Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
While correct on high salt content in water and buoyancy....
Totally different region than the water between points on discussion.
"than" or "then"...hmm admittedly I am not an English major.
Are we just throwing spaghetti at the wall now?
Saw the post where someone else is trying to lead you to it.
If you want the patent number I found in my search, just ask.
Or you can continue just reiterating something as truth just because you can not find it.
Never going to be in too deep in anything OTC related and again, I can swim fairly well. Please rid yourself of concern for me in that respect.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
It is Plop FYI.....
Did not do very good DD on the old commercial either?
Do not drink it, but it is Kool-Aid FYI.....
More bad DD?
If you must know, I swim about a mile a day to alleviate your growing concern of my ability to tread water.
I appreciate it though!
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Yes.
But you left out Samoa, Belize.
Either way, the water would be salty which can be said all across OTC land.
It is ok to swim in the salty water, just don't drink it straight up.
There are several patents to purify it only to end up toxic again via human processes, but even then can be re-purified for drinking.
Being that the discussion was on patents, you could perhaps lead he/she whom was having trouble finding it. I am thinking that finding it was not the motive, but purification for toxic character can only come from within.
Sometimes your the bagger, sometimes the baggage handler.
A disgruntle baggage handler is the one that end up stealing or breaking your stuff.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
That DD has zero PAR value.
Look a little harder. Will try and lead you to the water. Pun intended.
Warning, you may have to sift through old PRs and other DD material like 10K's 10Q's. Just a little work and water may splash you.
Only 2 puns, I promise. Or is that 3? Anyway....
Hint one:
Before trading as ALKAME HOLDINGS INC
What was the trading name of the entity rolled into Alkame?
Regards,
Fizzlegig
In the 8K, 5 months ago, when the stock was trading at 1/3 of what it is now.
If you umm, you know, read it....might even provide you with some more banter material in a more "edjumicated" format instead of guessing.
Stocks go up and down. Now if you can start rambling on about the ones that only go up....you would "probably" not have time for this board rolling in all your dough, but sadly not.
Cant say I would make the same choice, but it is not mine to make for you. Just saying.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Probably best not to PR that, since the App already exists:
https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/eternity-time-log-personal/id296683442?mt=8
Herding cats is already taken too:
https://itunes.apple.com/ca/app/cat-herding/id1009407825?mt=8
Back to the drawing board I guess..DOH!
App for that too:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/store/p/back-to-the-drawing-board/9wzdncrfj861
Guess I will just ride for free until the next accident.
WAIT! No app for that....think we could be on to something!
Dev team get crackin! PR now before too late!
Enough comedy for tonight.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
FROT trying to wake up too EOD.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
NASDAQ - SNMX
Don't post picks often, but picked some up today.
Reading the news I don't see why it could not go back to $3.00+ in the near future.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Scheduled to be released on Monday. Hope he has a reliable ride to pick him up! He is going to need a runner to pay the legal fees. Haha.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
GM Flex - Hope your feeling better at home now.
$CLSH looks thin to 1.85 and perhaps a 2 break today.
In on $ETST. Filled me at .55 on the market order.
Thanks and GLTA.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
GN to you Flex and hope you feel better.
In on $CLSH, but tapped till Wed. on $ETST and will keep a close eye on it until then.
Only so much divvy money each quarter and I have not added fresh non-divvy money to my account in ages and simply prefer not to. Only using moneys I have never actually held and the wifey can not spend.
Thank God there is not a checkbook attached to my 401k or Pension.
LOL
If I don't make this one...I am sure you will not tap out on good picks!
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Nice Flex and good weekend to you!
Regards,
Fizzlegig
*tips hat*
You so nailed it!
And with it just hitting radar on many and the MJ explosion....
Next week will be very interesting as well.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Took a bit to liquidate some free riding tickers, but now on board.
Good find, no post on the $CLSH board about that before you.
Thanks Flex.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Last one I received was 10/16. *cry*
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Scott has not updated the bid/ask since 10:55:55.
Think you all broke it...pffft!
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Understandable. When you find what works for you, stick to it! If you made money on the trade, don't beat yourself on what it "could" have been. Set it, forget it, move on.
Never had Scott tell me I could not buy XYZ. Just sometimes had to call, but they would place the order and perhaps warn about the OTC. I just tell them, yup, lost money before, thanks and place my order.
To stubborn to switch to e-trade. I don't do this to put food on the table so no need for me to switch for the minor inconvenience of adding my Scott office # on my cell.
Good luck!
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Thanks for all you do Flex and enjoy the weekend.
Some really good calls from the mailers and during the past two weeks on the fly, look forward to the next.
Cant get in all of them all the time but you have been on target 90% of the ones I did get in thusfar.
Figure out what the FROT happened and it would be 100%. Hah!
Cant win them all the time and some take more patience than others.
Been in a "dark period" as far as posting, but since I broke it this evening, wanted to at least give a shout out and thanks.
Love watching pennymachine for the lotto's too.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
You have been around a while so I assume you know, but just in case you do not.
You can buy with unsettled funds from sold stocks. However if you sell the stock bought with those funds before those trades settle it falls under the free ride regulation and your trade account is frozen for 90 days.
I used to prefer not to trade with unsettled funds, but after missing a few entry points, I just make notes on those stocks and/or put them in a different watch filter to make sure I do not sell them until after the settle date.
If it is a deposit, I have no idea. Have not made one in a while.
Just using dividends and trades from other stocks to play in OTC land when I do.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Nadda much
Work, work and more work.
Hope all is well in roachland!
Regards,
Fizzlegig
You forgot the Q!
PUMPER!!!
Regards,
Fizzlegig
No way you are that pretty.
Doing well, how about you?
Regards,
Fizzlegig
roach4091
I would definitely ask for a paternity test before you sign the birth certificate.
*grin*
Regards,
Fizzlegig
gandalfq01
First off, good luck with your situation.
I understand that a corporation can sell the operations and keep the corporation name/shell, but that is a totally different scenerio then what is presented here.
This is a takeover, but not of business, goodwill, assets and liabilities, but of the governing shell over those operating pieces.
I am not even saying it definitely cannot be done, I just have yet to find the regulation over the shell that would allow for it to seperate from operations in bankruptcy without trustee approval, bankruptcy discharge and zero liability of pending legal action or previous debt.
All the while keeping share structure in tact which would include officers of the now formal operations which probably have a hefty bag of dividends slightly past due in prefered form.
The only way I have worked it out an angle here is if bankruptcy was granted which leaves an empty shell with billions of new shares to raise money and a silver platter of prefered shares for the new board. Could the bankruptcy judge cancel the prefered shares only? I do not know if that is an option or not, but that is not how it is commonly done.
Since you are probably going through a legal firm familiar with corperate law to process your business transaction, it might be an interesting conversation to have whilest you are signing and initialing a triplicated sea of documents!
Anything shared from such a conversation would probably be
most welcome and informative than 99% of what one has to sift through here.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
RC
From what I remember in reading the Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS 78), they have to be a shareholder in order to file a petition to take custody.
What is still puzzling is if the shell can be seperated from the assets, debt and litigation. I did not find anything that suggest it can be done, but that is not confirmation either way.
The old company we know sold shares registered under the shell, probably paid for debt and services with those shares as well and assigned levels of prefered shares to themselves along with other common shareholders with the swap. The old officers probably still own common shares in addition to the prefered.
What an awful loophole if Paul and crew can end up selling common shares they may or may not still hold for huge profit after running the company into bankruptcy and/or collect on the prefered.
I just do not see how you can segrigate "the shell" from the rest of the companies liabilities when you can use shares from that shell to raise money or pay for debt from said company.
What it does say in the NRS super fun reading material is that if custody is won, they can perform all the tasks the previous officers could including issuance of more shares.
There are many perplexing penny stocks out there, but this has defintely been the most interesting ride in penny land I have had both the pleasure and displeasure of being in.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Amen!
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Xylan
The rabbit hole is deep here. I started reading the provisions in NRS 78 which is the basis being used for the appointment of custodianship over PBLS. My time is limited by choice and there is a great deal of reading material involved in NRS 78, but it is not exactly going to be cut and dry if you are not an attorney involved with civil and/or corp litigation.
I thought about giving up and just calling the Judge over the case and asking if he rules in favor of the appointment of custodianship what will become of the bankruptcy proceedings and other legal actions against PBLS. Or even perhaps the Attorney. Both of thier contact information is easy to find.
My uderstanding is that in bankruptcy, the court appointed trustee becomes custodian of the company more or less and that buisiness as usual can not be proceed without involving the trustee and/or the judge releasing the company from bankruptcy through ruling in favor or against the bankruptcy filing. If in favor of the bankruptcy then typically part of the re-org plan is to wipe out current investors and if against then the current assets remain along will all the litigation and debt.
It does not make a whole lot of logical sense that a company can come along and take over another through a relatively simple process just because they did not respond. Look for instance another comapany this happened to and the last 4 PR's for ULFS where the officers of the original company came back and said ummm...no. It will be interesting to see how that one plays out.
The reason it does not make logical sense to me is that lets say Google was incorperated in Nevada, so if the logic behind it is you file for custodianship and the plantiff does not respond, you, me or another entity could theoretically take over Google.
The whole process if any way binding just seems like one big paper pushing/shell game sham to me that counts on the former officers of an entity just letting the whole thing go.
And we thought our little peebles was entertaining, this should be an absolute riot but with probably the same results for shareholders and nothing more than a change of cast.
I am catching up on my PBLS reading, but as it stands I have already taken my write-off(s) and have moved on in that respect, but it is nice sometimes to revisit and who knows. *shrug*
Even if things change for me in that respect it will still be considered as money lost until the sell notification indicates otherwise.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
GL MC
I really mean that and hope it works out for everyone that jumps back in. I will not be getting my feet wet again, mostly in part to all my "play" moneys being tied up on the big boards. There have been some unbelievable buying oportunitys in the past year I could not pass up with some high yeild big boys and the several divy's from Q1 are already spent, but going forward it will just mean that I will have some sort of permanent "play" money income to dip down to the dark side of the market. Be safe and go PBLS!
Regards,
Fizzlegig
That is one nasty spread.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
I have been sitting on the bid and ask all day with the leftover lunchmoney not allocated in my account.
Nadda, no fill even though both the bid and ask have been tripped today with the low volume.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Very well roach, I hope all is well in roachland.
Technically they did sell them assuming Triad has assets.
I did not look to see if Triad has any restriction on them.
Still being on a bigger board I would think everthing to at least be unpinky-like. Nice run at any rate.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
roach,
No decoder ring needed, it is in there:
"4,000,000 shares of preferred stock were issued as partial consideration for the purchase of assets from Triad Energy
Corporation and certain of its affiliates. The shares of preferred stock issued were valued at $15,000,000 in the
purchase agreement."
Just scanning the news, looks like the purchase of Triad for 81 million included these prefered shares.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
They manage to get it trading at $2 then no one will care what insensitive male chauvinistic reference is made about how it trades.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Xylan,
A lot of times they can not find the money here in the states and it is that much harder to go overseas and prove anything.
Probably the only way to find the money if there is some hidden overseas is to find the "Laundry" mat that washed it almost squeky clean with the faintest color of our blood.
Sadly, and again if there is anything left, it will be waiting in a cookie jar for them when/if they get time.
Best we can hope for in that scenerio is that there is no honor amongst theives and that whomever knows where it is, has access and does not wait for golden year gang to come back from any manditory state sanctioned vacation.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Xylan,
It appears to be the mailing address of the United States Trustee covering middle Florida, Carolyn R. Chaney.
She was probbaly furnished a copy which is why it is on the document.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
In a nutshell and my reading of it:
They sold 3,747,558 common stock and diluted with options to potentially dilute 3,747,558 more shares. 7,495,116 total potentially when all is said and done.
3,747,558 will happen 12/22.
1,873,779 will be available for 18 months beginining 180 days from 12/22.
1,873,779 will be available for 5 years begining 180 days from 12/22.
That is bad news because if all potential shares are sold, there will be around 40% more shares on the market provided that 18+ million shares outstanding is accurate on Scottrade.
It may or may not bounce back. The options would lead one to believe that they are hoping the stock goes above 2.45 making it viable for the "institutional investors" to execute the potential warrants with the time limits.
From the looks of it and just on the surface, it appears they do not currently produce any product and is working on the 3 products from its recent aquisition of Torry Pines to come to fruitation and generate revenues and perhaps profits. While those are in developement, the moneys to pay salaries has to come from somewhere and now you are seeing where it is coming from.
I do not know how many phases are in clinical trials and how long from that processes(s) they will need to get FDA approval etc. etc. That would require a significant more amount of research.
Your are basically waging a bet for an indefinite amount of time that product will be produced and generate enough profits for your investment to profit.
Companies that actually lose money year after year can still equal profits in trading thier stock, so you really never know with these things. All you can do is research, research, research and hope, pray, flip a coin....whatever you feel most confortable with, but at the end of the day you should be prepared to lose it all for any stock you invest in.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
If your not first, your last.............
well...unless your both.
<edit>
Dear roach, please add 10 mins to this post, my finger slipped.
-or-
Delete so I can post it tomorrow.....this was a preview, yea thats it!
Regards,
Fizzlegig
He never said what type of anniversary.
What if it was 26 years ago this day that he got drunk of a bottle bubbly and burnt the house down trying to start a warm fire because he forgot to pay himself and the gas bill?
Ha! Jk! Congrats Roach!! About 1/3 of the average human lifetime is ummmm.................................................... about 1/3 of the average human lifetime.
The congrats is sincere though.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Around this househould, the word paycheck is not allowed.
It is referenced as the "bi-weekly insult".
Regards,
Fizzlegig
*whips out a catnip stuffed mouse on a string*
*puts water gun behind back*
Here Kitty Kitty!
Regards,
Fizzlegig