Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
good morning all & tgif. thanks sabre, i was thinking that might be the case.
gandal, we would be having some fun as you suggest (at least some of us).... but then we get word from a poster that he's spoken w/jc and that the outcome of his discussion w/him is anything but conducive to us investors. care to comment on that post? perhaps, you may mention that jc was blowing smoke out his azz or whatever...
btw, did you read that post from sabre's board?
i have my own thoughts, and one stems from earlier bb post of a (implied) hostile takeover. if they think they can do this r/s, it will never pass (in it's current state). hell has a better chance of freezing over first. those guys will have their azzes handed to them on a platter.
speak as one unified voice....
sabre, from the rb and d4o: By: drillin4oil
14 Jun 2007, 02:07 PM EDT
Msg. 110442 of 110444
(This msg. is a reply to 110435 by nipperdon4155.)
Jump to msg. #
Re the BIG bid
I just talked to one of OUR MMs and he looked on L3...there are NO large bids !!! Get real...neither Bitters or Christopher are going to buy the stock in the open market (at this point)
nip, reposted your your msg from here.
speak as one unified voice to management!
my thoughts exactly. what's new & exciting bio?!
going to close that gap, let it happen now. new mantra: speak as one unified voice to management/eom.
could it be that the market is digesting monday's 11 news? i think so. as that news is still hitting various news service's, case in point two more services ran monday's pr yesterday and late in the day to go along with the trading patterens.
edited
Latest News Headlines for AMERICAN ENERGY PRODUCTION INC
StockProfiler.US: Stock News Roundup
Wednesday 06/13/2007 2:28 PM ET - M2
StockProfilers' "Stocks To Watch" Picks For This Afternoon are:
COMVERSE TECHNOLOGY, INC. (PINK SHEETS: CMVT); SUN SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT INC. (PINKSHEETS: SSPE); AMERICAN ENERGY PRODUCTION INC. (OTCBB: AMEP); CREATIVE VISTAS, INC. (OTCBB: CVAS)
AMERICAN ENERGY PRODUCTION INC. (OTCBB: AMEP)
American Energy Production Inc. closed at $.044 Tuesday, trading 5,464,189 shares.
On June 11th, American Energy Production Inc. (the "Company") announced that its wholly owned subsidiary Bend Arch Petroleum Inc. ("Bend Arch") completed potential natural gas test on well #11-H on the 1,100 acre Padgett lease in Palo Pinto County, Texas.
Businessnetwire.us: Investor Focus
Wednesday 06/13/2007 11:05 AM ET - M2
BusinessNetWire's "Stocks On The Move" To Watch This Morning Are:
GEMINI EXPLORATIONS INC (OTCBB: GMXP); AMERICAN ENERGY PRODUCTION INC. (OTCBB: AMEP); TUBEAROO, INC. (PINKSHEETS: TUBR); PURE H2O, INC. (PINKSHEETS: PURH)
American Energy Production Inc. Announces Wholly Owned Subsidiary Bend Arch Petroleum Inc. Completes Gas Potential Test on Padgett Barnett Shale Well
Monday 06/11/2007 8:00 AM ET - Market Wire
American Energy Production Inc. (the "Company") (OTCBB: AMEP) announced today its wholly owned subsidiary Bend Arch Petroleum Inc. ("Bend Arch") completed potential natural gas test on well #11-H on the 1,100 acre Padgett lease in Palo Pinto County, Texas.
lets hash everything out and speak as a unified voice to management!
good morning all. mac, no disrepect meant as i wasn't stereotyping thirtysomething's. hell, i'm only two years removed myself and my wife is in her 20's. my point which i did not make is he's a whiner and immature, now granted we are in unchartered waters here and i'd might have cut him some intial slack but he has a precedence in this arena.
i agree with contractor in that we need to hash this out on the bb's w/o the sh1+ and if necessary speak as a unified voice to management.
awesome on your buys and thanks
rook/mac
agreed ltg. i'm ready to relax, have a good night./eom
sorry pro, no panzy azz drink like that is in my vocab and i'm sure i could run circles around you any ole day.
dude or whatever you are go buy a bond, i'm sure that's more you style. one with your make up or lack thereof shouldn't be allowed to play risky investments.
you are a 30's something whiner. you were speaking from experience earlier with that drunken spouse analogy, eh.
??? what a dumb statement!/eom
revised: lol man alive, i don't blame you. ihub has roving mods called the mod squad.
i thought you could not do stop losses on otcbb.
a dollar bet it was the "mod squad". /eom
doc, i'm waiting for the 12 news to be released, so he'll stop his perpetual whine.
betcha a cold one that it doesn't though.
here's a thought pro, why don't you call jc and ask about own monies being invested in the co.. ass umption.
what i would consider doing is to string out the pr's as much and often as possible with substance and updates. when i write load the clips to machine gun pr's that's exactly what i mean... whether that means to have a pr sometimes on back to back days or every other day to help fuel the pre and def proposals and drive the sp.
of course, my 2 cents
ctb, everyones been weighing in on this with ya and it's good that you raise these ?'s. i chalk it up to being prudent, pure and simple. if you're not; nobody will be regarding your $'s; to a degree :). on the flip side there are some good folks here trying wade through all of this as well and lending their insight and knowledge. with that out of the way, i'll say this even though it has been hashed out too.
i see biz as usual with a string of pr's to come out on the expentants that we all know about. once the sec reviews and than passes judgemnet than cb can tell his game plan going forward.
let the pr parade continue and make up lost ground and then some on the sp.
ps ~ how's that move coming along?
oh yeah./eom
sumaria, just a form of expression i've heard a time or two :)
anybody want to extend me a line of credit? i'm good for it, lol.
greed is good :)
lol porkchops, if memory serves me correct a certain king would write ....and applesauce.
tidbits of mississippian shale play from march 2005 and current info on a land drilling contract service provider:
A Mississippian shale play that has been compared to the Barnett Shale play in the Fort Worth Basin is developing on the southern flank of the Palo-Duro Basin. FieldPoint Petroleum recently acquired about 3,235 acres in Floyd County (RRC Dist. 8A) for about $25 per acre. The gas play currently encompasses three counties: Briscoe (RRC Dist. 10), Floyd and Motley (RRC Dist. 8A). The only current drilling is a Vintage Petroleum test in western Motley County. Last summer, Legacy Exploration apparently opened a new Mississippian field nearby, with few details available.
clues are there to do an rrc query....
edited
Providing Contract Land Drilling Services
Our goal is to build a service company with a fleet of 40 new and "like new" land rigs capable of drilling from 10,000 feet to 20,000 feet. We will concentrate our operations in Texas and New Mexico where rig utilization rates and day rates remain higher due to prospect quality and heavy concentrations of natural gas reserves. Natural gas reserves typically are found deeper and generally require bigger and better equipment and more experienced crews to drill the wells. Our competitive strategy emphasizes our ability to build a rig to our customers' specifications, the quality of our equipment, the maintenance of our equipment, the experience of our rig crews and our 75 year history to differentiate us from our competitors.
The Company currently owns seven rotary drilling rigs that are currently being rebuilt to "as new condition," six diesel-mechanical rotary drilling rigs: two National 50As, a Continental EMSCO A-550, a National 55, a National 50CA, a National 100 and one diesel-electric rotary drilling rig, a National 110UE. All seven rigs will be deployed in the Barnett Shale Trend of North Texas, the Permian Basin of West Texas and Eastern New Mexico and the Cotton Valley Trend of East Texas pursuant to term daywork contracts with anticipated day rates of 15,000 dollars to 26,000 dollars per day per rig.
Exploration, development, production, and sale of oil and natural gas. The Company will take a minority participation in some of our customers' prospects as a "time proven" method of building assets and income not dependent on our service contracts.
tharmon, there are many ways to line up capital. one is to farm out the challenger.
repost: the failure imho is cb's boilerplate bs p14a.
speculation has been wild and rampant and who can blame posters for spewing everything under the sun. the lack thereof on communicating a direction in the pre itself and or the q & a to spell out specifics in a more clear and concise manner has led to what's occurring today.
perhaps if this was presented in another light that's more conducive to shareholder expectations then we may not have experienced some of the weaker hands shaking loose and perhaps we would have drawn in new monies in a rising sp or at the very least sideways movement until the next leg up. now the sp has regressed and anyone conducting dd will surely be turned off by the filing.
thank goodness for yesterday's pr, i think those guys (more speculation) got a rude awakening on shareholder sentiment and crafted the 11 news for yesterday's release.
in any case lets get 12 and nm 1 news out...hopefully another pr to some degree by week's end and more the following week to go along with d14a which no doubt should be clear and concise in their plans.
of course we have the power......
with that said, i truely believe in staying the course becasue of everything that's been on the table, laid out by sound people and backed up by the rrc. case in point, swi and the 11 news rumored and substantiated. enough said :)
oh, another thing, i don't have anything against poison pills and they can be a good thing for us. so, if cb does want some protection via some type of pill, lets make sure it has our best interest in mind too.
spot on aardvark/eom.
good morning all. the failure sabre imho is cb's boilerplate bs p14a.
speculation has been wild and rampant and who can blame posters for spewing everything under the sun. the lack thereof on communicating a direction in the pre itself and or the q & a to spell out specifics in a more clear and concise manner has led to what's occurring today.
perhaps if this was presented in another light that's more conducive to shareholder expectations then we may not have experienced some of the weaker hands shaking loose and perhaps we would have drawn in new monies in a rising sp or at the very least sideways movement until the next leg up. now the sp has regressed and anyone conducting dd will surely be turned off by the filing.
thank goodness for yesterday's pr, i think those guys (more speculation) got a rude awakening on shareholder sentiment and crafted the 11 news for yesterday's release.
in any case lets get 12 and nm 1 news out...hopefully another pr to some degree by week's end and more the following week to go along with d14a which no doubt should be clear and concise in their plans.
of course we have the power......
with that said, i truely believe in staying the course becasue of everything that's been on the table, laid out by sound people and backed up by the rrc. case in point, swi and the 11 news rumored and substantiated. enough said :)
oh, another thing, i don't have anything against poison pills and they can be a good thing for us. so, if cb does want some protection via some type of pill, lets make sure it has our best interest in mind too.
thanks ctb! saturday is going to be some kind of special.
to compound it all i have a friend visiting from delaware and who's embarking on an alaskan cruise vacation from seattle. of course he's flying in with his family who i've yet to meet. his dad flew air force one for a certain president and my friend is a af maj (reserves) and a ua pilot.
my gal will probably wake up around 3a her time and arrive around 5p pst and we will probably try to get into seattle to see these folks. what a day this will be :)
well, i've burnt a pwr supply before or something else and been out of touch with the world, but dang, i never had a surprise like you probably had when you booted your pc up.
so what bit of information did you read first?
did your jaw hit the floor? i was so stunned when i saw the p14a that it seemed incredulous, even bordering on the insane.
boy, did you ever get the b-day gift. ctb, thanks for the pm...(others who have posted me privately, thank you too as i got your msgs) can read 'em but if ain't happy hour i'm not at the well, lol.
i got two words for ya ctb, that's awesome!
amen contractor. i'm not one of those individuals with that kind of sum of shares. what i do have will surely add to the synergies creating the mother of all mother dissension. to the sh1+ can this r/s crap can go.
cb better be loading clips and machine gunning those pr's.
mrditbme/psymenuyes, ty. coach33, did you see my reply about omers?
mrditbme, who did you talk with? perhaps share as much info in one post so this won't turn out to be 20?'s
here's some tidbits on pump jacks, the 160 pumping unit and what they go for:
Pump jacks at well sites are used to pump water and sometimes oil -- not gas. On a conventional gas well a pump jack is not necessary at the beginning, but may be added later to remove the increasing amounts of water. On a coalbed well, a pump jack is typically needed during the first few years and can be removed as the amount of water declines.
refurbs
160's-single reduction units jackshaft available
Bethlehem 160 74" stroke, leaf weight, $14,500
THREE- Emsco SC-160-212 w/64" stroke, $15,500
FOUR- Emsco SC-160 w/74" stroke, $15,500
Emsco SA-160 w/74" stroke, $15,500
National 160 w/74" stroke, $15,500
Lufkin 160 with 74" stroke, floor clearing, SC-26-C, order #38579 - S.N. 32 U, 10.5:1 gear ratio, #2 weights, 32"- 27"-22" crank hole radius, 64" crank arm swing, 6D 30" unit sheave, 18" brake drum, 170,000 in-lb torque, 34.4 hp @ 20 spm - $14,500
Lufkin 160 with 74" stroke, floor clearing, SC-26-C, serial #______, 10.5:1 gear ratio, #2 weights 37" crank hole radius - $14,500
Lufkin C-160S-74RO-16.4-GBB, non-floor clearing, order #198337, ser. #3, 10.5:1 gear ratio, 3CRO weights, 24"-18"-12" crank hole radius (factory offset beam), 60" crank arm swing, concrete base 44"W x 14"H x 24'L, $14,500 w/concrete base
Lufkin 160 with 74" stroke, TC 3A 18B, 163,350 in-lb peak torque, order #63661, ser. #104U, 10.5:1, 33.0 hp @ 20 SPM, 4C 30" QD unit sheave, 32"-27"-22"-17" crank hole radius, 60" crank arm swing, 36"W x 24"H x 26'L model O base, - $14,500 with concrete base
doc, remember there are good poison pills and bad ones... some are conducive to the shareholders and then there are others that are not.
i wonder if all this talk of a hostile take-over in the recent past pizzed off cb?
and if the pill is one of the objectives, why didn't he address that issue in the p14a to alleviate the panic that's going on.
coach33, omers is a pension fund up in canada. i wanted to post some info on the pill and omers offers some good insight.
good morning all, thoughts on the pr this pre-bell monday morning?
oh, btw, thank god for a pr, hopefully more to come this week!
mpdanford, et al., thank you for all of your kind words. i can hardly wait :) !
there's all kinds of ways to build poison pills. a pretty good intro into the pills and other bits:
Poison Pills
“Poison pill” describes shareholder rights agreements or plans that, when triggered by an event such as a hostile tender offer or the accumulation of a specified percentage of shares by a potential acquirer, provide the shareholders of the target company with rights to purchase additional shares or to sell shares at very attractive prices. These rights, when triggered, impose significant economic penalties on a hostile acquirer.
Poison pills are intended to force hostile bidders to negotiate with the Board and thus to help shareholders to receive the best price for their stock. However, poison pill can also have the effect of discouraging potential offerors and entrenching incumbent boards and management.
Poison pills are among the most potent anti-takeover measures a company can adopt and are usually not in the best interest of shareholders.
OMERS will review poison pills on a case-by-case basis and oppose those that do not meet our guidelines. In general, OMERS will support poison pills that meet the general criteria listed below and do not negatively affect shareholder rights:
Partial bids should be permitted provided that they are made to all shareholders and they remain open for approximately 60 days.
OMERS will support only “new style” poison pills that fairly protect shareholders’ rights and which neither impede normal corporate governance activities, nor diminish in any way the shareholders’ right to decide who should own the company. Others will be opposed.
Poison Pills should include an exemption for lock-ups so that a bid is not prevented from going forward because of a lock-up agreement. Exemptions for investment managers, trust companies, pension funds and other fiduciary investors are important so that their day-to-day activities do not inadvertently trigger the poison pill.
Poison pills should have a renewable lifetime of not more than three years.
The takeover bid threshold should be at least 20 per cent to harmonize with provincial standards.
Voting Recommendation
OMERS will vote against poison pill plans unless, in our view, they are in the best interests of minority shareholders. If the poison pill is instituted without a vote of the shareholders, withhold votes for, or vote against the board of directors that introduced the pill. OMERS will vote against provisions that can permanently entrench the power of incumbent boards and can block positive change in poison pills by subsequent directors at the expense of shareholder interests.
Crown Jewel Defence
A “crown jewel defence” against a takeover, occurs when a company sells its most valuable assets to a friendly third party. This may undermine shareholders’ rights to determine the company’s future course and may devalue the shares.
Acquisitions by a company at risk of being in play, when executed on terms which do not add to shareholder value, can undermine long-term investor interests. OMERS is generally opposed to such transactions.
Voting Recommendation
OMERS will vote against crown jewel defence proposals unless there is evidence that shareholder interests are protected.
Going Private Purchase Transactions, Leveraged Buyouts and Other Purchase Transactions
In a “going private” transaction, minority shareholders sell their equity interest in the company at a price offered by the major shareholder, who assumes control. OMERS evaluates these transactions on a case-by-case basis.
In cases of leveraged buyouts, other potential bidders should have an opportunity to investigate the company and make competing bids
Voting Recommendation
OMERS will vote for Going Private transactions, Leveraged Buyouts, or Other Purchase Transactions only if the shareholders’ interests are protected.
Lock-Up Arrangements
Under a lock-up arrangement, certain shareholders agree to tender their shares to a bidder if a takeover offer is made. Often, especially when there is a major or controlling shareholder, a lockup agreement is required by a potential buyer before making a bid.
We support lock-up agreements that stimulate a fair initial bid for a company. We oppose such arrangements if they prevent a company from developing a competitive bidding process.
Voting Recommendation
Vote for Lock-up arrangements only if the shareholders’ interests are protected.
Takeover Transactions
When evaluating takeover transactions, we consider the following:
Break-up Fees
OMERS generally opposes break-up fees, especially those that are at or above 2.5% of the price payable under the lock-up bid. High break-up fees can detract from shareholder value by discouraging a competing takeover offer.
Shareholder Approval
Shareholder approval of a takeover proposal is paramount, although the board should be allowed to waive the plan in response to a takeover bid circular sent to all shareowners. Should the board wish to revoke the plan to allow for a control-affecting transaction of another type, shareholder approval must be obtained first. All plan amendments must be approved by the shareholders.
Reincorporation
OMERS will support reincorporation proposals in cases where management and the board can demonstrate sound financial or business reasons for the proposal. However, OMERS will generally not support reincorporation proposals that are made as part of an anti-takeover defense or solely to limit directors’ liability.
Unequal or Subordinate Voting Shares
Common stock traditionally carries one vote per share and there have been several moves to convert from dual class structures in Canada recently. However, it is not unusual for certain convertible securities or specifically-designated preferred stocks to carry more than one vote.
Shares with multiple-voting rights concentrate control among a few individuals and are restrictive for institutional holders. The issuance of such shares is not in the best interest of shareholders and is opposed by an increasing number of pension fund and other investment fiduciaries around the world.
In general, OMERS opposes the creation of shares with unequal or multiple-voting rights. However, under special circumstances, OMERS may support and invest in such structures. (For example, in start-up ventures where companies are undergoing restructuring, or in the case of senior securities where par value is significantly in excess of the common share price.) Where such dual class structures exist, it is important to OMERS that they contain “safety valves” to protect the less powerful class.
These include: a sunset provision that requires approval by a majority of the other class or classes of shareholders every three years at least for the continuation of the superior voting class, and a separate group of directors to be elected exclusively by the non‑controlling shareholders.
Voting Recommendation
OMERS will vote against the authorization of any new issue of common stock that has unequal or subordinate voting shares.
OMERS will vote against multiple votes per share except in unusual circumstances as noted above.
OMERS will vote against the granting to, extension of, or restoration of any multiple voting privileges held by any officer or director of the corporation. Vote for the replacement of dual class shares with one vote per share, provided that the cost of such change is modest and in the non-controlling shareholders’ best interests.
Super-Majority Voting Rights
Super-majority voting rights in a company’s charter or bylaws require a level of shareholder approval above a simple majority. They may range as high as two-thirds or 80% of outstanding shares.
When the super-majority voting rights exceed the normal level of shareholder participation at a meeting, action that requires a super-majority is made all but impossible.
As super-majority requirements can be required on issues that may significantly impact a company’s future, they can limit long-term shareholder value. Shareholders are not often given a chance to vote on super-majority voting rights because such proposals are often bundled with other provisions.
Voting Recommendation
OMERS will vote against any super-majority voting right that exceeds two thirds (67 per cent) of the outstanding shares, unless it is in the best interests of shareholders.
Greenmail
“Greenmail” refers to the payment of a premium over the market value of shares to a raider who has accumulated a substantial block of shares. The premium is paid in exchange for the raider terminating a takeover bid. Although greenmail transactions have frequently occurred in the United States, issuer bid requirements under provincial securities legislation do not permit them in Canada.
A greenmail payment to a substantial shareholder discriminates against other shareholders because it is usually at a premium above the market price of the shares.
Voting Recommendation
OMERS will vote against greenmail transactions unless they can be shown to be in the best interest of shareholders. If no vote is offered on a greenmail transaction, OMERS will withhold votes from or vote against the director nominees.
Linked Proposals
Linked proposals are resolutions that link two issues together. This type of resolution should generally be discouraged, particularly when one of the linked proposals will likely have a negative impact on the shareholders.
For example, some proposals have linked corporate governance issues with the payment of a dividend or the granting of a right. Such proposals may coerce or “blackmail” shareholders into approving a proposal that they would not support if it were proposed alone.
Voting Recommendation
OMERS will generally vote against linked proposals except in the case where each individual issue contained in the proposal is in the best interests of shareholders.
Unlimited Share Issues
A company may ask shareholders to authorize additional common stock. OMERS generally will not support a proposal that seeks more than a 50 per cent increase in authorized common shares except in the case where management demonstrates an appropriate need.
Voting Recommendation
OMERS will vote against unlimited share issues. OMERS will vote for an issue only if the amount of stock to be issued is limited and the purpose of the issue is clearly in the shareholders’ interests.
“Blank Cheque” Preferred Shares
Blank cheque preferred shares carry a fixed dividend that is better secured by company assets than common shares and gives the board broad discretion (a “blank cheque”) to establish voting, dividend, conversion and other rights. Blank cheque preferred shares can provide corporations with the flexibility needed to meet changing financial conditions. They may also be used as a vehicle for a poison pill defense against hostile suitors, or may be placed in friendly hands to help block a takeover bid.
A concern for many shareholders is that once those shares have been authorized, the shareholders have no further power to determine how or when they will be allocated.
Voting Recommendation
OMERS will vote against blank cheque preferred shares that are not in shareholders’ interests.
Share Buybacks
Common share buybacks can sometimes enhance long-term shareholder value relative to making acquisitions. Share buybacks near or below book value can often be beneficial to shareholders, and have been supported by OMERS.
However, during periods of general market exuberance in the past, they have less long-term merit and can materially inflate option-driven compensation.
The use of surplus cash to make large share buybacks can also add to share price volatility. Unlike regular dividend increases, share buybacks do not provide enduring cash flow increases into shareholders’ hands and are less valuable to long-term holders.
Voting Recommendation
OMERS generally supports share buyback plans. Plan without an accompanying increase in the regular cash dividend will be given close scrutiny and may be opposed.
Dividend Policy
OMERS encourages corporate dividend payout guidelines which raise payments in line with long-term earnings growth. Executive compensation growth in excess of that in dividends per share is discouraged.
Voting Recommendation
OMERS will support dividend policies in line with shareholders’ interests.
Shareholder Proposals
In recent years OMERS has voted on a wide range of issues covered by various shareholder proposals. These include limitations to executive compensation, the expensing of options and a broad spectrum of other proposals with ethical components such as board composition, hiring and employment fairness and environmental concerns etc. Some deal with areas that are more appropriately decided by the board and management such as charitable donation and political contribution policy (particularly in the U.S). Other proposals attempt to press extreme viewpoints in areas of conduct already adequately covered by existing laws and regulations.
While OMERS agrees with the spirit of many of these proposals, an increasing number attempt to inflict arbitrary measures on management. In addition, many shareholder proposals require the preparation of reports that would be very time consuming and expensive and offer minimal or no tangible benefits to the company.
OMERS believes that management and boards must have the flexibility to conduct business freely provided they comply with applicable laws. OMERS is concerned that the artificial or arbitrary constraints included in many shareholder proposals put affected companies at a competitive disadvantage that will be harmful to the creation and maintenance of long term shareholder value.
Voting Recommendation
OMERS evaluates shareholder proposals on a case-by-case basis . OMERS generally supports proposals that embrace our guidelines in a fair way but we do not support proposals that are arbitrary, unduly expensive or could place the company at a competitive disadvantage.
whichever, thanks :) !!! listing requirements: http://www.cobeconet.com/global/adr/docs/nas_amex.html
4kids_9pets, thanks! missus been away since 6/20/05 and son 8mos 3wks old and has never been on us soil except the embassy in quito.
and, in time for father's day. :)
agreed with the confidentiality agreement.
ltg, how's the coast treating you?
yo hit me up with an email.
ltg, the coast is treating me well. overcast skies with rain messes up my plans to work in the yard, but i'm going out there in a bit. plus tomorrow i will bbq, again. got beef short ribs and it's time to marinade it... might have to drum up other meats and whatnot to throw on the grill.
on another note.....
i got my own hum dinger of a pr to drop.
the missus and jr will be here:
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 16JUN QUITO HOUSTON TX 640A 1200N
CO 654 SATURDAY MARISCAL SUCR G.BUSH INTERCO
H ECONOMY TERMINAL E
BREAKFAST NON STOP
RESERVATION CONFIRMED 5:20 DURATION
AIRCRAFT: BOEING 757-200/300
SEAT xxD NO SMOKING CONFIRMED
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 16JUN HOUSTON TX SEATTLE WA 230P 505P
CO 1739 SATURDAY G.BUSH INTERCO SEATTLE TACOMA
Y ECONOMY TERMINAL C
SNACK NON STOP
RESERVATION CONFIRMED 4:35 DURATION
AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-800
SEAT xxD NO SMOKING CONFIRMED