Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
LIABILITY Dave.
Isn't it obvious by now that the company knows eyes are on em? There is no liability when posters try ta release news. HLNT is gonna have huge problems with every claim they've made and published. Xray has brought out some of those as have many of us. After Humphries testified questions are bein asked about deeds that send folks to prison. Look back to the point "Mel's Group" took over. Has it been a fun ride? Have ya been fed a constant line of bs? Has anythin beem accomplished? Is there any potential profit in a product you can also buy online for a fraction of the price HLNT claims ta charge? Are shares bein hidden from shareholders? Is dilution on going? Have those dilution shares run out? There's plenty more I could post Dave but any logical thinker will get the picture real fast. The pps and shares sales indicated that they did, about 3 months ago. I think you'll be very surprised at how some insiders are tryin ta distance themselves from the liability issues right now.
I have major concerns about the past.
Any serious investors with just a little smarts should also. I may or may not have ta get inta the whole share distribution mess but suggest those that have skin in the game should be on it like a pitbull.
My concern and interest is attorney Randall Lanham and the 24 million shares he refused to return to the company. No one seems to want to discuss how he got them. I find that interestin. 24 million shares goes into an attorney trust account and then disapears inta a black hole and no one wants ta know why?
I'm actually 50/50 on who was involved besides Lanham. His typical game is ta present an offer and LOI and hold shares in trust as the attorney for the prospective investors. When they drop out he claims a breach of some sort and keeps the shares. A clean company would have him in court as does one now. Lanham would have played one of two possible hands in this case. He'd keep thw shares expectin the company to avoid any real diggin inta the transactions and deal accordingly. The other scenario is he was brought in to do the slight of hand transactions and set up the network to receive, transfer and sell shares for interested individuals. Either could have happened here. There are numerous connections and shares issuances that have question marks and more all over em.
I'm gonna go one step at a time tell I find out where those Lanham 24 million shares went. It does no good to ask those that failed to report 24 million missin shares. Unless it's asked in the context of a court case. Lanham is in one right now and guess what he did? He put shares in his trust account and refused to return those shares when his claimed investors fell out. Sound similar? Very, except the company has him in court for the deed and he refuses ta show up in court.
Some posters like ta say they haven't heard this name Lanham before and I'm here ta disrupt this companies tradin. Aint true. I will say that I view my quest as much more important that the pps of Dutch Gold. Some won't like that and i could care less. I don't post lies or ask for answers that make sense and are backed by documentation. So I'm here askin about Lanham in a totally selfish mode. The sooner I get to the bottom of his involvement with Dutch Gold and the major equity holders the sooner I'm off ta somethin else. I got a feelin I'll be around for some time.
Heather left when the handwritin was on the wall.
Heather knows stuff. She don't like Corey.
The name showed up here long ago. Pat attention and get your head out a the sand bro.
Some here didn't want it discussed. Read below, it's from company filins. Don't bother sendin someone to Lanhams address listed below. It's a mail drop. I can provide his home address to any that really need it.
'The Buyer acknowledges that 24,325,000 of the pre-reverse split Shares are currently being held without permission by Randall Lanham, an attorney in California located at 28562 Oso Parkway, Suite D, Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688"
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=6983415
Some interestin info from poster nodummy
Attorney randall Lanham sets these games up. Look ay your company filings. Lanham ended up with 24 million shares. There is no accounting for those shares except the claim that he refused to return them. This happens a lot with Lanham. Look into your share dilution and where those shares are going. Good luck with that.
Benton Mining Property - the first property leased by Dutch Gold Resources Inc.
Benton Mining Property is a property controlled by the Deinhart family. The Deinhart family is a German family in Florida and have owned a company in Oregon called Dutch Mining LLC since 1994.
http://egov.sos.state.or.us/br/pkg_web_name_srch_inq.show_detl?p_be_rsn=383299&p_srce=BR_INQ&p_print=FALSE
It is no coincidence this company would end up being called Dutch Gold Resources Inc and Aultra Gold Inc would be formed from a company known as Dutch Mining Canada. This stuff was all prearranged.
In January 2006 prior to becoming Aultra Gold Inc, Dutch Mining Canada did a deal with the Deinhart family for control of the Benton mining property and the adjacent Gold Bug property.
The property would never get used for anything and Aultra Gold didn't keep up with the lease instead going into debt for taking control of the property allowing for the Deinhart family to collect more money in shares than what was actually owned on the lease for the property.
In December of 2006, Aultra Gold Inc dropped the Benton property and adjacent Gold Bug property calling them unattractive:
http://img01.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=4995014
Since its inception on January 20, 2006, AGI has incurred the following expenses. Operating costs were $648,611. Mining development and explorations costs were $53,181 with related administrative costs of $15,928. Extraordinary costs of $393,373 were incurred with respect to AGI’s investment in the Benton Mine Property, in Josephine County, Southwestern Oregon, which was written off in connection with a decision by management to discontinue funding mining operations under an agreement that has been terminated by AGI with Dutch Mining LLC. AGI had obtained mining rights to the Benton Mine gold project through a direct buy out of the controlling rights from Dutch Mining, LLC (DMO), a limited liability company formed in 1994 in Merlin, Oregon, USA. In 1994, DMO acquired by assignment a Mining Lease and Option to Purchase covering the Benton Mine Group, which consists of 24 mining claims in good standing.
The Benton Mine was historically one of the largest gold mines in the area, and is currently the only operating underground gold mine in Oregon. Eight veins had been identified on the property with the Benton Vein, pending further exploration, being the largest and most persistent currently known. Some of the other veins are expected to become important with exploration. To date, most of the mine production has come from the Benton Vein, which received most of the historic exploration. The ore was simple, with the gold content within the pyrite found in the quartz. The Benton Vein has been developed since the early 1900s along 1,550 feet of its strike and for about 500 feet down dip. The width of the Benton varies from thin veinlets to as wide as 25 feet. The average width was about 4 feet. The mine was shut down in 1942 under WWII regulations. Management determined in fall 2006 that further economic exploitation of the Benton Property was economically unattractive.
Not even one month later this shell changed its name to Dutch Gold Resources Inc and signed a lease with the Deinhart family for control of the properties.
January 4, 2007 Dutch Gold Resources, Inc did a merger/acquisition with Dutch Mining LLC (Oregon Business Entity)
Dutch Mining, LLC
700 Merlin Rd
Grants Pass, OR 97526
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=4899439
http://egov.sos.state.or.us/br/pkg_web_name_srch_inq.show_detl?p_be_rsn=383299&p_srce=BR_INQ&p_print=FALSE
Embassy International, LLC owned 84.4% of Dutch Mining, LLC at the time (19,177,628 shares)
Embassy International, LLC is Ewald Dienhart and Dawn Caruso-Dienhart
http://sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?action=DETFIL&inq_doc_number=L05000000650&inq_came_from=NAMFWD&cor_web_names_seq_number=0000&names_name_ind=N&names_cor_number=&names_name_seq=&names_name_ind=&names_comp_name=EMBASSYINTERNATIONAL&names_filing_type=
Other Equity Holders of Dutch Mining, LLC were Bruce Burrow (2,865,622 shares) and HPUs LLC (681,750 shares)
This merger/acquisition brought the Benton Mine lease and the adjacent Gold Bug Mine
Patrick Engel who is the son-in-law of Dienhart is General Manager Oregon Operations
Related link:
http://archive.mailtribune.com/archive/97/august/80397b1.htm
Through this agreement to take over the properties Dutch Resources Inc also took on over $2.5 million dollars in debt Notes ALL payable to the Deinhart family. More than likely some of these were debts that accumulated while the Benton property and Gold Bug property were controlled by Perttu through Aultra Gold Inc which never made any payments owed. The rest were debts that owned to the Deinhart family (Embassy International) by the Deinhart family (Dutch Mining LLC). These sorts of independently arranged debt agreements happen often in these chains of companies. Perttu arranged debts with himself through Aultra Gold that helped him collect over $13 million dollars worth of shares in October of 2010 shortly after leaving that company to slide over to Dutch Gold Resources Inc.
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=4899439
The Company assumed a note issued by Dutch Mining, LLC in the amount of $1,214,916 to Embassy International, LLC, and Florida limited liability company controlled by the family of the former Chairman of the Board, Ewald Dienhart. This is a demand note with $900,000 secured by the mill equipment at an interest rate of 6% and the balance unsecured with a 0% interest rate. The parties have agreed not to demand the loans through December 31, 2012 therefore the loans are recorded as long-term liabilities
The Company assumed notes issued by Dutch Mining, LLC in the amount of $250K to Gabriela Dienhart-Engel, who is the daughter of the former Chairman of the Board, Ewald Dienhart. The note is dated July 31, 2006 and carries an interest rate of 6.0%. The note is partially secured by the title to the Gold Bug Mine, and may be converted into shares of the Company. The related parties have agreed not to demand the loans through December 31, 2012 therefore the loans are recorded as long-term liabilities
The Company assumed notes issued by Dutch Mining, LLC in the amount of $100,000 to CD TBE, LLC, a Company related to the former Chairman of the Board, Ewald Dienhart. The note is dated July 31, 2006 and carries an interest rate of 6.0%. The note is partially secured by the Gold Bug mine and certain equipment used by the Company, and may be converted into shares of the Company. The related parties have agreed not to demand the loans through December 31, 2012 therefore the loans are recorded as long-term liabilities.
The Company assumed a note issued by Dutch Mining LLC in the amount of $950,000 to Josef Bauer for working capital. The note is guaranteed by Ewald Dienhart and carries an interest rate of 8.0%. The related parties have agreed not to demand the loans through December 31, 2012 therefore the loans are recorded as long-term liabilities.
The Company leases space from Rendata Industrial Park, LLC. Rendata Industrial Park ownership: The Ebert Family Trust owns 52% and the remaining 48% is owned by the Caruso Dienhart (TBE) Family LLC. For the period ended December 31, 2009 the Company accrued rent and related expenses in the amount of $142,380 and had a payable balance accrued of $311, 775 at June 30, 2010.
The Company had an agreement with HPUs, LLC, whose Managing Member Patrick Engel[Deinhart's son-in-law], is related to the Company’s former Chairman, effective November 30, 2007 to provide management services. The contract was for one year, automatically renewable unless terminated for a monthly amount of $9,500.
The company owed $69,683 is owed to Caruso Dienhart (TBE) Family LLC for short term advances at December 31, 2009.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Benton and Gold Bug properties never amounted to any notable revenues for this company only greater and greater increasing debts. In 2010 Dutch Gold Resources dropped both properties.
Over the past three years since this arrangement was made Dutch Gold Resources Inc has been unable to pay off these debts - they have only been able to keep up with the interest payments.
The shady part is what is found in the filings. Millions and millions and millions of dollars worth of shares being payed out just to cover the thousands of dollars worth of interest payments on these debts. And these shares subsequently ending up going into offshore accounts located in the Bahamas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 2009 Dutch Gold Resources paid out $7,362,369 in professional Fees all in the form of shares.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/928375/000114036110016641/form10k.htm
The filings also show payments of $2,221,838 and $3,111,775 going to the Deinhart family for 2009 which accounts for $5,333,613 of that $7,362,369 in professional fees.
Yet despite the hefty payout to the Deinharts in 2009 the principle balance on the debt notes remained where they started in 2007.
In the summer of 2010 two more huge payments were given to the Deinhart family to cover just the interest again on their debt notes:
On June 23, 2010 Embassy International, LLC (Edward Dienhart and Dawn Caruso-Dienhart ) who already owned 17,800,000 shares on 12/31/09 was issued 15,800,000 more shares to satisfy $50,000.00 towards a $1,214,962.00 debt owned to Embassy International, LLC by Dutch Gold
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=7340722
Those 15,800,000 shares were then in turn sold to Socius CG II, Ltd., a Bermuda company for an undisclosed amount.
The shares were obtained pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 23, 2010, between Socius CG II, Ltd. and Embassy International, LLC.
---------------------
On July 15, 2010, the Company consummated an Exchange Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Embassy International, LLC, a Florida limited liability company (the “Holder”). Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company issued 15,800,000 shares (the “Shares”) of its common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”), in exchange for partial satisfaction in the amount equal to $50,000.00 of a certain promissory note owed by the Company to the Holder in the principal amount of $1,214,962.00. The Shares are subject to adjustment and potential return to the Company for retirement based upon the loan amount converted and 75% of the volume weighted average price of the Common Stock for the twenty trading days following the delivery of the Shares. The promissory note was issued by Dutch Mining, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Dutch Mining”), to the Holder on December 31, 2006 and was assumed by the Company pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Share Exchange, dated January 4, 2007, between the Company and Dutch Mining. Also on that date, the Holders sold the Shares to Socius CG, II, Ltd., an unaffiliated Bermuda company.
They only release what the company allows em ta release.
My interest is share distribution destination. A complete shareholders list would be great but that won't happen. Company reports should have complete info on share transaction that fall under the 'material event" catagory. They don't. I'm very use ta readin em and it's what's not said that is most impotant in this case. a good example is the claim of stolen shares and then no follow up reportin on the event.
nodummy.
I'm still on the attorney Randall Lanham trail. It leads through many comanies includin this one Shamika. I see at least a dozen mining opperations linked through Lanhams office, virtual office that is. Thought I'd post here since the trail leads here ta see if some of the DD types have additional info.
I suggest you dig deeper.
If you're actually an passive investor you'll thank me later. You might want to listen and do DD on some of the questions that have been asked by serious posters in the past. I've posted some names that will link to DGRI. You can add Gravhaven Limited. In my DD search on Randall Lanham I talked with insiders from a company named Starmed. I also talk with the same at Encompass Holdings. Both companies have had shares handled by attorney Randall Lanham as happened here at DGRI. Encompass has him in court now. When talkin with the Trussnet Group it came out that Lanham talked of a big mining scam he was in the middle of. It seemed to involve uranium, Texas and Wyoming properties alond with Chinese and Canadian Investors (perps). You've had posts here that point to a Canadian P&D brokerage house and links to a series of companies both on and offshore as well as trusts. you'll do youself a big favor by lettin these folks post without the nonsense so the real DD can get done. I'm afraid you're gonna find that millions of dollars in shares have changed hands under darkness as you've been gettin PR that good times are just around the corner.
I'm no paid basher folks. I have limited access at Ihub and only 15 posts a day. That aint a paid basher profile. I'm askin question for the reason I claimed from day one. It all revolves around Randall Lanham and his deals. Best to understand that and believe it so things don't get personal. I don't know anyone who posts here and have never conversed with any of em until a few days ago. A couple have very good information that will help shareholders find the facts. I'm not interested in anythin but the facts.
Is there any company revenue?
I see that millions of shares have changed hands over the last two years. What has been the trickle down effect to DGRI? I also see a very large note obligation. Is it bein paid and if so how? Cash or shares? Do you know of any relationship with a company named Pepper Rock Resources Inc. PEPR? What is the present relationship with High Plains Gas Inc and is Steve Lanham still involved in any way?
Has anyone heard of any DGRI connections with Bancroft Uranium?
Good, I have a company question.
Can anyone here provide additional information about the company claim that attorney Randall J. Lanham had 24 million shares in his trust accout that he refused to return to the company? Reaql info, like what happened to those shares? Were they distributed per company instruction through the company Transfer Agent? Were those shares 144 restricted and if so was there an attorney Letter of Opinion that removed the Legend? If so who wrote the opinion letter? What is the equity position of Embassey International LLC in this company. I've read that it was once over 80%. Does anyone have information on Socius C G 11 about shares issued to that entity. Any info on share distributions other than the Lanham shares that have not been reported will also help my DD quest.
The dude is hidin, tubbs.
Gotta deal with them facts bro and they aint lookin good for ya, as usual. Folks are seein that ya want no part of the real stuff goin down. Tell me about that 1.7 million your squeeze put inta Nacio bro. I like that story. Lrt's call it "The Turn Around Specialist Gets Bent Over" Dude asked and he received. Now you'd like ta change history and that aint happenin. Your boys are gonna be standin naked under the bright lights no matter how hard ya try ta avoid the facts.
I doubt even ECMH knows this.
My last post gave a snapshot of what went down at Nacio under Daly's direction. I've posted a lot about Daly's partner Randall Lanham lately and have received several questions and info on him. Here's what's gonna be fun in the trial. Daly and Lanham have the same attorney but have opposite agendas. Fact is, Lanham never had any hand in runnin Nacio although he positioned himself as a Director, attorney for new investors and attorney holdin a share cert. if a deal was consumated. Lanham wants no part of any trial. I think it'd hilarious that he's tryin ta beg his way out now and will not show up in court. He also set up the company N@ Holdings with Daly to bid on the Nacio assets and complete the takin of the ECMH Data Center named Nacio. I see he's now removed himself from that entity and wants no part of this dude Daly's game. Lanham was brought in by Goldenburg and Daly as the attorney expert in takin shares and companies from others and turin them inta money in his pocket. He's very well known in that role in So Cal. I now know that the proposed share split after Lanham did his thing included an attorney friend of Daly's named Paul Steiner. Steiner was the attorney in this case representin Lanham and Daly until ECMH had him removed. Paul Steiners name shows up in the bk opperatin reposrts as a huge payable and in the proposed share distribution if some deal was done to sell Nacio. This inept Daly dude spent a million bucks on attorneys fightin the Nacio landlord is a losin effort as well as past debtors. When he lost his --- in court he filed the bankruptcy with Lanham and they claimed they were the company owners. They lost there to and now claim all parties were a RICO organization formed to defraud them. so now we have this nut job Daly makin these claims right out a the Twilight Zone and Lanham tryin as has as possible to hide from everything. So this attorney they got now can't even come close ta representin his two clients interests except ta ask for Lanham ta be dropped from the case. None of the plantiffs are gonna allow that ta happen. They're gonna climb up Lanhams --- with a fine toothed comb in hand. Dudes got assets hidden evertwhere. Meanwhile the dude Daly who loses one fight after another is gonna go inta court with a Swiss Cheese group of claims that a kid could see through. It's really hilarious ta read the claims and docs he submits in court. The damage him not ECMH. Lanham wants not part of Daly's wacky attempts ta pove he's not the idiot he appears ta be. That's what's gonna make this whole deal just plain funny weird. The depositions of Daly, Lanham and Goldenburg are gonna be classic. Daly even has sued his partner Goldenburg. Daly signed the checks and withheld but failed to pay the taxes. His only choice besides comin up with a million bucks is ta blame Lanham and Goldeburg as coresponsible individuals. Problem is ECMH kicked Goldenburgs butt outta the company before Daly and Lanham filed the bk and Daly keep the funds. Better yet Daly now profiles himself as a Turn Around Specialist and a Forensic Auditor. Yep, you read that right. I'm thinkin the dude is a straight jacket case. Yes Marshall we will have fun seein this one through and I'm all eyes and ears everytime ya try ta post how this dude is the good guy. PM you buddies and see if ya can get them ta back ya up with some facts bro. That just makes it better for me. Problem is I see ya now don't want ta enter the facts game now. Gee, I wonder why.
Had to clean this post up. G rated now.
I want ta talk ta Marshall about the court case and her buddies Lanham and Daly. Also the claims about the present Directors. Marshall has now up the claim of money put inta Nacio by this dude Daly to 1.7 million bucks. Total nonsense and it will be proven so if needed but I'm curious as to why that's an issue with Marshall. Let me give ya a little run down here and Marshall can use the help of the new, crack legal minds from the HLNT board ta help dispute any they think they can.
Attorney Randall Lanham and his partner Daly were installed as directors of Nacio Systems by Nacio owner ECMH. In less than 30 days they filed the Nacio bankruptcy claimin they were the owners of the company. All contained in the original petition. They claimed they did it behind ECMH's back cause a creditor had seized money from the Nacio bank account. Daly and Murray Goldenburg had run Nacio into the ground as directors and mgmt. Had numerous lawsuits they were losin and had paid Daly's lawyer friends over a half million to get to that losin position. They got a-- kicked and filed a bk. Then attorney Lanham who has a history of this stuff and Daly formed a company together named N2 Holdings. Guess what? N2 Holdings puts in a bid to purchase all of the Nacio assets. Gee, anyone still wonder why ECMH was ticked? Nice little game Lanham and his buddy are tryin ta pull off. So ECMH puts in their own bid for their own assets that Lanham is tryin ta shift to his company. Now there are two bidders in a bankruptcy case filed by the perps themselves. Lanham and daly have since locked ECMH out of their own company. ECMH calls a shareholder meeting and removes Lanham and Daly as directors. Again they refuse ta leave. See the other Lanham games I posted for more on his tactics. Meanwhile the bk goes on and gets to decision time. All of the creditors that were taken line up ta get what they can and the court appoints an attorney for them from the LA area. His name is Brinkman. It appears that it didn't take Brinkman long ta figure out Lanham, Daly and Goldenburg.Read his most recent description of Daly in the District Court Case. Brinkman picks the ECMH bid for the assets as the best bid for the creditors. Now Daly and Lanham are removed from Nacio by the creditors themselves per their attorney. Lanham and Daly now have the case in District Court to fight so they come back and claim all the folks involved in the bk case were a RICO organization that was formed to defraud them. Ya sure guys. This group just happened to come together in bankruptcy court. Now Lanham and Daly, actually looks like Daly only have huge IRS and State Tax problems because they witheld funs from employee pay but failed to use it ta pay the taxes. Looks like well over half a million bucks. Your withholdings too Marshall. This dude Daly now comes back and says he put all this money into Nacio and has Marshall pump the same nonsense here so let's take a look at that. I've looked at the bankruptcy operatin reports and that claim is total fabrication. He was actually movin funds to his own accounts. Paper work is all there, go read it. The real point is SO WHAT. Daly filed the bk, tried ta move the assets to his own company and lost that bid because the Creditors Committee saw right through the game. The point is that ECMH purchased the assets not the company. ECMH was a logical bidder considerin the above facts. If this dude Daly who had his nonsense blow up in his face wants ta talk about money he put in he needs ta be talkin to the Trustee who controld the Nacio entity not ECMH who purchased assets in a typical bk bid process. Problem is the Trustee also knows the games that Lanham and Daly were tryin ta pay. He'll just say sure, too bad". My little (really huge) buddy Marshall seems ta think the claim will fly in court. Marshall aint the sharpest knife in the drawer but I though I'd give em a chance ta make sense of claims she's made. You're about to see from future Marshall posts that Marshall doesn't want ta get too close to the facts. It could really mess up the smoke and mirror attempt that no one that counts is buyin.
GENEO1 Share Saturday, June 25, 2011 3:52:45 PM
Re: xrayview post# 40620 Post # of 40622
You really don't get the picture, Sparks is not the accountant. Call the company and get the information from the new comptroller ok and quit sayin the same thins over and over. Get the straight scoop from the COMPANY.
Just doin their laundry Doc.
I'd say someone used shares ta make money. A bunch a times.
Hey Xman.
This is probably the point where Mel decides that bein the CFO aint a good place ta be. Better get that CEO hat back on and get someone in ta fix the scam. When have the numbers or the PR claims ever added up at HLNT? I can tell ya it hasn't happened since MR Transparency Mel Robinson got appointed the sole director and CEO of HLNT. Just gotta look under the tarp they try ta throw over these impossible claims they try ta cover up.
Covering with it.
Shefts controls Domestic. Domestic is the NIR prime Brooker. Shefts is claimed to be a large investor in NIR. Ribotsky of NIR makes large donations to the Shefts Dog charity, Onyx and Breezy. A Prime Booker could sell shares before they're received. NIR could have shares sold prior to a conversion in this scenario. ECMH is not convertin shares for NIR. If ya sold shares ya don't really have eventually ya need ta cover. If I were in that position (either NIR or Domestic) I'd cover as far below the radar as possible. Is that Short Sellin Sparky? Yes it is. Is that a breach of Note terms if NIR took this route? Yep.
Now do whatever the F ya want with that info. Pretend ya figured it out yourself if ya want.
Crusher, Randall Lanham there too.
I see you boys have gotten the full dose of the Lanham business model. Here's some of his holdins. See any names ya recognize?
http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/PeopleFilingResults.aspx?PersonID=2642916&PersonName=RANDALL%20LANHAM
Hey crusher.
Has the "hide the facts" group always been workin this board or has the Randall Lanhamm questions brought up new problems?
I see there are also some LA area virtual offices in play here just like the one Lanham works out of. I know he was served in the Encompass case in a gated community where the server had ta jump the fence. I also see tha a Nevada corps searh shows Lanhams mining interest. He uses Steve Lanham too.
OK, you might have an answer for this.
Was attorney Randall Lanham refusin ta return shares cause he had the dirt on the Dienhart family anf knew they wouldn't push the issue or did he set up the offshore Share Worm Hole in his usual fashion?
Randall Lanham info for Marshall.
This is a bit more on Lanham's game. Can't wait ta hear how this boy does in court.
nodummy Share Wednesday, January 05, 2011 2:17:16 PM
Re: thecrusher2011 post# 25344 Post # of 43158
Yeah the debt stuff going on in the DGRI filings is almost as unprofessional as the poor share counting in their sister company's filings (AGDI)
Until somebody can explain the $ 7,734,042 in professional fees for the 2009 calender year to me it sure seems to support that those two huge payments ($2,221,838 and $3111,775) were not errors.
It was already stated that the balances paid to the Deinhart group for those debt Notes could be paid in shares.
We know the $7,734,042 in professional fees were paid out in shares.
We know that their are offshore accounts involved when it comes to these payments to the Deinhart Notes.
We know despite paying out $7,734,042 in professional fees for the 2009 calender year the debt payments are still ongoing and seem to have barely even been dented.
On June 23, 2010 Embassy International, LLC (Edward Dienhart and Dawn Caruso-Dienhart ) who already owned 17,800,000 shares on 12/31/09 was issued 15,800,000 more shares to satisfy $50,000.00 towards a $1,214,962.00 debt owned to Embassy International, LLC by Dutch Gold
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=7340722
Those 15,800,000 shares were then in turn sold to Socius CG II, Ltd., a Bermuda company for an undisclosed amount.
The shares were obtained pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 23, 2010, between Socius CG II, Ltd. and Embassy International, LLC.
---------------------
On July 15, 2010, the Company consummated an Exchange Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Embassy International, LLC, a Florida limited liability company (the “Holder”). Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company issued 15,800,000 shares (the “Shares”) of its common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”), in exchange for partial satisfaction in the amount equal to $50,000.00 of a certain promissory note owed by the Company to the Holder in the principal amount of $1,214,962.00. The Shares are subject to adjustment and potential return to the Company for retirement based upon the loan amount converted and 75% of the volume weighted average price of the Common Stock for the twenty trading days following the delivery of the Shares. The promissory note was issued by Dutch Mining, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Dutch Mining”), to the Holder on December 31, 2006 and was assumed by the Company pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Share Exchange, dated January 4, 2007, between the Company and Dutch Mining. Also on that date, the Holders sold the Shares to Socius CG, II, Ltd., an unaffiliated Bermuda company.
How fast are these share being sold once they are given out?
Will we see Socius showing up as a beneficial owner on the 10K? Or will they be like one of the AGDI offshore account holders, Randall Lanham, and never show up in any filings as a beneficial owner.
The point of all this is that I'm not convinced they are "errors" until somebody can break down for me where the $7,734,042 in professional fees went. Without any amendments being filed to fix the errors they cannot be considered errors. And without some clear explanations about some of the debt arrangements and some of the huge professional payouts there are a lot of things that don't look good. They really need to be addressed and not just by posters on a message board looking out for their investments.
Lucky.
Is cult synonyms with "goose that lays the golden shares"?
Luckydog.
The quote below from your post is Hedge Fund language. I've looked inta Randall Lanhams game on and off for two years. It's all about movin shares off shore into names of folks that I've found don't exist. Further transactions can be made through hidden off shore entities to put those shares in the intended hands. All ya need are the right lawyers and Lanham is a lawyer. You can even tell what the discount was by the language. you can bet they were converted at 75% off the 20 day average. What you have is Lanham acting as a Hedge Fund would that loaned real money except that these shares seem to be for trumphed up fees that are not exp;ained in the reportin.
I'm not at all familiar with these companies and their directors. It appears I'm gonna have ta get up ta speed on them. You have problems here and I'm tellin ya right now, when you see the names Randall or Steve Lanham you'd better follow the share trail as far as you can. A company named Encompass Holdings ECMH has Lanham in court now for similar deeds. He has never shown up in court. Depositions will be up comin and he won't be able ta hide much longer. I'm postin this info on the Encompass Ihub board. Lots of people are on to Lanham includin Transfer Agents he's used.
I'm not yet sure who your DD investigative type posters are on this board yet. I suggest you start following the shares (money). you'll be able to identify your insider posters real quick when ya start this trip.
"On July 15, 2010, the Company consummated an Exchange Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Embassy International, LLC, a Florida limited liability company (the “Holder”). Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company issued 15,800,000 shares (the “Shares”) of its common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”), in exchange for partial satisfaction in the amount equal to $50,000.00 of a certain promissory note owed by the Company to the Holder in the principal amount of $1,214,962.00. The Shares are subject to adjustment and potential return to the Company for retirement based upon the loan amount converted and 75% of the volume weighted average price of the Common Stock for the twenty trading days following the delivery of the Shares. The promissory note was issued by Dutch Mining, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Dutch Mining”), to the Holder on December 31, 2006 and was assumed by the Company pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Share Exchange, dated January 4, 2007, between the Company and Dutch Mining. Also on that date, the Holders sold the Shares to Socius CG, II, Ltd., an unaffiliated Bermuda company."
You're right drcal.
But this is not your usual attorney. Finding out the status of those shares is a very good idea. I'll warn you now, you are probably crawin inta a rabbit hole that will bring many surprises. As I said, Randall Lanham has a very colorfull history when it comes to his escrow accout, shares in it, 144 legand removal and the distribution of those shares. My guess it that as you go down that road in search of the truth related to those shares you'll hit smoke and mirrors like you've never encountered. Look for facts and underlying documentation. The case I'm most familiar with regardin Lanham goes like this. He made an offer on behalf of a chinese group for a Data Center as the investors attorney. Inserted n himself and an associate as directors of that Data Center. Once in he filed a bankruptcy petition and claimed he was the company owner. Then set up his own company to bid on the assets. Problem came when the real owners exposed him and his plan, made their own bid and won in bk court. That's a breif overview of just one Lanham deal. I'm interested in how it went with Dutch Gold. I expect ta hear all kinds of nonsense from insiders considerin the playground these deals are made in. Thanks again for the response. hope ta hear more soon.
yomoney.
Props to ya bro. Your picture is classic. Too funny and yet only a couple of posters will get it.
I don't have an Xboard yet.
Can't wait ta get one though. You should stay away from them though. I recomend that you never buy ECMH stock or any ECMH products when available. you need to help HLNT out if you can. Buy as much of that stock as you possibly can. It's gettin dumped as fast as shareholders can get rid of it so there's plenty available for you. Take a second out on your home and buy all you can. But remember this, never should you buy ECMH stock or any product they offer. That's my recomendation to ya pal. I'll watch for your HLNT buys to post. Today would be a good day ta start buyin it.
Good, so listen up.
There is no reason I see for you ta buy even one share of ECMH stock. None, zero, nada. You wouldn't understand the technology and would likely be a total pain in the ass because your favorite company HLNT is goin down the tubes and ya seem ta think it's ECMH's fault. I did once post how ECMH could help prove up the HLNT hho claims if they were true but when the companies talked to one another the HLNT CEO had no idea aboub technology matters and ECMH laughed them off and asked me why I even bothered them with it all. In addition several posters at the HLNT site wanted no part of any proof of concept work and made that very clear in their posts. Seemed funny ta me until I looked deeper into the HLNT players and their past. So I believe you should buy as much HLNT stock as possible but never ever buy any ECMH.
Drcal.
That's fine but why was attorney Lanham holdin shares despite requests to return them. He did the same act with a company named Starmed and is in court now with another company regardin shares he refused to return. I know plenty about Lanhams game but was wonderin the specific reason he held shares and refused requests in this case. Any info non that?
No Sparky ya just don't get it, do ya?
What that really means is that NIR is havin ta cover their ass. You just don't get it yet pal. There aint no shortin plays with no BID. Shortin a stock at .0001 with no bid? Only you might make that bet.Go back and use your head bro. Sometimes I actually try ta help ya out but ya get so tied up in the moment ya can't friggin think. Those are covers for shares that were sold naked my friend. now shut the hell up and put on your thinkin cap. I just can't believe the level of the people I talk to. GET IT BRO? NAKED SHORT COVERIN. Now do I have ta hear from your little parrot about some arkansas math and suffer through that for awhile?
That's your dilemma Marshall.
Ya wanna post that what I say is bs but ya can't find one shed of evidence ta back up your claim. I can post fact after fact with docs filed in court ta back all I say. Randall Lanham pulls this same stuff on a regular basis. I now know of Transfer Agents that have reported him for 144 legend removal letters of opinion. So he plays in Canada. Yes the trial will be a fun one but not for you. I sense a real lack of confidence in ya bro. Like ya know how limited ya are. Ya expect folks ta listen ta that crp and buy inta it? Then when cornered ya beg off? Easy ta see through ya. Just like your friends that expect the same outcome. I'm bettin they wished you'd never popped off.
That's quite a leap sparky.
I simply stated that someone is buyin ECMH shares and has for some time. Are you one a those dudes who think a buy can't happen without a sell. Take a look at the HLNT share action. Sells are 2 to 8 times buys everyday. Where do ya think those shares are goin sparky? Maybe inta inventory? I asked ECMH is they were able to or were convertin shares for NIR or anyone else right now. One word answer. No. So someone is buyin ECMH shares and even you can see that. There are no sells. I'm wonderin who's buyin and that one sentence sent you and you little buddy inta goofy land. My recomendation to anyone who asked would be don't buy shares ya can't sell. Now back to what I'm interested in cause that's all that really matters ta me. Who's buyin all those shares? I'm guessin it aint you and loanboy.
Bad buy for you loandude.
Ya don't like the company. Don't ever buy any ECMH shares loanguy. Help your own company HLNT and buy those shares. they need buyer bad as I pointed out in my 8x shares sold post.
Another bright one here.
"PD, you stated that ECMH traded 8 times the number of shares as your favorite. If true, ECMH would have had to trade 18,480,000."
Now go look at my post. Look at the share sales for both ECMH and HLNT and get back ta me with reality instead of your wish list. You'll likely see that ECMH sold 8x as many shares as HLNT did today. Just as I said.
Sparky, are ya that dumb bro?
NIR doesn't buy shares. They convert shares per note language. When there is no BID NIR gets no shares. you haven't figured out the NIr game yet. No market, no convert. Someone is buyin ECMH shares and it aint NIR or a short cover. These are buys bro. someone is buyin. NIR would receive shares from ECMH and that transaction would show as a sell only when NIR sold em. Aint no shares bein sold. Catch up before ya yak. Makes ya look like you're desperate for some ammo. Smart folks see right through that game. No sales here bro, all buys.
Any of ya have insight on this?
Seems attorney Randall Lanham hijacked shares in your Aultra Gold deal with Dutch Gold as the buyer. Why would Dutch Gold allow Lanham to keep shares stole? Lanham is in a suit right now where he did virtually the same thing. I know of a third transaction where he did the same again. What's the connection between Lanham and Dutch Gold?
'The Buyer acknowledges that 24,325,000 of the pre-reverse split Shares are currently being held without permission by Randall Lanham, an attorney in California located at 28562 Oso Parkway, Suite D, Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688"
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=6983415
Steve Lantham/Randall J. Lanham
Marshall, had a chance ta digest this info yet?
Seems you're shyin away from the facts bro. Too much info for ya?
Randall and Steve Lanham. There's more.
This High Plains filing uses both names
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=7391983
Randall J. Lanham Attorney Record
http://members.calbar.ca.gov/search/member_detail.aspx?x=164839
Aultra Gold Inc (ADGI)
He is connected to Aultra Gold Inc (AGDI) as a very large shareholder in this statement found on a January 2010 filing by the company:
On the Closing Date, the Buyer shall deliver the Purchase Shares and the Indebtedness Retirement and the Seller shall deliver the Shares in their collective possession and medallion guaranteed stock powers for all the Shares to the Buyer. The Buyer acknowledges that 24,325,000 of the pre-reverse split Shares are currently being held without permission by Randall Lanham, an attorney in California located at 28562 Oso Parkway, Suite D, Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=6983415
That entry needs a lot more attention.
I have come across our Mr. Lanham and his company involved in two other companies, High Plains Gas Inc (NXPN) and Pepper Rock Resources Inc (PERPD) both companies have ties to some Canadian Boiler Room promotional cons that are linked to several pump and dump scams usually involving the insiders having large beneficial holdings in the company using offshore accounts.
Question #1 Why did the 24,325,000 shares not show up on any of the statement before this entry in January 2010? It definitely is enough shares to qualify this person as a beneficial owner.
Question #2 Why did the 24,325,000 share never show up again after.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background on Steve Lanham and his offshore accounts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
High Plains Gas Inc (NXPN)
Steve Lanham was a beneficial shareholder for Northern Explorations Ltd. (NXPN) (now known as High Plains Gas) back in early 2009
The 14C from April, 2009 there were two 27.08% beneficial owners from Bermuda both under the name St. Georges Trust
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=6536217
Med Ventures Limited 9,000,000 27.08%
c/o St. Georges Trust
27 Reid Street
Hamilton, Bermuda HM 11
Braemar Limited 9,000,000 27.08%
c/o St. Georges Trust
27 Reid Street
Hamilton, Bermuda HM 11
Then then later on in a 10K filing from July 14, 2010 you get two 27.08% beneficial owners again but this time without the Bermuda address:
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=7359391
Steve Laham
27,000,000 27.08%
28652 Oso Parkway, Suite D
Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688
Guy Peckham
27,000,000 27.08%
Suite 1104, 699 Jiazhou Road
Shanghai, China 200041
Doing a web search for the Bermuda Address brings up only one result:
LOM (Holdings) Limited is an international financial services company offering offshore financial services
http://www.lom.com/lom-holdings-limited
http://www.prweb.com/releases/LOMHoldingsLimited/LOMHoldings/prweb4659964.htm
http://bermudasun.bm/main.asp?SectionID=72&SubSectionID=205&ArticleID=48607
David Naylor was the CEO of High Plains Gas that brought Steve Lanham in as a director. David Naylor is directly tied to the likes of Robert McIntoch, William Scott Marshall, Mario Aiello, Glen Harder, Phil Kueber, and Sak Narwal
BANCROFT URANIUM INC (BCFT)
On Sept 14, 2007 CONSCIOUS INTENTION, INC did some share exchange with ONTARIO INC and GRAVHAVEN LIMITED
The company then became BANCROFT URANIUM INC and the new CEO became P. Leslie Hammond
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=5428560
More on P. Leslie Hammond here:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=58317807
ONTARIO INC has an address of St. Georges Trust Company Limited, 27 Reid Street, P.O. Box HM 3051, Hamilton, HMNX Bermuda
The same address used by Steve Lanham for Med Ventures Limited with High Plains Gas Inc.
Besides Steve Lanham becoming a part of Bancroft Uranium Inc so did his partner at High Plains Gas Inc, David Naylor. Naylor was added as an officer by Paul Leslie Hammond as his first act as CEO.
Pepper Rock Resources Corp (PERPD)
The following is the list of Current Beneficial Owners for Pepper Rock
(4) Mr. Bernal has voting and dispositive control over shares of our common stock owned by Alabaster Limited.
(5) Ms. Johnson has voting and dispositive control over shares of our common stock owned by Nuria Investment Ltd.
(6) Mr. Marshall has voting and dispositive control over shares of our common stock owned by Hayward Management, Inc.
(7) Kent Ltd. has voting and dispositive control over shares of our common stock owned by Med Ventures Ltd., and Gravhaven Limited.
(8 ) Mr. Frater has voting and dispositive control over shares of our common stock owned by Armada International, Inc.
William Scott Marshall is linked to two of the biggest beneficial shareholders - Naomi Johnson (his wife) and Jonathan Marshall (his son).
Notice who Kent Ltd is controlled by in the footnote #7
Med Ventures Ltd = Steve Lantham
Gravhaven Limited we've seen connected to Steve Lanham previously with Bancroft Uranium Inc not sure who that is yet - Maybe Paul Leslie Hammond, maybe David Naylor
The address Kent Ltd uses is the same address found for Gravhaven Limited as an officer for this Arizona SOS business entity - MEDUSA SENSORS, LLC
http://starpas.azcc.gov/scripts/cgiip.exe/WService%3Dwsbroker1/corp-detail.p?name-id=L14549860
FRANK N ANJAKOS the other officer of that company was the President of Fidelis Energy Inc in 2005 another company that connects back to the entire group. These are the officers of Fidelis Energy in 2006:
FIDELIS ENERGY INC. [FDEI]
CEO, WILLIAM MARSHALL
CFO, STERLING KLEIN
CONSULTANT - Robert McIntosh
CONSULTANT - David Naylor
Director - Glen Harder
Beneficial Shareholder - Sak Narwal
China Tel Group Inc. (CHTL)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=45329919
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=45329959
4 million shares purchased.
Who could it be now? That's 8x as many as HLNT taday. speakin of HLNT Marshall. Let;s hear that story ya made up about a massive amount of shares bein discussed betwween ECMH and HLNT? Cut your throat with that story like ever other lie you've posted and now want no part of backin up.
Does this help, xray?
Mel Robinson, Chief Financial Officer HLNT
http://www.projo.com/sharedcontent/dws/img/03-07/0311jimbolt3.pdf
Damn woog.
Did ya friggin pass out with your finger on submit or are ya just really thankful?
Hey Marshall.
I'm seein why attorney Randall Lanham is tryin ta hide himself. Besides a lot a DD on him I did some lookin back at the Nacio bankruptcy case with your claim that Daly put 1.7 million bucks inta Nacio. I'd love to see the accountin he produces on that cause I've been lookin at the accountin he provided the court. No indication of a dime comin in from him but i did revisit some interestin entries.
Lanham and Daly were actually funnelin funds to another entity they created named In Motion Media. It also looks as if these two were runnin their other company N2 Holdings out of the Nacio facility. Interestin that they wanted N2 Holdings to be the only bidder for the assets of Nacio that they took inta bankruptcy behind the back of ECMH and then locked ECMH Directors out of the Nacio facility. I can see why Lanham is tryin ta remove his name from the various entities and the court case.
This is all public record Marshall. Anyone can look it up. So now Lanham and Daly claim the attorney for the Creditors who saw right through their scam and declared ECMH the bid winner is part of a RICO organization formed ta defraud them? These two nut cases are quite the couple. I'm findin a bunch a hidden assets of Lanhams and Daly also submitted an asset list in the bid docs. Seems these two hacks got a bigger surprise than I even imagined when ECMH put in their bid. I see that these boys actually thought they'd be the only bidder a skate through unopposed and unexposed. that didn't happen, they lost the bid and got sued by ECMH. Now they have you tryin ta pass off this nonsense about money goin inta Nac io from Daly. Nice friggin try pal. The morons even submitted the docs themselves that disproves all they claim now. They really did think they were gonna be the only bidder. Classic. Ant proof you can dig up showin me wrong would be fun ta see. I haven't seen a workin brain yet from your group so surprise me.