is exploring the universal mind
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Ha! Seems to be a common thread lately.
Winner, winner, chicken dinner. Looks like he has some issues of his own to deal with now.
Check this out Scion, the attorney name should sound familiar......
http://www.lvrj.com/news/attorney-accused-of-assault-78206262.html
Attorney accused of assault
Argument at bar spills into parking lot, police say
By MIKE BLASKY
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
Michael Amador
Las Vegas defense attorney Michael Amador started his Thanksgiving holiday at a PT's Pub, continued it with a trip to Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center and ended it at the Clark County Detention Center.
Amador, 54, who ineffectively defended Margaret Rudin in the 2001 murder trial of her millionaire husband, was arrested Thursday on two felony counts of assault with a deadly weapon and one count of injury to the property of another, according to a Las Vegas police arrest report.
Las Vegas attorney Amador arrested on felony assault charges
The report said that police were called to PT's Pub, 3470 E. Sunset Road, about 5 a.m. When officers arrived, they found Amador sitting in the parking lot, surrounded by four men.
According to witness statements, Amador had been playing pool in the bar when he accused a man watching the game, Nick Brannigan, of stealing $200 from the table. An argument ensued. Brannigan and another man, Charles Huggins, left the bar, followed by Amador.
Huggins told police he had entered his vehicle when he "heard his rear window shatter." He said he saw Brannigan and two other men wrestling with Amador, who had pulled a handgun from his waistband to break the window.
Police determined that Amador had assaulted Brannigan and Huggins when he pointed the weapon at them.
The attorney was taken to Sunrise and treated for minor injuries. He then was booked at the county jail.
A spokesman for the State Bar of Nevada said Amador has been an attorney in Nevada since 1981 and has no record of public discipline.
Amador's proficiency as an attorney was discussed during Rudin's 2001 trial, which ended in her conviction. She petitioned for a new trial in 2008, a request that was granted based in part on Amador's questionable conduct.
After Rudin's 2001 trial, attorney Tom Pitaro, who also had represented Rudin, said in an affidavit that he was shocked by how little preparation Amador had done for the trial. Pitaro said that expert witnesses had not been retained and that many witnesses had not been interviewed.
Also, Amador was accused of leaking information about Rudin and giving family photos of Rudin to the National Enquirer. And he was accused of trying to write a book about the case during the trial.
One juror sent a letter to the court saying jurors thought he was an idiot.
"He was the laughingstock in the jury room," wrote juror Coreen Kovacs in April 2005.
A woman who answered Amador's cell phone Monday said he had no comment about his arrest.
Contact reporter Mike Blasky at mblasky@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0283.
Who would that be? The included and not included of course. TIA (being too lazy to dig for the info), turkey hangover.
Always around buddy!! Glad you took the handle back.
Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
LOL
Somebody was not nice this morning letting the stock gap up though.
That would prolly border on a tos/tou violation.
That PR was garbage and you know it. The 5 friends have even told you that the item, cram or driversmate or whatever is not marketable yet either because it needs work. That 1.4Billion was a pump job and we all know that.
And as for Eric Van, I am suspect of anything out of his mouth or keyboard, for the record.
OMG, are you really going to cite that infamous $1.4 Billion PR?
Come on BF, you know that was not true in the slightest.
Yes sir, pick out your mansion immediately, pass go, and collect 10 cents a share.
LOL
LOL, 10 cents a share exchanged to new shares and not a cash offer then.
Geez
I dont believe the rumor is real actually. Too much bad history with certain peeps I think.
Hello buddy, what do we have cooking in this stock?
LOL
Ahaha, perfect.
Sorry Jim, i have not been up to date, you know more than me.
Prolly a good thing.
Ya, but that is all in a Hacketts Store, so part of a different shell i hear.
LOL
Come on rose, let some of your "dry powder" out of the bag and snag these cheapies...
Scammofava still in biz i see.
Wow....
Ahaha, 2 funny G.
No kidding mike, no kidding.
Listen rose, I will show you your options here and it is as HONEST as I have been the whole time.
1. Go to the Court of Chancery, spend lots of time and money (all the while he will dilute, R/S and whatever) and possibly you can get him out and never recoup your investment or the money to do the suit.
OR
2. Send detailed complaints to the SEC at enforcement@sec.gov that gives a synopsis of the situation and is then expounded on with a 1X1 accounting and copy (with links) of all PR's that we know were hogwash, the lawsuits, the bankruptcy, etc... This is FREE mind you. The SEC would then hypothetically halt the stock, open an investigation, and start a process. Now the stock would get halted and then open on the greys, but it will hinder what RH can do to the stock when the SEC gets on the case. IF the SEC gets on him, you then may get others to move in and take control. Then those peeps would need to file additional papers eventually to get the stock trading on pinks again (which can be done).
Your call..... But at this point, 1 of those options should be on deck.
GLTYA in whatever you choose. I can show you a properly logged complaint filed on behalf of another stock that was successful in getting the SEC involved. It is all about information and formatting.
Isn't that nice......
Use shareholder monies to FUND legal fees against those same shareholders in a lawsuit.
Wow, oxymoron
The only way they would ever determine if something is fraudulent would be as a result of a hearing in the Court of Chancery.
They will not summarily start an investigation sans a court challenge, they simply dont have the resources to that. Somebody is going to have to pony up and go to court.
Yup, and BF you file for an R/S on a certain date and it is put into effect at another date.
Interesting stuff mike, thanks for the info over the prior spell regarding the court cases too.
BF, still only one class of shares?
Fair enough, in the meantime it looks like he is fundraising and knocked out most of the bid support.
I hope you are right.
I know, but nobody listened to me.
You have stated that lately too though.
You are going to have no choice but to seek the involvement of the SEC.
enforcement@sec.gov
No idea buddy, i suspect t-trades will be appearing soon here again.
600M A/S, trip zeros this time for sure.
Huppe' is a piece of work.
He did it from 100 million to 250 million without your permission.
Hmmmmm
No it is not BF, i have been telling you that for a while. A controlled board is a controlled board, just like they can install Nader, they can play with the shares.
Wouldn't that be a breath of fresh air, sure would level the playing field.
Today should be interesting on that front.
Interesting things going on with this one IKAG, i hide in the shadows.
Nice imagination, I saved that for future reference.