Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
So according to the blm website:
Placer Claims - Placer claims are defined as "...including all forms of deposit, excepting veins of quartz, or other rock in-place." In other words every deposit, not located with a lode claim, should be appropriated by a placer location. Placer claims, where practicable, are located by legal subdivision (aliquot part and complete lots). The maximum size is 20 acres per locator, and the maximum for an association placer is 160 acres for 8 or more locators. The maximum size for a corporation is 20 acres per claim. Corporations may not locate association placer claims unless they are in association with other locators or corporations as co-locators.
I hate to beat a dead horse here... But unless my understanding is incorrect for the words above, RCM or nwgc needs to be registered with the s.o.s. in sd or be affiliated with a registered s.d. business.
To which neither RCM or nwgc are findable in the business records search in south Dakota on the s.o.s. website. If the "claims" of aquireing a placer claim that sits in the Goldie lox zone of 3 tributaries... Shouldn't they have filed and/or registered so they can uh you know mine asap??!!
I call bs on the claims in sd. Those databases are updated as changes happen.
Do you think when the SEC comes knocking they will take over the website and put their lovely logo on it saying it has been taken down?
Well if you fancy pm'ing it to me.. I'll call and try to chat with Bob.
Yea that doesn't help clarify.. so your friend is an attorney that reached out to bob? Or bob is your friend?
Do you have proof of said fact?
Yea I thought it was funny how quick they were to make a bold statement like that. The statement was left open for interpretation that one could say miller was never involved... I wonder if they meant mark miller from Colorado or California...
I also forgot to mention, on or before July 16, we will find out what happens with miller and his possible new legal representation on the most important reopened case. Just in case no one saw it.
I kinda love reading your posts now.. lol you try so hard and the masses hate it... Lol oh well either hate it or love it, but this ticker sure isn't an underdog..
I wonder where ol bob the builder is at? Why has he not said anything? Also since the official statement of disowning miller basically we have all gotten the shaft. Many people had loads of money held up in here... And he doesn't seem to care. I bet it's because the case that was previously ruled on that granted him his ceo title, has been re-opened.... And the legal representation quit on them..... I guess it's pretty bad when a lawyer/ceo doesn't provide info/updates... Just my opinion.
So the fact that they re-opened case means nothing to you? They are literally re-doing the original case that granted miller ownership after the votes... It's in the e-case system where you can look it up... Is that not relevant and/or proof of something not positive is going on?
That doesn't help smartguy
So someone enlighten me, how does 56k share volume make a stock jump 13%?
So there are 2 major issues with this ticker still... One the case has been reopened that had previously granted miller a shareholder meeting and vote session, that means it is being challenged and to which you know the result of that previous voting session.
And two the sec might just shut this mofo down.
My real question is which one happens first?
Bag holders beware. It's not looking good for us.
Well a CNBC link is all there is as of now, so we are all gonna have to live with it. The beauty of open/re-opened cases is they don't publish the court records of said case until its over or that single part has been officially made part of the case.. So when you pull up the data from the case per palm beach county court' ecase system, it shows on 6/17/21 that the case was re-opened:
25 06/17/2021 MOTION MOTION TO AMEND DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT, NUNCPRO TUNC
MOTION TO AMEND DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT, NUNCPRO TUNC
Only other update is the filing fee:
26 06/28/2021 PAID $50.00 ON RECEIPT 4082842 $50.00 4082842 Fully Paid
So even if the cnbc article is a hit piece, then Bob should have said something, but he didn't.
Fridays have been our update days, but following the article, we didn't get a friday update.
As it stands now until there is another judgment on the re-opened case, then this ticker is no better then before the 4/22/21 final judgment when we all were riding high expecting to help vote miller in as ceo. The fuckery of some people I tell ya.
Haha I'm not reply to your pm. The only thing I will say is truth hurts man.
I want this to succeed as much as possible. I have been on this stock for dam near 2 years now. So don't get all panty hurt if the truth doesn't reflect what your goals are.
Foot of the Rockies is the business listed for rcm address in my maps app. It's close to the ups store.. but not it. This doesn't help the case though. I read your posts and it is comedic but some what truthful as well. I mean miller created the company at the end of last year, only a couple people have acknowledged that on any "good" dd.
Also on that note there is nothing else on the web for RCM and Exploration LLC. I did however find what I think is now mark millers old Twitter. It seems it has been renamed completely. But all the posts are still there as well as this statement of ownership for RCM that wasn't deleted by the author.
Have a look: https://mobile.twitter.com/Exchequer_Caske/status/1375398419330699266
Here's that Twitter: https://mobile.twitter.com/Exchequer_Caske
Dang.. Where is our Friday update?
Try using: 'NEW WORLD GOLD CORP'
Here is the info:
Case Number: 50-2021-CA-001801-XXXX-MB
Court Type: Circuit Civil
Case Type: BUSINESS TRANSACTION
Arrest Date:
File Date: 02/09/2021
Case Style: MILLER, MARK V NEW WORLD GOLD CORP
Status: Reopen
You are forgetting a vital point. Miller sued nwgc to get that judge to order a shareholder meeting.
Well whatever the case may be. We need an update from the person who is in 'charge' of nwgc. With all this speculation, court cases, negative pr... We need an update. And imo waiting till Friday to get an update after such dramatic info has been shared/released this week, is stupid and wreckless.
Yea I'ma go ahead and say no, you are wrong. It doesn't matter who wrote the piece, imo, it's all about the context. And the meat and potatoes of the article is millers lawyer quit on him after they petitioned to reopen the case "after" miller realized he fucked this shell up too. You know it's bad when your lawyer quits on you just after you got the sec on your back looking at everything you have ever done.
At this point its super hard to justify the actions of that man as great. I'm not here to bash you or nwgc. I had really high hopes for this company. The name itself is what got me to look into it so long ago.
However, this lawyer of miller is a securities fraud lawyer. They make a living on that. For him to excuse himself in the middle of court and go as far as say I can't say anything more as I might incriminate myself, means he knows a fuck ton of illegal information about what his former client did. I'm my experience as well as talking with lawyer friends, lawyers who excuse themselves from a case usually do it because of a conflict of interest. Which is not what we have here. He excused himself because of certain information that 'came to a head yesterday'. Which anyone who can read and comprehend will tell you that it is not good. His company helped miller sue nwgc to setup a shareholder meeting to which they gave wrong/false info to the Florida courts. They are on the chopping now too sorta speak.
No matter which side of the fence you are on with this stock, the future is dark and after today's court debacle.. there is no light at the end of tunnel, imo. It sucks I get it.
Yea dude totally......with mark a miller getting indicted. I'm sure mark b miller paid for that article so mark c miller could sell his shares straight away this am. Sound correct to you? Haha
So 5 million shares traded within the first 4 minutes after the bell ran, is all suckers bailing?? Sure ok pal. If you say so.
Dam she dipped hard to start the day today... Shorts are active again.
By no means is this meant as a bash, just curious. But I get that Miller was and still is a common shareholder, but he was at one point voted in as ceo after a court granted vote session filed by him. You know an sec investigation will go far. So the question is, it possible the money he used to buy the shares came illegally? If so then everything done after the fact is up for fraud too.... Correct?
Millopolis "no longer exists" Both twitter and his stock twits page have been deleted..
Well I didn't see anyone mentioning this so I figured I would. What sort of innocent man deletes these communication tools? SEC will come knocking. Shit doesn't get deleted from the internet. Luckily for miller there will be a bunch of cache still on the internet for him..
This is a bad analogy. This is investing. And the one thing I was always taught is that investors are scared little kids.. meaning any little thing will scare away money. To directly answer your question, yes it does mean you inherit the former owners issues, especially if the vehicle you purchase was used in fraudulent and illegal ways/activities. As a majority shareowner Miller would choose somebody he trusted to hand over a company the courts granted him ownership of. I'm not saying I'm against this or for it, I'm saying I'm no longer bullish on this ticker. There are way too many conflicting stories/facts/court documents to be all in on this.
My question is who is this Bob dude to Miller? If it's the same Miller that is being investigated then everything he did will be scrutinized. Including this ticker. And it's more risky, imo, to be holding a position here when Millers history is up for legal consequences.. I don't want my shares taken from me from an sec investigation. Just because this one isn't in the indictment, doesn't mean to say it won't be.
All in all it was the tweet from the new nwgc account that made me question my holdings here. I bought this shit when it was at .0002. I've been holding for a long time. Now that activity has been seemingly in order, the person who lead us to the light might have done so in a fraudulent way. Even if he didn't, it raises tons of non-profit able questions. It sucks because I had super high hopes here too.
And tchalla, I can't pm you. I haven't purchased a subscription here.. so I do understand what you said. However, I don't want to be the one holding the bag. You don't know 100% just as I don't, if this will get into the indictment. Just remember, Miller was granted CEO from the courts. He was the owner. If you look at rcm, Miller was listed as the owner. He started it in December 2020, if I remember correctly. But yet the Twitter statement says he isn't/was in control of rcm or nwgc....
If you hold any stock in this, then you should care. If the sec thing turns out to be the same mark Miller here, then nwgc will not go down a good path. Really though, if it is him, what sort of values does the new CEO have? What stranger would take ownership of a company that's not current and has nothing. That tweet from them about Miller and rcm is vital as far as I can see. How does a self proclaimed owner of a company merge into a shell then that company posts he had nothing to do with it?? I'm surprised this didn't drop more today. It's a shady situation here. I've love it to be a legit thing. but the waters are clouded now imo
So good chance I missed the talk about it. I tried reading as much as I could to see in case I missed something.... But wtf is going to happen now that seemingly a 'mark miller', who may or may not be our guy here, has legal issues with the indictment? I've been confused on the data stream on this one since reading the indictment as well as nwgc's Twitter post. Is there something I'm missing that makes this stock still bullish?
I haven't seen anyone mention this yet so here.. Confirmation that RCM has been acquired by NWGC. Another catalyst can bed checked off from the list!
https://stocktwits.com/Millopolis/message/342791520
So how fast does news spread in the trading community?
Anyone got the info for the meeting this am? Looking to join it over the phone
I thought pink sheet doesn't trade before and after hours...?
Why is everyone selling? wtf! The meeting has been extended a week so that all shareholders can legalize votes, get them notarized and submit them... That must be a scary process for the weaklings...
You should still be able to call in and listen
zoom meeting at capacity already..
As of this post, 203.69 million trade volume for the day! I love it when that happens.
So off topic question here as the Google box wasn't helpful... is there an application on pc or android that shows all the transactions of buy/sell for any given stock? I want to be able to see what happens with this stock as much as possible.
See but that isn't what you stated. You stated he disputed something with the court... Where is that proof?
How do you know he filed/disputed something with the court. Is there a record of it? I don't remember seeing anything his dispute with the courts. Also if he truly has shares and his name was with the company for actually having these shares then the court would have been able to get his info and serve him. But he isn't mentioned anywhere in those court filings that I remember of. Even if he actually has those 20% of total voting power isn't enough to force anyone to do anything.