Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yeah a real POS (Piece Of Sunshine)! Haha $HCMC
IMO That oral argument seems very much in favor for $HCMC. This may be good news to win the appeal!
I wonder why the hearing for 2/7 is not listed on Pacer.
Lots of new updates on the docket but no news.
They still have a lot of cash on hand and a growing business plan. If they can take care of the outstanding shares they can make it!
Oh well… C’est la vie… win some you lose some. It’s all up to HCMC mngt now. Hopefully they’ll have a PR soon.
Thanks for update! Merry Christmas & happy new year to you as well!
Based on the judge’s questions and responses, It seemed to me that PM counsel did a better job articulating their arguments. HCMC counsel mainly argued the definition of combustion, the clarity of combustion in the patents, and citing case law to prove why PM should be denied bc they can’t prove what grounds of petition. Im not an attorney and I hope I’m wrong but it seems that the only leg HCMC has are the technical part of the law. Fingers crossed they win the patent review bc i think that would give a chance on lawsuit. IMO $HCMC
Does anyone know what we are waiting for here? Will the shares just disappear on e everything is complete? I reached out to the receivership but got no answers.
I’ve been checking back daily but nothing yet. You can also check at this site https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/ptab/case/IPR2021-01079
PM posts lots of exhibits and reply...https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/ptab/case/IPR2021-01079
Oral arguments will commence at 1:00 pm Eastern Time on
October 17, 2022 by video.2 The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing, and the reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of the hearing.
https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/ptab-filings%2FIPR2021-01079%2F31
Sounds great to me! Thanks for the post!
Nice post, Thanks!
No that's not true.
I wouldn’t count on a buy back when on brink of recession. Cash on hand would place company in better position. IMO $HCMC
New posing on receivership fund. No mention of funds regarding ITKH. I guess we may be SOL?
Agreed. Sunk cost fallacy at its finest!
hahaha yeah right. the are ok... some reasoning behind the dip with the vape stores but the share structure is still an issue. Hopefully those acquisitions will pay off next year ; )
That is incorrect… this is Completely different company right now.
I hope to see 4Q reports around the corner. $HCMC
Does anyone have an idea of what’s in the works? If sold will they automatically place individual share proceeds sale in brokerage account?
IMO Unless the judge had a conflict of interest in PM vs HCMC then that case doesn’t matter. I highly doubt the judge would make that stupid mistake again only several months after putting out that statement. The appeal may go through but only if the patent office rules in HCMCs favor. $HCMC
If I’m reading this right it a case with JPMorgan from 2010-2011 where there was a conflict of interest bc he owned shares. Not PM vs HCMC
ORDER granting61 Motion for Extension of Time for Plaintiff to Respond to Defendants' Motion for Attorneys' Fees and for Defendants to Reply to Plaintiff's Response. Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motion for Attorneys' Fees58 shall be due on or before January 19, 2022. Defendants' Reply, if any, shall be due on or before February 4, 2022. Signed by Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. on 01/03/2022. (jkb)
Docket shows PM asking for attorney fees. If anyone has those figures please share. Thanks
Didn’t need at the time? It seems like it would have come in hand to fight PM in litigation and or buy back shares. Everyone was all for it then. Just bc it didn’t play out like you wanted doesn’t mean you have to get bent out of shape about it. What do you mean for himself?! You think that 27 million is his. Doesn’t work that way.
Looks like the "unsophisticated investors" have begun to show some true color and turn on each other. hahaha. I know a lot of investors put in 10,20,even 40k+ in this stock in hopes for huge payday. It's part of the risk that investors take. IMO no one was deceived here. Everyone knew what they were getting into. the CEO never said they'd win, the responsibly tried to pursue this litigation in both HCMC and the stockholders interest. If you have proof of otherwise please post it. For those who were in it for the lawsuit, then It would have been great payday if it went through. Unfortunately, it didn't work out that way and HCMC can't control what the attorneys have done. What is done is done. No need to get ugly everyone. Now you are either supporting the company or not. It's that easy. Don't turn against one another! I'm sure that was PMs goal when they put out that statement. Personally, I'll go down with the ship. Curious to see how this company will do in the next 2-5 years. Anyway GLTA $HCMC LONG.
High spike in volume but a 20% drop in pps. To me this signals a sell off or dump. Some heard the news before others… IMO $HCMC LONG
The case is over. Judge previously ruled that snd allowed for the motion to amend. Now that amendment has been denied. This case is closed. They can appeal and/or they can find another way to sue. $HCMC LONG
Very unlikely but who knows… maybe…
Looks like HCMC has lost the case. Pacer shows the case has been closed. Jawsomesauce has a live YouTube tonight at 9pm. I guess it’s Sad day for the HCMC army.
No problem, the more people know about the dates the better. I wish I had some more information. I'm in no position to say what may or may not happen. Just playing it by ear like everyone else here. I think you are right though, the dec 21st decision is most important as it will probably affect the judges decision which in my opinion will be the "end all be all". It makes sense that PM would rather win the case against RJ and deal with HCMC because the impact won't be as bad. They seem to have more options with HCMC vs RJ. If the patent is upheld then I think there will be a slight bump in price but only enough for the flippers to pull profits. I don't see it taking off until judge rules. Even then, we won't see a real valuation until the win or lose the case against PM.
Regardless, I'm long with $HCMC. I think the company is solid if/when they retire shares. I can understand why they are keeping the shares for now. Keeping the pps low will make it easier to trade and attract more traders or investors, as well as make it easier to retire shares. It's not the time to fix the share structure. I would do the same, and leverage it. If in fact that's what they are doing haha. who knows really. time will tell! $HCMC. GLTA
From Jawsomesauce YouTube video:
Dec 21st - ptab deadline for institution decision on HCMC Patent Review
Jan 25th - ptab deadline for final decision on RJ Reynolds Patent 9,930,915
Apr 2nd - stab deadline for final decisions on RJ Reynolds Patent 9,901,123
Coming " soon " - judge Batten Ruling on HCMC motion for Amended Complaint
Another uneventful filing! Smh $itkh