Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I was fully aware of the fine print in the pr identifying that only questions pertaining to direct would be responded to in the cc. I am of the opinion that there have been aspects of the L trial that could be discussed yet are not. I very much appreciate the update pertaining to direct, and will continue to hold for what I believe to be ground breaking therapy, yet the constant back and forth is starting to wear me down in all honesty. I am waiting for the day that NWBO can smother all the naysayers with data, PR's, guidance and vision. To the relief of cancer patients worldwide. I hope I am right, yet the jury is still out.
I also sent her a question pertaining to L and the question I had relating to the 10-Q mentioning expansion of the trial, and whether that meant increasing the size of the trial or enrolling more patients in with the original size intact.
Does that mean they updated the L study to allow for 99 participants that were previously screened and failed, that will now be eligible to enroll? Are we short of enrollment by 99 patients or would they allow additional participants? Thank you for all of you posts, I find them helpful.
AF has been busy on Twitter, but he won't post anything on the street until after the conference call. I assume that we will post something, he and his ilk are too invested in their short position to say nothing. I hate it, but understand it. My hope is that the CC is so outstanding that any response will be trampled by by the ensuing purchase orders/short covering. Time will tell. GLTA Longs and patients.
John if your shares are held in a margin account otherwise known as an account that allows margin activity then your shares could be placed on loan. You will need to confirm which account type your shares are held in, and if so adjust them out/indicate to fidelity that you do not want your shares loaned out.
I cannot say for certain with every brokerage house/financial institution. I use Fidelity. What I would say is that you should confirm if your shares are available for others to short. I did with mine a while back when a similar post came up. In the interest of a long position, I think it would be best to not allow someone else the opportunity to use your shares against you.
One thing that every long here should consider is how they are holding their shares. If you are concerned that your shares are eligible for loaning to shorts, contact your broker/financial institution and identify how you can change that, and not allow your shares to be loaned out. Unless you are receiving payment for your loaned shares, than maybe that would require additional considerations. This is something that we can all do, that could have an impact on the share price.
correction "unaltered/un-manipulated fashion"
It appears as though the manipulating shorts have already taken off for the weekend. Now the price can move in an unaltered/manipulated fashion. GLTA Longs, and if possible, thank a veteran or serviceman/servicewoman this weekend.
Doktor, thank you for the follow up. I was not holding high hopes for the plan. Hilarious image comes to mind... http://images.fanpop.com/images/polls/54141_1203634347033_full.jpg
Ohh well, we'll just have to wait for a PR.
I agree
I would go in a heartbeat, I would have to source a camera (I don't think that would be a problem). I called The ASCO a while back and forgot the exact figure for a non-ASCO member, but it was in excess of $1000. Before moving forward with any plan I would recommend that a few other members on this board also contact the ASCO and confirm the registration fee for a non-ASCO member, then post their findings. As I said before, I would certainly wear a camera, test it before hand for volume and picture, as well as work with members on this board to prepare a list of questions/dialogue for the ASCO.
Haha, I would do that in a heartbeat. We could could all prepare a list of questions and vote on which questions make to the ASCO. I'll find a big hat to hide the camera in.
I live in chicago, I was going to visit until I found out how much the non-ASCO member fee was in excess of $1000, too rich for me at the moment.
What do people think is meant by the highlighted item?
Research and Development Expense. Research and development expense was a combined (cash and non-cash) total of $20.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to $11.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The increase was primarily attributable to the DCVax-Direct manufacturing and product development work and the preparation costs for the launch of two clinical trial programs, one in the US and one in the UK, as well as expansion of the ongoing Phase III trial in the US, and increased manufacturing of DCVax?-L for the Phase III trial.
Do you think they mean to indicate expansion = more people enrolling with the initial population figure maintained?
or
Do you think they mean to indicate expansion = increasing the total amount of enrollment so that they can meet stat sig, as was referenced in the prior webcast?
I sure hope it's option A and not option B. I welcome all sides, as well as recommendation if contacting them for further details would or would not be a waste of time.
I, for one, would like to test the R1 of $7.63 tomorrow.
AF, otherwise known as H.H. Holmes
It is from the post #10058, check it out.
Flipper is back. Flipper I wanted to say thank you for the reply to my question the other day, but I am not a paying subscriber so I am not able to send private messages. I should probably pony up the money and subscribe. Thanks to all who tirelessly contribute to the pursuit of knowledge pertaining to NWBO, and immunotherapy. Thank you.
Will NWBO provide a press release on May 14th after 5pm when the ASCO embargo is lifted? If so, what do people think will be included in the PR?
BBking2003 thank you for the recommendation, I follow the NWBO board, I bought some ZGNX today in the $2.50 range. I know you were catching some flak from some people on that board for recommending ZGNX, thank you for the heads up.
I couldn't care less about your opinion. I have done my due diligence, I would side with the PEI of Germany, Dr. Linda Liau of UCLA, and Dr. Vivek Subbiah of MD Anderson over you any day. Would have me believe that they have their heads in the sand as well? That was a rhetorical question in case you were wondering.
Where you are wrong LTT is in your presumption that you are somehow able to identify and winnow out the frauds. You do not know the outcome of the trial do you? If you do not know the outcome of the trial then your presumption that they are frauds is incorrect, and you are effectively as bad as cancer. If the results come back positive will you post on this board that you stood in the way of progress? Will you post that you were incorrect in your presumption of fraudulent activities? Will you post that you aided cancer? If you do not believe that this company is a good investment then stay out, and go find another company that you think is a good investment and place your funds there, along with your efforts. Until then, as you believe this company and Linda Powers are frauds, I believe you are a cancer on this world that should be removed.
I just contacted Fidelity to make sure that my shares were not eligible for borrowing/lending to others for the purpose of shorting. The rep explained that because my account was not a margin account my shares would not be available for others to borrow. He further explained that if I did have a margin account I could restrict specific holdings from being available for borrowing. I recommend that if you are not certain how your shares are held that you confirm as soon as possible, and if possible to restrict your shares from borrowing/lending to short interests.
I agree, the reason I went with the 10's and 12.5's is leverage. I was able to buy more out of the money options versus a couple at the money options. In my opinion, the 10's and 12.5's will be at the money by the time ASCO gets here, and I believe that after the ASCO they will be in the money. I only purchased what I could afford to lose, as options are a risky investment. If it works out as planned, the reward will be great, for what I perceive to be little risk.
I would argue that the July call options are better suited for reaping the rewards from ASCO. JMO. Full disclosure, I rolled out of my April calls over to July calls (10's and 12.5's) to adjust for the ASCO.
I agree
I hope you are right, I have been buying almost every day during this most recent drag. I could really use an up day.
hahaha, great post Flipper! We better not make Flipper angry. That show was great.
December 10th
Are you referring to the BBC?
I was having a conversation with my girlfriend last night relating to submitting a formal complaint to the SEC relating to Adam Feuerstein. To which she replied "Why do that?", that question solidified my response. I will do anything in my power and within the confines of the law to fight back against the relentless attacks by Adam. If he will be relentless then so will I. I opened a twitter account and have since started replying to his tweets. I will complete a SEC complaint after March 15th (I am a tax accountant and we are busy), I will write complaints on The Street website. I believe in this company and I will fight for it with funds and my pen.
Moose Bite is correct, there is no such thing as a risk free investment.
I made an attempt to send a complaint to the SEC today. Work picked up and I was unable to complete the complaint. I will finish the SEC complaint this evening or tomorrow morning. I agree with you that we, representatives of the investment community, should step up and take action against such attacks, by any means available.