Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
"The FACT that companies are calling the company"
You posted that quite awhile ago. Are you implying that IR is telling you that these calls are continuing to this day? Does someone at the company tell you this every time you talk to them?
Or was this a conversation you had before the company warned us about this type of information?
No pictures of Condi, but it'll do for now. ;)
I did not delete any of your posts, Admin did. Direct your concerns to them.
I haven't seen where the company has said there is going to be any "soon to be mailed out" samples. They've simply stated that excess samples will be made available. This could be 500 or 5. They could also ask for a SASE to get one for all we know. lol Probably not but I doubt they're simply going to mail out 7000+ pads to shareholders nor have they indicated that they plan to do so.
If they're interested in building investor confidence then it would be a nice gesture on their part, but then again so would naming a CEO, filing the promised financials and providing the divy that they supposedly initiated well over a year ago.
It might be common sense if they had a viable product. It's up to the company to prove that they have one.
Try actually posting something about the company and it would probably stay up.
But the share structure isn't cleaned up at all according to the conspiracy theorists.
There are still supposedly 40 billion fake shares out there- so many that most longs who care should be very concerned that they aren't getting the divy at all- because they probably hold these supposed fake shares.
If the DTC audit revealed that shareholders were indeed holding fake shares and would not get the divy, then the company has been irresponsible and is doing a great disservice to it's shareholders by issuing a divy (supposedly anyway) after they've discovered that such a massive short position exists.
And they supposedly know all this and haven't made one single public statement about it.
But yeah, it's all part of Pillay's plan- although he doesn't appear to be the CEO anymore. LOL
Once again, anyone truly believing in this product has no need to make up the garbage in order to make the stock sound like a good deal.
" they will get a good return on their investment as well as the share holders."
Why would you think that given that knows how much the private investors have put into this? LOL
The shareholders have a better chance of banking on this that the private group if they indeed put anything substantial into it IMO. Remember, before there were problems and bad sales for CES we basically had the same thing- a flushable pad. And there was limited interest. Them claiming that it's new and improved will mean little IMO given that so few cared before.
Of course this has little to do with the stock moving, it could move with no sales at all.
Oddly enough no one can do that.
The MM's are supposedly continuing to fracture the law and dig themselves a bigger and bigger financial hole that will supposedly be impossible to get out of. These are the same MMs that supposedly called the company wanting to buy shares out of horrendous desperation and now they're instead shorting it more. Good lord.
So theyre going to kill their companies over a stock like PYCT. Riiiiiight.
This is simply how diluted companies trade. If the volume continues it can move, but IMO chances are those buying now will chose not to wait and start selling which will them create more theories about the MMs holding the price down. If it moves, great, if not look for the conspiracies to continue- for years.
Actually- they've already been going on for years. LOL
It can move with momentum although it will be hard to get anything started.
Crap stock or not, it can move. Will it? Probably not too far, but maybe far enough to bank a bit.
How do you think the high volume negates the issues with the stock? With the recent news, many are hopping aboard, that's the cycle with pinksheet companies.
"the i-box mis-represents the company"
So now links to the company's website and PRs misrepresent the company? Right. LOL
If you're happy with the website then you should be happy with the link to the website.
This board is about the company, not your opinions about whether I've been to the website. Adjust your discussion accordingly. If you have suggestions feel free to PM me.
You won't be able to hollor the scam thingy anymore.
A stock moving has nothing to do with it being a scam.
I can't help it that the website and the info that the company provides looks bad.
"When the SHORTS buy on the open market they don't know which ones are real and which ones are fake"
So anyone buying on the open market could have bought fake shares. LOL- according to that theory maybe you're holding fake shares.
"Are screwed?"
Nope. Those things have to happen in order for them to be screwed and there's little chance if any of that.
The company could still surprise though- I'd say more than $100,000 in sales would be a surprise. The status of the company would remain diluted POS however. Traders might still make a buck on it though.
"and catch the NAKED SHORTS off guard"
How will it catch the naked shorts off guard- you said that the divy is going to force them to cover and that's been in the works for a year now.
Or has the story now changed on what's actually supposedly going to force them to cover?
Notwithstanding the inane theories about forced short covering, the company could indeed surprise.
Yes it is illegal now and if you really believe that it's being NS now then set up a blog and uncover the great crime for all to see.
Perhaps you and your source could bring down Knight Securities and get yourself on CNBC. If the volume you're seeing is a mystery to you, then I suggest getting well-versed in how diluted micro-penny stocks trade.
In the meantime answer the question- why would a company now naked short at .0001? If the conspiracy theorists are correct, we should assume the following:
1) There will not be a reverse split, therefore...
2) The share price will NOT drop any lower (it can't w/o a reverse split.)
3) The dividend if going to force the covering of all current naked short shares.
If those three things are true, then there is no profit to be gained from naked shorting at this time and the naked shorters (supposedly NITE, a publically traded company) are breaking the law. Plus, the shares they will supposedly will have to buy back with cause a massive financial issue for them, and any further naked shorted shares will only make matters worse. Remember- NITE is publically traded- they have to answer to shareholders. You really think they're going to risk their company for a short position in a POS like PYCT?
So do tell, why does the theory that they're currently naked shorting make a bit of sense?
"this is not over"
Of course it isn't. Pinksheet POS stocks are like the Energizer Bunny. As long as they keep a transfer agent retained they have a very long shelf life.
" The company is not selling any shares now and HAS NOT SOLD ONE SHARE on the open market since PILLAY took over the shell and you know it."
I've never said that they did sell any. The gave away shares. They issued more shares. At least selling implies that the shares have a value. LOL Dilution is dilution- you should know that- Stocks 101.
"I'd say He;s done nothing but good."
That's your opinion and you're entitled to it. However when a CEO makes all sorts of claims that he's going to do a bunch of grandios stuff as he did 2 and a half years ago and does nothing to move that plan forward, then that's a negative. If you chose to ignore that, that's fine- no one else is though.
As for the stuff about naked shorters calling the company- again, until you can point out where the company has made this claim then it should be ignored as per the company.
When someone has been saying "time will tell" for years then time has already told.
He already answered you.
"They will be sending samples to distributors and retailers, as well as to shareholders"
They said that samples willbe available to shareholders- not that they're going to be automatically sending them out to shareholders.
You'll probably have to ask them nicely.
Of course I guess there's the stuff that tom Hands was saying before- not sure if that was before or after the stuff about the filings being out soon...
Sorry but it has not. Please check with the SEC if you need further guidance.
Reivison is just an excuse for delay- yet another in a long line. It goes on for years waiting for the next big thing. Hope is great but anyone not recognizing the red flags (as I believe you do) is simply not in the real world. And people bashing others for recognizing and discussing these red flags is foolishness.
I know we're supposed to forget the past delays here but it's not really the past when it repeats itself so often that the instances run into each other creating what amounts to one huge delay. lol First it was the China deals, then the online pay system, now the world-changing pads- same company though... strange huh? And when it goes from hoping for the best to attacking others and making up reasons for the delays, well- you get the idea.
But yes, the global community is still "marking these posts" almost 3 years after Pillay came onboard. LOL
Once again, when this supposed naked shorting was done it was not illegal.
Revised as in "Oops, we forgot to disclose the biggest transaction in the history of the company so we have to go back and stick it in there, our bad"? C'mon now...
"and announce their HQ location in Atlantis"
Well, they are supposedly working diligently on that humidity problem...
The PYCT cycle continues. Unrealistic Expectation Phase part XXIV in full affect.
"AND A PRODUCT THAT WILL BE MARKETED TO THE WHOLE DANG PLANET. "
Ahhh, like the "global launch" of PYCT's last deal... I get it. LOL As for shorting all the way down- no, that's not the way it's done. It's shorted on the way up and covered at the lows. Companies like Knight are accountable to shareholders, although it sounds like a nice thing to pump it's not a reality that they've done this with PYCT nor has anyone shown that it is.
If you tell me that PYCT or any other unsolicited stock is mentioned anywhere in that video then it might apply here and I'd be happy to watch.
Worse POS stocks have moved on less. :)
They issued shares for services rendered thereby increasing the share count. This is called dilution.
"and has been shorted ever since it's been PYCT. "
Yep, shorted all the way down to the bottom, that
the way the big boys play alright... good lord. LOL
All the company would probably say is that they're not selling, which they don't appear to be.
They choose to dilute in a different manner. They probably realize the true value of their shares.
Why would that be necessary when the filings tell the story on what shares they've issued?
So now the story is that the shares were naked shorted after the split, instead of before the split? Gotta keep these stories straight or people start to see it for what it is. lol
At least the possibility of that theory is supported by a history of diluted pink sheets that do just that.
The garbage about the imaginary 40 billion share short, the miraculous "forced short cover due to the divy", the "NITE is currently naked shorting" has never been supported because there is nothing with which to do so. That has yet to be disputed.
No I wasn't correct, I was being facetious. The past matters in all stocks. If someone wanted to tout 2006 info that's ok by me, it sure beats going on about the imaginary stuff.
"When growing up we were all taught what was safe to flush and what we should not flush down the toilet. Even though it seemed the logical place to put them, sanitary napkins and liners could block the system."
They really hit the nail on the head here. When growing up I was always taught that sanitary napkins were not to be flushed! LOL
Oops, copyright 2006- need something more current, this is 2009.
The past doesn't matter here remember. :)