Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Actually, he's a scientist.
Hey, at least we agree the Series A shouldn't exist. Progress.
Yet you mentioned increasing the authorized shares. Again, which one is it?
Which one is it? Increase AS or hold another special shareholders' meeting to increase the ratio of an RS?
I hope Power is doing ok.
Which ones?
I don't think they are ignoring this issue.... it's constantly talked about.
Premarket buy / sells on OTC? FINRA short interest on OTC Stock? Seems like there are lots of questions.
a broken clock is right twice a day.
You assume alot.
There's no special shareholder meeting ever mentioned. That's completely YOUR OWN speculation and fear mongering.
Do you live at the Lacoste facility? Lots of conclusory statements being pawned off as facts. You must be in the know.
My understanding is that there is a Ring video circulating....
The article may be misleading. On first glance, it appears that the fire was not in the new construction grow out facility (destroyed by previous fire). Can anyone confirm?
Old Construction Video
The more appropriate question:
Who is buying the 16 million shares to hold the line at $.12? I think Eqinvestor made this observation.
Old news, priced in.
Compare chart on August 17 - 19, 2021.
If you did DD (Wainwright presentation) you'd know.
Pacific White Shrimp life expectancy is just under 1 Year. If stocking since April 2021, then March 2022 was just under 1 Year. In recent videos, the shrimp appeared to be adult sized... SHMP has stated they've had supply chain issues with EC units and PLs. Many companies require lead time, to think otherwise about SHMP is unreasonable. What do you do with the shrimp that grow faster than the required lead time? They reamin in tanks until dished at the "cheesy" events of free shrimp, or sold to GSI under that contract. It's not a sign of weakness, it's a sign of humane treatment.
Are we missing a 10Q?
What are you even talking about?
505,500 unrestricted shares of what? If they are related to the NSH case, then see my prior post. NSI is under a duty to assist in getting "Shover Shares" onto exchanges.
Certain Brokerages have restricted buying of $SHMP? Can anyone verify? Vanguard? TD? Schwab?
Dated July 21, 2021. Approved December 6, 2021:
"8. No later than 30 business days following the date that the Court enters the Order, time being of the essence, Defendant shall take or cause to be taken all such necessary action including, without limitation, the execution and delivery of such further instruments and documents, as may be reasonably requested by any party for such purposes or otherwise necessary to complete or perfect the transaction contemplated hereby, including, but not limited to: (a) deliver a copy of this Order to Defendant’s transfer agent; (b) cause its legal counsel to issue an
opinion to Defendant’s transfer agent, in form and substance acceptable to Plaintiff and such transfer agent, that the shares of Common Stock to be issued pursuant to the Order (i) are legally issued, fully paid and non-assessable, (ii) are exempt from registration under the Securities Act, and (iii) may be issued without restrictive legend, and may be resold by Purchaser without restriction; and (c) transmit via email, facsimile and overnight delivery an irrevocable and unconditional instruction to Defendant’s stock transfer agent, in form and substance acceptable to Plaintiff and such transfer agent, to issue all shares of Common Stock required by the Order."
Thirty (30) days from the Order = January 5, 2022.
Things that make you go hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Lots of speculation. No facts.
2022 Short Interest Reporting Dates
Settlement Date Due Date1 Publication Date
May 13 (Friday) May 17 – 6 p.m.(Tuesday) May 24 (Tuesday)
May 31 (Tuesday) June 2 – 6 p.m.(Thursday) June 9 (Thursday)
If memory serves, all the disclosures have mentioned that an R/S is not necessarily guaranteed. With so many other scenarios, unsure why there'd be a full expectation for an outcome that hasn't once been mentioned by the Company. Pure speculation and fear mongering.
There's tots of FA here, but little to no TA. Let's just say this, if I were short heading into earnings, Management's stoicism (generally) and Easterling's Form 4's (specifically) would have me very concerned about being squeezed. That may not be the actual outcome, but I'd be concerned nonetheless.
So much buying over the last few days. Series A existence remains a legal issue, not a factual one.
If the PPS hasn't crashed and burned yet, what do you pretell will be the catalyst?
It gets awfully quiet at expiry
About 20% of the bonus
CEO put 10% of that last bonus back into the company...
Interesting.
FYI, they are of the same subset of litigation preclusion doctrines. One precludes subsequent litigation of the same claim, while the other the same issue. Here, the claim and issue are one in the same. Therefore, it's res judicata since the CLAIM (share conversion - of which the SERIES A, as a matter of law, are fully constituent) was substantively decided. I.e. good luck filing a suit to adjudicate anything with the Series A (other than when they became/become legally ineffective) and not have some reference be made to the Shover Texas litigation.
Also, whether you had notice and an obligation to defend yourself is a fact issue. I wouldn't want to be you, in front of a judge, saying: "oh yea, I knew about that case, but I made a mistake of law and didn't think it would effect MY ownership interest in NSI." Opposing counsel will make a judge tell you to go pound sand.
Every shareholder had notice (by way of SEC filings) of the pendency of the Shover case. Caveat emptor. ;)
50,000 out of....
Context matters
Don't conflate cases. The Texas Order is res judicata. It applies to the Company and ALL its shareholders. All shareholders had a chance to object on ANY ground. NO. ONE. did. It's OVER.
Now, apply the law of that case to the facts here (which are not indispute) and what you get is a legal issue, i.e. are the Series A voting rights legally effective in the context of res judicata (the Texas Order). Yes, they were "exercised," but does/did it have the legally desired effect?
If the Texas Order voided the Series A, then one may have a good cause of action to argue "NO" and ask a judge for declaratory and injunctive relief (rulings of law). If the Texas Order made the Series A voidable, then one may not have a good cause of action to ask a judge for declatory and injunctive relief. Now, what do I know, this is just IMO.
Depending on $$$ at stake, some shareholder may feel obliged to muck up the 1:15 through 1:25, just to see if there's anything here. Just saying.
Interesting... cause this is a matter of law, not fact.
Anything done pursuant to the Texas Court's Order cannot be an SEC violation. That was the WHOLE point of the lawsuit and settlement.