Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Thank you and sorry I missed your humor. Yes the board is great.
I would sure hope so.
That's a sign of competency, not sure success, as one would gather from these posts.
"GTC is HIGHLY profitable" This board would be real interesting if someone like you would retort to that.
What am I missing here?
What's truthful about ANYTHING about these posts. I understand that their opinions are truthful to themselves, but all their posts are mostly ridiculous claims and false connections to industry news.
"You want the truth?"...
Please read the financials.
What this board need it input from people who trade and due a ton of DD for a living who don't have their heads in the sand.
Are you referring to the figures as last reported on the income statement? Or some double secrert black ops figures?
Come on folks what did I say?
Don't count on it. This company has demonstrated ships for the military before. Still winter.
Please don't stop posting your links and predictions. Its funnier than reading the company's PRs. Oh sorry, they're called NRs now.
Oh god this stuff is great.
Those basic disclosures, for a company such as this, in no way whatsoever ratify your claim that it is a scam.
It means they have a independent CPA firm
Nice try, that is a note worded to protect the company and CPA firm from lawnsuits when this company folds and to present the financial statements fairly and conservatively.. The statement is common knowledge, at least to rationale investors.
I am real are you? Maybe before your time so you don't know, but one of TAO ships was demonstrated a long time ago in San Diego. And who knows how long it's been around before that time? And it was not that Lotte either. It was a segmented ship, the ship that the Argus was based on. And I think the military was there too, not 100% sure.
It was not putting around on a string either.
So in light of facts and reality, why do you have such a problem with my question? What is it that upsets you so much about it?
Since you think I'm kidding and ignoring what is so obvious,it should be very easy for to explain why this demonstration is a sign of real, got to buy this product interest from the DOD.
And if you respond with "do your own DD", I know you don't know either.
By the way, nice dark shades you got there.
gee and I would love to have some DD as how much the military is REALLY interested in the tech. This ship or some other form of it been around for a decade.
Is this nevada testing a indicator that they like it or is it just run of the mill procurement process?
What does "going well" mean for you after a decade?
No mishaps, or
DOD liked the air ship?
Yes that's the most I take from this. A statement from the company that they are still alive, in response to a growing concern among shareholders that there has been silence. Optimistic? My view has not changed. I hope for a success, but firmly expect there will be none. But it's good to know my money is still on the table. Move on? And miss reading this board? Never!
The company already PR'd that it was being tested there last month, or did you miss that?
The most that you can take from this is that the Argus is still in Nevada, which for this company is a good thing, it's not liquidated yet.
jeesh, this board is great
Interesting, I also said that there are shareholders more interested in the company than the technology. If this company were to focus on something else, the same words, links and hype would be posted by the same posters. There is a reason for that.
You can repost PRs, continue to post links to news that nothing to do with WSGI, but the only public information that matters, the financial statements, are full of notes explaining projects and agreemenents that the company no longer has pursued. Maybe you choose not to read them but they are there. "due your own dd"
If management thought the SP will be rising in the near term they would not have settled at those numbers, no?
You can end the thread right now by posting anything, other than someone else's post, that ties this simulator, in any way, to the Argus.
Again since there is no evidence, then what I wrote is valid.
You can write anything you want here does not mean it going to happen.
There is no evidence, no evidence whatsoever, that the facility has, had or will have anything to do with Argus.
you're not missing anything. It has nothing to do with Argus, nothing.
What was the share price then?
anyone know the amount of the original claim, before they settled?
anyone know the amount of the claim before they settled?
Minus the telephone switch business fraud, there is no difference. and by the way, not my opinion, just a fact.
Same losses, insolvent balance sheet, promises and promotional PRs and posts.
There will only be a difference when your rosy scenarios show up in Net Income.
What about past countless times the company been quite?
Maybe you should read my post again, I asked you a question. Please explain, thank you.
You think the smaller version is being tested as well? Maybe Barebaxbo can chime in with his DD on the smaller prototype.
You're positive they will play a part, you just don't know what?
This is almost as good as the S2 took part in black ops in Iraq.
This board is entertainment I tell you.
And they will be mass producing Arguses there?
Another one who reads his own words in someone else's post
The stock compensation does not bother me really. They are entitled to get paid are they not? Does anyone know what the cash portion of their annual salary is?
You can thank the government for that. Huff nor the three four administrations since him still have not delivered any product yet.
My other side is that I have hope that this will pay off, that's why I throw a little money at it when I can afford to. But I expect it not to. If it does, I'll be as happy as any other long.
And if you understand and follow my posts you know the reason for the negativity. And this is important, they have been responses.
But the notion that this is a good investment, or they made "massive" improvements (LOL) is rediculous.
This is an insolvent entity only alive at the whim of a few wealthy individuals. That is not an opinion.
Just RESPONDING to the misrepresentations.
"Massive improvements"?
What have I been telling you folks?
Why not respond honestly.
Other than the SEC resolution what has changed? To an investor, it's actually gotten worse. NMO
What's the purpose of this post?
Does anyone here know the significance of this?
- Does it represent urgent interest as in we really got to have this?
- Is it in the normal course of the DOD procurement process where ours and a host of other potential products get demonstrated?
-is it someone in the Army doing the good ol' Captain a favor?
I don't know the answers and do not pay enough attention to the board if these questions have been discussed.
Also Mide, it may be new for this company but the whole world is full of both successful and failed companies where management, owners and founders have invested their own money into their companies.
Trunk:
what I posted: Other than the PRs that we have read can anybody show that the government or military contractors have any serious interest in a portable UAV
Your response: do you think customers are going to tell you directly on a message board. why do you think they are doing what they are doing right now, for fun?
You fabricated that I said something about customers posting here. Where I simply just asked the board. It's all there in the print.
Your response is reflective of your analysis of the company. You read what you want to read, despite the words being what they are.
You seem to have your very own conclusions to what I write.