Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I will probably go as well KMey.
Are you attending any conferences? I am particularly interested in the degree to which Donald Godfrey is adamant that PR3D is superior to CMM and tomography due to the interference that part support structures gives. In all that I have read, he is pretty clear that computed tomography is problematic in these instances, while PR3D is crystal clear.
Unfortunately, the exhibitors for this event are all industry vendors, not OEMs. I would like to talk to OEMs to see what they have to say about PR3D use in live printing.
I suspect that this will be the typical new-industry exhibition show with all the attendant frenetic scurrying and frantic grab for attention that start-up companies, in start-up industries, go through in the early days of birth.
All the best,
Silversmith
You have to be a total geek to get anything out of it, but if you go to vimeo.com, enter printrite 3d in the search box, you can watch a video of PR3D layer scanning a powder bed, showing 'off nominal' locations of the build. It says that it was uploaded 6 days ago.
All the best,
Silversmith
I could talk for an hour in response to that Alan. But I won't.
If you study an industry, study a company, study the probabilities, you can make decisions about the investment. The firmer the conviction, the bolder the action should be. If you want timid results, you take timid action.
What you are really saying, underneath it all, is that all the other investors, whom I shouldn't be addressing, who might have read my post, really don't know what they are doing. They are incapable of making rational decisions based on their knowledge. Therefore I shouldn't be talking to them in that manner.
Do you really think Magnetics knew his/her position completely? The company reverse split the stock, and he/she seemingly threw the position out the window without regard to the fact that the split makes the company much more interesting to new investors, gives it many more opportunities, and is a step toward trading in a professional market.
But I do indeed have a strong conviction for this company's chances. If someone is as strongly convinced, on the other side of the isle, they should boldly short the stock as well.
All the best,
Silversmith
No.
-initial position buy at $.046 per share.
-market cap goes up to $100 million.
-shares outstanding = 624,000,000
-resultant share price = $100 million/624 million = $.16 per share.
-percent gain on investment = (.16-.046)/.046 = 248.4%
VS
-initial position buy at $4.60 per share.
-market cap goes up to $100 million.
-shares outstanding = 6,240,000
-resultant share price = $100 million/6.24 million = $16.00 per share.
-percent gain on investment = (16.00-4.60)/4.60 = 248.4%
It is the same either way.
All the best,
Silversmith
Buying low and selling high is far easier to say, than to do. Buying low means buying a bombed out, out of favor, expected failure of a stock. Buying low never comes unattached to fear/concern/negative hype and the like.
But the SGLB story just keeps getting better from a business success reference. And a new investor never reaps the benefit of what happened before, only what is going to happen in the future.
A legitimate tenet of philosophy is that it is an error to make a bold statement, and follow it up with timid action. How many times have you heard someone say that they got the outcome right, but didn't get in deep enough to make a difference? All the time. That is the error of timid action.
We have nothing less than Honeywell showing the IPQA lineup for AM metal production quality certification. If you are going to make parts for Honeywell, you have to be certified. And that certification process is going to have PR3D spec'd in. There is so much information, right in front of our face, saying that PR3D is the IPQA solution, that it would be foolish to not expect that revenue is coming.
I have been buying post split, and will continue to buy. I anticipate outsized gains.
All the best,
Silversmith
For all the oldies of NEOM, the SEC finally caught up to Tobin Smith. He was found guilty of penny stock promotion at the expense of investors, but NEOM wasn't specifically one of the companies named in the suit.
All the best,
Silversmith
Norway,
Unless something strange happened, it was a fat-finger trade about 6 months ago. All it did was distort the daily chart.
All the best,
Silversmith
Probably both, tyfoidhana.
I have long felt that Honeywell was likely a more important piece to the SGLB puzzle than GE. Don't get me wrong, I think that both GE and Honeywell are vital to SGLB. Those two accounts will cement the steep upward growth curve for SGLB, as all the other lesser AM OEMs and print contractors will follow suit. Still, I said a while back that I thought Contour was likely more important than Inspect. Inspect is more of a real time check that the whole printer/laser/powder-bed system is operating properly. Contour is more along the lines of whether the engineering and design behind the digital-part is working out as intended.
Originally, I felt that HON would be a likely buyer of SGLB, the company. Recently, I felt that one of the serious metal AM printer machine manufacturers would be a prime candidate to buy SGLB to ensure that they have the advantage over competition in selling their printers. I don't know. PR3D is likely so important to the metal AM industry that if someone made a move to buy SGLB, there might a bidding war, or a compromise by the 3D print industry to leave SGLB exist as it own company.
It looks to me that Honeywell is very much on top of their game. They are clearly at the very leading edge of establishing a robust metal AM process. There are a lot of moving parts and a lot of support technology, beyond just PR3D, to bring all together. I would guess that GE is in the same place as Honeywell. It is all there, they are just not ready yet to pull the trigger until the whole suite of build technology is ready to go.
Things are getting very interesting and very exciting.
All the best,
Silversmith
1day,
MTU's optical tomography is a little different look at the part build. Optical tomography gives information about the material structure itself. It would be more along the lines of correlated inherent material behavior, such as tensile strength, elongation, toughness etc. It is an excellent addition to the scan of the part build. Honeywell is doing nothing less than putting together a full array of objective analysis technology to validate AM build product. It is very impressive.
All the best,
Silversmith
That was beautiful truthandlove. It looks like the PR3D suite is highly regarded at Honeywell. I don't think that Honeywell would have neglected to canvas the potential IPQA solutions that were out there. Therefore, PR3D is it. Honeywell's goal is heavy reliance on objective evidence in-process solutions, and so far SGLB is it.
This is looking very good.
All the best,
Silversmith
That little bit of commentary from Mark rang a half-note off for me GetRich1day. I have looked at it a few times now. It can be read and interpreted a couple of different ways. One of which is that SGLB is maybe not so close to a contract with GE.
We went from Morris saying that SGLB would save lots of time and money for GE, to 'in lockstep with GE', to 'definitely anticipating actual production run orders from GE', to, finally, production is starting for OEMs, it is evolving, we continue to work with them, we don't know when something might happen, but we expect to be further involved with them in the next 12 months. That sounds like a few steps back from it to me.
All the best,
Silversmith
Sigma Labs Inc (OTCMKTS:SGLB) Advances on 200% Revenue Increase
By Robert Johnson -
March 16, 2016
Sigma Labs Inc (OTCMKTS:SGLB) investors have reason to be excited with the announcement of record revenues, potential up-listing to NASDAQ, and agreements and partnerships. Share price almost double since hitting a new 52-week low towards the end of February. The stock has surged in advance of its earning release and done so on heavy volume. Yesterday, over 2 million shares exchanged hands and today is already exceeding those levels with plenty of time till markets close.
SGLB is ready for a breakout year after being stuck in a downtrend over the last three years. The company just announced huge milestones and developments that should increase awareness and investor interest. SGLB recently announced that it hit record revenues for the fourth quarter ending December 31st. It posted revenues of $0.6 million for the quarter and $1.2 million for the full year. For the fourth quarter, revenues approximately increased 200% from $0.2 million to $0.6 million for the fourth quarter (same period year-over-year comparison). For full year comparison, SGLB increased revenues by more than 100% from $0.5 million to $1.2 million.
Sales increase was led by its PrintRite3D systems in addition to software licenses. SGLB has announced that it received orders from Aerojet for PrintRite3D. SGLB also recently announced a development agreement with 3DSIM for metal AM. According to the CEO of 3DSIM, “Bringing 3DSIM’s modeling capabilities together with Sigma Labs’ IPQA® technology will help overcome the single biggest hurdle to wide-scale adoption of additive manufacturing.”
On even more milestones, a German AM manufactured began an evaluation period for PrintRite3D. This is to help speed up the process for considering adding SGLB quality assurance and process control technology to its offering. SGLB also extended its business development programs which helps incentivize potential customers to install and valuate its flagship product.
Last on the list is the SGLB’s plan to up-list to a more senior national exchange which will likely be the NASDAQ. In order to do so, the share price must be over a specific requirement so the company announced that it would implement a reverse stock split of 1 to 100, meaning that for every 100 shares it will be replaced by just 1 at a high share price. The market cap will remain the same but the number of shares reduced and stock price increased by 100.
SGLB is currently trading at a $42 million market valuation. SGLB has been advancing steadily ahead of its earnings release. The company is making strides ahead and continues to see strong revenue growth. This is a small, microcap company that is in the beginning stages of huge growth. Up-listing to a senior exchange will provide increased investor awareness and better financing terms to fund growth.
We will be updating on SGLB when more details emerge so make sure you are subscribed to Microcapspot so you know what’s going on with SGLB.
Disclosure: we hold no position in SGLB either long or short and we have not been compensated for this article.
The bottom line is:
-the metal AM industry is serious business, there is no stopping it, it will take off in production, and there are going to be very large amounts of money in it.
-SGLB is at the heart of the IPQA need, and PR3D appears to be starting to being accepted.
-SGLB is already showing signs of concept-design thinking for follow-on products to fill industry needs, thereby indicating future growth paths.
Patience is the order of the day.
All the best,
Silversmith
Stop worrying about it HopeToRetire.
The people who are on the other side of the isle, and we long-shares iHubbers are not the ones who are going to take SGLB to proper valuation. Up-listing to a proper venue for trading is going to be a huge game changer. Once there, SGLB will live or die according to its fate in the industry and itself. As long as the company performs and grows, then once wall-street turns to deploying cash into the industry, deep pools of money will flow to the companies positioned well in the industry. That is what will take your breath away. All the rest is noise.
All the best,
Silversmith
Longs in SGLB will get a break before too much longer. It won't be years from now. It will be sooner than that. As long as SGLB keeps pushing, we will be fine.
The industry analysts that I read are still cautious and continue to hold a low-key tone on the 3D print industry. They look at the past two years and have come to realize that they have no real understanding of the pull/demand for the technology from industry. They don't spend much time really digging into it.
Cowen analysts claim that visibility is limited for projections. That is because they haven't been handed the information on a silver platter.
Wholers Associates is completely the opposite. They are in the trenches. They are very upbeat. Terry has been quoted saying that it is completely clear that corporations, government and universities have embraced 3D technology. He says that investors aren't seeing what's going on.
What we have here is the case where the very large effort, development and growing demand for production metal AM printing is currently disconnected from wall street. The AM industry is now considerably further along the growth curve than what the investment crowd knows about. Before long the numbers will be coming to the attention of the investment world, and the tide will turn in our favor. It should prove to be perfect timing for SGLB.
All the best,
Silversmith
It doesn't take much to recognize that my mirror image has been seriously burned in the past by penny stocks; cut to the bone, and still in the kind of pain that slays the soul.
All the best,
Silversmith
Too funny HopeToRetire.
I can assure you that I am not RFB. A person who was both of us would definitely be psychotic.
All the best,
Silversmith
Tacos,
Way back in my chain of posts, you will see where I called the private 100,000,000 share offering at $.01 per share, a parachute jump by Cola. That was a bone headed move in my opinion. In fact, I feel strongly that that is a big reason why we find ourselves here today with the reverse split and expansion proposal for the authorized. The board of directors, including Mark Cola, never once, apparently, though that maybe the existing common shareholders would have been interested in a secondary offering at an even better price for the company. Cola received $1 million in cash in exchange for almost 14% of the entire company, and effectively set the bar for the company share value at $.01 per share. This was at a time when Greg Morris was going on and on about the benefits that SGLB will bring to the AM table. I feel it was a bad decision by Cola. Then, you have to consider how they actually got to the point where they had consumed 67% of the authorized share count, even before the parachute jump.
This is what I am referring to when I say they have history.
For the last two years plus, though, I am impressed with the way that they have kept overhead in control, expenditures fully in check, and impressively contained needless spending. I give them an A+ for controlling costs for the last two years. I expect that they have learned their lesson. I expect that intelligent spending will carry forward for the complete future of the company.
All the best,
Silversmith
No 3DHopeful, it does not.
But it still is a trust thing.
If you were looking at a company's share structure, degree of share consumption, and debt structure,(and I am not talking about the cash flow and other stuff, just the structure of the company) and it looked like a nicely healthy company structure, with lots of options for seizing opportunities as they came upon them, then it would look exactly like what SGLB's will look like after the split and authorized structure changes.
The fear, which I acknowledge, but don't particularly expect to be realized, is that the resources of the company, at the behest of the common shareholders' wealth, will be squandered by SGLB management. I acknowledge that there has been history with Mark Cola, and the board of directors, that was clearly severely disadvantageous to common shareholders. They have a proven track record of heavily diminishing shareholder value.
But I sincerely, honesty, and strongly believe that that is not the case going forward. I sincerely believe that the company is moving to become a true, profitable, strategic and organic growth company because they have the product line that is vital to the maturation of the critical metal AM industry. The big boys in the metal AM industry are going to be using PR3D. SGLB must be a real company, operating under best practices, mores, integrity and business practices in order to play at the level that is staring them in the face.
I am 95% trusting, and I sense it at the gut level, that things have turned for the company. It is my intuition that tells me we are about to become the real deal. And I have put my money where my mouth is.
All the best,
Silversmith
HopeToRetire,
I do this religiously. But I don't put the sell order in for a double. I put it in for what the Stock price would be if it were fully ripe for the potential of the company.
All the best,
Silversmith
Response from Chris Witty on preferred shares.
The preferred stock is unchanged.
Best,
-Chris
______________________________________________
Chris Witty, Managing Director Investor Relations
Darrow Associates
New York, NY
646-438-9385
cwitty@darrowir.com
All the best,
Silversmith
No chef911. I would love the thirty thousand foot view of the workings of the company, but I am not qualified. I formally know the science of it, but not the hard-core business finance and accounting of it.
All the best,
Silversmith
Not too simple, jeffxtrade. It could very well be done that way. And if in the process, the investing company sets the bar for SGLB's perceived share price value that is higher than it is now, then the stock should move up to the bar as well. The opposite applies as well though. It is a time tested way of declaring company value and share pricing. It happens all the time.
All the best,
Silversmith
There is something to what you are saying here chef911.
I can fully appreciate these words. But it is a coin toss at this point. I can also fully appreciate that the growth opportunities, and the path taken to enable the growth, is a mostly fully formed vision in the minds of the SGLB management. I have no doubt that they feel strongly that revenue streams can be made with additional endeavors by the company. Endeavors that will have to be invested in by the company in order to enact them.
It is a case of trust at this point. Do you?. Or don't you? That is the question.
All the best,
Silversmith
Driftin,
I just email Witty to get verification that the preferred are also subject to the 1 for 100 reverse split. I will pass on what I get back.
All the best,
Silversmith
I would imagine that the anticipation with the board isn't nearly so much that they need this for operating expenses, but rather for something along the lines of buying a half dozen more EOS printers, buying 3DSIM, buying Stratonics, buying Impact Engineering, buying Vibrant Corp, accepting investments offers from the big league guys, ongoing research costs for the new efforts at future product line 'apps', adding significant body count for support of large contracts etc.
There is a lot of growth that can be bought that is right in SGB's wheelhouse.
All the best,
Silversmith
You're right Driftin.
It is 15,000,000 authorized common, and 100,000 authorized preferred, That is even better than my 17,500,000 common. I had mistakenly included one of the profit sharing numbers in my math.
Thanks for the fix.
All the best,
Silversmith
And now that I have seen the amendment board proposals for the annual shareholder meeting, I am betting that I will owe Alan a dozen doughnuts, in addition to a coffee.
A large investment in SGLB from another firm could easily be contingent, both from a business point of view and a logistics point of view, upon the board proposals passing shareholder approval, so as to enable the size of the investment, and keep the fiscal depth of SGLB in tact.
This likely means that we won't see NASDAQ trading in SGLB until the end of May.
We will see.
All the best,
Silversmith
No chef911.
Prior to the split it would have been a full 750,000,000 increase. But now things are different. The split applies to the authorized AND the proposed increase together.
We are post split at 7,500,000 authorized right now. The proposal from the board will increase the authorized to 17,500,000. The preferred shares authorized would go from 10,000,000 to 100,000.
All else stays that same.
I am still mulling it over, but my gut reaction is that I am okay with this. An authorized count of 7,500,000 in total, as we have now, was going to be a problem.
The move to 17 million and change in the authorized count is very much more appropriate to the conduct of the business. If this were a scam penny stock company, it would be a bitter brew. And if this were a scam penny stock company, they would have crammed a reverse split down the shareholders throat that DID NOT also reverse split the existing authorized and the preferred, AND would have increased the authorized count. We DON"T have that at all here. This is the action of a rational, seriously intent on growth capability, company.
It opens the door for buying growth and resources and talent. As long as that is what it gets used for, I am all for it. In my opinion this proposal greatly strengthens the company and its ability to move forward.
All the best,
Silversmith
I don't think you need read so much into this truthandlove.
The simplest explanation is the best.
It was enacted to support the share price during the up-list effort. It doesn't seem like so much, and it isn't, but it is likely enough. Unless there is some kind of a concerted effort to take down the stock, the buyback kitty should be enough. All they have to do is support the trading action, not make the trading action.
For instance, yesterday's move from $4.90 to $5.90 was precipitated by a simple $1,560, 300 share trade at the ask of $5.20. That trade took out the ask, and the ask moved up as it normally should have. Unlike we saw repeatedly before. A whole cascade of buys took place at that time that culminated in the ticker paint of $5.90 at 3:58 pm.
Support of the action is all that will be needed to get the job done.
All the best,
Silversmith
I noticed a tucked away discussion of SGLB's expected sales behavior in the 10K. The people signing their name to the document believe that SGLB's sales revenue curve will be "significantly steeper upward, and less volatile, than the overall AM industry behavior."
Also, Rockville has not sold a single share of stock since the day they purchased.
I think that SGLB sees a great deal of growth coming.
All the best,
Silversmith
But I can tell you right now, Alan, if the annual meeting is indeed, as I saw on someone's post, for April 28, I am not going to be able to make it for this one. We are going to have to settle up at another time.
All the best,
Silversmith
Deal.
Make mine Krispy Kreme. Hot out of the oven.
Enjoy the weekend.
Silversmith
And all the nay-saying about Cola initiating a revere split without being able to up-list to the NASDAQ, without a plan, is pretty funny too.
If you think that he, and the board of directors, and all of the fortune 500 C-level relations, and their advice, don't know EXACTLY what is needed for an up-list, then I don't know what to say. SGLB has an electron microscope up the hind end of NASDAQ, monitoring the hurdle parameters for entrance to the board. He even said as much on the conference call. He said they know perfectly well what the conditions are, and monitor it very closely indeed.
Do you really think that they are going to miss this prime opportunity to move up to the NASDAQ? No way.
The shareholder value and cash on the books requirements can be accomplished in one fell swoop. The independent directors classification is already met, even if the guy I owe a coffee to doesn't want it to be so. I would bet an eye tooth that very soon we are going to get word that either the likes of UL, or GE, or Honeywell, or someone else has made a significant investment in SGLB, probably through preferred shares. Either that, or we will get word of a large contract signed that puts a nice chunk of change in the treasury.
And why do the reverse split first?
To get the stock out of the reach of the penny minds and the penny antics, and so that the bazillion shares that used to be in the float can't be used to overly influence the efforts of the up-list. Now, it will take a concerted effort on the part of moneyed, risk-taker, investors to sink the efforts of the up-list. I seriously don't believe that that is what anyone in the market will want to do.
I will bet a dozen doughnuts that we are going to be trading on the NASDAQ by the end of April.
All the best,
Silversmith
Now that we seem to have a little bit of a quieting happening, I thought I'd put my two cents in. I am amazed at the incredible degree of irrational thought from so many of the recent posters here. It is incredible.
Prior to the conference call and the reverse split, we all knew the current public knowledge concerning the company. It was looking pretty darn good then. It was a bullish story and profitability was on the horizon.
Somewhere in the past four hundred posts here, there were a few saying that we learned nothing new in the conference call. It was the same ole story, bla, bla, bla. The stock is doomed....
Well you must have known a hell of a lot more than I did. I never knew that the proof of compatibility with Materialise was successful and completed. And that integration is beginning.
I never knew that GE and Honeywell revenue streams continue even when the DARPA program ends.
I never knew that Dr. Dave was still in his traditional role with SGLB.
I never knew that the contract manufacturing/Arete business line has already generated revenue and is ramping up significantly in 2016, with significant 2106 revenue contributions expected.
I never knew that the in-situ sensor based systems being touted by the printer manufacturers were un-actionable systems that are not real competition for PR3D.
I never new that the OEM and Partner program has many parties in the pipe line that are actually in the negotiation stage of sales completion.
I never knew that even if not a single additional dollar of revenue comes in in 2016, that SGLB has the horses to get through all of 2016 yet.
I never knew that SGLB was very much neck deep in ICME structure development.
I never knew, for sure, that the reverse split was part of the actual commencement of the up-list project.
I never knew that a typical sale has both a hardware and a software revenue income, followed by recurring software maintenance revenue of 22%.
In fact, I did not hear one single piece of information that was negative during the conference call. It was 100% good news.
And now we find ourselves in a world where there are only 7,500,000 shares authorized, 6,230,000 shares outstanding, and under 5,000,000 shares in the float. All of the math remains the same. Period. SGLB was a buy at $.05 before. And now the story is even better than before. It is a buy now at $5.00 too. But all the screaming penny people see is that their 75K or 150K shares are now 750 and 1500 shares, and they don't see the rest of the picture.
There is not another 3D print space company that has as tight a share count in the float or outstanding. Very soon we are going to be somewhere between XONE and ARCAM for numbers. XONE has 16 million shares outstanding, operating profit of -68.7%, an EPS of -$2.21, a market cap of $177 million, and a share price of $11.10.
SGLB's story and potential far exceeds XONE's.
ARCAM has 21 million shares outstanding, operating profit of +8.73%, EPS of +.14, a market cap of $475 million, and a share price of $23.00.
Now, what is SGLB going to look like with production contracts from GE, Honeywell, Rocketdyne, and who knows what other OEM/Partner pipeline deals, contract manufacturing, integration with Concept Laser, Materialise, Trumpf, Additive Industries, and 3DSIM.
It will be a damn sight different from the 'sky-is-falling' mentality that I have seen over the past two days.
You cannot argue with the math. If the market prices SGLB even mid-way between ARCAM and XONE, that is $326 million. That will yield a share price, at 6,230,000 shares outstanding, of $52.33 per share. That is just how tight our share structure is now. And it damn well can happen. I will predict here, right now, that we will see a future forward stock split. But not for a good long time yet.
All the best,
Silversmith
I hear what you guys are saying Alan. And it will be a bumpy ride. But I don't think the shorts will do anything other than maybe dabble in the stock, at least if they know what they are doing, anyway. With a float of something less than 6 million shares, shorts would face being destroyed in about 30 seconds on a serious move into the stock.
We will certainly see.
All the best,
Silversmith
I think this is all hilarious. The dust is flying today. I am traveling today, so I'm getting updates intermittently. But it sure is fun to watch. In my opinion, this is SGLB's payback to all the penny stock investors that absolutely would not acknowledge the company's achievements with proper share price trading. So.... now they will be priced out of the stock. We will still be on the OTC exchange, the same as Arcam, but now we will have a whole new type of investor capable of coming into the stock. As you all know, I have been beating the penny stock people over the head for their trading behavior, and yelling that we must have a whole new type investor get into the stock.
Thankfully, we are about to get that.
All the best,
Silversmith
I couldn't help but look at comparable numbers in the 3D space. For sure, at a 1 for 75 split, SGLB will have the lowest outstanding share count of them all; by far in most instances. I still think that a 75 factor split is too aggressive.
As it stands right this minute, the share price would be $4.95.
For the various prospective GE, Honeywell, and Rocketdyne contract events, like we have gone over before, with sales to price ratios similar to the printer manufacturers, let alone what it actually currently is, we could easily be in the mid thirties per share. That is a whole different set of investors that will be playing ball in SGLB. I cant wait to hear the thinking behind the 75 factor.
All the best,
Silversmith
Absolutely and completely MD, since the very first days I bought into the stock, and story, two years ago. You can go back to my very first posts and see it.
It isn't the reverse split that is the win for investors. It is the up-listing to a real market venue, enabled by the split, that will be the win. The reason is that in the NASDAQ or American or other major board, the company, and its shareholders, will be rewarded for growth, profitability and execution and potential. They will equally by dinged by poor execution and results though. Even with the 3D market overall in the doldrums, wall street rewards profitability and growth. If SGLB shows growth and profitability, the stock will move up even if the rest of the space moves down. Other than SSYS, the marquee 3D print names do not play in the critical use, metal AM sphere. The key metal players are not directly investible on the public market. SGLB may be the most direct way to get a public piece of that action.
The growth potential that SGLB has before it will be noticed and acted upon by real investors. The depth of investment cash that can be brought to bare on investing in the stock is orders of magnitude larger, on a real market, than what could ever be seen on the OTC. The stock will immediately be picked up by index funds and type specific funds. Analysts will begin to follow and prognosticate on the company. The number of eyes that will be on SGLB will increase tremendously.
All the company has to do is perform, grow along with metal AM implementation, and beat or keep up with the competition.
All the best,
Silversmith
It doesn't take balls to ask these questions RFB. They are simple questions. It is a little hilarious to see SGLB as a company who thinks they must first screw the shareholder in order to clear room for later dilutive funding. If a person couldn't see that a split was all along a part of their uplifting strategy, and a legitimate method for gaining elevation to larger and more professional trading venues for small new birth companies, then that person has spent much too much time in penny land.
All the best,
Silversmith