is exploring the universal mind
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
He typed the wrong name, it was not a copy.
Then again, you would not know what the proceedings would look like since you said you have not PURCHASED them.
Maybe he meant 1.4 BILLION in Monopoly Dollars
Now that's a safe harbor.
How about RH give an update on that $1.4 BILLION??
I am sure that has tacked on some mucho interest by now.
Hey!!! Nice to see you free bud.
Well we can talk about PR's tomorrow then.
Then what did this post mean about 100million shares (which is wrong by the way)??? DILUTION
More interesting is that you have ceded the point that RH and Co. have prolly sold shares, hence the increase in the A/S, and yes, over a period of time.
What is most interesting is that you don't seem to grasp the concept that the company has a burn rate, lots of guru's over there drawin cash and that does not even account for cramrunners, etc..
So if over the course of the last 2 years (if i use your number for this purpose), let's shoot low and say that the avg. pps of share selling was at 5 cents a share.
Surely you realize that at current pps, in order to feed that burn rate, the company in the future has to sell 5-6 times that amount, sans legal fees, blah blah blah stuff.
So I expect the dilution to ramp up to warp speed, fairly obvious if as you say they area legit startup. Just to cover $500K for an annum at present prices would necessitate at a full rip a need to sell 50-60million shares and the bid support is not there.
So for arguments sake, with a decline in pps and in an effort to compensate for that burn, I say they will part with 200M minimum this year or more because after that initial run, the bid wont hold and then you sell even more.
Until you R/S.
and PS.. I can guarantee you that burn rate is far higher than $500K with all the peeps over there
I would not get too excited about that rose, would not be the first time pinksheets.com was incorrect and the t-trades easily show that to be a fallacy number..
T-Trade 125000 @ .0087
Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
So you are saying that Huppe Duppe presented his product in the restroom of a Krispy Kreme shop in Boston.
Gotcha
So the ECT team was chicken?
Bwaaaaack bwaaaaaack
I want a cram runner t-shirt first.
Seems that way. Good info mike.
What in the world are you talking about? If this data is considered positive, I would certainly assume that the company would have presented it and pimp-slapped anyone that was a detractor.
But yet they did not show? That's because THAT data does not say anything good. Seriously, it is data with Standard Deviations and means. 22% false posi's, 49% accurate.
And they kicked out some of the data sets of the sample, those were prolly worse.
Simplistic in that you attempt to factor that by increasing the amount of time that it increases the results???
Let's see, I am inventing a CRAM too, stare at it for 15 hours and with 100% accuracy at the end of that 15 hours you will show up tired.
LOL
Wrong, using that logic (being generous), the false positive would exponentially increase as well. End result, not good.
Maybe Martin Walker Texas Ranger could send her a copy of his.
Fun experiment, I see your point. But, in that case you were the one getting paid, that was the guarantee, no matter if you went "rogue" on the experiment or not.
I cannot fathom, nor accept, that the large number of shares were ever held by retail as it is just too lofty, especially considering prior prices. And that mindset you referred to generally has one pull the trigger in much less a methodical way. Nor would a retail hold up and absorb from the bid either.
You seem like a nice soul, I hope you pull one out, you placed your bet already. I note that you proceed here differently,in most cases, than the rationale/view expressed by others, let's me know that you understand things for what they are.
You can't play this game and win, if you do not understand that the rules do not apply and that the goal posts can constantly be moved. Seems like you know that deep down, that makes you a trader, good luck.
Don't look now, looks like NITE overpowered the daily ration for the sub-penny protector as AUTO has left the building on the bid at .01.
Well I hope you get it rose, but I wont lie to you about it. Nothing personal but I have seen this a thousand times and the odds are well against it. It's tough to be objective when you dig in though.
Sans the past 2 trading days with minimal movement, it is trending down, not in a channel on the longer term. Check all the moving avg's and tell me what you see.
I know, you are not supposed to be working both sides of trades for gods sake, LOL, gee whiz.
fire sale, getting bigger.
Well he is going to be busy today then. 2 trades and a large towards the end of the day. a good ol' 3-fer.. LOL
Scratch that. Huge t-trade 1,484,430 and another 139570 at .0107
Since the last few were intraday and not t-trades, the figures might not be too reliable anymore. Seems they try to settle during the day now.
What's the tally at lately?
Fantastic day here for PGYC, nice pop early then solid consolidation to end on an upswing.
Nice close.
Close, 869K at .0115
that's for sure, be interesting to see the t-trade.
Well lookie lookie, auto back on ask too again at .012.
Uh huh.
This should be fun, lets see just how many auto is willing to soak up on the bid at .011 before moving.
It's coming, volly before price..
40% increase in efficiency, 3000% increase in the wallet
Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
I know raw, woot woot PGYC, 7's are close at hand...
PGYC is up over 130% today STILL
LOL
Hip hip hooray for PGYC, monster runner.
No big whoop, looks like rh got a few extra sheckles per share this morning though.
I have no doubts...
:o)