle, and that would be trial success
Did not buy again at 20 and would not buy now. Of course it will drop on the news- if Leo can ever actually start the trial. Should we all buy lower and sell on the news? I am an actual long and prefer not to play around in that fashion, but it will work for many obviously
who would predict otherwise? It seems pretty obvious
1- Leo strikes out. 0 for 3. Cannot even get right when the trial will start. Now no one knows when. We deserved an update, folks. This is pathetic.
2-Selling on the news. Bump with trial starts-whenever that is- and then the price will start a big slide down
none starting through the ED. In hospital do not know, but have not heard about any.
amusing! any Schrodinger ref is fun
I am sure you realize that Leo is struggling here....
funny that you ask- do you start on trial on the weekend? Of course not
Every single hospital that I have worked at- that includes famous big Boston hospitals , the bets in the world, and now a slmaller community hospital- all have less staff and action on weekends.
Over time this is changing for more every day every hour availability-
But- to start a big trial on Saturday or Sunday would be stupid
ask around and let me know if you hear o/w- but you will not.
Biodoc??
selling on the news of the trial start, then?
wonder when it'll actually start...
Imagine if B v C actually really did have a very good chance of success in the coming trial- what would the share price be?
At least 10x this
will Leo strike out re trial start?
2 strikes so far, one day left in the week
A case study in killing momentum continues....
Sing along! Tomorrow, tomorrow-
the waiting is over, right? the trial starts tomorrow! Just as announced. Right? Right?
It could not be that leo strikes out and Q4 and January and now next week will all bite the dust as missed deadlines.
Could it?
He would not be wrong again. Right?
Tomorrow, tomorrow, it's only a day away!
Let's all sing along- that's the spirit
Leo about to go 0 for 3 for trial start. pathetic.
does "probability" of success mean "very likely". success, as was asserted? The share price of 33 cents should explain how many people actually believe that nonsense.
A healthy skepticism says the lab data may not translate.
currently 33 cents for a very likely COVID treatment success? Ha.
interesting. why assert something so patently false? why?
UCSF Pharmaceutical Chem Dept- how often has he seen lab wonder drugs fail in human trials? How about, all the time
he does not have a strong opinion about trial success. Neither do I.
He has hopes, as do you and I.
Nor does any thinking person pretend to know more, since we all need to pause and admit the trial can very easily fail and is not even close to a sure thing.
really? Dr DeG says "High likelihod" of B v C success in this trial? Not even a chance, he ain't no fool
why no capacity for late in the day news? Always early morning h for IP so no shot that Leo will come out now and say , guess what folks we have started the trial.
2 more days and then he will be wrong re start x 3
total doses of B to be given worldwide- if it worked/works-will be less because of vaccines. That is bound to be true, even if the variants prove problematic.
it is not a false narrative. It is simple and obvious
For it to be a false narrative the vaccines would have to not work at all- but they do. Sure they have shortcomings and there are variants, but even so-
I suppose you could try to respond to the substance. If that is not too hard.
if no patient gets B this week should we care? Um, only if it works. Because then all the delays will have meant awful loss of life and suffering. Plus the loss of a large amount of share value here, eroded- already- by vaccination as the primary defense against COVID.
Much lost already by the delay of B v C- if it works-
and if it does not work the company may be lost, that's all
will Leo get it wrong 3x? trial start q4, then January, then this week.
Will any patient get B this week?
Do shareholders deserve info?
can you get back to me when you have results? That would be the response of all of them, no?
ugh. excellent point. if Boston and Mass are better, plenty of places that are not. I see just in front of my nose at times, and we have many fewer sick COVID patients right now. Of Course as goes MA so does not go elsewhere
c'mon Leo start the trial
fewer hospital pts. as you note incr vacc plus other trials. Leo shoulda got this done 3 months ago- not a problem if it fails, a very very big deal if it works. Potential use plummets
unless the variants prove very problematic
the slow pace of research during the summer for a company with no money brought us to this sorry state.
start the trial already Leo and find out if it works- this is just awful-
COVID here in Mass: hospitalized patients dropping. Wonder where the trial will be.
Any day now IP, any day...
What Leo does really well? I have to say he is a practiced momentum killer. Announce good results and paper coming out and trial start and then get all the timelines wrong so stock rally dies. Up to 60 cents and then way back down.
Now announcing trial start for q4 and then January and then next week and nothing so far and gee that's a great way to kill any momentum and drop the share price. Could he do a better job?
Sure. Just keep delaying the trial start and details and dosing. And we will be back at 20 cents in no time.
no patients dosed, no trial started no details , nothing. So it goes here, B v C.
Here in Leo land expect delays and then expect bogus parsing of data when it comes. He has a proven track record, P2a/b and B OM, of misinforming us shareholders. But who's counting....
at least some of us are
let's get the show on the road already IP
Q4 2020? No.
January 2021? No
Promises promises
hello? Cannot state the obvious too much. What is hard about this? Unmet need=desperate, plus very easy means of administration=oral liquid, plus serious disease?
B OM if any good woulda been snapped up Dec 2018
Give me a break.
This is laughable insulting logic
Umm for the newbies: could you please recap prurisol and B OM? And how the CEO totally misinformed shareholders about those trials with bogus statistics about results? Just for some perspective.
You know.
You mean, if it works, right? Maybe include that disclaimer.
People are so excited that there is a disconnect from reality. I suppose that is to be expected. You know, just like when it went to 60 cents and the right back down again last time. Before Leo Killed the momentum
Wake me when the trial results are announced
Although interested in trial details also- just no chance of real sustained price rise until data are back and good.
you mean, another rise and fall? Like today? How meaningful.
The SI translates directly into efficacy in hospitalized patients, right? Right?
LOL.
simply trying to counter the absurd irrational exuberance repeated here. How dumb are the "new eyes"? Dumb enough to buy IPIX right now? Dip your toes in ,sure, if you like very high risk investing, and are willing to lose every penny if the trial fails. Or wait for data and buy at a worse price- but at least all is not lost.
Such advice will be weak if B smashes C and good if it fails.
Too bad we do not know the answer.
How many patients will they enroll this week, even? Prepare for disappointment, IP style, unless we are ridiculously lucky.
the only reason for any rise now is people hoping to flip shares with trial start PR
We will have to wait for 6-8 weeks to know more- in all likelihood
The question was about trial success or failure. Not to worry - DeGrado and Bakovic et al- they have no idea if it will work either. As scientists they know lab data may not transfer to hospitalized patients. Nobody knows yet
got it. Enroll COVID pneumonia patients and then prevent and measure- if possible- progression to anti-inflammatory complications/manifestations.
then how to measure the antiinflamm impact? See if those enrolled with just lung disease do not go on to develop those complications? Trial exclusions will be interesting
Best wishes - will be interested to hear your thoughts on the trial as it progresses