Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I'm an investor here, and enjoy watching NASCAR racing. But the reality is that unless the Retro Infinity car is performing well during the race, there will be very little (if any) visibility of the brand for the television viewers. This is because the TV cameras are focused on those nearest to the front of the pack, during the race.
If, however, that sponsored car can be in the top ten at some point during the race, there will be a whole lot of national coverage visibility. I'm still not sure how many racing fans are paying much attention to the logos and trademarks on the cars, but at least there would be brand visibility to those that do.
As always simply my opinion.
National branding. Nascar sponsor. 2 nationally televised races this weekend. HOW MANY NASCAR FANS????????? Coast to Coast coverage. And there it is, Retro Infinity, a wholly owned subsidiary of WRIT MEDIA GROUP. POTENTIAL INVESTORS WILL LOOK AT THAT, WON'T THEY.
For those that have not taken a close look at the recent agreement which will provide up to $1.25 million in funding, it has the structure of a 'put' option, which is far more favorable than convertible note financing.
For those who are unfamiliar with how a 'Put' option works, it is the right (but not the obligation) to sell a certain number of shares at a certain price. Since FPFI holds the 'Put' option, all power and timing is with FPFI. They can 'put' none of the shares when the stock price is weakest, and 'put' many shares when the stock price is strong.
For this reason, it is far more favorable than a convertible note, where the share price may be in the dumps just as the note due date is approaching.
While there is still some degree of uncertainty with this specific agreement, because the put share price will be determined by 7 days of trading after notice of the intent to put by FPFI, 7 days of uncertainty is far better than the 6 months to a year of share price uncertainty on a typical convertible note.
BTW, the current CEO of Fresh Promise Foods is Kevin Quirk, the former head of marketing for the Minute Maid division of Coca Cola. And that's the sort of background that you don't often see in an OTC company.
As always, simply my opinion.
FPFI
I don't disagree with you (especially from a market cap valuation perspective). I was just making a point to those that are traders, that .0008 was probably a good entry point for a high probability 50% return.
I am a long-term investor here, and have been very supportive of Fresh Promise Foods.
As always, simply my opinion.
hey, some simple math -- if the OS is under 500M (right now i think it's around 460M or so)....
what does that make the company worth at say, .01...?
yes, i'm asking a rhetorical question.
my point is, FPFI is going to pennies.
Money manager and high-energy financial TV personality Jim Cramer has mentioned something several times on his 'Mad Money' show (on CNBC) that I think is relevant here. In his early days of investing, he noticed that stocks which hit $80 per share almost always continued up to hit $120.
I have observed that this same move often occurs with penny stocks, where they will usually make the move to at least .0012 shortly after hitting .0008. I think entering FPFI now at .0008 will yield at least a 50% return (when it hits .0012) in a very short time. It could eventually go significantly higher, or course, but I would say that the .0012 exit point would be what is commonly referred to as 'low hanging fruit'.
As always, simply my opinion.
FPFI
•••>This may be one of the most company-favorable funding agreements I've ever seen in the OTC (reported on 9/30 form 8-K).
For starters, there is only a 15% discount applied to the lowest avg trading day bids (I've seen as much as a 50% discount applied). Secondly, the measurement period for the computation of the avg price is only 7 days (the more days, the worse the agrmt). Thirdly, the period covered is 36 months long. This means that Fresh Promise can wait for the share price to recover, and then put a whole lot of those more expensive share to J.P. Carey Enterprises, with a higher cost basis. Fourthly, it provides for more than $1 million, so it is deep funding.
As always, simply my opinion.
Effective September 24, 2014, Fresh Promise Foods, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into an Investment Agreement (the “Investment Agreement”) with J.P. Carey Enterprises, Inc. (“Carey”), whereby the parties also agreed to enter into a registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the Investment Agreement, for a period of thirty-six (36) months commencing on the trading day immediately following date of effectiveness of the Registration Statement (as defined below), Carey shall commit to purchase up to $1,250,000 of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.00001 per share (the “Shares”), pursuant to Puts (as defined below), covering the Registrable Securities (as defined below). The purchase price of the Shares under the Investment Agreement is equal to a fifteen (15%) percent discount to the average of the three lowest closing bids as calculated using the average of the three lowest closing bids during the last seven trading days after the Company delivers to Carey a Put notice in writing requiring Carey to purchase shares of the Company, subject to the terms of the Investment Agreement.
FPFI
The interesting part is that you chose to compare the Sam's Club price for the 5 lb Arnold Iron Whey only to the bloated GNC price of $84.99, rather than the bodybuilding.com price of $54.97. Wouldn't that be relevant in the comparison, being that bb.bom is the world's #1 online seller of supplements?
I have no doubt that the margins for MP will be lower at Sam's Club, but more data is usually better than less data.
As always, simply my opinion.
GNC is pricing the Arnold 5lb Iron Whey for $84.99. Sam's Club prices the same Arnold 5lb Iron Whey according to you for $42.95. I think it is obvious that margins are severely impacted at Sam's.
Believe it or not, even monkeys have participated in experiments that use mind controlled devices.
'Monkey Mind-Control Holds Promise for Paraplegics'
An exerpt from the article:
'But there’s a long way to go before these microchips help humans regain control of their limbs. The monkey experiment simply proved a concept, and the mind-controlled movements were very basic. In order to be useful for humans, they’ll need to achieve more complex fine motor control.'
Monkeys Control a Mechanical Arm With Their Thoughts ...
New York Times article:
'Monkeys Think, Moving Artificial Arm as Own' - exerpt:
'Two monkeys with tiny sensors in their brains have learned to control a mechanical arm with just their thoughts, using it to reach for and grab food and even to adjust for the size and stickiness of morsels when necessary, scientists reported on Wednesday.'
Here's a 2008 Video: Monkey uses brain to control prothetic arm - YouTube:
That may be as a result of the rather large bid/ask spread of about 40%. It has been nearly that large for more than a month now, representing a significant risk of immediate capital reduction moments after a buyer is willing to shell out the money at the ask.
But I think the real reservation in buying has more to do with the risk that when the launch countdown on the 1bitcoinnetwork website hits zero, there may be a delay and the actual launch does not occur on time.
Another item to consider is that the launch time-frame of between 17 and 18 days from now could be viewed as an eternity to OTC traders. I expect trading action to increase as the scheduled launch date approaches.
As always, simply my opinion.
I'm surprised with the good news the stock hasn't traded at all. Hopefully that will change.
Here's what was officially announced, regarding the launch...
Oct 09, 2014 (eTeligis.com via COMTEX) -- HENDERSON, NV, United States, via ETELIGIS INC., 10/09/2014 - - Get Real USA, Inc. trading symbol (OTC Pink: GTRL) (PINKSHEETS: GTRL), 1Bitcoinnetwork.com announces today the launch of its international Bitcoin classified ad platform.
'Jim Clayton, President/ CEO, stated today "These are exciting times here as we move forward developing the first and only Global Bitcoin Marketplace Directory. Our platform is similar to Angie's List or Craigslist but with a big edge. Our directory is global, providing merchants worldwide with a directory to advertise and promote goods and services, in turn accommodating both domestic and international consumers with a one of a kind e-commerce experience. This extraordinary environment eliminates the challenges of world bankcard acceptance, the high cost of credit card merchants and consumer fees, chargebacks and eliminates cross border currency exchange costs. Up to now these factors have greatly hindered the global ecommerce experience. Millions throughout the world have embraced the Bitcoin economy. Until now the challenge for merchants has been; how do I acquire customers that spend Bitcoin? And for consumers, how do I find merchants that accept and trade in Bitcoin? We are that solution at www.1bitcoinnetwork.com."'
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/GTRL/news
GTRL
There are 18 days remaining until launch, according to link:
http://1bitcoinnetwork.com/.
GTRL
According the to the Nevada Secretary of State (as well as OTC Markets filings as recently as yesterday), the company is still legally known as Get Real USA, Inc.
So at the moment, 1Bitcoinnetwork.com is division or property of Get Real USA, Inc.
https://nvsos.gov/SOSEntitySearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=h4e7k0kKggq20f%252fR1A1OYg%253d%253d&nt7=0
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=GTRL&id=127485
Is the name of this company still get real USA or is it 1bitcoin?
Walmart is notorious not just for squeezing small manufacturers, but larger ones as well. Here's one such example:
'Everything -- including the technology and corporate culture -- feeds into that ultimate goal of delivering the lowest prices possible. Wal-Mart also pushes its suppliers, some say relentlessly, to cut prices. In "The Wal-Mart Effect," author Charles Fishman discusses how the price of a four-pack of GE light bulbs decreased from $2.19 to 88 cents during a five-year period." '
link:
http://money.howstuffworks.com/wal-mart.htm
What the manufacturer gets in return is a larger market share, and significantly less competition from their competitors, because the selection choices presented to the consumer are far more limited. Just as an example, look at how few protein power brands are available in a Walmart, as compared to a GNC location.
With larger market share comes economies of scale, which strengthens the company from a cost of manufacturing perspective. Another benefit is that once niche brands can become ubiquitous.
As always, simply my opinion.
Any idea how the margins are at Walmart? Is this a decent margin sale (in your opinion) for MSLP or just good for brand exposure?
Before the faithful get their flame guns out, it's just a question out of curiosity. Walmart has a lot leverage and has been known to squeeze small manufacturers.
Interesting that you are supporting GoldBuf's warnings to early investors, but take issue with others providing the same type of warnings this time around (following the Reverse Split). Specifically, warnings of the same type of corporate actions that caused the destruction of shareholder value the first time around.
Those actions (which are now being repeated, post Reverse Split) are:
-Taking on additional (and significant) debt
-Large increase to the authorized common shares (including the very recent 10x increase from 50 million to 500 million)
In business somebody always has got to get burned and if the early investors didn't wabt to be the ones they should have heeded GoldBuffalos warnings but they didn't out of greed.
Sounds sort of like 'blaming the victim' logic to me. After all, wasn't it the early investors that have seen significant erosion to their capital investments?
And by significant erosion, I mean having 749 out of each 750 original shares confiscated in a reverse split, and then having the share price return to approximately the level it was at just a couple of fiscal quarters prior to the R/S announcement. I'm not as good with math as I was when I was attending school, but if you are left with one of something worth about penny, when you used to have 750 of something worth about a penny, that would be a significant loss, right?
Well I think owoo got smart and realized they needed to burn the "stepping stone" shareholders to save the company and move on to better, less emotional investors like blackbridge.
After some DD, I was able to determine precisely what has been the cause of the Dept of Agriculture delays. Please see the image below for the explanation:
BTW, I agree that we will likely see .001s pre-launch, and significantly higher after the juice product launches. As always, simply my opinion.
im NOT expectin .01 its not so easy to call how high until we see if/when FPFi gets their GA Lic n does a Product Launch n just how much of the 446M are being held n how tightly held.
im thinkin into the .001`s before News then its watch the ask n see how thin it is.
I'm not going to try and sugar coat this, it was a rough day for longs such as myself. But I will comment about a few points of interest.
A total of about 1.8 million shares, valued at about $12,000 traded under .007 today. Of that amount, about 665k were traded at the bid, and about 1.14 million were traded at the ask.
So with the buying/selling action of only about 12% (1/8) of the shares traded today, the daily chart was made to look real ugly. It wouldn't surprise me if that was by design.
On a positive note, the stock quickly bounced off of .0064, to go up as much as 25% from the .0064 bottom, and closed up about 17% from the .0064 bottom. That doesn't remove all pain from the significant drop, but it does show that there are still longs who strongly believe in this company. I will continue to hold GRCU, because I strongly believe a significant upward move is not too far off.
As always, simply my opinion.
GRCU
Maria is no longer at CNBC. She has since moved on to the Fox Business Network. But I'm sure that others on CNBC would be interested in the story. It may make more sense to suggest the idea to Robert Calkin, where he could then contact CNBC himself. It would give him an opportunity to gain additional exposure for CCI as well.
Perhaps you could send Maria an email and let her know about Calkin and what he is doing. It can't hurt. You would be a hero if Maria picks up on your story.
Watch what happens if/when Robert Calkin does a live interview on CNBC. I know some of you are saying to yourselves, 'That will never happen. CNBC doesn't allow OTC companies to promote themselves on such a prestigious and widely viewed financial network.'
But I would point out that CNBC has made exceptions in the past. One such example was an OTC supplement company interviewed on CNBC live by Maria Bartiromo. CNBC chose to do that on-air interview because Tiger Woods became associated with that company, and CNBC knew that the interview would be good for ratings. Below is an image of that interview, with the OTC CEO and Tiger.
So what would be the angle for CNBC to conduct an on-air interview with Green Cures CEO Robert Calkin, you may ask. The simple answer is a ratings boost. CNBC has recently aired (over and over) several specials on the business of Cannabis/MJ/Hemp. So they clearly think that this subject is good for ratings. And who better to interview than an industry guru who has now taken command of a publicaly traded entity within the same industry/sector.
I think that such an interview is very plausible in the near future. And I would not want to be on the sidelines should such an interview take place.
As always, simply my opinion.
GRCU
Since the days of my first atari, I have been an enthusiastic gamer. Following the atari, I moved on to consoles such as colecovision, nintendo, sega genesis, sega saturn, ps 1/2, and xbox 360, etc.
I see this VOIS ear mounted hands-free controller as something that could create a revolution in gaming. As was pointed out during the CNBC interview, the world currently expects a clunky, bulky, uncomfortable helmet type device to enjoy mind driven gaming. If VOIS can truly deliver with the accuracy and comfort on their final production version of this ear-mounted controller device, I think this company can scale quickly, and become extremely valuable. Additionally, the application of mind-controlled devices goes far beyond the gaming industry.
Here's some relevant research:
More than 24 million units of the Xbox Kinect motion controller (another innovative device) have been sold
Around 50% of US households have at least one working game console.
If Mind Control (VOIS) could eventually sell 1 million units of their ear-mounted mind controller, that would likely equate to more than $125 million in wholesale revenue.
As an indication of the increased focus on game controllers, Microsoft spent hundreds of millions of dollars to develop the XBox One controller:
He actually receives one quarter of that number of shares. The original wording that GRCU used in their filing was unclear, so it has since been clarified in the most recent quarterly filing, to read as follows:
"Pursuant to his agreement, Mr. Calkin is entitled to receive up to 4,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock during 1 calendar year; 1,000,000 vesting quarterly on each three-month anniversary of the commencement of Mr. Calkin’s employment with the Company, provided that Mr. Calkin remains employed with the Company. In the event that the agreement is terminated, any unvested shares will be forfeited and not issued by the Company. As of June 30, 2014, 1,000,000 of Mr. Calkin’s shares had vested and had been issued by the Company."
Calkin receives 4mm shares/quarter of GRCU stock or 16mm in his first year. I show that in the Supplemental Information excerpt below.
Here's the genesis of the explosive price move that GRCU has had, and some of my thoughts on the subject. As painful as this price consolidation near a penny is, IMO it has been a necessary evil over the past few months, for the following reasons.
During the period of Aug 2012 thru Dec 2013, GRCU (formerly TTDZ) traded in the low triple zeros (see chart below). That's 5 complete fiscal quarters of a trading range within the low triple zeros. During that extended period of time, there was least a couple billion shares traded, which represented the entire share structure for the company.
With the entire share structure having been traded in the low triple zero range between Aug 2012 and Dec 2013, there is a very high probability that the vast majority of shareholders had an entry price in the low triple zeros, prior to the price explosion.
Within the 3 month period of Jan 1 2014 and April 1 2014, the share price then ran from .0002 to 4.9 cents. That's a 240x move, which is more than 24,000%. And since that move was preceded by trading of several billion in the low triple zeros which was more than the entire share structure, the huge move upward likely left many original shareholders with huge gains from the triple zero level.
Had the share price been in the low triple zero level only briefly (as some of the OTC stocks experience prior to a huge move), there would not be a large number of shareholder sitting on gains of tens of thousands of percent. But as we know from the historical chart (see below), there was a period well in excess of a year with the stock trading in the low triple zeros for shares to be acquired.
I think it is because of this price history that we have been seeing the stock drift downward from the huge pop, finally stabilizing over the past couple of months. I believe that on most days, there's probably a couple of million shares that were originally picked up in the low triple zeros being sold at the bid. While some are questioning why would some people be selling each day with such future potential, the answer is that even around one penny, an original low triple zero buyer is clearing 20 to 50x their original purchase amount. And with an uncertain future, who could blame them.
With each passing day, more of those original buyers (with an entry point in the low triple zeros) are flushed from the system, and I believe we should begin to see share price appreciation in the near future (followed by another massive upside pop).
As always simply my opinion.
GRCU
From the looks of things, the math is rather simple (and the deal potentially very lucrative).
500 million shs for 100,000 tons of sugar (first month's allocation)
100,000 tons x 2,000 lbs per ton = 200 million pounds of sugar
500 million shs for 200 million pounds = 2.5 shares per pound
current share price of .0005 x 2.5 = .00125 per pound
For that share exchange, we own 20% of the profit generated from the COOP
So if the profit is more than .00625 per pound (5 x .00125), we have earned back 100% of the cost (at our current share price) of this JV on just the first 100,000 tons of sugar (first month's allocation). That bears repeating. With an assumption of slightly more than one half of one penny of profit per pound, PSRU has an ROI (return on investment) of 100% based upon the very first month's shipment of this sugar commodity. Everything sold at that level of profit, after the first month's shipment, exceeds the total value of the upfront PSRU investment (based upon the current share price).
Excuse the pun, but that sounds like a 'sweet' deal to me.
As always, simply my opinion.
--------------
Vero Beach, FL - October 08, 2014 - InvestorsHub NewsWire - PureSpectrum, Inc. (OTC Pink: PSRU), Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Gregory F. Gustin, has announced that the Company entered a Joint Venture Agreement (“JVA”) with Central Sun Ukraine LLC (“CSU”).
“Central Sun Ukraine is a multi-disciplined organization based in Kiev, Ukraine. Amongst its many ‘assets’ is that it is an approved ‘Foreign Investment Company’. Such approval allows for investments into Ukraine that might otherwise be restricted.” said Mr. Gustin, who is also part owner and President of CSU.
In addition, CSU has recently established its Commodities SUGAR Division. This week CSU will countersign an offer for the exclusive allocation from three government sugar refineries in Ukraine. CSU’s allocation will be 100,000 metric tons per month. The first shipments are scheduled within thirty days, with plans to reach the full allocation with ninety days. In exchange for 500,000,000 common shares of PRSU Stock, CSU will remit 20% of Sugar COOP Profits to PRSU. Using current market pricing, for both PRSU shares and refined beet sugar, PRSU anticipates a significant return on its investment.
Mr. Gustin further states, “Not only will this JVA generate our first revenues with positive cash flow, it provides our firm a formal introduction into the global market of food grade commodities.”
PSRU
Of the thousands of NASDAQ traded companies:
-About half have a valuation of more than 1.5 times annual sales.
-About one third have a valuation above 3 times annual sales.
-About one fifth have a valuation above 5 times annual sales.
-About one tenth have a valuation above 9 times annual sales.
It is my opinion that in the near future, MSLP will trade in the upper 80th percentile, giving it a valuation of about 5x annual sales.
MSLP
Some would have us believe that we own a mere pile of coal. Let us not forget that with pressure and time, coal will turn into diamonds. Our CEO, Robert Calkin, is applying pressure on the industry in the form of legislative influence.
'Investment wisdom could be defined as the ability to see the building of a future empire, even as the earliest bricks are being laid.' - Odessa99
Get in on the ground floor of the newest empire...
GRCU
Somewhere in the neighborhood of $50/shr, would be my estimate. And with the SEC investigation behind them (which I think is close to winding down), they would be worth every penny of that. Wall St loves a good growth story, and Muscle Pharm has not only proven that they can continue growing, but they have now demonstrated the fiscal discipline to convert the long string of quarterly losses into future profitability.
As always, simply my opinion.
Odessa, at that market cap, what is your PPS estimate for this company? Thank you for your contributions.
With the sideways trading near a penny during the past couple of months (which has followed the pullback from the initial pop to 4.9 cents), it is easy to make the mistake of believing that GRCU is destined to resume the downward drift into oblivion. Although every stock has a unique chart, below I have posted the chart of another company (NTE*) which I believe demonstrates similar price movement as GRCU, and also demonstrates the upside potential once consolidation has occurred.
After bottoming at under one tenth of a penny in late Nov '12, an uptrend began in NTE* which brought it to copperland. After peaking at nearly 3 cents in early Feb '13 (up thousands of percent from the Nov bottom), it spent the next few months drifting downward, and stood at about a penny a share in mid May '13.
So after peaking at around .03, it had lost two thirds of the extraordinary gains over the next few months. At that point, those still holding had to be concerned that is might drop back into the sub-pennies never to return to copperland.
Just as with NTE*, GRCU had quickly run from tripps to multipennies, only to drift back down to about a penny a few short months later.
But just as NTE* holders were likely beginning to lose hope, those who continued to hold were in store for an extraordinary run... one that would dwarf the original run which had peaked at 3 cents. After drifting back down to the 1 cent level, NTE* went on to hit a high of 13 cents per share a couple of months later, and then ran to 17 cents per share about 4 months after that.
So my point is that after a massive move upward (such as GRCU has made), from the land of triple zeros, price consolidation is almost always a necessary evil. It allows shareholders with an entry price far lower than the current share price to be replaced with newer buyers much closer to the current price. This process, as most already know, provides a much more stable foundation, allowing for higher highs on the next run.
Although anything can happen with the respect to share price in OTC land, it is my opinion that we'll be seeing new 52 week highs for the GRCU share price within the next few months.
As always, simply my opinion.
GRCU
Could this be the next PR that we see?
"I'd like to begin by thanking those customers that have made our launch of allcbd.com, our second e-commerce site, an enormous success. This overwhelmingly positive reception, as indicated by our much larger than expected product demand, has made it somewhat of a challenge for us to fill orders as quickly as we would like.
As many of you know, we are still a relatively small and lean operation. Since we are very aware that bloated overhead costs is the single largest factor contributing to failures in OTC companies, it has been a core objective of ours from the start to keep our overhead costs low. Tightly managing our overhead unfortunately leads to product shipping delays during periodic sales spikes. We do believe that this careful management of expenses will result in increased shareholder value, as we continue to build and scale this business.
We will continue to focus on and work through the large volume of orders received, and would like to thank all of those customers and shareholders that have been so very supportive of our efforts. We are confident that as new developments within Green Cures continue to unfold in the coming months, shareholders will be very satisfied with what we have accomplished."
Again, this is simply a hypothetical PR that I would like to see released (but it wouldn't surprise me one bit to see such a PR in the near future).
As always, simply my opinion.
GRCU
Change of heart... here was your view of GRCU 4 days ago.
'After this interview with Calkin, and the transpiring news, only the most knowledgeable GRCU shareholders are completely confident in the huge events coming forward. Most can't imagine or won't believe what is about to happen. This is due to lack of knowledge on the occurring events on all fronts of Green Cures.'
Pretty sure this is the end of days for grcu
PSRU: Here's some interesting math:
500 million shs for 100,000 tons of sugar (first month's allocation)
100,000 tons x 2,000 lbs per ton = 200 million pounds of sugar
500 million shs for 200 million pounds = 2.5 shares per pound
current share price of .0005 x 2.5 = .00125 per pound
For that share exchange, we own 20% of the profit generated from the COOP
If the profit is more than .00625 per pound (5 x .00125), we have earned back 100% of the cost (at our current share price) of this JV on just the first 100,000 tons of sugar (first month's allocation).
Excuse the pun, but that sounds like a 'sweet' deal to me.
As always, simply my opinion.
--------------
Vero Beach, FL - October 08, 2014 - InvestorsHub NewsWire - PureSpectrum, Inc. (OTC Pink: PSRU), Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Gregory F. Gustin, has announced that the Company entered a Joint Venture Agreement (“JVA”) with Central Sun Ukraine LLC (“CSU”).
“Central Sun Ukraine is a multi-disciplined organization based in Kiev, Ukraine. Amongst its many ‘assets’ is that it is an approved ‘Foreign Investment Company’. Such approval allows for investments into Ukraine that might otherwise be restricted.” said Mr. Gustin, who is also part owner and President of CSU.
In addition, CSU has recently established its Commodities SUGAR Division. This week CSU will countersign an offer for the exclusive allocation from three government sugar refineries in Ukraine. CSU’s allocation will be 100,000 metric tons per month. The first shipments are scheduled within thirty days, with plans to reach the full allocation with ninety days. In exchange for 500,000,000 common shares of PRSU Stock, CSU will remit 20% of Sugar COOP Profits to PRSU. Using current market pricing, for both PRSU shares and refined beet sugar, PRSU anticipates a significant return on its investment.
Mr. Gustin further states, “Not only will this JVA generate our first revenues with positive cash flow, it provides our firm a formal introduction into the global market of food grade commodities.”
PSRU