Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
yes, and you have to pay them to take the CFLs.
I have not search that out yet, that was next.
Right Now I can only refer you to what motocrossnut34 posted
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=66721959
SAVW is up against a lot of other companies that manufacture solar LED street lights, and a quite a few from China that are UL approved.
They are actually off to a slow start and behind the crowd.
US Navy has already letted the onboard submarine lighting, changing to LEDs. That was back in March of this year.
The waterproofing they have now would have been a big selling point, if there is no others that have the equivalent.
-----------
take all the SavWatt is doing and search the internet. Will give you an idea of what market they are actually trying to break into.
Never mind the Eco-pole. Their other products.
They have their work cutout for them.
-----------
One thing that does upset me, is that on their web site they have Buy American statement. Yet searching their assembled items in the US will not qualify for Made in America.
The only revenue they have listed is 4,059 for the year 2010, with no other revenue listed from 2006.
This income could have been the lights you are talking about. But usually on a beta test there is usually a deep discount, and sometime even supplied for free.
Beta testing is used to give some creditablity to the product and is usually written off as developement.
never mind. post became irrelevant
No that can not be right, even counting multi buys thru individule broker ( which I am sure it does ) it does not add up.
Shares are held in broker name.
Just not too sure about how much added reliablity the wind vanes add. Seems like SBU has already installed quite a few solar powered LED lights.
------
The unit operates completely off grid and can even operate for approximately 5 days without being recharged.
http://www.stonybrook.edu/sustainability/green-map/details/solar-lighting.shtml
Might be considered maintance and not worth noting.
Web site seems to address stuff like this.
Now if Savwatt can get some of this percentage:
June.20, 2011
LEDinside was honored to interview Mr. Xiaoning Lin, Deputy General Manager of Unilumin Technology Co. Ltd, who introduced their unique market strategy and sales channels which had led the Unilumin’s sales growth to almost double every year.
-----
What I am wondering is SavWatt really the only supplier?
I can pull it, no shows work.
What were you after on it?
Can not see them blocking it, for outside areas.
Have yet to see a recent post mention:
--------------------------
Progessive Energy, Environment & Sustainability Congress 9
September 12-13, 2011
Westin Chicago North Shore
Chicago, Illinois
Savwatt has been selected and accepted, to be one of just 25 companies to display at the premiere Energy and Environmental Trade Congress.
-------------------------
2012 LIGHTFAIR International
October 9-11, 2012
Las Vegas Convention Center
Las Vegas, Nevada
Savwatt will be attending Light Fair 2012, the largest lighting industry trade show in North America.
( just attending? oh well )
I am with sevit on TA n CP.
I will refraze my previous post, I do rely on S/R for subs. Like SAVW now, it has built a base at 18, with a couple of forays to 16. I see nothing to get alarmed about at this time.
The next 10q should show if any sales have been made with the Eco-pole, that is what will make or break this level of support.
Subpennies - TA and CP:
I do not see how any TA or candle patterns can be applied to subpennies. They run on PRs, hype, and rumors, for better or worse.
Sent to SavWatt:
As an investor, I would like to receive the specs of the components MTBF for the Eco-Pole, including installation requirements.
Thank you.
------
yes i did include my mailing address.
Sent thru website to IR.
Yes, i did sound like that.
I guess the only way way to know is to get the spec.
Just don't think they would supply it to an investor.
In installation spec:
There should be the size, weight and hardness of cement to pour for a base to with stand the rated wind load.
Mostly it would be the excavation cost of the base and labor.
Ecopole 10,000 not including installation.
Streets lights probley cost 2,000+ by not much more.
Can not find any pricing from manuf on street light.
'Call for quote'.
One manuf has solar panel, battery for streetlight, but no pricing on web.
Well, finally some action.
Probley will not amount to much, but a least a step forward, or rather up.
Latest news was not July 18.
http://www.otcbb.com/
symbol SAVW
rose you are new here and from the way your first post sounds you just jumped in feet first.
We need info in PRs, just talking on phone to someone does not get it. They can not really tell you anything substantial or that becomes insider info n trading.
Rural roads intersections.
Seems that i remember the boondock roads having solar collectors to power them, if not? A cost analysis would seem to be in order for an Eco-pole type power supply.
Just off the top of my head I see no cost savings for existing setups. But maybe for new installations.
Lot of cities already going with leds, in my town for sure.
Led Traffic Street Light Wattage:
90 LEDs, 120VAC 50/60Hz < 8W Maximum power
note: just to give idea of power consumption.
Seems to be a lot of manufacture already in the business.
No, you have to count to 21.
Close at 22 or 23, would not be impress. Close at 24, then maybe something going on.
Has collapse at 23 too many times to be of significance. just imo.
yes, it looks good, but the same thing will happen that has happened so many times before. It will hit 23 on ask and the scalpers will take over selling just to make a few ticks.
SAVW, not today.
It is running the same pattern that it has for the last 30 days. Seems to be lower total volume for this time of day.
There has been nothing to drive it up.
It was mentioned earlier about the 'E' scaring investors off, no, they would also seen the filings made Fri and would have read that the 'E' was not going to be put on SAVW.
SAVW really needs to release more info about the Eco-pole installation. Will have to wait and see what the next 10q says about any sales.
I am still 'worried' about dilution. Dont care how far in the future it is. Without some worthwhile news about receiving contracts, and i am not talking about 'non-exclusive', it could be a rough ride.
SAVW does seem to have an idea ( or more than one ), that could be a big gainer for the company. They just seem to be too secertive about their operations.
Just read mdimport post, have to agree with him on that.
what was the wind like when pics taken?
Anyone know about what the max wind velocity might have been at that loc during storm?
you need to upload them to a image host site and then post link to pic loc.
imageshack.us
photobucket.com
Yes, it is an old post. Not even sure if that really amounts to anything as it is a non-exclusive agreement.
Could have changed since then and no notice given.
Posted it because it was sort of an anserwer to the previous post.
Would be nice to have the data sheet on the EcoPole.
MTBF on components.
Wind loading data, expecially for the wind vanes.
SavWatt's Subsidiary Pro EcoSolutions Signs Contract With Con Edison
www.marketwire.com/press-release/SavWatts-Subsidiary-Pro-EcoSolutions-Signs-Contract-With-Con-Edison-1421176.htm
Yes, you are correct.
The filings were made on Aug 26, 2011.
did you read the DEF 14C?
----------------
They did state earlier that they would sell additional to get operating capital.
I still believe the eco-poles are being put in for free as PR.
5th letter 'E', They are delinquent in required SEC filings
Labor saving replacement for offshore work boats, drilling rigs, and the like.
Look at the cost savings in replacement costs for nav lights.
One LED blub grouping can replace one incandescent. Incandescent goes out and you have to replace the bulb. I am thinking you lose 25% of your LED elements and you will still meet coast guard requirements. Just guessing 4 times the life and labor saved.
These are actually already availible for small craft.
They just need to break into the market.
Would like to see them manufacture their own, but then would there realy be any saving in cost as opposed to just buying Asian and being a reseller.
Dilution due to money flow.
thought I read in one of their 10q or PRs, that they were having to sell shares to come up with operating capital.
Still not satisfied with any response from anyone, that they did not just install Eco-pole as a Pr.
Keep the Faith.
May the Force be with you.
Lot of potential in marine enviroment (all aspects, drilling rigs, work boats, nav lights).
Been awhile since i have needed any nav lights, so do not know what is already out there in LED for this. Guess that would be the deciding factor.
Energy efficiency is highly desired.
Longer life for nav lights, instead of one buld that goes and needs replacing, you now have say 25% of the leds can go out and still meet coast guard specs. How much more life time than an incandescent bulb.
Thanks detailman.
Even with the losses posted, it still seems like it has a lot going for it. But then again it depends on how management really thinks and operates.
I do agree with you, but still can not help but have some reservations.