Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yea right...a pump n dump scheme orchestrated thru the florida bankruptcy court!!!!
Did you read anything before u posted????
That post just shows how much you know...ie nothing!!!
Buys: 1379774
Sells: 409392
What you fail to do is state that ur using the projected revs from the DS/POR which by now have been surpassed since they have added to their customer base significantly and continue to do so on a monthly basis. People invest based on potential growth since if anyone knew a company profits would soar, investing in it would be obvious. Since this is rarely if ever known before hand investors speculate on future performance, thus we are here now...speculating/forecasting about company growth(QSGI/KRUSE). Lets also not forget the IBM antitrust issue which will add to company revenues by way of settlement and an additional revenue stream from the sale/repair of modified servers.
Chart analysis is secondary to pacer ballots here. All that matters now is the acceptance of the DS/POR by creditors... nothing else!!!!
Thats incorrect!
On July 20, 2010, the SEC approved a FINRA proposed rule change to adopt NASD Rule
3210, with minor changes, as FINRA Rule 4320 in the Consolidated FINRA Rulebook.6
FINRA Rule 4320 applies short sale delivery requirements to equity securities not
otherwise covered by the close-out requirements of Regulation SHO.7 Among other
things, FINRA Rule 4320 requires participants of registered clearing agencies to take
action on failures to deliver that exist for 13 consecutive settlement days in certain
non-reporting securities.
It applies to stocks not covered by reg sho ....ie specifically otc/pink stocks. check finra rule 4320 which comes into effect monday.
The DS/POR was revised and the $8 million revs stated in 2010. Since then the company has been gaining multiple new clients (eg. 10 hospital servicing deal) on an almost monthly basis thus adding significantly to the revs for 2011. IMO that figure is not valid at this point and has already been surpassed.
As i have contended before, the estimated revs for 2011 stated in the DS/POR are way undervalued by qsgi and was purposely done as is the norm in most bankruptcies. Lets also not forget their antitrust lawsuit against IBM which they are poised to win and collect from. Once resolved they they will be able to resume modifying IBM servers for resale thus providing an additional revenue stream. These are the real facts here.
SPY????
Market cap as of yesterday($13+ million) divided by pps as of yesterday(.0058) = guess what????? 2.256 billion. The O/S hasnt changed since december!!!!!
Thats incorrect. If you multiply the last O/S by the pps for 14/02(0.0058) u get exactly the market capital figure quoted for the 14/02 in the top sticky and pinksheets. The O/Sis still just over 2.2 billion shares
correct. breaking up larger complex molecules into smaller ones with weaker bonds..hence easier to combust.
This result shows an improvement in MPG of 20.1% city and 40.3% highway or a combined average of 30.2% overall. These results do not take into account that the EPA sticker estimate is at sea level, where MPG would normally be higher, or that the test vehicle has more than 180,000 miles on it. The Company anticipates results will vary with different fuels, additives, ethanol substitutes, engines, etc., but will provide at least 20 to 25% overall MPG improvement.
READ AND UNDERSTAND!!!!
THIS NEEDS A PR TO GET MOVING!!!!
That is exactly why it tanked. A few pumping a-holes posted that crap and when it didnt materialise the masses sold and /or it was shorted down. I fully expect when the dust settles it will go back to around 0.002 or thereabouts where it actually belongs. The company is generating revenue, more than i can say for the hundreds of pennyless/worthless stocks that are trading much higher than dtro even though they have no business or revenue coming in.
The etrade baby is more mature than some of the azzes posting here..you know who i'm talking about!!!
My 41K buy today was filled in three lots..27K, 8.5K and 5K. Interesting that they showed up as sells on L2 though except for the 5K buy...???
Anyone: In terms of the ongoing testing of samples, how long before results are available?
TIA
I like what i'm seeing here. Will be taking an initial position today!!!
Sorrry i must be confused but what does that PR above the stickies have to do with NUBL????
looks like a classic "gap n trap"!!!!
I dont see this play being any different from SAE*???
Simple really...as in almost every bankruptcy, the debtors always try to hide and undervalue assets. If they put forth actual numbers or values, the creditors would want a larger piece of what is owed to them.
That letter is a pile of steaming BS! How are they going to explain the geologist's email stating he NEVER heard of them!!!
Not his name. Name in PR is different by a carefully omitted "H"
What did you expect them to say??? i've seen scams previously(spng) where this carbon copy legal threat was made and the stock was still delisted. The only misinformation here is what was posted in the companys PR's. Misspelled names of principals involved, wrong phone numbers and vague associations... is that what you would call "being on the up n up"???
65 million A/S and O/S as per my call thursday to Empire(TA). Was told float info can only be given out by letter or email request and subject to company approval.
i thought you couldnt short otc stocks. tried on etrade but was restricted.
he was referred to abengoa sa in spain so he wanted someone who spoke spanish to call them. all he said was the person he talked to spoke a foreign language...which was most likely dutch.
Has anyone found any reference to Stan Larson in any PYBX filings?
I have been painstakingly going through each filing via my paid edgar access account and have yet to find ANY reference to him.
This seems to me so far as some type of smear campaign to associate the name Stan Larson with a company that has an extremely poor track record with regard to shareholders.
Any thoughts or filing would put this to rest or it will just fall into the category of unsubstiantiated BS.
interesting how these veterans of dd ihub accounts are usually new and free.
do you guys really believe it when people claim to have spoken to mr larson??? i surely dont and wouldnt base my investment strategy on it either!!!
No the sad thing is that if people listen to you guys they would have lost a ton of money on this run. Had fools like you over at QSGI* and if i had listened i would have lost over 40K in profits.
did my eyes deceive me or did a 1.2 mil share buy @ 0.0214 just fly by!!!!
ALL I CAN SAY IS....WTF!!!!
They filed an NT-10q in August and the 10q was released a couple months later, so i'm not so sure about that.
me too and its not comin from my shoes!!!
If it were true the sigs would have been posted ages ago for comparison.
He's blowin smoke up our azzes.
thats absolutely not an option!!!
whats at issue here is not who he is since his name is irrevalent. the real issue is what value his past or present affiliations bring to trudy. remember it is that single piece of info that will cause the sp to rocket or remain stagnant. the only info that should be released via phone is confirmation of the sale and pending filings.
all imo.