Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Oh my good!
Yes, it's hard but happens everyday. I agree that a lawfirm or the authorities should look into it. Imo both, but I cannot agree with your safe harbor statement. This is a non reporting pink. Safe harbor doesn't prevent them of anything!
They did lie about the patents and trademarks, those infamous PRs were never corrected and they did use that trademark symbol till the end.
They lied about even everything of what they ever released.
The announced joint venture with SFB in symbol management was listed till the end at the website. I'm curious if they had even anything to show to SFB to justify that announcement. I doubt it.
Don't forget the even more infamous launch in February 2008, the face to face lies about immeditedly incoming revenues from customers which obviousely didn't exist.
Like I wrote 18 months ago, we could start with...This "was" a Nevada incorporated company
Add the points, they are here, countless!
And finally but I left out several important points, this thing was sold via an internet boards scheme play with several promoters who should be known by now.
I would start with Hensel here if I would be a lawyer in the States. Ihub alone delivers more evidence than any beginner would need.
It is pretty easy to add one and one!
I guess for almost all is this more than obvious now.
I can list a few hundred points of evidence but as we all also know, you aren't the right reference person.
Lol, funny! I wish you luck though!
Did you probably reckon in your reasoning that the other one is a scam too?
Why isn't anyone able to stop this imbecile sorry excuse of a poster?
Exactly of the quality we could expect. Thanks!
Just like their financials, if you wish, I will post them here again but just in case, anyone is still interested, they are still available at pinksheets.com. An outstanding example of a boilerrom produced piece of faked sheet.
Unbelievable, but what did you mean with the hmm?
Probably! I'm a bit ambivalent to it right now. For sure a great step into seriousness and better attention but without financing or partnership announcements associated we will have first of all naked figures and the naked truth which should be devastating from a financial point of view. Not to many will have the foresight to look into the future if the presence looks bad because there will be the threat of significant dilution for our shares over us.
Yep, but you should know that their plans have a lot in common with geological ages or at least the lifespan of Methuselah.
Well said, lol
Lol, I have to say that this will become the most ridiculous, useless intention of all times.
I don't know where to start, it's all included, starting from the propagandists till a non disclosure agreement.
It is for sure an attack to all who lost their money here.
Guys, this should be a strong letter of demand and not something like a begging letter.
Shaking my head for 18 months now!
Sounds good and I have only one question. Will you also already submit the answers as in the past?
It's still up to the shareholders..and nobody else!
I guess you learned it finally here, something is not only wrong in 141/spoozland. A resolution letter with the current .... means to carry coal to Newcastle.
I wish you luck. This is for sure a company with great prospects and experts with a clue in science. Unfortunately, business is different. The real situation is difficult, maxed out shares and a lack in financing. The move to the otc indicates that they are looking for serious money and the believe in the future. I'm obviousely with you but those momos will destroy every progress in short-term gains. It is a hold and wait while those people make their money. Apparently, as the devastating current economic situation as well as theirs followers are indicating it, fast money seems to be still prefered.
Whatever. Imo, the current and past ihub problem are those shakerzz. They make their living on your back so if you keep that wording, it would be fine for me.
Help, the pumpers are coming.
?
You won't come out of this mess without a blessing!
Useful would be to use your own link but for sure not to look for some substitutes of your holdings.
Lol, I tend to say that I'm the living sec complaints link supplier on ihub.
hey are not harming investor but erosing investors confidence in the market.
Should read are not only... but also, right?
In any case, you are right and I guess there already a lot of complaints there. Problem is, a few agents have thousands of cases. Every additional complaint btw could add to make it real here.
It is more a legal and moral question and first of all how to name it what they are doing. To call it dilution is pretty lame even though it's the reality.
It is simply theft!
It is not really complicated but I can offer you a detailed drawing if you don't get it.
You are absolutely right but don't forget to mention that it was already a scam before those fraudsters stepped in.
It is described, open and written for all so often that any denial is simply comical and only against personal interests.
In other words, those who deny it, belong into the same category.
There was a stetement from Strickland in the ibox that the company officers don't own a single share of the float.
This was here for a year and more and got removed after I brought it up during the final pumps.
So much to your post!
Which sense would it make for fraudsters to keep toiletpaper?
Lol
It should be equal now, lol.
Btw. Not only the website is "default."
https://esos.state.nv.us/SOSServices/AnonymousAccess/CorpSearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=zQzOVoNHbqLvNhFmqPsPLA%253d%253d
yep, that's what I figured out finally. Could have seen it first hand on the smiley.
Hi and regards!
No I haven't but will have a look into it.
Well, after I did answer to burps post I opened his profile and I guess he just followed his favorite interests.
He already made now at least two people smile and laugh!
Who has multiple aliases?
Bobwins or me? Are you not awake yet?
You made this statement
"The only think I might point out is that Jim Hensel never posted WHILE he worked for Spooz. Only before."
and you demand proof for the suspect of the contrary?
Unbelievable!
Btw. It would be ok to correct think into thing. As written it looks like a thought.
Bobwins is the contrary of almost all here on ihub. Just call him a straight, honest guy!
I know him from gfci a few years back and I have to say that he was among very few with common sense and the spine to express that!
Sure, because he they you say so!
I guess that's as accurate like the rest of what they ever said. And he had just this alias, right?
It would be very interesting to see at which time the spooz payments did start!
There is almost no volume here, so it is still a mm game without any meaning. We need at least 20 fold volume days to get a clue.
Like always, it is up to the company to deliver.
It is criminal but just a piece of the fraudulent scheme.
Why don't you ask the experts concerning software theft? The Groves and He bashers who put them in jail here? Have you seen a similar reaction from those "hang them up people" to this important topic?
Lol!
Where in the wording is the difference to spooztoolz besides the name?
Lol about this share selling scam operation
"it appears it's too complicated for management to explain so I've never bothered asking."
Rotflmao
Apparently.
It also means shareholders aren't here anyamore.
It's posted here. Especially the remarks from Strickland about immediatedly starting revenues, lol
No product no patents no costumers no revenues but lies.
If there is something where I can agree, I won't see any reasons to avoid it.
It would be fair to say they don't give such informations to individuals by mail and or phone.
I guess what's still happenig here is to draw a red herring across shareholders' track.
You don't have to read between the lines for the content of those posts. The message is always the same. Don't do anything! You have to ask yourself if that's in the interest of a shareholder, nothing else is acceptable and then you can only say hmmh!
zohn, I can't do that from here. I can give you ideas, stimuli if you like and of course even names of lawyers who are willing to go for a derivative action in behalf of the shareholders but someone in the states has to contact them and to coordinate it.
I agree that a class action suite as step one would be a waste of money. Enough complaints, reasonably written will probably already do the trick and a derivative action against Strickland is a must. The theft of spooztoolz alone is reason enough and there are a lot of others. It doesn't matters if spooztoolz goes to 50 % to a lawyer or to 70% and more to Unwin.
I have a very good memory and enough of that too at my harddisc.
There is a lot to say here, I guess you know that.