Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
So is lcy up and running or not? They don't answer the phone. Ever
I called mike Hartman on the supposed active number on linkedin. Its a bad number.
I called KKR regarding this share redemption. I called the number that was in the 10-q and they transferred me to someone else who told me to send an email. I sent an email and haven't heard anything back
Has anyone contacted Mike Hartmann in any way shape or form?
Does the 5711 share difference matter? Regarding the share redemption.
Does it matter that there's a 5711 difference in the share structure?
Okay but to be fair bio Amber really was mirroring those stocks.
What's the next hurdle tho? The lawsuit is over so what are we waiting on?
Do you foresee money in your future? Or is it just blind hope?
Now that part is true. They had options to buy but to my knowledge didn't exercise those options
Does 1c 1E stand for 1:1?
Well that settles it
Quiet today...wonder what people will say now that the class action suit is over. Will there be more excuses as to why we haven't heard from anyone?
That maybe was causing confusion for a lot of the people here because there's been no cancellation nor warning of cancellation of the shares. Unlike with Air Canada they were warned that their shares would be worthless and were then canceled
What makes you think a shareholder was threatening them?
Well I understand what you're saying to a degree. But if they are the one responsible for suspending the stock then I should be able to talk to them and see if what you're proposing to be true actually is. Because right now you're saying that the individuals that works there are not the authority and you are on what's right and what's wrong. So then I would ask you for your credentials and What Makes You The Authority on whether or not a stock can or cannot come back after 3 years of transpired
Okay give me the number of your favorite bankruptcy lawyer and I will call them right now and report my findings
So is finra lying or just incompetent?
I'm not sure what that has to do with anything. This isn't about the resignation of the BioAmber employees. I'm just making the argument that this whole idea about bioAmber never being able to revive itself out of the Dead stock graveyard is fox. And I invite anyone who thinks I'm lying to call for themselves and determine what's true and what isn't. I guess before all the employees resigned they called finra to have the cusip suspended. Because they already determined that they did not do that on their own accord. That was a request from BioAmber. They suspended their own stock
Why would finra think that this was a sec pension when they're the one that suspended it? Do you not think finra knows when they're suspending something versus when the SEC is suspending something? I usually value your input but that was kind of underwhelming and laughable. Makes you lose credibility
Well that's weird because the person I spoke to a couple of years ago didn't mention anything about bankruptcy laws prohibiting them from Reviving themselves if they wanted to. But I called just now just to Double Down. And the lady I spoke to said that it's not impossible for them to come back under their same cusip but it would be an uphill battle that would require 2 years of paperwork to show why they want to revive themself from the dead stock graveyard. However I think that people were saying that bioAmber was going to suspend there cusip and get another one. I mean that's at least what Tyler Mooney said a couple of years ago. Oh and by the way the person I talked to a couple of years ago said it was a bioAmber that requested that their cusip be suspended. Finra didn't just step in and do that on their own accord
I called finra and they said it was perfectly plausible for the company to come back from their suspension and start start trading again. I called them several times
What's the difference in a terminal suspension and cusip suspension. What ford it means that bioamber is trading on Taiwanese exchange?
Maybe because we don't have any money in our accounts
Well perhaps this is another suit being referenced here but I just wanted to make sure I was understanding what the poster was saying. Because it sounds like somebody was saying in order for them to be paid they had to Forfeit their shares and not sue them in the future... presumably hypothetically speaking if the shares were to revalue at a specified dollar amount higher than what was being given to those in the lawsuit
I'm not well-versed in legalese. But it sounds like you're saying that a condition of being paid was to Forfeit the shares. Could someone not wanting to Forfeit their shares be the holdup with payout? Or could there be another hold up. I don't buy anything related to covid because people are working around covid with zoom and social distancing so there must be another reason
Got him there
Not about harboring hope it's much as it is about people needing to have concrete answers to the questions posed. To me it seems a little weird that a guy would be under an nda for a company that no longer exist. Does that not sound strange to you? I'm totally willing to admit that bio Amber is toast and that all of this is useless chatter provided you can give concrete answers to the questions posed without going on tangents
@Real mccoy why is Mike Hartmann under NDA regarding anything to do with bioamber? We aren't asking about lcy or visolis. Why can't he answer our questions?
Im just posing the question of why its still running and why there are still active employees. It really is just a curious question
Im not trying to ignite any hope im just asking questions. And there are several narratives here and the standard narrative says there's nothing to see here. Ok no problem just seems there's a few loose ends and unanswered questions.
Thanks for sending the link! One difference I notice is one is written in the past tense and has no active employee one has their bio written in present tense and has employees.
Side note: has anyone emailed Mike Hartman?
I'm sure you're right. As I stated before I was literally just posing a question. Do you have any examples of companies that went bankrupt and kept their LinkedIn page up and running?
Yeah I get that. My whole point was I would think that during the resignation and liquidation process they would have shut it down. Its useless. The whole point of a LinkedIn page is to get attention for you and your business
The standard narrative has holes in it
Again kind sir I am simply asking the question. I've known companies that go out of business and their Facebook's are shut down they are listed as permanently closed on Google and they certainly don't have a LinkedIn pages. Im also curious why these people are showing up as employers.
I don't know. That's why im asking. As far as who would take it down? Of course I can't give any specifics as to who. But I would imagine that when this liquidation occurred since that was the end of Bio Amber as we know it according to standard narrative I would think it would have been taken down then. I would certainly not think it would be up three years after the fact
Why is BioAmber's LinkedIn page still active? Why is Mike Hartman showing as the vice president?
Have we actually retained legal aid?
Can anyone answer definitively and possibly sticky the answer? Why would lcy need BioAmber's shares? This question has been posed and there's been a bunch of mumbo-jumbo silvertongue answers but no one has definitively said why.
Why would they need our shares when they could have their own? That hasn't been answered definitively.
What makes you so sure it's so ORGN? At first it was lcyb then lcygf then pttpf and I'm sure I'm missing some... and everyone who made a prediction was surer than sure