is exploring the universal mind
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
LOL, you could just say you got a $15000 hooker and lost nothing.
LOL, glad we comped you something for paying the light bill.
Cha ching, see you when you come to the real sin city.
:o)
It is an abomination, LOL
You are correct, as long as the Main People are still involved everything will work out as it is supposed to in the end.
:o)
Glad you agree man, amen.....
Shish bang boom, LOL, that's funny, you are detail oriented.
LOL, 2 kind.
:o)
YES I AM, nanny nanny boo boo. It was MY post because it was OT, but you are in the parking lot sister so knuckle up and deal with it.
LOL, weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
I don't, like Bob Villa says "hire a contractor".... So dumb am i, 2 bad that post I did last week was deleted on your board.. How am I doing??
:o)
Post Date: 4/4/2009 8:25:03 PM in reply to a deleted post by rosebud05
Board: Effective Control Transport Inc Reason: Off-Topic
Oooh, off by a whopping 1.5"..
So, you're about 5 1/2 feet tall without the 8" heels?
Well get on the bone phone to your man in the white house and ask him to grow a pair.
Pay a ransom, get the captain, immediately send in the marines, AGAIN (though it has been a few centuries) and wipe out the coast of that dump. And before you call me anything, remember it was President JEFFERSON (a founding father) who did exactly that sans the ransom.
Then we get another 200 years of maritime safey and rid the planet of thugs.
Oh, and the nice people there are not living on the beach, fyi.
Or, do nothing and it will happen again and again and again, just like all the other chump nations that keep paying ransoms over and over again for hijacked ships.
You fight fire with fire, the man in the white house does not have fire in the belly for this job. You pay ONE ransom and then you exact your might so that it never happens again, or at least for 200 more years, I am good with that.
Well I hope that happens for you, and it is going to be a great day.
Good morning rose.
:o)
I am not in the "sewing circle" obviously, don't know about the rating system.
I love rumor info in pms, what was the topic? You dont have to give me the details, I assume it was something alluded to on the board by Pw.
Bad day?
Advertising at its finest.....
http://premium.fileden.com/premium/2007/12/18/1651938/Durex-_Balloon_Animals.mpg
weeeeeeeeeeeeee.
In da sheeeeeeter.
LOL, yeah, dusty crystal ball. Not a bad day here.
I was just commenting that it was not 3 cents as you predicted. .049 is quite higher than that.
Nope, closed a good clip higher than that.
That's an honest answer, I got time.
Look what this one did, LOL..... Now that's weeeeeeeeeee too.
LOL, "is this a good stock"... Did not want to reply to you over there since my posts get deleted by some.
Glad you are on the loose, weeeeeeeeeeeeeee
:o)
True, I think they make more sense to the scientists/techs in that field so deciphering the data for most is not really plausible. I dont think victory can be granted to either at this point.
Still prolly a good thing to attend though and present?
My comments were going to be inconclusive. Bio went with a graphical (which is difficult to comprehend without knowledge of EEG readings), whereas ECT went with data points (but with 20 algos not defined).
All in all looks like both are hard to decipher which is ahead of the curve to me and both dont really appear ready for market yet.
How's that for fair and balanced? LOL
You want my analysis of the 2 abstracts?
Well, I am just a lowly consultant who analyzes pools of data daily, so I think I have an understanding of means, modes, medians, coefficients, etc...
My opinion is based on the fact that they did not show up to the conference to present. A sleep detection machine will process over a certain period of time, increasing the times increases the processes and not necessarily the resulting mean.
And to top it off, about a third of the data set was rejected which is questionable to me.
I dont believe it would help me, other than I dont believe those results are as stellar as you do. We can agree to disagree on that.
I would think they would have shown up at the conference if they were really good to be proud of it.
And I think the underlying tech will be judged IN COURT to be too similar or identical to the SDS and it will all be over then.
LOL, you are funny today rose, but I take no offense. Anyway, i estimated 200 shares of EFFC for a copy (around $16).
Then again, maybe it is 250 shares or $20.
200 Shares of EFFC, or around $16..
mike said he PAID for a copy of the proceedings and that YOU could as well.
I believe he is correct, you don't offer one of your own so I dont expect it is in the public domain or you would be parsing it up.
Look at the smirks on these 2 faces of EFFC, they got your money, not me.
That's a sweet setup, LOL, go CAGI>....
What I KNOW is that in your hypothetical adding of time and the percentage of detection, you are conveniently leaving out the false positives, which were also high.
And if you are going to increase 1, which you cannot state because you dont know, at a minimum you have to increase the other.
I can see a truck driver pulling over on the side of the road after the 4th false positive in the day and getting out his tire iron and beating the beast to a pulp. Those results were not flattering.
And sure, great results (NOT) and still no-show? LOL
I would think you would make getting a copy a priority personally.
That's because you are NOT listening. A copy of the conference proceedings is not sent to you for free, you usually pay a nominal fee for their effort to provide it to you.
This is not the schedule