Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Love that picture of the Grand Canyon Jimmy. Did you say something?
No, I am saying that it is grossly misleading. That headline is announcing Pinnacle getting an 18% interest in SRE, S.C.
You know, it's pretty pathetic that none of the mods or other longs have not attempted to set you straight on this issue. It smells of desperation.
itsonlymuni, I am saying that Pinnacle does not own SRE. Mac owns SRE. Pinnacle owns 18% of SRE, S.C.
I don't blame you for not understanding, the confusion is intentional.
For anybody mislead by your post, keep in mind, the $25 million, IF awarded, goes to SCSU. A portion of it would then go to SRE, S.C. to help fund their operations. SYNJ owns only 18% of SRE, S.C.
With that said, the $25 million WOULD help immensely in sustaining the PPS above .0040. The cash value alone does that (assuming full dilution). It would be a HUGE confidence boost to the longs. All, IMO.
Really? You got information on this guy other than the PR? Or are you just blowing smoke?
Obscure bre-x reference. Nice one pontiak.
is it possible to throw a geologist out of a submarine ?
Thoughts? Here was my first one: Must be a slow day for the front-running, hit-n-run, no conscience types here on the hub.
Anyone think CMKX will get that diamond mine open and make a come back? Thoughts?
The fact is that if you take 30 accounts each with 250 Bill shares, then we have a problem!
Did this come to you in a dream?
I treat jimmy's posts like I used to treat Playboy magazine. I just look at the pictures, anything more is just a waste of time.
You have done more damage to Bob Maheu's reputation with this one post than all of the previous posts disparaging Maheu on this or any other board. Nice work tiger.
Jarta, I don't know who Mike Williams is as asked by Faulk, however I did know Rendall Williams and I was in his office when Bob Maheu was introduced to me. They had two offices here in Las Vegas that they shared with CMKX.
(1) 1481 W. Warm Spring Rd, suit 133
(2) 5380 Valley View Ave. Suite F
That Procyon, hot rod shop was to throw people off for some reason. My business with Williams was unrelated to their stocks. I know that Maheu was involved a long time prior to his joining the company and he knew the addresses, He played
dumb when being questioned by the SEC.
Nope, won't happen, not with government grant money.
A simple loan to the parent from the sub for the required amount would suffice.
No, it's 85% of 30 day EMA. Look on page 21.
http://www.pinksheets.com/otciq/ajax/showFinancialReportById.pdf?id=21493
No, that's absolutely wrong. SYNJ will not see a penny of the grant money. It all has to stay in SRE, S.C. for the purpose which it was intended. Grants may not have to be repaid, but the money comes with strings attached, as it should.
Now here is the real gamble, if SYNJ/Pinnacle/SRE gets the 25M grant the "loan" from Cornell will be paid back with cash and Cornell will have to cover their short by buying back the shares rather then covering with the shares held in escrow.
It's actually 85% of the 30 day EMA.
Is the 80% discount true???
Is that an invitation? You should be careful what you wish for.
Do some more dd..........lol
That's extremely misleading to include solicitations that have nothing whatsoever to do with Pinnacle/SYNJ.
It could possibly be criminal for Mac to secure contracts based on a minority/small business set aside and later transfer those contracts to a publicly traded company.
lilburrito, ask and ye shall be answered:
By: leowanta
28 Oct 2009, 06:31 PM EDT
Rating: Rate this post: Msg. 881106 of 881108
(Reply to 881078 by lilburrito0)
Jump to msg. #
lilburrito0...
my account, the WANTA account was held in citigroup, Roubini(sp)i claimed it by written demand fall 2007; Roubini/Geithner moved to back to NYFED....
September 16, 2008, the administration didn't have the cash to save Bear Sterns, Lehman Bros.....they fell into bankruptcy...AIG was within hours of bankruptcy, which would have meant city municipal bonds/401Ks/health insurance payments/auto insurance payments etc. would not be paid...to include city transportation, etc....my conscience would not let see that happen....
i sent emails to Bush Jr, and Paulson giving them express written consent to take 200B from my account to save AIG. around noon on September 16, 2008....before that time, all press releases clearly stated Paulson was going to let AIG fail, there was no way to save AIG, Lehman had already failed, the administration/treasury/NYFed had no cash to save Bear or Lehman... as soon as Bush Jr. got my authorization to use the funds from my account, Paulson was given the ok to do so....which to my demise, gave Paulson the knowledge of my huge account. Paulson saved AIG the 85B was from my account, i am the 80% owner of AIG...except Paulson refused to give me the Preferred E share holding 80% ownership...instead, Paulson got a "waiver" from Jr. to talk to Goldman Sacs....of course, the waiver permission was to tell Goldman Sacs of my account and set up electronic transfers to steal my account, since Paulson knew my reward had been copted by Bush Sr back in 1989; no honor amongst thieves...paulson stole the account from sr who stole it from me...and paulson secretly moved the account to goldman sacs...where it resides now....
i want the FED AUDITED to prove all this embezzlement tagged with the correct name of all who used the interest off my account as well as frunds from my account without my permission....
so there you have it, i will get my money, cause the Lord caused it to exist for me in the first place back in 1988-1989...HE has a plan for that money...that money has shown the greedy hand of many i guess that's what the Lord wanted to see; cause he allowed it.
i wait for congress to force the money be given to me...it looks like many in congress may too have their hand in my account; or getting blackmail money to not force it be released to me...
bottom line, the Lord is in the midst, it's HIS timing, when it's time and all have shown their true heart; HE will cause it to be released, and those who stolen from the Lord have sealed their fate!
Thanks for Asking....and know i ask it of you!
Thank You Father
leowanta
Still spreading his expert opinions around the globe.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/profile.asp?user=60190
tiger, ignorance is one thing, but, ignorance tinged with cockiness is just embarrassing. You better run along before people start confusing you with Chas.
Sure they did, a confession in writing, keep up Janice.
Who are you directing this to? Frizzell? If he has the proof, why is he keeping it hidden?
Show us all the paperwork if you have nothing to hide:)
What does it tell you when the "Accumulation' steadily increases and the price steadily decreases? Any guesses?
There is no current transfer agent.
Roe and Doe? Way to stick to that script, jimmy.
Good question Jimmy, who didn't get certs? 4 years since the stock traded, over 2 years since Deli/Brewer/Wright and insiders moved shares, and we have yet to hear of a single lawsuit against brokers for non delivery. WTF?
Lou, the bottom line is, he was just wrong. If you think that it's somehow actionable, go for it.
You too tufan? Met is a subsidiary of Methes, Sun is a subsidiary of Sunsi. Mac's company, SRE is the majority owner of SRE,S.C.. That is how SRE can claim to be a minority owned company and apply for the government set asides. SYNJ owns 18%, and 18% only.
THIS POST IS ON TOPIC, AND NOT A PERSONAL ATTACK!
Mac owns 100% of Sentinal which owns 51% of SRE, S.C.. It has to be that way in order for them to manipulate the minority owner government set asides. SYNJ, through Pinnacle owns 18% of this venture. This really isn't subject to debate.
You should be concerned about the fact that subsidiaries of public companies own 49%, might hurt their chances of getting the grant.
Dragonwing found this:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=40552949
Are you saying they are defrauding the government?
It's more then 18%. They do that for tax purposes and too show Mack is Minority owner.
When you say "we'll get the $25M", who is we? SYNJ isn't getting it. IF SCSU gets the grant, SRE S.C., Inc. will get a piece of it. None of it will get to SYNJ, which owns 18% of SRE, S.C.. There are definitely strings attached to that money.
getting your kicks in Ash Fork.
Jimmy, stay away from sweat lodges in Sedona.
lol, how can I argue with that attempt at logic?
Mazel tov grandpa.
Not supporting anybody, just wondering why you respond to valid points with a lame personal attack. But now I remember, that's what you do.
He made valid points, and you answer with that tired response.
Wait, I got it. When the company starts trading again, the dirty borkers will have to cover those extra 6 trillion shares! Ha! Bhollenegg can make that argument.
Could it not be argued that the investors would benefit if the certs they held were actually back up by a company with it's assets returned to it?
Hold on... according to Tramp, the Smeaton dump will be the largest... oh crap.
Could it not be argued that the investors would benefit if the certs they held were actually back up by a company with it's assets returned to it?
Ok, let's give it a shot...With Kevin West's vast experience at the head of ...damn...lost my train of thought.
Could it not be argued that the investors would benefit if the certs they held were actually back up by a company with it's assets returned to it?
Sure, I'll make that argument. Wait, let me hit this pipe a few more times...hold on..., where was I?
Could it not be argued that the investors would benefit if the certs they held were actually back up by a company with it's assets returned to it?
They were post revocation, brokers couldn't sell them.
what if these people sold via a real broker? the shares marco sold to them??
So you're saying that Marco changed his story after Frizzell sued Monte Verde, implicating Frizzell at the behest of Brewer? But Monte Verde was Rendal's company. OK, I'm confused.